Literature DB >> 35652600

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among nonphysician healthcare personnel by work location at a tertiary-care center, Iowa, 2020-2021.

Takaaki Kobayashi1, John Heinemann1, Alexandra Trannel1, Alexandre R Marra1,2, Mohammed Alsuhaibani1, William Etienne1, Lorinda L Sheeler1, Oluchi Abosi1, Stephanie Holley1, Mary Beth Kukla1, Angelique Dains1, Kyle E Jenn1, Holly Meacham1, Beth Hanna1, Bradley Ford1, Karen Brust1, Melanie Wellington1, Patrick G Hartley1, Daniel J Diekema1, Jorge L Salinas3.   

Abstract

We describe COVID-19 cases among nonphysician healthcare personnel (HCP) by work location. The proportion of HCP with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was highest in the emergency department and lowest among those working remotely. COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 units had similar proportions of HCP with COVID-19 (13%). Cases decreased across all work locations following COVID-19 vaccination.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35652600      PMCID: PMC9203358          DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   6.520


Healthcare personnel (HCP) work on the frontlines of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response, potentially putting them at a higher risk of infection, and subsequently exposing patients and colleagues. A wide range of COVID-19 incidence rates among HCP have been reported (0.3%–52%). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that HCP should avoid sharing work responsibilities between COVID-19 units and other units. Some HCP are hesitant to work on COVID-19 units due to concerns of acquiring severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from patients. We report trends of COVID-19 among HCP and the association between COVID-19 cases and work location in the hospital.

Methods

The University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics (UIHC) is an 860-bed, academic medical center. All HCP at UIHC were required to notify the University Employee Health Clinic (UEHC) if they tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The UEHC recorded all employee COVID-19 cases whether they were diagnosed at UIHC, self-reported (home test), or diagnosed elsewhere. All HCP with COVID-19 were required to stay home for at least 10 days and could return to work if asymptomatic or symptoms improved and they were fever free for 24 hours after 10 full days. We retrospectively collected COVID-19–associated data for HCP from UEHC between June 2020 and July 2021. The data included age, sex, job title, work location, history of COVID-19, and date of positive SARS-CoV-2 test if they had a history of COVID-19. We excluded HCP who did not have a designated work location or who worked on multiple units during the same shift (eg, medicine resident, hospitalist, etc) to assess the association between COVID-19 and work location. Job titles were divided into 5 categories: (1) nurse, (2) medical assistant, (3) technician, (4) clerk, and (5) others (eg, patient access, billing office, etc). Some staff worked remotely from March 17, 2020, until July 6, 2021. Work locations were divided into 6 categories: (1) emergency department (ED), (2) COVID-19 unit, (3) non–COVID-19 unit, (4) clinic, (5) perioperative units, and (6) remote work. Designated COVID-19 units comprised either airborne isolation rooms or modified airborne isolation rooms (using air scrubbers with high-efficiency particulate air filters vented out the window to create negative airflow). Air exchanges per hour (ACH) in COVID-19 units were 14–18 ACH, and in non–COVID-19 units they ranged from 2 to 8 ACH. During the study period, HCP were required to wear a medical-grade mask, gown, gloves, and eye protection or face shield when caring for patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 or patients under investigation for COVID-19. A respirator (ie, N95) was required only when aerosol-generating procedures were performed. In healthcare settings outside COVID-19 patient rooms, universal masking was in place. Comparison of Demographics Between Healthcare Personnel With and Without COVID-19, 2020–2021, Iowa Note. HCP, healthcare personnel.

Results

Of 18,229 HCP registered at UEHC, 6,971 HCP had a discrete working location recorded. Among them, 758 (10.8%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Of these 758 HCP, 658 (86.8%) were diagnosed before COVID-19 vaccines became available at UIHC in December 2020. The mean age of HCP with COVID-19 was 35 years, and the mean age of HCP without COVID-19 was 38 years (P < .01). The highest COVID-19 incidence was observed in November 2020 when Iowa had the highest community incidence. The job title with the highest proportion of HCP with COVID-19 was medical assistant (16.5%), followed by nurses (12.1%). The location with the highest proportion of COVID-19 cases was the ED (17%), followed by both COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 units (12.7%), clinics (11.0%), perioperative units (9.4%), and remote work setting (6.6%) (P < .01). Differences in COVID-19 case proportions by location became nonsignificant after COVID-19 vaccines became available in December 2020 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Trend of COVID-19 cases among healthcare personnel at a Midwestern tertiary-care hospital by work location and COVID-19 cases in the local county, 2020–2021.

Trend of COVID-19 cases among healthcare personnel at a Midwestern tertiary-care hospital by work location and COVID-19 cases in the local county, 2020–2021.

Discussion

The proportion of HCP with COVID-19 was highest in the ED and lowest among those working remotely. COVID-19 and non–COVID-19 units had similar proportions of HCP with COVID-19. Cases decreased across all work locations following COVID-19 vaccination. In our hospital, the proportion of HCP with COVID-19 was highest in the ED. Although this association has not been well established, these results are similar to data published in New York City and Iran. HCP in the ED may have been exposed to patients during the peak of their infectious period. Emergent aerosol-generating procedures, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, without proper PPE might have contributed to higher rates. During the study period, our policy was to isolate any patient who presented to the ED with respiratory symptoms to a designated area upon screening. However, a previous study demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 transmission from asymptomatic individuals accounted for ∼60% of all transmissions. Stricter infection control measures, such as increased air exchanges and universal N95 use, should be considered for HCP in the ED during periods of high community transmission. Whether working on COVID-19 units is associated with an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 remains a controversial topic; data have been inconsistent. COVID-19 units and non–COVID-19 units had similar proportions of HCP with COVID-19 at UIHC. This finding might suggest that infection control practices reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 acquisition from patients with known or suspected COVID-19. All rooms in the COVID-19 units had high air exchange rates and negative pressure. Patients admitted for COVID-19–related reasons may have had a lower viral load by the time they were admitted. Transmission risk may be higher from patients on non–COVID-19 units who were not suspected to have COVID-19. Ensuring the availability of appropriate PPE, keeping safety measures and guidelines updated, and monitoring compliance of infection control measures are essential to reduce the risk of acquiring COVID-19 for frontline HCP in non–COVID-19 units. The proportion of HCP with COVID-19 was second lowest among those working in perioperative locations such as preoperative or recovery areas. All patients underwent preprocedure testing during the study period, which may have contributed to a smaller proportion of HCP acquiring COVID-19. The job title of medical assistant was associated with the highest case proportion. These HCP perform a variety of tasks involving close patient contact, which may put them at increased risk. This study had several limitations. HCP without dedicated work locations were not included. COVID-19 data obtained from UEHC included self-reported history and some HCP may have been diagnosed with COVID-19 outside our institution but did not report to UEHC. In addition, information on whether HCP with SARS-CoV-2 were symptomatic was not available. COVID-19 vaccine information for individual HCP was protected by UEHC and was not used in this study. However, vaccine uptake among HCP at UIHC was >90% by September 1, 2021. We did not ascertain whether HCP acquired COVID-19 at work or in the community. Some studies have shown that COVID-19 incidence among HCP is primarily influenced by community incidence and household exposures rather than the workplace. We did not include whether an HCP had had patient contact. We did not obtain race data and did not evaluate the COVID-19 incidence among HCP by race. In conclusion, special infection control strategies including increased air exchanges and stricter PPE and vaccination policies may be needed for HCP in the ED, for those with higher risk job titles, and in areas with low vaccine uptake. COVID-19 among HCP by location became comparable following the availability of COVID-19 vaccines.
Table 1.

Comparison of Demographics Between Healthcare Personnel With and Without COVID-19, 2020–2021, Iowa

VariableSARS-CoV-2 Positive(N = 758)SARS-CoV-2 Negative(N = 6,213) P Value
Age, mean y (range) 35.1 (19–72)38.4 (18–78)
Quartile 1 (19 ≤ age < 28), no. (column %)232 (30.6)1,552 (25.0)<.01
Quartile 2 (28 ≤ age < 36), no. (column %)207 (27.3)1,416 (22.8)
Quartile 3 (36 ≤ age < 49), no. (column %)186 (24.5)1,600 (25.8)
Quartile 4 (49 ≤ age < 79), no. (column %)133 (17.6)1,645 (26.4)
Sex, no. (column %)
Female655 (86.4)5,193 (83.6).045
Male103 (13.6)1,020 (16.4)
Job title, no. (row %) <.01
Medical assistant (N = 394)64 (16.5)330 (83.8)
Nurse (N = 4,030)489 (12.1)3541 (87.9)
Technician (N = 323)34 (10.5)289 (89.5)
Clerk (N = 221)21 (9.5)200 (90.5)
Other (N = 2,003)150 (7.5)1,853 (92.5)
Location, no. (row %) <.01
Emergency department (N = 188)32 (17.0)156 (83.0)
COVID-19 units (N = 370)47 (12.7)323 (87.3)
Non–COVID-19 units (N = 2,576)326 (12.7)2,250 (87.3)
Clinics (N = 1,972)217 (11.0)1,755 (89.0)
Perioperative (N = 479)45 (9.4)434 (90.6)
Remote work (N = 1,386)91 (6.6)1,295 (93.4)

Note. HCP, healthcare personnel.

  10 in total

1.  Indoor Air Changes and Potential Implications for SARS-CoV-2 Transmission.

Authors:  Joseph G Allen; Andrew M Ibrahim
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Association between SARS-CoV-2 and exposure risks in health care workers and university employees - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David Nygren; Jonas Norén; Yang De Marinis; Anna Holmberg; Carl-Johan Fraenkel; Magnus Rasmussen
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-09

3.  SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Among Healthcare Workers by Job Function and Work Location in a New York Inner-City Hospital.

Authors:  Murli U Purswani; Jessica Bucciarelli; Jose Tiburcio; Shamuel M Yagudayev; Georgia H Connell; Arafat A Omidiran; Launcelot Hannaway; Cosmina Zeana; Maureen Healy; Gary Yu; Doug Reich
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Why N95 Should Be the Standard for All COVID-19 Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Nhu Quyen Dau; Harry Peled; Helen Lau; Julie Lyou; Claudia Skinner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms.

Authors:  Michael A Johansson; Talia M Quandelacy; Sarah Kada; Pragati Venkata Prasad; Molly Steele; John T Brooks; Rachel B Slayton; Matthew Biggerstaff; Jay C Butler
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in southwest Iran.

Authors:  Golnar Sabetian; Mohsen Moghadami; Leila Hashemizadeh Fard Haghighi; Reza Shahriarirad; Mohammad Javad Fallahi; Naeimehossadat Asmarian; Yalda Sadat Moeini
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.099

7.  SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers at a frontline hospital in Tokyo.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fukuda; Kuniaki Seyama; Kanami Ito; Tomohiko Ai; Shuko Nojiri; Satoshi Hori; Mitsuru Wakita; Kaori Saito; Yuka Shida; Rie Nagura; Mayu Hasegawa; Chiaki Kanemoto; Mayumi Tokuhara; Katsunobu Okajima; Yukio Yoshikawa; Narimasa Katsuta; Takamasa Yamamoto; Mayumi Idei; Yuki Horiuchi; Kotoko Yamatani; Shigeki Misawa; Toshio Naito; Takashi Miida; Hiroyuki Sato; Nobutaka Hattori; Yoko Tabe; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of antibody-positive compared with antibody-negative health-care workers in England: a large, multicentre, prospective cohort study (SIREN).

Authors:  Victoria Jane Hall; Sarah Foulkes; Andre Charlett; Ana Atti; Edward J M Monk; Ruth Simmons; Edgar Wellington; Michelle J Cole; Ayoub Saei; Blanche Oguti; Katie Munro; Sarah Wallace; Peter D Kirwan; Madhumita Shrotri; Amoolya Vusirikala; Sakib Rokadiya; Meaghan Kall; Maria Zambon; Mary Ramsay; Tim Brooks; Colin S Brown; Meera A Chand; Susan Hopkins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Healthcare institutions' recommendation regarding the use of FFP-2 masks and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Cédric Hirzel; Alexia Cusini; Katarzyna Szajek; Felix Fleisch; Sandra Hutter; Martin Risch; Theresa Bechmann; Valerie A Luyckx; Sabine Güsewell; Amico Study Group
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.887

10.  Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seropositivity among Healthcare Personnel in Hospitals and Nursing Homes, Rhode Island, USA, July-August 2020.

Authors:  Lara J Akinbami; Philip A Chan; Nga Vuong; Samira Sami; Dawn Lewis; Philip E Sheridan; Susan L Lukacs; Lisa Mackey; Lisa A Grohskopf; Anita Patel; Lyle R Petersen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 16.126

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.