An enantioselective Michael addition of malonates to α,β-unsaturated para-nitrophenyl esters was achieved using the Lewis basic isothiourea HyperBTM, giving excellent levels of product enantioselectivity (up to >99:1 enantiomeric ratio) in good yields and with complete regioselectivity (>20:1 regioselectivity ratio) in the presence of alternative (phenyl ketone and ethyl ester) Michael acceptors. Density functional theory calculations indicate that N-acylation is rate-limiting. This constitutes a rare example of a highly enantioselective addition of simple, readily available malonates to α,β-unsaturated esters.
An enantioselective Michael addition of malonates to α,β-unsaturated para-nitrophenyl esters was achieved using the Lewis basic isothiourea HyperBTM, giving excellent levels of product enantioselectivity (up to >99:1 enantiomeric ratio) in good yields and with complete regioselectivity (>20:1 regioselectivity ratio) in the presence of alternative (phenyl ketone and ethyl ester) Michael acceptors. Density functional theory calculations indicate that N-acylation is rate-limiting. This constitutes a rare example of a highly enantioselective addition of simple, readily available malonates to α,β-unsaturated esters.
The asymmetric Michael reaction
is a powerful method for stereoselective C–C bond formation.
While enantioselective catalytic Michael addition of carbon nucleophiles
to α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, ketones, and alkylidene
malonates are well-established,[1] analogous
enantioselective addition to α,β-unsaturated esters are
rare. This is likely due to the low inherent electrophilicity of the
carboxylic acid oxidation state compared to alternative Michael acceptors[2] combined with the lack of enantiofacial discrimination.
Despite these issues, several useful catalytic enantioselective additions
have been achieved with highly reactive nucleophilic partners, including
silyl ketene acetals,[3] dihydropyrazol-3-ones,[4] aryl boronic acids,[5] thiols and amines,[6] and Grignard reagents.[7] However, the addition of less reactive, stabilized
carbon nucleophiles, such as malonates, remains an unsolved challenge.
The current state of the art was demonstrated by Nakamura and co-workers
in 2016, who employed a chiral lithium binaphtholate complex 1 to promote the highly enantioselective addition of malonates
to symmetric maleic esters,[8] but this was
limited by the lack of variability at the β position of the
Michael acceptor (Scheme A). As a result of the importance of this bond disconnection,
alternative enantioselective methods with a broad scope would be a
welcome addition to the synthetic toolbox.
Scheme 1
Selected Examples
of Chiral Amine-Catalyzed Michael Reaction/Cyclization
Cascades with Malonate Derivatives and Comparison to This Work
Chiral tertiary amines, such as chiral 4-dimethylaminopyridine
(DMAP) derivatives,[9] cinchona alkaloids,[10] and isothioureas,[11] are effective organocatalysts for inducing asymmetry in a variety
of transformations with α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acid
derivatives via chiral α,β-unsaturated N-acylammonium intermediates.[12] This technique
is frequently employed with bis-nucleophile coupling partners that
rely upon an initial stereoselective conjugate addition followed by
a second nucleophilic addition to achieve turnover of the chiral tertiary
amine catalyst. Using this strategy, several methods have been developed
employing an asymmetric Michael reaction with malonate derivatives
followed by cyclization to release the organocatalysts, with instructive
examples highlighted in Scheme B.Romo and co-workers developed an elegant cinchona
alkaloid 2-catalyzed Michael reaction/proton transfer/lactamization
cascade to provide lactams from aminomalonates and α,β-unsaturated
acid chlorides (top left).[10] The isothioureas,
HBTM 4 and HyperBTM 5, have been employed
in cascade reactions, where an initial Michael reaction with β-ketoesters[10a,13] (top right) and β-ketomalonates[14] (bottom left) was followed by a cyclization event to release the
catalyst and deliver δ- and β-lactones in high enantioselectivity,
respectively. Building on this precedent and previous work that demonstrated
the multifunctional nature of electron-deficient phenoxides as a leaving
group and as a secondary nucleophile to achieve catalytic turnover
in isothiourea catalysis,[15] we posited
that α,β-unsaturated p-nitrophenyl (PNP)
esters would be able to perform the Michael addition reaction without
the need for a pendent secondary nucleophile to achieve catalytic
turnover. This PNP turnover strategy has previously been employed
to promote the enantioselective nitronate addition to α,β-unsaturated
PNP esters;[15a] however, this process required
nitroalkane to be used as a solvent or highly reactive silyl nitronates
to be used as stoichiometric nucleophiles.[15b,16] The use of dihydropyrazol-3-ones and 3-substituted oxindoles as N-heterocyclic enolates was also achieved through the aryloxide
catalytic turnover.[4] Herein, we report
the HyperBTM-catalyzed addition of simple malonates and related derivatives
to α,β-unsaturated aryl esters possessing a variety of
electron-withdrawing β substituents under mild reaction conditions.An examination to determine the most suitable reaction parameters
began with an analysis of solvents and bases (Table ). β-Trifluoromethyl α,β-unsaturated
PNP ester 6 was reacted with dimethyl malonate 7 in the presence of 20 mol % HyperBTM 5 and
1 equiv of diisopropylethylamine in CH2Cl2 to
provide the desired product with promising 62:38 enantiomeric ratio
(er) (entry 1). Moving to more polar solvents, acetonitrile (MeCN)
and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF),
provided higher yields (58 and 65%) and enantioselectivity (70:30
and 89:11) (entries 2 and 3). Gratifyingly, cooling the reaction in
DMF to 0 °C increased the er to 90:10 (entry 4). Performing the
reaction in the absence of external base at 0 °C (entry 5) provided
high levels of enantioinduction (>99:1 er). Lowering the catalyst
loading of compound 5 to 10 mol % (entry 6) resulted
in similar enantioselectivity but a decreased yield. Attempting the
reaction with (R)-BTM 9 furnished the
desired Michael adduct in only 8% yield but with high 95:5 er (entry
7), while (S)-tetramisole 10 provided
no desired product under the optimized reaction conditions (entry
8).
Table 1
Reaction Optimizationa
entry
solvent
catalyst (mol %)
base
T (°C)
yield (%)
er
1
CH2Cl2
5 (20)
iPr2NEt
rt
30
62:38
2
MeCN
5 (20)
iPr2NEt
rt
58
70:30
3
DMF
5 (20)
iPr2NEt
rt
65
89:11
4
DMF
5 (20)
iPr2NEt
0
73
90:10
5
DMF
5 (20)
0
66
>99:1
6
DMF
5 (10)
0
47
>99:1
7
DMF
9 (20)
0
8
96:4
8
DMF
10 (20)
0
0
All yields are isolated yields after
purification by column chromatography. Enantiomeric ratios are determined
by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis on a chiral
stationary phase. PNP = p-nitrophenyl.
All yields are isolated yields after
purification by column chromatography. Enantiomeric ratios are determined
by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis on a chiral
stationary phase. PNP = p-nitrophenyl.With the optimized conditions in
hand, the steric and electronic
parameters of the process were investigated. A variety of α,β-unsaturated
aryl esters with electron-withdrawing β substituents were subjected
to the optimized reaction conditions, with the results presented in Scheme .
Scheme 2
Scope and Limitations
of Dimethyl Malonate Addition to α,β-Unsaturated
Esters
(2R,3S)-HyperBTM was used, and the product has the opposite absolute
configuration to that shown.
All yields are isolated yields after purification by column chromatography.
Enantiomeric ratios are determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary
phase. PNP, p-nitrophenyl; TCP, 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl.
Scope and Limitations
of Dimethyl Malonate Addition to α,β-Unsaturated
Esters
(2R,3S)-HyperBTM was used, and the product has the opposite absolute
configuration to that shown.All yields are isolated yields after purification by column chromatography.
Enantiomeric ratios are determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary
phase. PNP, p-nitrophenyl; TCP, 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl.Model β-trifluoromethyl α,β-unsaturated p-nitrophenyl ester 6 and β-trifluoromethyl
α,β-unsaturated 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl (TCP) ester 11 performed similarly in the reaction conditions, providing
66 and 63% yields, respectively, with complete enantioselectivity
(>99:1 er) in both cases. This suggests that p-nitrophenoxide
and 2,4,6-trichlorophenoxide are both capable of facilitating catalyst
turnover to propagate the reaction. The reaction can be performed
on a gram scale (3.8 mmol) to provide compound 8a in
a 60% yield and 99:1 er. To demonstrate the utility of p-nitrophenyl esters,[15c] compound 8a was derivatized in situ via the addition
of benzylamine to produce the amide 8b. The absolute
configuration within compound 22 was unambiguously determined
by single-crystal X-ray analysis to be the S enantiomer,
with the configuration of all other examples assigned by analogy.
Extension of this protocol to the use of alternative β-substituted
a,β-unsaturated PNP esters gave product yields ranging from
37 to 67% with high levels of enantioselectivity (from 85:15 to >99:1
er). The enantioselectivity was complete for all β-perhalogenated
examples 20–22 (β-C2F5, β-CF2Cl, and β-CF2Br), with lower enantioselectivity observed for β-ester 23 (98:2 er), β-ketone 24 (97:3 er), and
β-CHF219 (85:15 er). Because CHF2 functions as a bioisostere for an alcohol,[18] the hydrogen-bonding abilities of these three substrates
may contribute to the slightly diminished enantiomeric ratios. The
ethyl ester 23 constitutes the first highly enantioselective
addition of malonate to unsymmetric fumaric ester and proceeds with
complete regioselectivity [20:1 regioselectivity ratio (rr)]. Additionally,
the labile PNP ester offers the opportunity for facile differentiation
between the two ester moieties of fumaric ester. Interestingly, full
regioselectivity is also observed for the aryl ketone substrate 24. This highlights that the activated electrophilic α,β-unsaturated
acyl isothiouronium intermediate can override the inherent selectivity
of the parent molecule to provide exclusive Michael addition to the
α,β-unsaturated PNP ester. Although promising, limitations
of the methodology include the requirement of an activating β-electron-withdrawing
substituent. Alternative substrates, such as β-methyl and β-phenyl
α,β-unsaturated PNP esters 25 and 26 did not provide the desired Michael addition product, returning
only starting material. The β,β-disubstituted fumaric
ester 27 also provided no desired product, and the incorporation
of a strongly withdrawing trifluoromethyl substituent in the α
position for compound 28 instead of the β position
was not supported.The variability of the nucleophilic partner
was then explored,
commencing with the alkyl malonate series (Scheme ). Gratifyingly, in addition to dimethyl
malonate, dimethyl fluoromalonate provided the desired fluorinated
tetrasubstituted carbon-containing product 37 in 82%
yield and 98:2 er; however, dimethyl methylmalonate provided no desired
product likely as a result of steric hindrance at the nucleophilic
site. Ethyl, isopropyl, benzyl, and tert-butyl malonates
were then examined and showed a decrease in yield correlating with
increasing steric bulk within the nucleophile: ethyl (43%) 38, isopropyl (32%) 39, and tert-butyl
(0%) malonates, while the 2-fluorobenzyl malonate and benzyl malonate
gave the desired products 40 and 41 in 81
and 72% yields, respectively. The relatively high yields obtained
when using benzyl malonates may result from π-stacking interactions
with the α,β-unsaturated acyl ammonium complex. All examples 37–44 provided complete enantioselectivity
of >99:1 er. With the performance of the reaction in MeCN and addition
of catalytic diisopropylethylamine, malononitrile could be used, giving
compound 42 in 48% yield with >99:1 er. Dithiomalonates
are valuable substrates as a result of their ability to be converted
into aldehydes and ketones more easily than their ester counterparts.[19] Odorless S,S-bis(4-tert-butyl)benzyl)propanebis(thiolate) in
MeCN with catalytic diisopropylethylamine gave the desired product 43 as a precipitate after 3 h in 58% yield and >99:1 er.
To
the best of our knowledge, these represent the first example of malononitrile
or dithiomalonate addition in an enantioselective fashion to an α,β-unsaturated
ester. Finally, β-ketoesters have been previously demonstrated
to provide access to dihydropyrans in HyperBTM-catalyzed reactions
of homoanhydrides. This reaction also proceeded smoothly with α,β-unsaturated
PNP ester to provide compound 44 in 66% yield and 99:1
er. This example does not use the ability of p-nitrophenoxide
to reform the ester, with turnover instead facilitated by the nascent
enolate. In comparison to the use of a homoanhydride substrate, use
of the ester starting material represents better atom economy with p-nitrophenol as the only byproduct and does not require
an excess of the isothiouronium precursor.
Scheme 3
Scope and Limitations
of the Addition of Nucleophiles to β-Trifluoromethyl
α,β-Unsaturated PNP Ester
(2R,3S)-HyperBTM was used, and the product has the
opposite absolute
configuration to that shown.
In MeCN, and 10% diisopropylethyl amine was added.
Complete in 5 h.
Complete in 3 h.
All yields are isolated yields after purification
by column chromatography. Enantiomeric ratios are determined by HPLC
analysis on a chiral stationary phase.
Scope and Limitations
of the Addition of Nucleophiles to β-Trifluoromethyl
α,β-Unsaturated PNP Ester
(2R,3S)-HyperBTM was used, and the product has the
opposite absolute
configuration to that shown.In MeCN, and 10% diisopropylethyl amine was added.Complete in 5 h.Complete in 3 h.All yields are isolated yields after purification
by column chromatography. Enantiomeric ratios are determined by HPLC
analysis on a chiral stationary phase.On
the basis of prior investigations[15b] and
in combination with density functional theory (DFT) studies
[M06-2X/6-31G(d,p)/IEFPCM optimized, see Supporting Information for details] based on methodology introduced by
Wang et al.,[20] the proposed catalytic cycle
for the transformation is illustrated in Scheme . Acylation of HyperBTM 5 by
the α,β-unsaturated PNP ester and displacement of p-nitrophenoxide were calculated to be rate-limiting (ΔG⧧ = 52.8 kJ mol–1),
forming the corresponding α,β-unsaturated isothiouronium
ion pair. This electrophilic complex is then engaged by the malonate
anion in a stereoselective Michael addition through transition state 49. Within this transition state, the isothiouronium adopts
a s-cis conformation, with an stabilizing syn-coplanar 1,5-S···O chalcogen bond (no to σ*S–C)[19−23] providing a conformational lock. To minimize 1,2
strain, the aryl stereodirecting unit adopts a pseudo-axial orientation,
promoting facial selectivity in the Michael addition. This transition
state is further stabilized by two weak CH···O interactions
between ortho-C–H of the stereodirecting phenyl
substituent and C–H α to positively charged nitrogen
of acylated HyperBTM with the anionic malonate. Malonate addition
to the electrophile is computed to be irreversible, and anti addition to the stereodirecting phenyl group is favored over the
corresponding diastereomeric transition state by ΔΔG⧧ = 17.5 kJ mol–1 (Table
S1, Supporting Information). This leads
to preferential formation of the (S)-enantiomer of
the product and is consistent with the level of enantioselectivity
observed experimentally (>99:1 er). Resultant isothiouronium enolate
is protonated, presumably by p-nitrophenol, providing p-nitrophenoxide necessary to complete catalytic turnover[15] and generate the Michael addition product.
Scheme 4
Proposed Catalytic Cycle [M06-2X/6-31G(d,p)/IEFPCM Optimized]: TS
to (S)-Product Enantiomer
To conclude, the isothiourea-catalyzed addition of malonates and
malonate derivatives to α,β-unsaturated p-nitrophenyl esters is disclosed. The reaction exploits the multifunctional
nature of p-nitrophenoxide as a (1) leaving group,
(2) proton shuttle, and (3) secondary nucleophile to provide catalytic
turnover without the need for a pendent nucleophile within malonate.
A variety of α,β-unsaturated aryl ester electrophiles
containing β-electron-withdrawing substituents and malonate
nucleophiles were tolerated in good yield and excellent enantioselectivity
(typically >99:1 er). Exquisite regioselectivity was observed in
examples
with competing Michael addition reaction sites. Finally, DFT studies
identified Michael addition of malonate to the chiral isothiouronium
ion intermediate to be stereodetermining, consistent with experimental
observations.
Authors: Claire M Young; Alex Elmi; Dominic J Pascoe; Rylie K Morris; Calum McLaughlin; Andrew M Woods; Aileen B Frost; Alix de la Houpliere; Kenneth B Ling; Terry K Smith; Alexandra M Z Slawin; Patrick H Willoughby; Scott L Cockroft; Andrew D Smith Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Tim Gatzenmeier; Philip S J Kaib; Julia B Lingnau; Richard Goddard; Benjamin List Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Chanan D Sessler; Martin Rahm; Sabine Becker; Jacob M Goldberg; Fang Wang; Stephen J Lippard Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Anastassia Matviitsuk; Mark D Greenhalgh; Diego-Javier Barrios Antúnez; Alexandra M Z Slawin; Andrew D Smith Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 15.336