| Literature DB >> 35651767 |
Samantha Higgins1, Sudip Biswas2, Nicolas K Goff1, Endang M Septiningsih2, Dmitry Kurouski1,3.
Abstract
Metal toxicities can be detrimental to a plant health, as well as to the health of animals and humans that consume such plants. Metal content of plants can be analyzed using colorimetric, atomic absorption- or mass spectroscopy-based methods. However, these techniques are destructive, costly and laborious. In the current study, we investigate the potential of Raman spectroscopy (RS), a modern spectroscopic technique, for detection and identification of metal toxicities in rice. We modeled medium and high levels of iron and aluminum toxicities in hydroponically grown plants. Spectroscopic analyses of their leaves showed that both iron and aluminum toxicities can be detected and identified with ∼100% accuracy as early as day 2 after the stress initiation. We also showed that diagnostics accuracy was very high not only on early, but also on middle (day 4-day 8) and late (day 10-day 14) stages of the stress development. Importantly this approach only requires an acquisition time of 1 s; it is non-invasive and non-destructive to plants. Our findings suggest that if implemented in farming, RS can enable pre-symptomatic detection and identification of metallic toxins that would lead to faster recovery of crops and prevent further damage.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; metal toxicity; non-invasive diagnostics; plants; rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35651767 PMCID: PMC9149412 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.754735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Percent accuracy of stress vs. healthy over 2 weeks.
| Accuracy of stress vs. Healthy each day | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| D2 | D4 | D6 | D8 | D10 | D12 | D14 | |
| Al High | 100% | 82% | 100% | 92% | 94% | 90% | 96% |
| Al Medium | 100% | 94% | 100% | 100% | 74% | 100% | 94% |
| Fe High | 92% | 82% | 100% | 100% | 100% | – | – |
| Fe Medium | 100% | 74% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
Percent accuracy from binary model to distinguish between stressed plant and healthy plants.
| Stress vs. Healthy | |||
|
| |||
| Al | Fe | Healthy Avg. | |
| High stress | 88.60% | 87.23% | 88.29% |
| Medium stress | 94.90% | 88.03% | 91.00% |
FIGURE 1Raman spectra collected from leaves of healthy (green) and Fe stressed (red) at day 10 with high (A) and medium (B) levels of Fe. Spectra normalized on CH2 vibrations (1,440 cm-1) present in nearly all classes in biological molecules [marked by asterisks (*)].
Vibrational bands and their assignments for spectra collected from rice leaves.
| Band (cm–1) | Vibrational mode | Assignment |
| 520 | ν(C-O-C) Glycosidic | Carbohydrates ( |
| 747 | γ(C–O-H) of COOH | Pectin ( |
| 915 | ν(C-O-C) In-plane, | Cellulose, phenylpropanoids ( |
| 1,000 | In-plane CH3 rocking of polyene aromatic ring of phenylalanine | Carotenoids ( |
| 1,047 | ν(C-O)+ν(C-C)+δ(C-O-H) | Cellulose, phenylpropanoids ( |
| 1,085 | ν(C-O)+ν(C-C)+δ(C-O-H) | Carbohydrates ( |
| 1,155 | C-C Stretching; ν(C-O-C), ν(C-C) in glycosidic linkages, asymmetric ring breathing | Carotenoids ( |
| 1,184 | ν(C-O-H) Next to aromatic ring+σ(CH) | Carotenoids ( |
| 1,218 | δ(C-C-H) | Carotenoids ( |
| 1,265 | Guaiacyl ring breathing, C-O stretching (aromatic); -C=C- | Phenylpropanoids ( |
| 1,288 | δ(C-C-H) | Aliphatics ( |
| 1,326 | δCH2 Bending | Aliphatics, cellulose, phenylpropanoids ( |
| 1,382 | δCH2 Bending | Aliphatics ( |
| 1,440–1,488 | δ(CH2) | Aliphatics ( |
| 1,525 | -C=C- (in-plane) | Carotenoids ( |
| 1,601–1,630 | ν(C-C) Aromatic ring+σ(CH) | Phenylpropanoids ( |
| 1,654 | -C= C-, C=O Stretching, amide I | Proteins ( |
FIGURE 2Raman spectra collected from leaves of (A) Al High (red) vs. Healthy (green) on day 14; (B) Al Medium (red) vs. Healthy (green) on day 14. Spectra normalized on CH2 vibrations (1,440 cm-1) present in nearly all classes in biological molecules [marked by asterisks (*)].
FIGURE 3Comparison of plant height over 2 weeks, showing healthy vs. stress. Fe died after day 10. Each bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 14). Different letters in each graph (a–k) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, ANOVA and Duncan’s test).