| Literature DB >> 35655797 |
Fei Mao1, E Wang2, Jing Xu3, Jin Lu2, Guofeng Yan2, Li Fu2, Yang Jiao2, Ling Wu4, Tiemin Liu1, Yao Li2.
Abstract
High-salt diet (HSD) is associated with dysregulated metabolism and metabolic disorders. Although previous studies have indicated its effect on metabolic tissues, the involving molecular mechanisms are not quite understood. In the present study, we provided a comprehensive transcriptome analysis on multiple metabolic tissues of HSD-fed mouse model by RNA sequencing. We observed that several genes associated with de novo lipogenesis and cholesterol biosynthesis were significantly downregulated in white adipose tissue and liver tissue of HSD mice group, such as Fasn, Scd1, Acaca, and Thrsp. Furthermore, combined with secretome datasets, our results further demonstrated that HSD could alter expression levels of organokines in metabolic tissues, for example, Tsk and Manf, in liver tissue and, thus, possibly mediate cross-talk between different metabolic tissues. Our study provided new insight about molecular signatures of HSD on multiple metabolic tissues.Entities:
Keywords: HSD; lipogenesis; metabolism; organokines; transcriptome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35655797 PMCID: PMC9152432 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.887843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 6.055
Figure 1Metabolic parameters of 12 weeks high-salt diet–induced mouse model. (A) Workflow of RNA-seq in three metabolic tissues of high-salt diet–induced mouse model. (B) Body weight, (C) metabolic tissue weight, (D) tissue to body weight, and (E, F) body composition measured in HSD and CON mice. (G) Representative H&E and oil red O staining of liver and eWAT of HSD mice group compared to CON group. (H) Feed intake and RER level of HSD and CON mice group. (I, J) RER and metabolic rate detected by metabolic cage of HSD and CON mice group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 compared to the control group. The scale bar represents 50 µm. n = 6–10 per group.
DEGs detected in different metabolic tissues from RNA-seq in HSD group.
| CON | HSD | Upregulated | Downregulated | Total DEGs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Liver | 354 | 299 | 653 |
| eWAT | eWAT | 667 | 329 | 996 |
| Muscle | Muscle | 14 | 43 | 57 |
DEGs, differentially expressed genes; CON, Control; HSD, high-salt diet.
Key DEGs significantly changed in metabolic tissues of HSD group.
| eWAT | Liver | Muscle | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSD vs. CON | HSD vs. CON | HSD vs. CON | |||
|
| Log2 Fold Change |
| Log2 Fold Change |
| Log2 Fold Change |
|
| −3.60 |
| −4.31 |
| 1.45 |
|
| −2.11 |
| −1.91 |
| −1.01 |
|
| −1.52 |
| −2.09 | ||
| F | −1.47 |
| −1.31 | ||
|
| −4.56 |
| −2.53 | ||
|
| −2.13 |
| −1.62 | ||
DEGs, differentially expressed genes; CON, control; HSD, high-salt diet.
Figure 2Transcriptome analysis of liver tissue in the high-salt diet (HSD) vs. CON groups of mice. (A) Volcano plot showing DEGs (up- and downregulated) from liver tissue in HSD group compared with CON group. The red dots represent the upregulated genes, and the blue dots represent the downregulated genes. (B) Heatmap showing gene expression patterns in the liver of HSD group compared with CON group. (C, D) Gene Ontology analysis of the biological process of upregulated (C) and downregulated (D) differential genes from liver tissue in HSD group compared to CON group. (E, F) KEGG analysis assessing the pathways associated with the upregulated (E) and downregulated (F) gene sets from liver tissue in HSD group compared to the CON group. (G) Protein–protein interaction analysis of downregulated differential genes in the liver of HSD group mice.
Figure 3Transcriptome analysis of eWAT in the high-salt diet (HSD) vs. CON groups of mice. (A) Volcano plot showing DEGs (up- and downregulated) from eWAT in HSD group compared with CON group. The red dots represent the upregulated genes, and the blue dots represent the downregulated genes. (B) Heatmap showing gene expression patterns in eWAT of HSD group compared with CON group. (C, D) Gene Ontology analysis of the biological process of upregulated (C) and downregulated (D) differential genes from eWAT in HSD group compared to CON group. (E) KEGG analysis assessing the pathways associated with downregulated gene sets from eWAT in HSD group compared to the CON group. (F, G) Protein–protein interaction analysis of upregulated (F) and downregulated (G) differential genes in eWAT of HSD group mice.
Figure 4DEGs of secretomes detected in HSD mouse metabolic tissues. (A–C) Venn diagram showing organokines detected by overlapping DEGs with mouse secretome database in (A) liver, (B) eWAT, and (C) muscle tissue of HSD mouse model. (D, E) Key secretomes differentially expressed in liver tissue (D) and eWAT (E) of HSD mice group.