| Literature DB >> 35649657 |
Matthew D Hellmann1, Justin Gainor2, Kurt A Schalper3,4, Miguel Lopez de Rodas5, Venkata Nagineni5, Arvind Ravi6, Ila J Datar5, Mari Mino-Kenudson7, German Corredor8, Cristian Barrera8, Lindsey Behlman5, David L Rimm5, Roy S Herbst4, Anant Madabhushi8,9, Jonathan W Riess10, Vamsidhar Velcheti11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) reflect adaptive antitumor immune responses in cancer and are generally associated with favorable prognosis. However, the relationships between TILs subsets and their spatial arrangement with clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains less explored.Entities:
Keywords: immunotherapy; lung neoplasms; lymphocytes, tumor-infiltrating; programmed cell death 1 receptor; tumor biomarkers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35649657 PMCID: PMC9161072 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004440
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 12.469
Clinicopathological description of non-small cell lung cancer cohort
| Variable | Stratification | #Cases SU2C |
| Age | <65 | 72 (49.3%) |
| ≥65 | 74 (50.7%) | |
| Gender | Male | 78 (49.1%) |
| Female | 81 (50.9%) | |
| Smoking | Smoker | 128 (81.0%) |
| Non-smoker | 30 (19.0%) | |
| Stage | I–II | 32 (20.4%) |
| III–IV | 125 (79.6%) | |
| Histology | Adenocarcinoma | 108 (73.0%) |
| Squamous | 40 (27.0%) | |
| PD-L1 status | PD-L1 <1% | 58 (41.4%) |
| PD-L1 ≥1% | 72 (58.6%) | |
| Treatment | Nivolumab | 126 (83.5%) |
| Pembrolizumab | 15 (9.9%) | |
| Atezolizumab | 10 (6.6%) |
PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1.
Figure 1TILs show variable distribution in NSCLC and they are located preferentially in the stromal compartment. (A) Representative multicolor images of TILs staining, tissue segmentation and cell phenotyping. Left panel: Representative image after scanning. Middle panel: Compartmentalization of tissue in stroma (red) and tumor (green). Right panel: Phenotyping of individual cells. (B) Mean density distribution for CD4+ (left panel), CD8+ (middle panel) and CD20+ cells (right panel) for each patient across the cohort (n=179). (C) Percentage of TILs represented by each lymphocyte subset in each patient across the cohort. (D) Correlation between CD8+ T cells and CD4+ and CD20+ cells. Results show Pearson’s correlation coefficient. (E) Bar plots for the mean density of TILs by tissue compartment. (F) Pie charts representing the percentage of cells in the stroma (top) and tumor (bottom). Inset shows percentage of TIL subsets. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.
Figure 2Stromal CD8+ effector T cells are associated with better outcome after ICI in NSCLC cases with PD-L1 expressing tumors. (A) TILs density by compartment based on PD-L1 status. (B–E) Forest plots showing the PFS and OS Hazard ratios calculated for the continuous levels of each TIL marker using a Cox univariate model in PD-L1 positive (B and C) and negative cases (D and E). (F–I) Kaplan-Meier graphical analysis of the PFS and OS of cases in the cohort stratified by high (top 15% of scores) and low (bottom 85% of scores) density of stromal CD8+ T cells in the PD-L1 positive and negative group. ICI, immune checkpoint blockers; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; PFS, progression-free survival; TIL, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte.
Figure 3The TCR fraction is associated with better outcome after ICI in PD-L1 positive NSCLC cases. (A) Overview of the TCR burden analysis protocol. (B) Forest plots showing the PFS and OS Hazard ratios of cases in the NSCLC cohort using a Cox univariate model. Cases were stratified by PD-L1 expression into positive (B) and negative (C) by immunohistochemistry. (D). Kaplan-Meier graphical analysis of PFS (D) and OS (E) of NSCLC cases stratified by the median TCR fraction and by PD-L1 status (F and G). ICI, Immune checkpoint inhibitors; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; PFS, progression-free survival; TCR, T cell receptor.
Figure 4Elevated T cell exhaustion/dysfuntion markers are associated with worse outcomes after ICI in NSCLC. (A) Representative multicolor immunofluorescence captions showing DAPI (dark blue), CD3 (cyan), LAG-3 (orange), PD-1 (red) and TIM-3 (green) staining in NSCLC cases. (B) Bar plot for the distribution of the normalized expression of exhaustion markers in the CD3 compartment across the cohort. (C–E) Correlation between expression of TIM-3 and LAG-3 (C), LAG-3 and PD-1 (D), PD-1 and TIM-3 (E). Results show Pearson’s r correlation coefficient. (F–K) Kaplan-Meier graphical analysis of the progression-free survival and overall survival for the normalized QIF scores for LAG-3, PD-1 and TIM-3 measured selectively in CD3+ T cells. DAPI, 4’,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; TIM-3, T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3; LAG-3, lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3); PD-1, programmed cell death protein-1; QIF, quantitative immunofluorescence.
Figure 5High spatial immune heterogeneity is associated with worse survival after ICI in NSCLC. (A) Graphical representation of cases with low RQI (left) and high RQI (right) immune heterogeneity scores. (B) Violin plot showing the RQI in individual cell subsets obtained from NSCLCs in the cohort. (C) Bar Plot showing the distribution of the for the integrated RQI scores calculated from all cell subsets in the cohort cases. (D–E) Survival analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival of NSCLC cases stratified by the mean integrated RQI of the cohort. (F–G) Survival analysis of cases stratified by the mean integrated RQI based on the PD-L1 status. NSCLC, non-small lung cancer; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; RQI, Rao’s Q Index.