Haizhu Chen1, Yu Feng1, Yu Zhou1, Yunxia Tao1, Le Tang1, Yuankai Shi2. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, No. 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China. syuankai@cicams.ac.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debatable. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs for NSCLC with BMs. We also evaluated the effect of BMs on outcomes of ICIs. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies where the efficacy of ICIs against BMs from NSCLC, or the association between BMs and outcomes of ICIs were evaluated. Outcomes included intracranial objective response rate (icORR), intracranial disease control rate (icDCR), systemic ORR and DCR. RESULTS: Overall, 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled icORR was 13% (95%CI 6-23%) and icDCR was 50% (95%CI 40-63%) for programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) unselected patients with any BMs. For active BMs, pooled icORR was 15% (95%CI 6-28%) and icDCR was 47% (95% CI 36-57%). For PD-L1 ≥ 50% patients with any BMs, pooled icORR and icDCR were 68% (95%CI 57-80%) and 82% (95%CI 73-92%), respectively. Additionally, pooled systemic ORR and DCR for any BMs were 22% (95%CI 15-30%) and 41% (95%CI 18-67%), respectively. Patients with BMs had inferior progression-free survival (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.07-1.33, P = 0.0016) and overall survival (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.011) when applying ICIs compared to those without BMs. However, no significant difference in systemic ORR between patients with and without BMs was observed (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.72-1.20, P = 0.629). CONCLUSION: ICIs may be clinically active in NSCLC patients with BMs. More effective treatments for BMs from NSCLC are needed.
BACKGROUND: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debatable. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs for NSCLC with BMs. We also evaluated the effect of BMs on outcomes of ICIs. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify studies where the efficacy of ICIs against BMs from NSCLC, or the association between BMs and outcomes of ICIs were evaluated. Outcomes included intracranial objective response rate (icORR), intracranial disease control rate (icDCR), systemic ORR and DCR. RESULTS: Overall, 33 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled icORR was 13% (95%CI 6-23%) and icDCR was 50% (95%CI 40-63%) for programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) unselected patients with any BMs. For active BMs, pooled icORR was 15% (95%CI 6-28%) and icDCR was 47% (95% CI 36-57%). For PD-L1 ≥ 50% patients with any BMs, pooled icORR and icDCR were 68% (95%CI 57-80%) and 82% (95%CI 73-92%), respectively. Additionally, pooled systemic ORR and DCR for any BMs were 22% (95%CI 15-30%) and 41% (95%CI 18-67%), respectively. Patients with BMs had inferior progression-free survival (HR 1.19, 95%CI 1.07-1.33, P = 0.0016) and overall survival (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.03-1.25, P = 0.011) when applying ICIs compared to those without BMs. However, no significant difference in systemic ORR between patients with and without BMs was observed (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.72-1.20, P = 0.629). CONCLUSION: ICIs may be clinically active in NSCLC patients with BMs. More effective treatments for BMs from NSCLC are needed.
Authors: D Ross Camidge; Eudocia Q Lee; Nancy U Lin; Kim Margolin; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Martin Bendszus; Susan M Chang; Janet Dancey; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gordon J Harris; F Stephen Hodi; Andrew B Lassman; David R Macdonald; David M Peereboom; David Schiff; Ricardo Soffietti; Martin J van den Bent; Jeffrey S Wefel; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sarah B Goldberg; Kurt A Schalper; Scott N Gettinger; Amit Mahajan; Roy S Herbst; Anne C Chiang; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Frederick H Wilson; Sacit Bulent Omay; James B Yu; Lucia Jilaveanu; Thuy Tran; Kira Pavlik; Elin Rowen; Heather Gerrish; Annette Komlo; Richa Gupta; Hailey Wyatt; Matthew Ribeiro; Yuval Kluger; Geyu Zhou; Wei Wei; Veronica L Chiang; Harriet M Kluger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Solange Peters; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Shirish Gadgeel; Jin S Ahn; Dong-Wan Kim; Sai-Hong I Ou; Maurice Pérol; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Rafael Rosell; Ali Zeaiter; Emmanuel Mitry; Sophie Golding; Bogdana Balas; Johannes Noe; Peter N Morcos; Tony Mok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lucio Crinò; Giuseppe Bronte; Paolo Bidoli; Paola Cravero; Elisa Minenza; Enrico Cortesi; Marina C Garassino; Claudia Proto; Federico Cappuzzo; Francesco Grossi; Giuseppe Tonini; Maria Giuseppina Sarobba; Graziella Pinotti; Gianmauro Numico; Riccardo Samaritani; Libero Ciuffreda; Antonio Frassoldati; Marco Bregni; Antonio Santo; Francovito Piantedosi; Alfonso Illiano; Filippo De Marinis; Stefano Tamberi; Diana Giannarelli; Angelo Delmonte Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 5.705