| Literature DB >> 35651332 |
Seongjun So1, Song Lee2, Yeonmi Lee3, Jongsuk Han3, Soonsuk Kang3, Jiwan Choi3, Bitnara Kim3, Deokhoon Kim4, Hyun-Ju Yoo5, In-Kyong Shim5, Ju-Yun Oh5, Yu-Na Lee5, Song-Cheol Kim6, Eunju Kang3.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a serious disease in which blood sugar levels rise abnormally because of failed insulin production or decreased insulin sensitivity. Although many studies are being conducted for the treatment or early diagnosis of DM, it is not fully understood how mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) abnormalities appear in patients with DM. Here, we induced iPSCs from fibroblasts, PBMCs, or pancreatic cells of three patients with type 2 DM (T2D) and three patients with non-diabetes counterpart. The mtDNA mutations were detected randomly without any tendency among tissues or patients. In T2D patients, 62% (21/34) of iPSC clones harbored multiple mtDNA mutations, of which 37% were homoplasmy at the 100% mutation level compared to only 8% in non-diabetes. We next selected iPSC clones that were a wild type or carried mutations and differentiated into pancreatic cells. Oxygen consumption rates were significantly lower in cells carrying mutant mtDNA. Additionally, the mutant cells exhibited decreased production of insulin and reduced secretion of insulin in response to glucose. Overall, the results suggest that screening mtDNA mutations in iPSCs from patients with T2D is an essential step before pancreatic cell differentiation for disease modeling or autologous cell therapy. [BMB Reports 2022; 55(9): 453-458].Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35651332 PMCID: PMC9537029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMB Rep ISSN: 1976-6696 Impact factor: 5.041
mtDNA mutations in iPSCs derived from patients with T2D
| Subject | Cell origin | Position | Locus | Effect | Major haplotype | Parental cells (%) | Individual iPSC clone (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||||
| T2D-1 | Fib | 3315 | ND1 | Syn | G | ND | A (48) | ND | ND | ||
| 5226 | ND2 | Non-syn | G | A (100) | |||||||
| 9018 | ATPase6 | Syn | T | C (39) | |||||||
| 12650 | ND5 | Non-syn | T | C (56) | |||||||
| Blo | 2613 | 16S | rRNA | T | ND | C (100) | ND | ND | C (100) | ||
| 10400 | ND3 | Syn | T | C (100) | |||||||
| 11002 | ND4 | Syn | A | G (100) | C (100) | ||||||
| 16005 | ATT/P | MitoTIP 25.60% | T | C (7) | |||||||
| 16129 | ATT/CR | Non-coding | G | A (78) | |||||||
| T2D-2 | Fib | 5654 | A | MitoTIP 29.80% | T | C (13) | C (10) | ND | |||
| 5655 | A | MitoTIP 26.70% | T | C (3) | |||||||
| 6207 | COI | Non-syn | T | C (6) | |||||||
| 9928 | COIII | Non-syn | A | G (11) | |||||||
| 11976 | ND4 | Non-syn | A | G (64) | G (55) | ||||||
| 13726 | ND5 | Non-syn | G | T (13) | |||||||
| 14260 | ND6 | Syn | A | G (100) | G (100) | G (100) | |||||
| Blo | 874 | 12S | rRNA | G | ND | A (5) | |||||
| 2220 | 16S | rRNA | A | G (8) | |||||||
| 4703 | ND2 | Syn | T | C (5) | |||||||
| 6458 | COI | Syn | C | T (100) | |||||||
| 6678 | COI | Non-syn | A | G (100) | |||||||
| 7970 | COII | Non-syn | G | A (13) | |||||||
| 13312 | ND5 | Non-syn | T | C (75) | |||||||
| 14900 | Cytb | Non-syn | G | A (13) | |||||||
| Pan | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||
| T2D-3 | Blo | 6023 | COI | Syn | A | G (2) | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| 10535 | ND4L | Syn | T | C (50) | |||||||
| Pan | 302 | CR:HVS2/ | Non-coding | A | ND | ND | ND | C (31) | |||
| 9591 | COIII | Non-syn | G | A (55) | |||||||
| 10535 | ND4L | Syn | T | C (55) | |||||||
ND: not detected, Gray block: no iPSC clone, %: heteroplasmy.
mtDNA mutations in iPSCs derived from patients with ND
| Subject | Cell origin | Position | Locus | Effect | Major haplotype | Parental cells (%) | Individual iPSC clones (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||||
| ND-1 | Fib | 1351 | 12S | rRNA | G | A (45) | |||||
| 10158 | ND3 | Non-syn | T | C (6) | |||||||
| 14287 | ND6 | Syn | A | T (36) | T (44) | T (45) | T (47) | T (39) | |||
| 15077 | Cytb | Non-syn | G | C (14) | |||||||
| Blo | 7780 | COII | Syn | A | G (78) | ||||||
| 13726 | ND5 | Non-syn | G | T (7) | T (4) | ||||||
| 14287 | ND6 | Syn | A | T (35) | T (44) | T (14) | T (44) | ||||
| 15077 | Cytb | Non-syn | G | A (12) | |||||||
| 15773 | Cytb | Non-syn | G | A (24) | |||||||
| Pan | 9478 | COIII | Non-syn | T | ND | C (100) | |||||
| 13726 | ND5 | Non-syn | G | T (12) | |||||||
| 14268 | ND6 | Syn | G | T (14) | T (100) | T (100) | |||||
| 14287 | ND6 | Syn | A | T (34) | T (50) | T (45) | |||||
| 15087 | Cytb | Non-syn | A | G (4) | |||||||
| 15096 | Cytb | Non-syn | T | C (4) | |||||||
| ND-2 | Fib | 13726 | A | MitoTIP 29.80% | G | T (7) | |||||
| Blo | ND | ||||||||||
| Pan | 2976 | 16S | rRNA | G | A (48) | ND | |||||
| 4028 | ND1 | Non-syn | T | G (5) | G (12) | G (5) | |||||
| 6026 | COI | Syn | G | C (5) | |||||||
| 11379 | ND4 | Non-syn | T | C (6) | |||||||
| 14343 | ND6 | Non-syn | A | A (16) | A (23) | ||||||
| ND-3 | Fib | 3047 | 16S | rRNA | G | ND | A (8) | ||||
| Blo | 13107 | ND5 | Non-syn | A | A (40) | A (8) | A (39) | ||||
| Pan | 4298 | I | MitoTIP pathogenic (83.50%) | G | ND | A (52) | ND | A (47) | |||
| 4713 | ND2 | ND2:G82TERM | G | A (74) | |||||||
ND: not detected, Gray block: no iPSC clone, %: heteroplasmy.
Fig. 1mtDNA mutations in patients with ND- and T2D-iPSCs. (A) The number of mtDNA mutations in iPSC clones derived from patients with ND and T2D. There were no significant differences between ND and T2D. (B) The proportion of iPSCs with and without mtDNA mutations in ND and T2D. n = the number of iPSC clones. (C) Heteroplasmy proportion of whole mtDNA mutations in iPSCs. The proportion of homoplasmic mutations was only 8% in ND compared to 37% in T2D. N = the number of mtDNA mutations (D) Heteroplasmy distribution of mtDNA mutations found in ND and T2D. The heteroplasmy of mutations found in T2D was higher than that of ND (*P < 0.05). (E) Probability of obtaining iPSCs with homoplasmic mtDNA mutations. iPSC clones with homoplasmy were found with a probability of 7% in ND and 24% in T2D. (F) Distribution of mtDNA mutations in ND and T2D. The ratio of mutations in the RNA region was higher in T2D than in ND (23% vs. 8%). iPSC: induced pluripotent stem cell; mtDNA: mitochondrial DNA; ND: non-diabetes; T2D: type 2 diabetes.
Fig. 2mtDNA mutations affect the dysfunction of differentiated pancreatic cells. (A) The gene expression of PPC, PDX1, NGN3, and NKX6.1, relative to GAPDH in T2D-2 BiPSCs. All gene expressions in clone 1 were significantly lower compared to other clones (*P < 0.05, 2 biological replicates, 3 technical replicates). (B) PPC-gene expression was inversely proportional to the sum of the heteroplasmy of mtDNA mutations in the positions of change of the amino acid, and RNA. As heteroplasmy increases, the expression of PPC-related genes decreases. (C) Morphology of clones 1 and 2 and pancreatic spheroids derived from them. Clone 1 had 100% mt6678A>G and 13% mt7970G>A mutations in the non-syn protein-coding region and clone 2 had only 5% mt874G>A mutations in the rRNA region. Both clones showed similar spheroid formation. Scale bar = 200 μm. (D) Immunocytochemistry examining the INSULIN (green) expression of pancreatic spheroids. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 20 μm. (E) Analysis of OCR levels in differentiated pancreatic cells. In clone 1, all OCRs were significantly lower compared with clone 2 (*P < 0.05, 2 biological replicates, and 3 technical replicates). (F) Insulin production in pancreatic spheroids derived from iPSC clones. The insulin in clone 2 was significantly higher than that of clone 1 (*P < 0.05). (G) GSIS analysis of pancreatic spheroids. Clone 2-derived pancreatic spheroids increased the amount of insulin secretion when glucose concentration increased, whereas clone 1 did not (*P < 0.05, 2 biological replicates, 3 technical replicates). PPC: pancreatic progenitor cell; DAPI: 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; OCR: oxygen consumption rate; GSIS: glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.