| Literature DB >> 35653920 |
Hitesh Kumar1, Neeru Vasudeva2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phytotherapeutic modulation of the immune system to mitigate infectious ailments has been in vogue all over the world.Entities:
Keywords: Cyclophosphamide; Immunoglobulins; Neutrophil adhesion; Nyctanthes arbortristis; Phagocytic index
Year: 2022 PMID: 35653920 PMCID: PMC9163693 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2022.100556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 1Effect of MNA and ANA on serum immunoglobulin level. Value indicates mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗∗P ≤ 0.01, significant compared to control group.
Effect of MNA and ANA on neutrophil adhesion.
| Sr. no. | Treatment | TLC | Reduction of TLC (%) | Neutrophil count (%) | Reduction of neutrophils (%) | Neutrophil index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated blood (A) | Treated blood (B) | Untreated blood (C) | Treated blood (D) | Untreated blood (NIu) | treated blood (NIt) | Neutrophil | ||||
| 1 | Control | 7680± | 7220± | 5.98 | 17.60 ± 0.9274 | 12.80 ± 0.5831 | 27.27 | 135,600 ± 9173.9 | 92,540 ± 5045.8 | 31.75 |
| 2 | Methanolic extract (200 mg/kg) | 9120 ± 292.23 | 8180 ± 270.92 | 10.30 | 22.80 ± 1.314 | 14.00 ± 1.300 | 38.59 | 200,360 ± 11,012 | 115,020 ± 12,642 | 42.59∗ |
| 3 | Aqueous extract (200 mg/kg) | 8700 ± 251.95 | 7800 ± 242.90 | 12.64 | 23.00 ± 1.88 | 11.80 ± 0.86 | 48.69 | 198,600 ± 11,838 | 92,320 ± 8123.4 | 53.01∗∗ |
Value indicates mean ± SEM (n = 6). ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, significant compared to control group.
Effect of MNA and ANA on phagocytic index.
| Treatment | Phagocytic index | % change |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.018 ± 0.003 | – |
| Control | 0.006 ± 0.001## | ↓ 67% |
| Methanolic extract (200 mg/kg) | 0.010 ± 0.002∗ | ↑66 |
| Aqueous extract (200 mg/kg) | 0.013 ± 0.003∗∗ | ↑ 116 |
Value indicates mean ± SEM (n = 6).
##p ≤ 0.01, significant compared to normal group. ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, significant compared to control group.
Effect of MNA and ANA on cyclophosphamide-induced neutropenia.
| Sr. No. | Treatment | TLC | Reduction in TLC (%) | Neutrophil count (%) | Reduction of neutrophils (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before (A) | After (B) | Reduction (A-B) | Before (C) | After (D) | Reduction (C-D) | ||||
| 1 | Normal | 8912 ± 268.47 | 8789 ± 278.86 | 123 ± 10.78 | 01.38 | 29.67 ± 3.92 | 28.97 ± 2.89 | 0.70 ± 0.09 | 02.25 |
| 2 | Control | 7680 ± 152.97 | 1875 ± 149.30 | 5805 ± 103.67 | 72.21## | 17.60 ± 0.92 | 2.50 ± 0.64 | 15.18 ± 01.34 | 86.25## |
| 3 | Methanolic extract (200 mg/kg) | 9120 ± 292.23 | 4425.0 ± 513.77 | 4694 ± 780.78 | 51.46∗∗ | 22.80 ± 01.34 | 8.500 ± 01.25 | 14.30 ± 0.91 | 62.79∗∗ |
| 4 | Aqueous extract (200 mg/kg) | 8700 ± 251.95 | 5425.0 ± 217.47 | 3275 ± 34.05 | 37.42∗∗ | 23.00 ± 01.88 | 10.250 ± 0.94 | 12.75 ± 01.12 | 55.43∗∗ |
Value indicates mean ± SEM (n = 6).
##p ≤ 0.01, significant compared to normal group. ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, significant compared to control group