| Literature DB >> 35655655 |
Ioana Anca Stefanopol1,2, Magdalena Miulescu3, Luiza Nechita4, Ciprian Adrian Dinu5, Carmen Bobeica1, Alexandru Nechifor4, Liliana Baroiu4,6, Sergiu Chirila7, Lucreţia Anghel4,8, Victorita Stefanescu4, Alin Laurenţiu Tatu4,9,10,11.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of ovarian cystic lesions (OCLs) in pediatric patients has been increasing in recent years. An early diagnosis is mandatory for a favourable prognosis but it depends on the primary medical care services and on the socioeconomic status of the patient. The present study aims at assessing the prevalence and the age-specific frequencies of pediatric OCLs, as well as identifying disparities between subjects in the urban and the rural areas, in order to explore the extent to which OCLs occurrence, diagnosis, evolution and treatment differ in the case of patients living in rural areas.Entities:
Keywords: body mass index; incidence; management; ovarian cyst; rural population; torsion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35655655 PMCID: PMC9153997 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S368202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Figure 1Flowchart of the patients’ inclusion.
Age-Specific Frequencies of OCLs ≥ 10 mm
| Patients’ Age | Number of Pediatric Female Patients Who Underwent USG | Number (%) of Pediatric Female Patients with OCLs ≥ 10 mm |
|---|---|---|
| 0–12 months | 88 | 10 (11.36) |
| 1 year | 34 | 0 (0) |
| 2 years | 53 | 1 (1.88) |
| 3 years | 60 | 2 (3.33) |
| 4 years | 75 | 1 (1.33) |
| 5 years | 84 | 1 (1.19) |
| 6 years | 84 | 1 (1.19) |
| 7 years | 100 | 1 (1) |
| 8 years | 150 | 3 (2) |
| 9 years | 150 | 4 (2.66) |
| 10 years | 158 | 10 (6.32) |
| 11 years | 187 | 26 (13.9) |
| 12 years | 241 | 44 (18.25) |
| 13 years | 310 | 62 (20) |
| 14 years | 310 | 62 (20) |
| 15 years | 368 | 95 (25.81) |
| 16 years | 385 | 84 (21.81) |
| 17 years | 432 | 80 (18.51) |
| 18 years | 15 | 1 (6.66) |
| Total | 3284 | 488 (14.85) |
Abbreviations: USG, ultrasonography; OCLs, ovarian cystic lesions.
Figure 2Age distribution histogram for the study group.
Comparative analysis of the mean values for some variables according to the patients'area of origin
| Rural (N=230) | Urban (N=258) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean±SD (years) | 14.20±3.11 | 14.07±3.05 | 0.654 |
| Age at menarche, mean±SD (years) | 11.87±1.13 | 11.86±4.23 | 0.922 |
| BMI, mean±SD (mm) | 21.21±3.71 | 22.30±4.29 | 0.003 |
| OCLs size, mean±SD (mm) | 30.56 ± 14.24 | 33.41 ± 17.25 | 0.046 |
Note: Statistical significance: p<0.05.
Abbreviations: N, number; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3The distribution of the patients’ ages according to the area of origin.
Comparative Analysis of the Main Variables According to the Patients’ Area of Origin
| Rural (N=230) | Urban (N=258) | Total (N=488) | P-value Chi2 Test | RR [95% CI] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body Mass Index | <18.5 kg/m2 | 52 (22.6%) | 38 (14.7%) | 90 | 0.002* | 1.36>25,U [1.14–1.62] |
| 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 | 148 (64.3%) | 158 (61.2%) | 306 | |||
| ≥25 kg/m2 | 30 (13.0%) | 62 (24.0%) | 92 | |||
| Size categories | Small: 10–29 mm | 115 (50.0%) | 145 (56.2%) | 260 | 0.278* | 1.20≥50,R [0.90–1.61] |
| Medium: 30–49 mm | 82 (35.7%) | 86 (33.3%) | 168 | |||
| Large: ≥50 mm | 33 (14.3%) | 27 (10.5%) | 60 | |||
| Diagnostic method | Ultrasonography | 210 (91.3%) | 247 (95.7%) | 457 | 0.044 | 1.52intraop,R [0.94–2.47] |
| Intraoperatively | 20 (8.7%) | 11 (4.3%) | 31 | |||
| Ultrasonographic aspect | Simple | 175 (76.1%) | 220 (85.3%) | 395 | 0.01 | 1.34complex,R [1.09–1.63] |
| Complex | 55 (23.9%) | 38 (14.7%) | 93 | |||
| Surgical treatment | No | 200 (87.0%) | 248 (96.1%) | 448 | 0.001 | 1.68surgical,R [1.37–2.07] |
| Yes | 30 (13.0%) | 10 (3.9%) | 40 | |||
| Surgical intervention | Scheduled | 12 (40.0%) | 5 (50.0%) | 17 | 0.657 | 1.13emergency,R [0.66–1.93] |
| Emergency | 18 (60.0%) | 5 (50.0%) | 23 | |||
| First Presentation | ECU, without referral from GP | 189 (82.2%) | 184 (71.3%) | 373 | 0.005 | 1.42withoutGP,R [1.09–1.85] |
| Referred by GP | 41 (17.8%) | 74 (28.7%) | 115 | |||
| Complications | Uncomplicated OCLs | 211 (91.7%) | 250 (96.9%) | 461 | 0.012 | 1.83complicated OCLs,R [1.02–3.29] |
| Complicated OCLs | 19 (8.3%) | 8 (3.1%) | 27 | |||
| Type of complication | Rupture | 12 (63.2%) | 5 (62.5%) | 17 | 0.974 | – |
| Torsion | 7 (36.8%) | 3 (37.5%) | 10 | |||
Notes: *p values for Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance: p<0.05.
Abbreviations: GP, general physician; OCLs, ovarian cystic lesions; R, rural; intraop, intraoperatively; N, number; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
Multivariate Analysis. Dependent Variable: OCLs. Predictors: Area, Age, BMI and Presence of Complications
| Model | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | Sig. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | Std. Error | Beta | ||||
| 1 | (Constant) | 36.268 | 2.294 | 15.807 | 0.000 | |
| Area | −2.855 | 1.427 | −0.090 | −2.001 | 0.046 | |
| 2 | (Constant) | 30.359 | 4.028 | 7.537 | 0.000 | |
| Area | −2.803 | 1.424 | −0.089 | −1.969 | 0.050 | |
| Age | 0.413 | 0.231 | 0.080 | 1.783 | 0.075 | |
| 3 | (Constant) | 29.059 | 5.252 | 5.533 | 0.000 | |
| Area | −2.879 | 1.439 | −0.091 | −2.001 | 0.046 | |
| Age | 0.407 | 0.232 | 0.079 | 1.755 | 0.080 | |
| BMI | 0.068 | 0.177 | 0.018 | 0.386 | 0.699 | |
| 4 | (Constant) | 3.857 | 6.217 | 0.620 | 0.535 | |
| Area | −1.898 | 1.382 | −0.060 | −1.374 | 0.170 | |
| Age | 0.428 | 0.222 | 0.083 | 1.930 | 0.154 | |
| BMI | 0.145 | 0.170 | 0.037 | 0.857 | 0.392 | |
| Complications | 20.593 | 2.999 | 0.299 | 6.868 | 0.000 | |
Note: Statistical significance: p<0.05.
Abbreviations: OCLs, ovarian cystic lesions; BMI, Body Mass Index; Std, standard; Sig, significance;
Distribution of Patients According to OCLs Size and Aspect on USG
| Environment | Rural versus Urban | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | Urban | Chi2 test | RR | |||||
| N | % | N | % | p | [95% CI] | |||
| OCLs Size | 10–29 mm | Complex | 5 | 4.3% | 3 | 2.1% | 0.291 | 1.43 [0.82–2.49] |
| Simple | 110 | 95.7% | 142 | 97.9% | ||||
| 30–49 mm | Complex | 26 | 31.7% | 22 | 25.6% | 0.381 | 1.16 [0.84–1.60] | |
| Simple | 56 | 68.3% | 64 | 74.4% | ||||
| ≥ 50 mm | Complex | 24 | 72.7% | 13 | 48.1% | 0.05 | 1.66 [0.94–2.91] | |
| Simple | 9 | 27.3% | 14 | 51.9% | ||||
Note: Statistical significance: p<0.05.
Abbreviations: OCLs, ovarian cystic lesions; USG, ultrasonography; N, number; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.