| Literature DB >> 35649615 |
Vivien Hohberg1, Jan-Niklas Kreppke2, Jan Kohl3, Eleonora Seelig4,5, Lukas Zahner2, Fiona Streckmann2,6, Markus Gerber2, Daniel König3,7, Oliver Faude2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The widespread prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) not only influences patients' daily lives but also has an economic impact on society. Increasing physical activity and a healthy diet can delay the progression of T2D. Although there are evidence-based recommendations on diet and physical activity, patients with T2D have difficulties implementing them. An appropriate lifestyle intervention can address this problem. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is based on the need to develop an intervention that helps patients to establish behavioural changes in order to achieve glycaemic control. The intervention will be evaluated in a monocentric, open-label, pragmatic, two-arm randomised controlled trial with a sample ratio of 1:1 and a parallel design. This superiority study will be conducted in Switzerland. All enrolled patients (n=90) will receive the standard medical treatment for T2D. The intervention group will receive personal health coaching by telephone and access to a smartphone and web application for 1 year. The control group will receive access to the application for 1 year and a one-time written diet and exercise recommendation. The primary outcomes are objectively measured physical activity and glycated haemoglobin. Secondary outcomes are self-reported physical activity, nutrition, cognitive mediators of changes in sport-related behaviour, blood values, medication and nutritional supplements, anthropometric data, quality of life, neuropathy and cost-effectiveness. All outcomes will be measured at baseline, at 27 weeks after inclusion and at 54 weeks after inclusion. The recruitment of participants and the measurements will be completed after 2 years. Linear mixed-effects models will be applied for each outcome variable to analyse the intervention effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee North-western and Central Switzerland in February 2021 (ref: 2020-02755). All participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN79457541. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SPORTS MEDICINE
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35649615 PMCID: PMC9161069 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 3.006
Schedule for enrolment, interventions and assessments
| Time point | Measurement | Evaluator | Enrolment | Allocation | T0 | T1 | T2 |
| Screening | X | ||||||
| Informed consent | X | ||||||
| Allocation | X | ||||||
| Intervention group | |||||||
| TAU (medical diabetes treatment) | X | X | X | X | |||
| dbcoach (telephone coaching, app) | X | X | X | X | |||
| Control group | |||||||
| TAU (medical diabetes treatment) | X | X | X | X | |||
| dbcoach-app, written recommendation | X | X | X | X | |||
| Inclusion criteria | |||||||
| Age >18 years old | Screening | Study team | X | ||||
| HbA1c>7.5 % | Screening | Physician | X | ||||
| T2D according to ADA | Screening | Physician | X | ||||
| Sufficient knowledge of German language | Screening | Physician | X | ||||
| Access to ongoing diabetes care | Screening | Physician | X | ||||
| Internet access | Screening | Study team | X | ||||
| Physically inactive | Screening | Study team | X | ||||
| Primary outcomes | |||||||
| HbA1c | Medical report | Physician | X | X | X | ||
| Objectively assessed physical activity | ActiGraph wGT3X-BT | Objective | X | X | X | ||
| Secondary outcomes | |||||||
| Self-reported physical activity | SIMPAQ questionnaire | Self-rating | X | X | X | ||
| Cognitive mediators of behaviour change | Sport related: | Self-rating | |||||
|
Goal intention | X | X | X | ||||
|
Self-concordance | X | X | X | ||||
|
Consequence experience | X | X | X | ||||
|
Barrier management | X | X | X | ||||
|
Action planning | X | X | X | ||||
|
Self-efficacy | X | X | X | ||||
| Nutrition | Nutrition diary, Healthy Eating Index | Self-rating | X | X | X | ||
| Nutrition behaviour | SEV questionnaire | Self-rating | X | X | X | ||
| Quality of life | SF-8 questionnaire | Self-rating | X | X | X | ||
| Neuropathy | FACT questionnaire | Self-rating | X | X | X | ||
| Medication | Medical report | Physician | X | X | X | ||
| Food supplements | Medical report | Physician | X | X | X | ||
| Anthropometry | Medical report | Physician | X | X | X | ||
| Blood values | Medical report | Physician | X | X | X | ||
| Comorbidities | Medical report | Physician | X | X | X | ||
| Cost-effectiveness | Tarmed V.1.09 | Study team | X | X | X | ||
| Demographic variables | Demographic questionnaire | Self-rating | X | ||||
ADA, American Diabetes Association; FACT, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; SEV, Eating Behaviour Scale; SF-8, Short Form-8 Health Survey; SIMPAQ, Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire; TAU, treatment as usual; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 1Study flow chart based on Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials. TAU, treatment as usual.
Elements of the dbcoach intervention
| Component | Time of event | Duration | Content/aim | Task for participants before the next coaching |
| Coaching 1 | Week 1 | 30 min |
Give overview of coaching process Build trust with coach Establish compliance with the programme |
Test functions of the app |
| Coaching 2 | Week 2 | 30 min |
Provide information about targeted health behaviour Clarify advantages of the new health behaviour Strengthen expectations of consequences |
Monitor nutrition and exercise Read information on diet approaches and exercise recommendations |
| Coaching 3 | Week 3 | 30 min |
Determine health goals Set nutrition and physical-activity goals Collect ideas for action planning |
Experiment with exercise and nutrition ideas |
| Coaching 4 | Week 4 | 30 min |
Discuss implementation of nutrition ideas Concretize ideas and create nutrition plan Review nutrition plan |
Implement nutrition plan |
| Coaching 5 | Week 5 | 30 min |
Discuss implementation of ideas for physical activity Concretise ideas and create physical-activity plan Review physical-activity plan |
Implement physical-activity plan |
| Coaching 6 | Week 6 | 30 min |
Identify barriers to physical activity and healthy eating Create individual barrier management |
Use barrier management Note further barriers |
| Coaching 7–24 | Weeks 8–54 | 30 min |
Address individual goals, needs and problems Use of individual BCTs |
Set individual tasks |
BCTs, Behaviour change techniques.
Description of the measured cognitive mediators of behaviour changes related to physical activity
| Cognitive mediators of behaviour changes related to physical activity | Description |
| Goal intention | Goal intentions are the result of motivational processes of considering and choosing processes between the different simultaneously existing needs of a person. |
| Self-concordance | Self-concordance expresses the degree to which goal intention is consistent with a person’s other individual interests and values. |
| Self-efficacy | Self-efficacy is the belief in performing a physical activity programme over a longer period of time. |
| Action planning | In action planning, a person determines when, where and how to begin or continue an intended action. |
| Barriers and barrier management | Situational barriers describe physical, social and psychological conditions that can impede or jeopardise the implementation of a behavioural intention. activity. |
| Consequence experience | As a construct, consequence experience related to physical activity represent experiences with physical activity, exercise and sports. |