Literature DB >> 35649600

Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with cervical atypia in adolescent women with short-term or long-term use of oral contraceptives: a longitudinal study in HPV vaccinated women.

Indira Adhikari1, Tiina Eriksson2,3, Katja Harjula3, Mari Hokkanen3, Dan Apter4, Pekka Nieminen5, Tapio Luostarinen6, Matti Lehtinen3,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the relationship between Chlamydia trachomatis infection, duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use and cervical atypia among young adult Finnish women.
DESIGN: A longitudinal study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Women who were included in this study participated in a community-randomised trial on the effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and C. trachomatis screening at ages 18.5 and 22 years in Finland. They completed questionnaires on both visits about sexual behaviours. The cytology test results at age 18.5 and 22 years were also available for those women. The total number of participants in this study at 18.5 years of age were 11 701 and at 22 years of age were 6618. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: ORs with 95% CIs using univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association between C. trachomatis infection, duration of OC and squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL).
RESULTS: There were 940 cytological SIL cases at the first screening visit and 129 cytological SIL cases at the second screening visit. Among the 22 years old, more than fourfold adjusted risk of SIL was associated with C. trachomatis positivity. The HPV16/18, condom use, smoking and number of sexual partners adjusted joint effect of prolonged OC use and C. trachomatis was significantly increased (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 12.8) in the 22-year-old women. This observed joint effect was 1.6 times higher than expected on a multiplicative scale. On additive scale, the observed relative excess risk from interaction was 1.8.
CONCLUSION: The risk of SIL in HPV vaccinated women is significantly increased if they are C. trachomatis positive and have used OC for 5 or more years. The biological basis may be lack of condom facilitated protection against sexually transmitted diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00534638. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; gynaecological oncology; public health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35649600      PMCID: PMC9161064          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


The longitudinal study design allows the prospective evaluation of oral contraceptive use. The well-controlled sensitive testing of Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR. The inadequate data on barrier methods of contraception might have confounded the results.

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the most common sexually transmitted bacterial infection characterised by persistent inflammation of epithelial tissue and chronic, also neoplastic, disease sequelae.1 C. trachomatis is especially common in sexually active young women with early age at first intercourse, multiple sex partners and use of non-barrier contraceptive methods.2 Most notably, C. trachomatis infection is associated with the persistence of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.3 Like smoking, C. trachomatis infection is a cervical carcinogenesis cofactor possibly independent of HPV.4 5 On the other hand, concomitant infection with C. trachomatis and HPV types 18 or 45 is associated with synergistically increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3), that is, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL).6 The association between C. trachomatis infection and cervical neoplasia could be the result of confounding by overlapping HPV exposure and/or oral contraceptive (OC) use.7–10 While the role of C. trachomatis and HPV infections in cervical carcinogenesis has been documented,6–8 the interplay of C. trachomatis infection and duration of OC use has not been studied over time. In this study, we have evaluated the risk of cytological SIL associated with the duration of OC use among C. trachomatis positive and negative women. We have studied the joint effect of C. trachomatis infection and duration of OC use on the development of cytological SIL in a large community-randomised trial cohort followed-up for up to 10 years.11

Material and methods

Study conduct

The study material was obtained from the community-randomised trial on the effectiveness of gender-neutral or girls-only HPV vaccination strategies conducted in Finland.11 12 In 2007–2009, all 80 272 Finnish boys and girls (1992–1995 birth cohorts) resident in 33 Finnish communities were identified using Finnish Population Register in three study arms each with 11 communities. All the males and females received either Cervarix (HPV16/18) vaccine (90%) or Engerix (hepatitis B-virus, HBV) vaccine (10%) in arm A. All the females received either HPV vaccine (90%) or HBV vaccine (10%) and the males received HBV vaccine in arm B. In arm C all the males and females received the HBV vaccine. Virtually all 99.4% of the participants received all three vaccine doses at months 0, 1 and 6.13 In 2010–2014, all the 1992–1995 born female residents in the trial communities were invited at the age of 18.5 years for a follow-up visit. They were offered cross-vaccination with either HPV16/18-vaccine or HBV-vaccine, if they had not received them earlier in the trial. Cervical cytological sample taken by a study nurse and a self-collected cervico-vaginal sample for HPV and/or C. trachomatis testing were obtained.13 All the female participants during the follow-up agreed to participate in a C. trachomatis screening trial and filled in a questionnaire on demographics, life habits and sexual behaviour.13 Four years later (2014–2018) all the HPV16/18 vaccinated female participants were invited for the second follow-up visit at age 22 years. Again, cervical cytological sample and a self-collected cervico-vaginal sample for HPV and/or C. trachomatis testing were obtained, and the participants also filled in the questionnaires.13 In this study, we have four different types of datasets at both 18.5 years and 22 years of age: questionnaire dataset, C. trachomatis dataset, cytology dataset and HPV DNA dataset. All the four datasets were merged one-by-one at a time. All those which did not match/merge with any of the datasets were excluded from the study at the end (figure 1) of merging. The total number of study participants after merging all these datasets in this study at 18.5 years of age were 11 701 and at 22 years of age were 6618. The women were included if they merged with at least one or all the datasets. That is also the reason not all the merged women have complete data. However, during the analysis, complete case approach was applied and none of the missing values were included neither in adjusted nor in unadjusted analyses.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of female community randomised trial participants. 1852 participants at 18.5 years and 340 participants at 22 years of age were excluded from the study while merging the datasets as they did not merge with any of the other datasets. HBV, hepatitis B-virus; HPV, human papillomavirus.

Flow diagram of female community randomised trial participants. 1852 participants at 18.5 years and 340 participants at 22 years of age were excluded from the study while merging the datasets as they did not merge with any of the other datasets. HBV, hepatitis B-virus; HPV, human papillomavirus.

Patient and public involvement

The study presents analysis of secondary data. There was no patient and public involvement.

Laboratory analysis

The self-collected cervical samples were analysed for the presence of HPV-DNA and further identification of the detected HPV types 6/11/16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68 by PCR (MGP primers) and matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry.14 The DNA sequence specific for the presence of C. trachomatis in the sample was detected by commercial PCR (Abbott-TM).

Statistical analyses

The main independent variables of the study were C. trachomatis status at ages 18.5 and 22 years, and duration of OC use (≤2 years and >2 years at 18.5 years of age, ≤5 years and >5 years at 22 years of age). Information about OC use was available from the questionnaires. Years since start of OC use was calculated using questionnaire information about years between start of OC use and sexual debut and information about age at sexual debut.15 The endpoint was cytological SIL divided into low-grade SIL and HSIL. The questionnaire dataset, C. trachomatis result dataset, HPV and cytology dataset were merged using personal ID. ORs with 95% CI were calculated using logistic regression models to assess the risk of SIL associated with the C. trachomatis infection at age 18.5 and 22 years. In this study, we have interpreted OR as relative risk due to rare events. The risk estimates were adjusted to account for the potential confounding due to HPV DNA, condom use, number of sexual partners and smoking using multivariable logistic regression. Finally, the joint effect of duration of OC use and C. trachomatis was calculated and adjusted for potential confounders. In the main analysis, women with missing values on confounders were excluded from all regression models to ensure that the model included the same women (complete case analysis). As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the crude analysis including women with missing values on confounders, to see whether this changed our estimates. All analyses were done by using Stata V.14.0 (Stata Corp: release 14).

Results

At the first visit, the total number of cytological SIL cases was 940. The cytological results were missing for 781 participants out of 11 701 of the study participants (table 1). The number of cytological HSIL cases was 36 at 18.5 years of age. The baseline characteristics of 940 women with cytological SIL and 9980 women without cytological SIL were comparable. The age at first sexual intercourse, number of new sexual partners and OC use were materially similar in the SIL cases and healthy controls at the first visit (table 1). There were no notable differences in HPV16/18 positivity. Also smoking and condom use were comparable at 18.5 years of age (table 1).
Table 1

Cohort characteristics of study endpoints at 18.5 and at 22 years of age

CategoriesAt 18.5 yearsAt 22 years
SIL (N=940)No SIL (N=9980)SIL (N=129)No SIL (N=6489)
Age at first sexual intercourse
 8–13 years31 (3.3%)316 (3.2%)2 (1.5%)162 (2.5%)
 14–18 years712 (75.7%)7546 (75.6%)85 (65.9%)4392 (67.7%)
 19–22 yearsNANA13 (10.1%)697 (10.7%)
 Missing197 (21.0%)2118 (21.2%)29 (22.5%)1238 (19.1%)
New sexual partners last year (n)
 2 or less546 (58.0%)6068 (60.8%)61 (47.3%)4209 (64.9%)
 3 or more197 (21.0%)1793 (18.0%)39 (30.2%)1032 (15.9%)
 Missing197 (21.0%)2119 (21.2%)29 (22.5%)1248 (19.2%)
Current smoking
 No579 (61.6%)5971 (59.8%)49 (38.0%)3273 (50.4%)
 Yes297 (31.6%)3203 (32.1%)38 (29.5%)1518 (23.4%)
 Missing64 (6.8%)806 (8.1%)42 (32.5%)1698 (26.2%)
OC-use
 No152 (16.2%)1645 (16.5%)14 (10.8%)573 (8.8%)
 Yes591 (62.8%)6202 (62.1%)85 (65.9%)4648 (71.6%)
 Missing197 (21.0%)2133 (21.4%)30 (23.3%)1268 (19.6%)
Condom use last year
 Not at all182 (19.4%)1978 (19.8%)32 (24.8%)1965 (30.3%)
 Sometimes207 (22.0%)2216 (22.2%)24 (18.6%)1164 (17.9%)
 In half of the intercourse95 (10.1%)985 (9.90%)12 (9.3%)603 (9.3%)
 Almost always135 (14.4%)1160 (11.6%)21 (16.3%)669 (10.3%)
 Always111 (11.8%)1433 (14.4%)10 (7.7%)776 (12.0%)
 Missing210 (22.3%)2208 (22.1%)30 (23.3%)1312 (20.2%)
HPV16/18
 Negative886 (94.3%)9500 (95.2%)106 (82.2%)5307 (81.7%)
 Positive54 (5.70%)480 (4.80%)2 (1.5%)49 (0.8%)
 Missing*21 (16.3%)1133 (17.5%)

*Cytological results were missing for 781 of the HPV16/18 results among 18.5 years old.

HPV, human papillomavirus; OC, oral contraceptive; SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Cohort characteristics of study endpoints at 18.5 and at 22 years of age *Cytological results were missing for 781 of the HPV16/18 results among 18.5 years old. HPV, human papillomavirus; OC, oral contraceptive; SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesions. At the second visit, the total number of cytological SIL cases was 129 of 6618 (1.9%) of the study participants (table 1). The number of cytological HSIL cases was 27 at 22 years of age. At the second visit, while condom use did not differ between the 129 SIL cases and 6489 healthy controls, smoking and number of new sexual partners were somewhat higher in the SIL cases (table 1). There were double the SIL cases with three or more sexual partners compared with healthy controls. OC use was comparable between SIL cases and the healthy controls (table 1). In the univariable analysis, the risk of cytological SIL associated with C. trachomatis was slightly, although non-significantly increased (OR 1.1) at 18.5 years of age (table 2). There was no further risk after adjusting for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners (table 2). At 22 years of age, the crude risk of SIL was highly significantly increased (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.3) in C. trachomatis positive women compared with C. trachomatis negative women (table 2). In the multivariable analysis, the adjusted OR was still significantly high (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.2 to 8.5) among the C. trachomatis positive women (table 2). When we repeated the crude regression analysis including women with missing values on confounders, the results were virtually unchanged.
Table 2

Risk of cervical cytological squamous intraepithelial neoplasia by C. trachomatis at 18.5 and 22 years old

CategoryNSILAdjusted SIL*
nOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
At 18.5 years
Chlamydia seronegative women10 51290111
Chlamydia seropositive women408391.1 (0.8 to 1.6)1.0 (0.6 to 1.5)
At 22 years
Chlamydia seronegative women53528611
Chlamydia seropositive women198144.6 (2.6 to 8.3)4.3 (2.2 to 8.5)

N is the number of C. trachomatis in each age group. n is number of SIL cases.

*Adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners.

HPV, human papillomavirus; SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Risk of cervical cytological squamous intraepithelial neoplasia by C. trachomatis at 18.5 and 22 years old N is the number of C. trachomatis in each age group. n is number of SIL cases. *Adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners. HPV, human papillomavirus; SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesions. Finally, the joint effect of C. trachomatis and duration of OC use was assessed. Among the 18.5 years old, the joint effect of C. trachomatis and duration of OC use on SIL was OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.7). The separate effects of C. trachomatis and duration of OC use were insignificant (table 3). The risk estimates were adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners. The missing values were not included in the analyses.
Table 3

Risk of cervical cytological squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIL) by joint effect of duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use and C. trachomatis positivity at 18.5 years

Risk factorsNSILAdjusted SIL*
nOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
CT#Duration of OC use
00274623311
0136752980.9 (0.8 to 1.1)0.9 (0.7 to 1.1)
108870.9 (0.4 to 1.9)0.7 (0.3 to 1.7)
11126111.0 (0.5 to 1.8)0.9 (0.4 to 1.7)

In duration (0=5 or less than 5 years/short-term OC use, 1= more than 5 years/long-term OC use).

*Adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners.

CT, C. trachomatis (0= CT negative, 1=CT positive); HPV, human papillomavirus.

Risk of cervical cytological squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIL) by joint effect of duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use and C. trachomatis positivity at 18.5 years In duration (0=5 or less than 5 years/short-term OC use, 1= more than 5 years/long-term OC use). *Adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners. CT, C. trachomatis (0= CT negative, 1=CT positive); HPV, human papillomavirus. On the contrary, in the 22 years old, even after adjusting for the potential confounders (HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and number of sexual partners) the joint effect risk of cytological SIL was (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.7 to 12.8) in C. trachomatis positive women who had used OC for 5 or more than 5 years compared with C. trachomatis negative and short-term OC users (table 4). The individual adjusted effects of C. trachomatis and duration of OC use on SIL were (OR 2.9, 95% CI 0.8 to 10.3) and (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.9), respectively. Under a multiplicative model, the expected joint effect of C. trachomatis positivity and five or more than 5 years of OC use was (OR 2.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 14.0). The observed joint effect of 4.7 was 1.6 times higher than expected on a multiplicative scale. Under an additive scale, the relative excess risk from interaction was (OR 1.8, 95% CI −3.5 to 7.2). The missing values were not included in the analyses.
Table 4

Risk of cervical cytological squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIL) by joint effect of duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use and C. trachomatis positivity at 22 years

Risk FactorsNSILAdjusted SIL*
nOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
CT#Duration of OC use
0022933011
011958361.4 (0.9 to 2.3)1.0 (0.5 to 1.9)
107933.0 (0.9 to 9.9)2.9 (0.8 to 10.3)
119087.3 (3.3 to 16.6)4.7 (1.7 to 12.8)

In duration (0=5 or less than 5 years/short-term OC use, 1= more than 5 years/long-term OC use).

*Adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and no. of sexual partners.

CT, C. trachomatis (0= CT negative, 1=CT positive); HPV, human papillomavirus.

Risk of cervical cytological squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIL) by joint effect of duration of oral contraceptive (OC) use and C. trachomatis positivity at 22 years In duration (0=5 or less than 5 years/short-term OC use, 1= more than 5 years/long-term OC use). *Adjusted for HPV16/18, condom use last year, smoking and no. of sexual partners. CT, C. trachomatis (0= CT negative, 1=CT positive); HPV, human papillomavirus.

Discussion

This study shows that C. trachomatis positive HPV-vaccinated women have increased risk of cytological SIL. The adjusted risk of SIL associated with C. trachomatis positivity was significantly higher (4.3-fold) even after adjusting for the potential confounders among 22-year-old women. The observed joint effect of C. trachomatis positivity and long-term duration of OC use (more than 5 years) was higher than expected on both multiplicative and additive scale compared with C. trachomatis negative and short-term OC users (5 or less than 5 years) of OC use among 22-year-old women. The observed synergistic interaction was an unanticipated finding in this study. In a number of other prospective studies, C. trachomatis has been proven to set the stage for cervical carcinogenesis leading to CIN3, possibly even independently of HPV.5–10 Our finding that C. trachomatis was associated with the increased risk of SIL in HPV-vaccinated women is in line with these studies since Chlamydia probably interacts also with non-vaccine HPV types. C. trachomatis is most common in adolescents and young adults of age 15–29,16 which is also the case in our study. The reason for increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections is because the young adults are more into casual sex and often do not use barrier methods of contraception.17 This was also the case in our study, where most of the participants replied infrequent and less use of condom as well as having multiple sexual partners which predisposes to Chlamydia associated carcinogenesis.18 In our study, the mean age at first sexual intercourse was at 16 years of age. While OCs are one of the most common contraceptive methods among adolescents, they provide protection against unwanted pregnancies, but not against the sexually transmitted infections.16 There are several studies showing an increased risk of C. trachomatis infection associated with OC use.19–21 This is also in line with our findings. There is biological plausibility to assume synergistic interaction between OC use and cervical C. trachomatis infection. The long-term use of OC may increase the growth and persistence of C. trachomatis infection by altering the immune response especially among those, who do not use only barrier method of contraception.19 C. trachomatis infection also favours the persistence of all (both vaccine and non-vaccine) high-risk HPV types which facilitates progress of neoplastic lesions.18 Also, there are epidemiological studies which have found that the risk of cervical neoplasia/cancer increases with the increase in duration of OC use.22 23 Thus, both the C. trachomatis infection and long-term OC use are associated with the increased risk of cervical neoplasia, which is supported by our joint effect risk of long-term OC use and C. trachomatis infection. The main strength of our study is the large study population and longitudinal study design, which allowed the over time evaluation of OC use and timely measurement (and treatment) of the C. trachomatis infection. Another strength is the well-controlled and sensitive testing of C. trachomatis by PCR. One limitation of our study is the number of cytological HSIL finding is small. Another limitation of our study is inadequate data on the use of barrier methods of contraception, which might have confounded the results. Yet another limitation of our study could be, that we have not considered the missing values in tables 2 and 3, which might bias the results. However, we checked including the missing values but the estimates did not differ much. Furthermore, we do not have information about the types of OC used. The risk might differ among the various types of OC depending on the hormonal composition. In conclusion, we found increased risk of SIL associated with C. trachomatis positivity in HPV vaccinated population. Although based on small number of cases, the joint effect of C. trachomatis positivity and long-term use of OC on risk of SIL was higher than effects expected on the basis of additive or multiplicative interaction, which suggests synergism between the two variables. People who use OC as a means of contraception, may not use barrier methods of contraception and hence are prone to many sexually transmitted diseases. Thus, contraceptive and sexual health counselling should be enforced also among HPV vaccinated young women using oral/hormonal contraceptives. Additional studies are required to understand the biological basis of the interaction effect better.
  20 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis and cancer.

Authors:  J Paavonen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Gender-neutral vaccination provides improved control of human papillomavirus types 18/31/33/35 through herd immunity: Results of a community randomized trial (III).

Authors:  Matti Lehtinen; Tapio Luostarinen; Simopekka Vänskä; Anna Söderlund-Strand; Tiina Eriksson; Kari Natunen; Dan Apter; Iacopo Baussano; Katja Harjula; Mari Hokkanen; Marjo Kuortti; Johanna Palmroth; Tiina Petäjä; Eero Pukkala; Sirpa Rekonen; Mari Siitari-Mattila; Heljä-Marja Surcel; Leena Tuomivaara; Jorma Paavonen; Pekka Nieminen; Joakim Dillner; Gary Dubin; Geoff Garnett
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Characteristics of a cluster-randomized phase IV human papillomavirus vaccination effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Matti Lehtinen; Dan Apter; Iacopo Baussano; Tiina Eriksson; Kari Natunen; Jorma Paavonen; Simopekka Vänskä; Dan Bi; Marie-Pierre David; Sanjoy Datta; Frank Struyf; David Jenkins; Eero Pukkala; Geoff Garnett; Gary Dubin
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jorma Paavonen; Renee Turzanski Fortner; Matti Lehtinen; Annika Idahl
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Cervical cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data for 16,573 women with cervical cancer and 35,509 women without cervical cancer from 24 epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Paul Appleby; Valerie Beral; Amy Berrington de González; Didier Colin; Silvia Franceschi; Adrian Goodhill; Jane Green; Julian Peto; Martyn Plummer; Siân Sweetland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Women at risk for sexually transmitted diseases: correlates of intercourse without barrier contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Peipert; Kate L Lapane; Jenifer E Allsworth; Colleen A Redding; Jeffrey L Blume; Faye Lozowski; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Is smoking an independent risk factor for invasive cervical cancer? A nested case-control study within Nordic biobanks.

Authors:  Aline Simen Kapeu; Tapio Luostarinen; Egil Jellum; Joakim Dillner; Matti Hakama; Pentti Koskela; Per Lenner; Arthur Löve; Eija Mahlamaki; Steinar Thoresen; Laufey Tryggvadóttir; Göran Wadell; Linda Youngman; Matti Lehtinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Order of HPV/Chlamydia infections and cervical high-grade precancer risk: a case-cohort study.

Authors:  Tapio Luostarinen; Proscovia B Namujju; Marko Merikukka; Joakim Dillner; Timo Hakulinen; Pentti Koskela; Jorma Paavonen; Heljä-Marja Surcel; Matti Lehtinen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis and invasive cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of the IARC multicentric case-control study.

Authors:  Jennifer S Smith; Cristina Bosetti; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; F Xavier Bosch; José Eluf-Neto; Chris J L M Meijer; Adriaan J C Van Den Brule; Silvia Franceschi; Rosanna W Peeling
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Impact of gender-neutral or girls-only vaccination against human papillomavirus-Results of a community-randomized clinical trial (I).

Authors:  Matti Lehtinen; Anna Söderlund-Strand; Simopekka Vänskä; Tapio Luostarinen; Tiina Eriksson; Kari Natunen; Dan Apter; Iacopo Baussano; Katja Harjula; Mari Hokkanen; Marjo Kuortti; Johanna Palmroth; Tiina Petäjä; Eero Pukkala; Sirpa Rekonen; Mari Siitari-Mattila; Heljä-Marja Surcel; Leena Tuomivaara; Jorma Paavonen; Joakim Dillner; Gary Dubin; Geoffrey Garnett
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.