Literature DB >> 35654492

Comparison of the Utility of High-Resolution CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI Fusion Images for the Localization of Cholesteatoma.

X Fan1, C Ding1, Z Liu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Cholesteatoma is an aggressive disease that may lead to hearing impairment. This study aimed to compare the utility of high-resolution CT and TSE-DWI fusion images with that of T2WI and TSE-DWI fusion images in the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were retrospectively recruited. High-resolution CT, T2WI with fat suppression, and TSE-DWI scans were obtained, and image fusion was performed using a 3D reconstruction postprocessing workstation to form CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images. The quality of the 2 fused images was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the horizontal semicircular canal transverse position as the reference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the diagnostic efficacies of CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images in localizing middle ear cholesteatoma were calculated.
RESULTS: The overall quality of T2WI-DWI fusion images was slightly higher than that of CT-DWI fusion images (P < .001), and the semicircular canal was slightly less clear on T2WI-DWI than on CT-DWI (P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic confidence between them. In the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of T2WI-DWI fusion images and CT-DWI fusion images were equivalent for involvement of the attic, tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and mastoid process, with no statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS: T2WI-DWI fusion images could replace CT-DWI in the preoperative selection of surgical options for middle ear cholesteatoma.
© 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35654492      PMCID: PMC9262052          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   4.966


  25 in total

1.  A Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Performance of Non-Echoplanar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Detecting Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: 10 Years On.

Authors:  Ravi K Lingam; Paul Bassett
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  High-resolution three-dimensional diffusion-weighted MRI/CT image data fusion for cholesteatoma surgical planning: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Koji Yamashita; Akio Hiwatashi; Osamu Togao; Kazufumi Kikuchi; Nozomu Matsumoto; Makoto Obara; Takashi Yoshiura; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance fusion imaging in cholesteatoma preoperative assessment.

Authors:  Agustín Campos; Federico Mata; Rosa Reboll; María Luisa Peris; Jorge Basterra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Migrating to the Modern PACS: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Seth J Berkowitz; Jesse L Wei; Safwan Halabi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Discovering Middle Ear Anatomy by Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery: A Dissection Manual.

Authors:  Lukas Anschuetz; Livio Presutti; Daniele Marchioni; Marco Bonali; Wilhelm Wimmer; Domenico Villari; Marco Caversaccio
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Improved Assessment of Middle Ear Recurrent Cholesteatomas Using a Fusion of Conventional CT and Non-EPI-DWI MRI.

Authors:  F Felici; U Scemama; D Bendahan; J-P Lavieille; G Moulin; C Chagnaud; M Montava; A Varoquaux
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The Antrum-Malleus-Tegmen Score: A Pilot Study Assessing Preoperative Radiographic Predictors for Transcanal Endoscopic Cholesteatoma Dissection.

Authors:  Anthony M Tolisano; Daniel E Killeen; Jacob B Hunter; Joe Walter Kutz; Brandon Isaacson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Postoperative diffusion weighted MRI and preoperative CT scan fusion for residual cholesteatoma localization.

Authors:  Musaed Alzahrani; Rami Alhazmi; Manon Bélair; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Detectability and anatomical correlation of middle ear cholesteatoma using fused thin slice non-echo planar imaging diffusion-weighted image and magnetic resonance cisternography (FTS-nEPID).

Authors:  Masafumi Kanoto; Yukio Sugai; Takaaki Hosoya; Yuuki Toyoguchi; Yoshihiro Konno; Fumika Watarai; Tsukasa Ito; Tomoo Watanabe; Seiji Kakehata
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension.

Authors:  Akira Baba; Sho Kurihara; Takeshi Fukuda; Hideomi Yamauchi; Satoshi Matsushima; Koshi Ikeda; Ryo Kurokawa; Yoshiaki Ota; Masahiro Takahashi; Yuika Sakurai; Masaomi Motegi; Manabu Komori; Kazuhisa Yamamoto; Yutaka Yamamoto; Hiromi Kojima; Hiroya Ojiri
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.