| Literature DB >> 35652928 |
Masashi Kumagai1, Yohei Otaka2, Taiki Yoshida3, Shin Kitamura4, Kazuki Ushizawa5, Naoki Mori6, Daisuke Matsuura7, Kaoru Honaga8, Kunitsugu Kondo7, Eiji Shimizu9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term cumulative risk and factors associated with fall-related fractures in stroke survivors discharged from convalescent rehabilitation wards.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35652928 PMCID: PMC9255282 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Rehabil Med ISSN: 1650-1977 Impact factor: 3.959
Participants’ characteristics at admission/discharge to/from convalescent rehabilitation wards (n = 786)
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age at admission, years, mean (SD) | 68.4 (13.5) |
| Sex, female/male, | 307/479 |
| Premorbid modified Rankin Scale, 0/1/2/3/4/5, | 429/75/51/37/16/0 |
| History of stroke, no/yes, | 675/111 |
| Type of stroke, infarction/intracerebral haemorrhage/subarachnoid haemorrhage, | 470/257/59 |
| Duration from onset to admission, days, mean (SD) | 35.1 (13.7) |
| Length of stay in convalescent rehabilitation ward, days, mean (SD) | 92.3 (44.7) |
| Duration after discharge, months, mean (SD) | 38.0 (19.0) |
| Side of paresis, right/left/both/none, | 310/286/41/89 |
| Motor score on SIAS at discharge, median (IQR) | |
| Total upper limb function score | 8 (4–10) |
| Total lower limb function score | 12 (8–15) |
| Independence of gait at discharge, independent/non-independent, | 475/282 |
| FIM at discharge, median (IQR) | |
| Total score | 107 (80–119) |
| Total score of motor items | 78 (60–87) |
| Total score of cognitive items | 30 (22–34) |
| Discharge destination, home/nursing home/transferred to another hospital, | 698/73/15 |
Number of missing values:
n = 178,
n = 60,
n = 77,
n = 83,
n = 29,
n = 30,
n = 29,
n = 30.
FIM: Functional Independence Measure; IQR: interquartile range; n: number; SIAS: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set; SD: standard deviation.
Fall-related fractures in 786 participants
| Items | |
|---|---|
| Respondent, participants/family/facility staff, n | 410/375/1 |
| Experience of fall-related fracture(s), none/once/twice, n | 700/73/13 |
| Time from discharge to the first fall-related fracture, months, mean (SD) | 18.4 (15.6) |
| Location of first fall-related fracture after discharge, n | |
| Hip (more-affected side/less-affected side) | 35 (32/3) |
| Proximal humerus (more-affected side/less-affected side) | 13 (13/0) |
| Wrist (more-affected side/less-affected side) | 9 (3/6) |
| Lumbar vertebrae | 8 |
| Pelvis | 5 |
| Rib | 4 |
| Other | 15 |
| Uncertain | 1 |
The date of the event was missing in 4 individuals.
Four individuals had 2 fractures during the first fall-related fracture event.
SD: standard deviation; n: number.
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier survival curve for freedom from fall-related fractures after discharge in participants with stroke. (A) Survival curve for all participants and (B) survival curves according to participant sex and severity of lower motor paresis. Y-axes show the percentage of participants who did not suffer fall-related fractures and x-axes show the time from discharge from convalescent rehabilitation wards. Moderate paresis, participants with Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS) lower limb scores ranging from 6 to 11 points.
Bivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of variables related to fall-related fractures (n = 782)
| Variable | Hazard ratio | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 1.82 | 1.18–2.82 | 0.006 |
| Age at admission, years | 1.03 | 1.01–1.05 | 0.001 |
| Premorbid modified Rankin Scale | |||
| Grade 0 | Reference | ||
| Grade 1 | 1.81 | 0.90–3.65 | 0.094 |
| Grade 2 | 2.57 | 1.24–5.34 | 0.011 |
| Grade 3 | 1.64 | 0.58–4.62 | 0.346 |
| Grade 4 | 0.82 | 0.11–6.02 | 0.850 |
| Grade 5 | – | – | – |
| Type of stroke | |||
| Infarction | Reference | ||
| Intracerebral haemorrhage | 1.13 | 0.72–1.78 | 0.582 |
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | 0.47 | 0.14–1.51 | 0.208 |
| Duration from onset to admission, days | 0.99 | 0.97–1.01 | 0.609 |
| Length of stay in convalescent rehabilitation ward, days | 1.00 | 1.00–1.01 | 0.011 |
| History of stroke | 1.35 | 0.76–2.40 | 0.303 |
| Side of paresis | |||
| Right | Reference | ||
| Left | 1.58 | 0.97–2.59 | 0.065 |
| Both | 0.56 | 0.13–2.37 | 0.436 |
| Total upper limb function score on the SIAS | |||
| Score 10 | Reference | ||
| Score 8–9 | 1.72 | 0.78–3.75 | 0.173 |
| Score 6–7 | 4.12 | 1.81–9.41 | 0.001 |
| Score 4–5 | 4.02 | 1.76–9.18 | 0.001 |
| Score 2–3 | 1.97 | 0.77–4.99 | 0.153 |
| Score 0–1 | 2.81 | 1.19–6.63 | 0.018 |
| Total lower limb function score on the SIAS | |||
| Score 15 | Reference | ||
| Score 12–14 | 1.19 | 0.57–2.47 | 0.639 |
| Score 9–11 | 3.43 | 1.63–7.21 | 0.001 |
| Score 6–8 | 3.04 | 1.40–6.56 | 0.005 |
| Score 3–5 | 2.09 | 0.86–5.05 | 0.100 |
| Score 0–2 | 2.37 | 0.94–5.96 | 0.065 |
| Independence of gait | |||
| Independent | Reference | ||
| Non-independent | 2.01 | 1.29–3.13 | 0.002 |
| Total score of motor items in the FIM | |||
| Score 91 | Reference | ||
| Score 78–90 | 1.10 | 0.33–3.63 | 0.864 |
| Score 65–77 | 1.50 | 0.43–5.20 | 0.518 |
| Score 52–64 | 2.33 | 0.65–8.26 | 0.190 |
| Score 39–51 | 3.06 | 0.81–11.58 | 0.098 |
| Score 26–38 | 2.98 | 0.80–11.04 | 0.101 |
| Score 13–25 | 0.89 | 0.14–5.38 | 0.907 |
| Total score of cognitive items in the FIM | 0.97 | 0.94–0.99 | 0.029 |
| Destination | |||
| Home | Reference | ||
| Nursing home | 1.19 | 0.55–2.61 | 0.648 |
| Different hospital | 2.17 | 0.53–8.89 | 0.278 |
Of 786 participants, 4 had missing dates concerning their fall-related fractures.
Number of missing values:
n = 178,
n = 149,
n = 77,
n = 83,
n = 29,
n = 29,
n = 30
FIM: Functional Independence Measure; SIAS: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set.
Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of risk factors for fall-related fractures (n = 585)
| Variable | Hazard ratio | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 1.69 | 1.00–2.87 | 0.049 |
| Age at admission, years | 1.00 | 0.98–1.03 | 0.438 |
| Premorbid modified Rankin Scale | |||
| Grade 0 | Reference | ||
| Grade 1 | 1.22 | 0.58–2.59 | 0.588 |
| Grade 2 | 1.61 | 0.70–3.72 | 0.258 |
| Grade 3 | 1.20 | 0.40–3.59 | 0.734 |
| Grade 4 | 0.39 | 0.04–3.07 | 0.373 |
| Grade 5 | – | – | – |
| Length of stay in convalescent rehabilitation ward, days | 0.99 | 0.99–1.00 | 0.942 |
| Total lower limb function score on the SIAS | |||
| Score 15 | Reference | ||
| Score 12–14 | 1.13 | 0.50–2.55 | 0.757 |
| Score 9–11 | 3.08 | 1.28–7.38 | 0.012 |
| Score 6–8 | 3.05 | 1.18–7.87 | 0.021 |
| Score 3–5 | 0.56 | 0.11–2.82 | 0.484 |
| Score 0–2 | 1.51 | 0.44–5.18 | 0.512 |
| Independence of gait | |||
| Independent | Reference | ||
| Non-independent | 1.21 | 0.57–2.55 | 0.611 |
| Total score of cognitive items in the FIM | 0.99 | 0.95–1.04 | 0.992 |
FIM: Functional Independence Measure; SIAS: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set.