Literature DB >> 35653559

Gene-rich X chromosomes implicate intragenomic conflict in the evolution of bizarre genetic systems.

Noelle Anderson1,2, Kamil S Jaron3, Christina N Hodson3, Matthew B Couger4, Jan Ševčík5, Brooke Weinstein1,2, Stacy Pirro6, Laura Ross3, Scott William Roy1,7.   

Abstract

Haplodiploidy and paternal genome elimination (HD/PGE) are common in invertebrates, having evolved at least two dozen times, all from male heterogamety (i.e., systems with X chromosomes). However, why X chromosomes are important for the evolution of HD/PGE remains debated. The Haploid Viability Hypothesis posits that X-linked genes promote the evolution of male haploidy by facilitating purging recessive deleterious mutations. The Intragenomic Conflict Hypothesis holds that conflict between genes drives genetic system turnover; under this model, X-linked genes could promote the evolution of male haploidy due to conflicts with autosomes over sex ratios and genetic transmission. We studied lineages where we can distinguish these hypotheses: species with germline PGE that retain an XX/X0 sex determination system (gPGE+X). Because evolving PGE in these cases involves changes in transmission without increases in male hemizygosity, a high degree of X linkage in these systems is predicted by the Intragenomic Conflict Hypothesis but not the Haploid Viability Hypothesis. To quantify the degree of X linkage, we sequenced and compared 7 gPGE+X species’ genomes with 11 related species with typical XX/XY or XX/X0 genetic systems, representing three transitions to gPGE. We find highly increased X linkage in both modern and ancestral genomes of gPGE+X species compared to non-gPGE relatives and recover a significant positive correlation between percent X linkage and the evolution of gPGE. These empirical results substantiate longstanding proposals for a role for intragenomic conflict in the evolution of genetic systems such as HD/PGE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomic conflict; haplodiploidy; insects; sex chromosomes; sex determination

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35653559      PMCID: PMC9191650          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122580119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  35 in total

1.  Comparative genome and proteome analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeny M Zdobnov; Christian von Mering; Ivica Letunic; David Torrents; Mikita Suyama; Richard R Copley; George K Christophides; Dana Thomasova; Robert A Holt; G Mani Subramanian; Hans-Michael Mueller; George Dimopoulos; John H Law; Michael A Wells; Ewan Birney; Rosane Charlab; Aaron L Halpern; Elena Kokoza; Cheryl L Kraft; Zhongwu Lai; Suzanna Lewis; Christos Louis; Carolina Barillas-Mury; Deborah Nusskern; Gerald M Rubin; Steven L Salzberg; Granger G Sutton; Pantelis Topalis; Ron Wides; Patrick Wincker; Mark Yandell; Frank H Collins; Jose Ribeiro; William M Gelbart; Fotis C Kafatos; Peer Bork
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Perspective: maternal kin groups and the origins of asymmetric genetic systems-genomic imprinting, haplodiploidy, and parthenogenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin B Normark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The origin of male haploid genetic systems and their expected sex ratio.

Authors:  D L Hartl; S W Brown
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Whole-Genome Annotation with BRAKER.

Authors:  Katharina J Hoff; Alexandre Lomsadze; Mark Borodovsky; Mario Stanke
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 5.  The Y Chromosome as a Battleground for Intragenomic Conflict.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Polytene chromosomal maps of 11 Drosophila species: the order of genomic scaffolds inferred from genetic and physical maps.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer; Arjun Bhutkar; Bryant F McAllister; Muneo Matsuda; Luciano M Matzkin; Patrick M O'Grady; Claudia Rohde; Vera L S Valente; Montserrat Aguadé; Wyatt W Anderson; Kevin Edwards; Ana C L Garcia; Josh Goodman; James Hartigan; Eiko Kataoka; Richard T Lapoint; Elena R Lozovsky; Carlos A Machado; Mohamed A F Noor; Montserrat Papaceit; Laura K Reed; Stephen Richards; Tania T Rieger; Susan M Russo; Hajime Sato; Carmen Segarra; Douglas R Smith; Temple F Smith; Victor Strelets; Yoshiko N Tobari; Yoshihiko Tomimura; Marvin Wasserman; Thomas Watts; Robert Wilson; Kiyohito Yoshida; Therese A Markow; William M Gelbart; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Extraordinary conservation of entire chromosomes in insects over long evolutionary periods.

Authors:  John A Sved; Yizhou Chen; Deborah Shearman; Marianne Frommer; A Stuart Gilchrist; William B Sherwin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Reversal of an ancient sex chromosome to an autosome in Drosophila.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The evolutionary dynamics of haplodiploidy: Genome architecture and haploid viability.

Authors:  Heath Blackmon; Nate B Hardy; Laura Ross
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.