Literature DB >> 35654752

Intratumoral Resolution of Driver Gene Mutation Heterogeneity in Renal Cancer Using Deep Learning.

Paul H Acosta1, Vandana Panwar2, Vipul Jarmale1, Alana Christie3, Jay Jasti1, Vitaly Margulis3,4, Dinesh Rakheja2, John Cheville5, Bradley C Leibovich6, Alexander Parker7, James Brugarolas3,8, Payal Kapur2,3,4, Satwik Rajaram1,2,3.   

Abstract

Intratumoral heterogeneity arising from tumor evolution poses significant challenges biologically and clinically. Dissecting this complexity may benefit from deep learning (DL) algorithms, which can infer molecular features from ubiquitous hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tissue sections. Although DL algorithms have been developed to predict some driver mutations from H&E images, the ability of these DL algorithms to resolve intratumoral mutation heterogeneity at subclonal spatial resolution is unexplored. Here, we apply DL to a paradigm of intratumoral heterogeneity, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common type of kidney cancer. Matched IHC and H&E images were leveraged to develop DL models for predicting intratumoral genetic heterogeneity of the three most frequently mutated ccRCC genes, BAP1, PBRM1, and SETD2. DL models were generated on a large cohort (N = 1,282) and tested on several independent cohorts, including a TCGA cohort (N = 363 patients) and two tissue microarray (TMA) cohorts (N = 118 and 365 patients). These models were also expanded to a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) TMA, affording analysis of homotopic and heterotopic interactions of tumor and stroma. The status of all three genes could be inferred by DL, with BAP1 showing the highest sensitivity and performance within and across tissue samples (AUC = 0.87-0.89 on holdout). BAP1 results were validated on independent human (AUC = 0.77-0.84) and PDX (AUC = 0.80) cohorts. Finally, BAP1 predictions correlated with clinical outputs such as disease-specific survival. Overall, these data show that DL models can resolve intratumoral heterogeneity in cancer with potential diagnostic, prognostic, and biological implications. SIGNIFICANCE: This work demonstrates the potential for deep learning analysis of histopathologic images to serve as a fast, low-cost method to assess genetic intratumoral heterogeneity. See related commentary by Song et al., p. 2672. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35654752      PMCID: PMC9373732          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-2318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   13.312


  48 in total

1.  Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathology.

Authors:  David Tellez; Geert Litjens; Péter Bándi; Wouter Bulten; John-Melle Bokhorst; Francesco Ciompi; Jeroen van der Laak
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Modeling Renal Cell Carcinoma in Mice: Bap1 and Pbrm1 Inactivation Drive Tumor Grade.

Authors:  Yi-Feng Gu; Shannon Cohn; Alana Christie; Tiffani McKenzie; Nicholas Wolff; Quyen N Do; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Ivan Pedrosa; Tao Wang; Anwesha Dey; Meinrad Busslinger; Xian-Jin Xie; Robert E Hammer; Renée M McKay; Payal Kapur; James Brugarolas
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 3.  Clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  David J Grignon; Mingxin Che
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.935

4.  Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Alexander W Jung; Ramon Viñas Torne; Santiago Gonzalez; Harald Vöhringer; Artem Shmatko; Lucy R Yates; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Luiza Moore; Moritz Gerstung
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-07-27

5.  Dysregulation of β-catenin is an independent predictor of oncologic outcomes in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Mary E Westerman; Aditya Bagrodia; Bishoy A Gayed; Oussama M Darwish; Ahmed Q Haddad; Dina Khalil; Payal Kapur; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes Identified by BAP1 and PBRM1 Expression.

Authors:  Richard W Joseph; Payal Kapur; Daniel J Serie; Mansi Parasramka; Thai H Ho; John C Cheville; Eugene Frenkel; Alexander S Parker; James Brugarolas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations.

Authors:  Alexander T Pearson; Tom Luedde; Jakob Nikolas Kather; Lara R Heij; Heike I Grabsch; Chiara Loeffler; Amelie Echle; Hannah Sophie Muti; Jeremias Krause; Jan M Niehues; Kai A J Sommer; Peter Bankhead; Loes F S Kooreman; Jefree J Schulte; Nicole A Cipriani; Roman D Buelow; Peter Boor; Nadi-Na Ortiz-Brüchle; Andrew M Hanby; Valerie Speirs; Sara Kochanny; Akash Patnaik; Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Piet A van den Brandt; Dirk Jäger; Christian Trautwein
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-07-27

8.  Evaluation of Deep Learning Strategies for Nucleus Segmentation in Fluorescence Images.

Authors:  Juan C Caicedo; Jonathan Roth; Allen Goodman; Tim Becker; Kyle W Karhohs; Matthieu Broisin; Csaba Molnar; Claire McQuin; Shantanu Singh; Fabian J Theis; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.

Authors:  Nicolas Coudray; Paolo Santiago Ocampo; Theodore Sakellaropoulos; Navneet Narula; Matija Snuderl; David Fenyö; Andre L Moreira; Narges Razavian; Aristotelis Tsirigos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 53.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.