Literature DB >> 35647905

Calibration Approach for Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Based on Nonthermal Plasma Oxidation of Elemental Mercury.

Jan Gačnik1,2, Igor Živković1, Sergio Ribeiro Guevara3, Jože Kotnik1,2, Sabina Berisha2, Sreekanth Vijayakumaran Nair1,2, Andrea Jurov4, Uroš Cvelbar2,4, Milena Horvat1,2.   

Abstract

Atmospheric mercury measurements carried out in the recent decades have been a subject of bias largely due to insufficient consideration of metrological traceability and associated measurement uncertainty, which are ultimately needed for the demonstration of comparability of the measurement results. This is particularly challenging for gaseous HgII species, which are reactive and their ambient concentrations are very low, causing difficulties in proper sampling and calibration. Calibration for atmospheric HgII exists, but barriers to reliable calibration are most evident at ambient HgII concentration levels. We present a calibration of HgII species based on nonthermal plasma oxidation of Hg0 to HgII. Hg0 was produced by quantitative reduction of HgII in aqueous solution by SnCl2 and aeration. The generated Hg0 in a stream of He and traces of reaction gas (O2, Cl2, or Br2) was then oxidized to different HgII species by nonthermal plasma. A highly sensitive 197Hg radiotracer was used to evaluate the oxidation efficiency. Nonthermal plasma oxidation efficiencies with corresponding expanded standard uncertainty values were 100.5 ± 4.7% (k = 2) for 100 pg of HgO, 96.8 ± 7.3% (k = 2) for 250 pg of HgCl2, and 77.3 ± 9.4% (k = 2) for 250 pg of HgBr2. The presence of HgO, HgCl2, and HgBr2 was confirmed by temperature-programmed desorption quadrupole mass spectrometry (TPD-QMS). This work demonstrates the potential for nonthermal plasma oxidation to generate reliable and repeatable amounts of HgII compounds for routine calibration of ambient air measurement instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35647905      PMCID: PMC9201811          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   8.008


Atmospheric mercury is the largest pool of anthropogenic Hg.[1] Oxidized mercury (HgII) is present in the atmosphere either directly due to emissions or indirectly through the oxidation of elemental mercury. HgII can be methylated and bioaccumulated into the food chain after entering ecosystems via wet and dry deposition to aquatic and terrestrial environments.[2] The degree of dry and wet deposition in global Hg assessments can only be estimated by knowing the chemistry and composition of atmospheric HgII species.[3] Atmospheric HgII species are usually presented as operationally defined gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), particulate-bound mercury (PBM), or reactive mercury (RM, GOM + PBM). Even though some HgII species, such as HgCl2 and HgBr2, have been identified in the atmosphere,[4,5] the exact composition of atmospheric HgII remains unknown; this points to the need for improved atmospheric mercury speciation.[6] The first problems associated with atmospheric mercury speciation were identified more than a decade ago. The most commonly used procedure for atmospheric mercury speciation uses preconcentration on KCl-coated denuders that are subject to biases. Biases originate from the low GOM collection efficiency of denuders in the presence of ozone and high humidity.[7−10] Another analytical challenge is the correct calibration or lack thereof, as currently the calibration for GOM measurements is performed using Hg0 vapor. Moreover, Hg0 vapor concentration and its temperature dependence are described by an empirical equation that is not universally agreed upon.[11,12] Additionally, instruments should be calibrated directly with gaseous HgII species instead of Hg0 to ensure a valid calibration.[13] Currently, the available calibrations for oxidized mercury species are based on either permeation[14,15] or liquid evaporation of HgII salts.[16,17] Although permeation calibrators are promising, they are still in the development stage, showing inconsistent results at permeation rates relevant to ambient HgII concentrations.[18] Liquid-evaporative calibrators perform well at flue gas HgII concentrations while having a biased low output at ambient HgII concentrations, mainly due to the adsorption and reactive nature of HgII.[19] Permeation and liquid-evaporative calibrators may also be subject to Hg0 impurities.[14] No calibration is currently available for PBM measurements. Due to the aforementioned problematics of atmospheric mercury speciation, measurement results are still a subject of biases and thus cannot be reliably evaluated as equivalent. Validation of the calibration and, in general, validation of the methodology for atmospheric mercury speciation can be effectively assessed utilizing labeled Hg species. Although the use of Hg stable isotopes is prevalent in the literature,[20−24] radioactive isotopes offer certain advantages. The use of the 197Hg radiotracer (half-life 2.671 days) enables validation at ambient concentrations due to its high specific activity and absence of blanks and contamination issues (197Hg is not present in the nature).[19,25,26] Nonthermal plasmas (NTP) differ from thermal and high-temperature plasmas in terms of the output energy conversion: in nonthermal plasmas, most of the energy is used to produce energetic electrons, while in thermal plasmas, the energy is also converted into heat.[27] NTP can be generated under near-ambient conditions (room temperature and atmospheric pressure) by means of corona discharges, dielectric barrier discharges (DBD), atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ), micro hollow cathode discharges (MHCD), and many more, all having their own distinctive properties and applications.[28] To the best of the authors’ knowledge, Chen et al.[29] were the first to employ NTP using DBD as a method for the oxidation of Hg0 in flue gases. The method was found to be cost-effective with good oxidation efficiency (up to 80%) in the simulated flue gas mixture.[29] Oxidation reaction pathways,[30,31] the influence of flue gas composition[32,33] and the improvement of the Hg0 oxidation efficiency by CaCl2 treatment[34] were all investigated for the oxidation of Hg0 in flue gases with NTP. The use of DBD-NTP (hereinafter abbreviated as NTP) has so far been largely limited to the removal of Hg0 from flue gases. In this paper, we report the development of a novel calibration system for gaseous HgII species based on the oxidation of Hg0 to HgII by NTP. Using a highly selective and sensitive 197Hg radiotracer, the newly developed calibration method was validated for use at ambient HgII concentrations.

Experimental Section

The validation experiments were performed using a 197Hg radiotracer. The use of 197Hg is not an essential part of the calibration but a useful tool that has been used for validation. For real-time calibration, the use of “normal” or nonradioactive Hg, such as National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference material (SRM) 3133, is intended. Real-time calibration instructions are described in the Supporting Information, Section S1, in the standard operating procedure (SOP) format. All chemicals and instruments that were utilized in the following experiments are listed in the Supporting Information, Section S2.

Production of 197Hg Radiotracer

197Hg radiotracer was used for the majority of performed experiments. Mercury enriched to 51.58% in 196Hg isotope (0.15% natural abundance) was used for irradiation to produce a 197Hg radiotracer. Enriched 196Hg was diluted in 2% HNO3 acid (v/v) solution and sealed into a quartz ampoule. By irradiating the ampoule with a high neutron flux (1013 cm–2 s–1) for 12 h in the central channel (CC) of the 250 kW TRIGA Mark II research reactor (Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia), 197Hg (t1/2 = 2.671 d) was formed via a neutron capture reaction (n,γ).[26] Similar reactions occur also for the formation of 199mHg (t1/2 = 0.0296 d) from 198Hg, 203Hg (t1/2 = 46.594 d) from 202Hg, and 205Hg (t1/2 = 0.0036 d) from 204Hg. Nevertheless, 199mHg, 203Hg, and 205Hg were never measured in our experiments due to their lower specific activity. Other Hg isotopes were unaffected by the neutron flux. After irradiation, the 197HgII(aq) stock solution was diluted to 100 pg mL–1 which was used as the working solution for the experiments.

Determining 197Hg Using an HPGe Detector

The activity of 197Hg was determined using two approaches, depending on the Hg collection protocol. The activity of 197Hg collected on gold sorbent traps was measured by means of a coaxial-type HPGe detector, while in solutions, the activity was measured using a well-type HPGe detector. All activity measurements were relative to standards obtained from the irradiated solution in each experimental run. Peak area comparison of the sample and standard activity for the characteristic doublet peaks of γ-ray and X-ray emissions (67.0 + 68.8 and 77.3 + 78.1 keV) was performed using Genie 2000 Gamma analysis software. Oxidation and thermal reduction efficiencies were calculated as shown in the Supporting Information, Section S3. Standards for the coaxial-type HPGe detector were obtained by a reduction of 197HgII(aq) to 197Hg0(g), using a tin(II) chloride (SnCl2) solution (100 mL, 2% SnCl2 (w/v) and 0.5% HCl (v/v)). Produced 197Hg0 was purged for 10 min with N2 carrier gas (purity 4.7, flow rate of 1 L min–1) and captured by a downstream gold trap to obtain a measurement standard. Gold traps were prepared out of gold-coated Al2O3 (corundum) as described in previous work.[35] To obtain standards for a well-type HPGe detector, triplicates of a Hg radiolabeled solution (8 mL, 2% HNO3 (v/v)) were transferred into glass vials and measured by a well-type HPGe detector. The values discussed in the Section were obtained by comparing the sample activities to the standard activities. To determine the equivalence between the 197Hg activity level and the Hg amount (including all Hg isotopes), the activity of stock 197HgII(aq) solution was connected to its concentration by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CV-AAS) measurement (calibration against NIST SRM 3133).[36] The concentration of stock 197HgII(aq) solution was 93.3 μg mL–1 of Hg. CV-AAS measurements were performed before and after irradiation to ensure the stability of Hg concentration in the stock solution.

Production of HgII Species by Nonthermal Plasma

A simplified scheme of the experimental design is shown in Figure a. In the first step, Hg0 was produced in a 250 mL impinger by the reduction of 197HgII(aq) working solution using SnCl2 (as in Section .). From 1 to 2.5 mL of 100 pg mL–1 197HgII(aq) working solution was used to produce 100–250 pg of Hg0. This amount was chosen as it is sufficiently low to imitate ambient Hg levels while still assuring low measurement uncertainty of the activity measurement.
Figure 2

(A) Experimental setup for nonthermal plasma (NTP) loading of HgII species: in step 1, the gold trap is loaded with Hg0 by purge and trap. In step 2, the loaded Hg0 is desorbed from the gold trap and oxidized to HgII by NTP in a stream of helium and reaction gas mixture. (B) Experimental setup for HgII to Hg0 thermal reduction and reduction efficiency studies: HgII loaded on the KCl is reduced to Hg0 in the stream of N2 by Al2O3 catalyst-assisted thermal reduction. The reduced Hg0 is captured by the gold trap.

Produced Hg0 was aerated from the reaction solution for 10 min using nitrogen gas (1400 mL min–1), dried using a soda lime trap, and collected on the primary gold trap. The primary gold trap was then transferred to a separate setup that was used for the second step of NTP loading. In the second step, the primary gold trap was heated at 400 °C which released the trapped Hg0 into the stream of He gas (gas flow of 370 mL min–1). Downstream, Hg0 and He carrier gas were mixed with trace amounts of reaction gas (O2, Cl2, or Br2). O2 was obtained from a gas cylinder (purity 5.0), while Cl2 and Br2 were produced by electrolysis of 1 mol L–1 NaCl and KBr solution, respectively. More details regarding the electrolytic production of Cl2 and Br2 are available in the Supporting Information, Section S4. Reaction gas was mixed with He and Hg0 downstream of the primary gold trap. The resulting gas mixture consisted of 99.2% of He and 0.8% of O2, while for Cl2 and Br2, their relative flows were about 0.5% due to the partial solubility of Br2 and Cl2 in the KBr or NaCl electrolytic solution. In the mixture of He and the reaction gas, Hg0 was then oxidized to HgII by NTP. HgII was captured on the spot by the KCl crystals, while traces of unoxidized fraction of Hg0 (breakthrough) were collected on a gold trap. The oxidation efficiency was determined according to the analytical protocol described in Section . The most important parameter for the NTP oxidation system was the design of the dielectric quartz tube used as “plasma trap” shown in Figure . The use of Al2O3 catalyst is explained in Section .
Figure 1

Design of the plasma trap, implemented for NTP oxidation of Hg0 to HgII (QW—quartz wool).

Design of the plasma trap, implemented for NTP oxidation of Hg0 to HgII (QW—quartz wool). NTP was ignited using a high-voltage high-frequency power generator by applying voltage to a pair of copper electrodes. Electrodes were made of 1 mm thick copper plates, which were cut into 10 mm wide strips and bent around the quartz tube. Such copper strips were separated 5 mm from each other when placed on the plasma trap. By controlling the input power (and indirectly voltage and current) of the generator, we controlled the NTP parameters. The obtained optimal parameters of the NTP generator were: average power applied to the electrodes of 180 μW, radiofrequency of 20 kHz, effective voltage of 345 V, effective current of 7.0 mA, and the phase angle between voltage and current of −101°. The presented values were measured for the gas combination of He and O2, but they were similar for other gas mixtures.

Thermal Reduction of HgII to Hg0 on Sorbent Traps

Traps with KCl crystal and tested catalyst material (or “plasma traps”) were also used for the thermal reduction experiments to assure quantitative reduction. 197HgII was loaded onto the KCl crystal part by spiking 10 μL of 197HgII(aq) in a 2% HNO3 solution. The actual amount of HgII depended on the extent to which the radiotracer had already decayed and ranged between 100 and 500 pg. The design shown in Figure b was used to study the HgII thermal reduction efficiency. (A) Experimental setup for nonthermal plasma (NTP) loading of HgII species: in step 1, the gold trap is loaded with Hg0 by purge and trap. In step 2, the loaded Hg0 is desorbed from the gold trap and oxidized to HgII by NTP in a stream of helium and reaction gas mixture. (B) Experimental setup for HgII to Hg0 thermal reduction and reduction efficiency studies: HgII loaded on the KCl is reduced to Hg0 in the stream of N2 by Al2O3 catalyst-assisted thermal reduction. The reduced Hg0 is captured by the gold trap. Both the KCl crystal and the catalyst part were heated (ramped) from room temperature to 600 °C in 20 s. The trap was vented using N2 carrier gas (flow rate of 370 mL min–1) for 60 s after the end of heating to ensure complete downstream transport of 197Hg0 to a gold trap. 197Hg0 on the gold trap was measured using a γ coaxial detector. Unconverted 197HgII on the KCl trap was washed from the quartz tube and leached from the trap using a previously determined optimal washing solution (20 mL of 10% HNO3 (v/v) + 5% HCl (v/v) solution). The washing solution (8 mL) was taken into the measurement vial, and the activity of the solution was measured with a γ well detector.

Analysis of HgII Species Using Temperature-Programmed Desorption

Indirect analysis of HgII species was performed on the basis of temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) using a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) operating under a high vacuum. The experimental design of the TPD-QMS analysis of Hg was based on previous work.[37] Samples (<5 mg) loaded into a heating cell were heated to 750 °C at a rate of 10 °C min–1. Heated desorbed atoms or molecules were then ionized at 70 eV using a cross-beam ion source followed by QMS separation based on mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio and detected using a secondary electron multiplier detector. Two different stable Hg isotopes were measured simultaneously, 200Hg and 202Hg. Data for 202Hg were used to prepare TPD spectra for all analyzed HgII species. HgII species were determined indirectly because the direct determination of 202HgXn (X=O, Cl, or Br) is not possible; therefore, only 202Hg was measured directly. Using TPD-QMS, we measured two kinds of samples: Al2O3 (corundum) with HgII species loaded by NTP and Al2O3 mixed with HgII species standards. HgII species were loaded on Al2O3 using NTP as described in Section , with the only difference being that NIST 3133 was used instead of the 197Hg radiotracer. HgII species standards were prepared using the so-called “wet preparation” method. For the wet preparation method, we used 100 mL of 1 mg mL–1 HgO, HgCl2, and HgBr2 solutions and added 0.5 g of Al2O3. The resulting solution containing insoluble Al2O3 was then stirred for 30 min, centrifuged, and air-dried. Al2O3 prepared in this way served as a HgII species standard for TPD-QMS.

Results and Discussion

Initial results showed that the efficiency of NTP oxidation of Hg0 to HgII could not be reliably estimated if the produced HgII was incompletely converted to Hg0 by thermal reduction (Figure b). Therefore, we first tested various catalysts that could promote higher efficiency of thermal reduction of HgII to Hg0. After selecting the most suitable catalyst, we examined the production of HgII by the NTP oxidation of Hg0. Finally, we performed measurements using TPD-QMS with an attempt to confirm the presence of different HgII species that were produced by NTP oxidation. The order of presenting the results and discussion is therefore in the same sequence as described in the above paragraph. We studied the efficiency of thermal reduction for HgII loaded by spiking the plasma trap. Optimization of the thermal reduction was crucial to ensure reliable estimation of the NTP oxidation efficiency, which is discussed in Section . First results showed low reduction efficiencies; therefore, a set of different catalysts were used to promote the HgII thermal reduction. The catalysts were placed in the section of the “plasma trap” marked as “Al2O3” in Figure . Used catalysts were: Au-coated silica sand, densely packed platinum (Pt) wire, densely packed quartz wool, and Al2O3 (corundum, 0.60–0.85 mm grain size). The results of the experiments are shown in Table .
Table 1

HgII to Hg0 Thermal Reduction, HgII Loaded by Spikinga

catalyst usedHg0 [%]unconverted HgII [%]mass balance [%]
none88 (26)25.6 (43)113 (22)
Au-coated silica38 (3)61 (5)99 (2)
Pt wire39 (28)49 (32)88 (5)
quartz wool86 (19)15 (12)101 (8)
Al2O3101 (3)<0.1101 (3)

Values are shown as averages of multiple replicates (replicates shown in Supporting Information, Section S5) with the repeatability standard deviation notation in the brackets.

Values are shown as averages of multiple replicates (replicates shown in Supporting Information, Section S5) with the repeatability standard deviation notation in the brackets. When thermal reduction was not quantitative, HgII species were not completely reduced but partially desorbed from the plasma trap and deposited on the cooler parts of the tubing prior to reaching the gold trap. Initially, Pt wire as a catalyst showed promising results, but it was evident that with its reuse, the reduction efficiency decreased considerably between runs (1.92, 59.4, 64.8, and 71.5% of unconverted HgII, listed in consecutive runs: see Supporting Information, Section S5). The decrease in efficiency was attributed to the passivation of Pt. Quartz wool performed better than Pt wire, but Al2O3 was selected as the best catalyst, having the highest and most repeatable reduction efficiency (Table ). Due to the knowledge gained from HgII reduction experiments, only the Al2O3 catalyst was implemented into the final NTP design. The method of producing gaseous HgII species by NTP utilizes the oxidation of Hg0 in plasma with oxidative gases and He carrier gas. The combination of plasma and oxidative gases seems to be effective in the quantitative production of gaseous HgII species under ambient air concentrations. The predicted HgII species that were produced were HgO using O2 as a reaction gas, HgCl2 using Cl2 as a reaction gas, and HgBr2 using Br2 as a reaction gas. Whether those exact species were actually produced is discussed in Section . The validity of the calibration for HgII species by NTP oxidation was tested by evaluating the oxidation efficiency for each investigated oxidation reaction. Four to five replicate measurements were performed for each species to assess the oxidation efficiency (all replicates shown in the Supporting Information, Section S5). The corresponding standard uncertainty of the developed calibration was estimated according to the GUM and Eurachem guidelines.[38,39] Standard measurement uncertainties were assessed from all experimental data; repeatability contributed the most to the combined standard uncertainty for all three HgII species (relative contribution of 65, 81, and 94% for HgO, HgCl2, and HgBr2, respectively). The uncertainty contribution due to 197Hg activity measurement was substantially lower, indicating that the use of 197Hg is justified for the intended use. However, for the proper traceability to NIST 3133 (and as a consequence traceability to System of Units), the effects of blanks will be needed to be taken into account, as they will likely contribute significantly to the analytical signal and measurement uncertainty. This is especially true at very low (ambient) HgII concentrations. The complete standard uncertainty estimation procedure is given in the Supporting Information, Section S6. Resulting oxidation efficiencies with corresponding expanded standard uncertainty values were 100.5% ± 4.7% (k = 2) for 100 pg of HgO, 96.8% ± 7.3% (k = 2) for 250 pg of HgCl2, and 77.3% ± 9.4% (k = 2) for 250 pg of HgBr2. The provided masses refer to the amount of Hg0 used for oxidation to HgII. Similar ambient-level masses of HgII as used in our work are usually sampled for atmospheric Hg speciation. For example, 125 min sample preconcentration using 8 L min–1 airflow of ambient air with 100 pg m–3 HgII concentration gives 100 pg of preconcentrated HgII. While the oxidation efficiency values for HgO and HgCl2 indicated almost quantitative oxidation, the oxidation efficiencies of HgBr2 were considerably lower. There are two contrasting effects that might influence this observation. First, the low recoveries of HgBr2 might be due to the electrolytic production of Br2 gas. When Br2 is produced from the electrolytic solution, it dissolves immediately, so a large amount of Br2 must be produced to achieve a sufficiently high vapor pressure of aqueous Br2. Otherwise, the small amount of Br2 in the carrier gas seemed insufficient for the complete oxidization of Hg0 in the NTP. Nevertheless, Br2 and Cl2 are highly reactive gases that can oxidize Hg0 even prior to the NTP part of the setup, resulting in losses due to adsorption of HgII on walls prior to the NTP section. To reduce losses, the distance between T-split (mixing of Cl2(g)/Br2(g) with Hg0(g)) and NTP (Figure ) had to be minimized. Of the two described effects (insufficient amount of Br2 in the carrier gas and premature oxidation), we cannot assess which effect is more prevalent. Due to the aforementioned properties of Cl2 and Br2, the highest recoveries and the lowest standard uncertainties were achieved using O2 as a reaction gas, as it introduces the least complexity into the experimental setup due to its relative inertness and availability. Repeatability could be improved in the future by automating the presented NTP calibration system. Comparison of the NTP calibration system with other available HgII calibration systems is difficult due to (i) scarce data on the system accuracy and precision, (ii) data usually available only for high HgII concentrations (>1 μg m–3 of Hg), and (iii) lack of metrological traceability for the accuracy and precision data. Liquid evaporative calibrators developed by HovaCal, VTT & Optoseven, and Tekran (model 3315) are designed for use with high HgII concentrations. In our previous work, we evaluated the accuracy of a liquid-evaporative calibrator at near-ambient HgII concentration levels. The main conclusion was that while at the μg m–3 level, the error ranged from 19 to 4% (depending on the duration of operation time), at the ng m–3 level, the error increased to as much as 63%. Additionally, the precision was unsatisfactory due to the time dependence of the calibrator output.[19] Therefore, the only calibration systems that can be compared to the NTP calibration system are those that were evaluated at ambient HgII concentration levels. As such, HgII permeation tubes are currently the only calibration system suitable for comparison. The permeation rates, their precision, and accuracy have been determined, but the data depended on measurement systems that can be subject to biases and are not traceable.[14] The design and dimensions of each individual permeation tube affect the permeation rate; consequently, each unit has to be assessed individually. Lyman et al.[18] attempted to establish the traceability of permeation tubes to the mass (and consequently to SI units), but low mass losses and weighing difficulties prevented reliable results.[18] High permeation rates (up to 30 pg s–1) based on the gravimetric method matched the determined Hg concentrations to within 25%, but the agreement was worse for lower permeation rates.[18] The NTP approach for HgII calibration is accurate (no observed bias when calibration uncertainty is considered) for HgO and HgCl2, while future optimization will be needed for HgBr2 calibration accuracy and precision. Although traceability to SI units was not demonstrated within this paper, future work is planned on achieving SI traceability via NIST SRM 3133.

TPD-QMS Analysis of Produced HgII Species

In addition to the evaluation of NTP oxidation efficiency, we attempted to confirm the presence of each species on the plasma trap by indirect TPD-QMS measurement. The results of TPD-QMS measurements are shown in Figure . Figure a shows the temperature-programmed desorption of HgII species obtained by NTP oxidation, while Figure b shows the results for HgII species standards.
Figure 3

(A) Temperature-programmed desorption for three HgII species loaded on sorbent traps by NTP oxidation. (B) Results of the temperature-programmed desorption for HgII species standards. The temperatures indicated above the peaks are the temperatures of the highest signal intensity for each respective peak.

(A) Temperature-programmed desorption for three HgII species loaded on sorbent traps by NTP oxidation. (B) Results of the temperature-programmed desorption for HgII species standards. The temperatures indicated above the peaks are the temperatures of the highest signal intensity for each respective peak. TPD-QMS peaks for HgII species loaded by NTP oxidation and HgII species standards were compared to identify which species were produced. To simplify the discussion, we indexed the temperatures of the highest signal intensity as follows: THgO, THgCl, and THgBr notations for HgO, HgCl2, and HgBr2, respectively, and “NTP” or “STD” notations for NTP-loaded HgII species or for HgII species standards. THgO, NTP (269 °C) and THgO, STD (279 °C) are similar as well as THgBr (164 °C) and THgBr (162 °C). THgCl (201 °C) and THgCl (263 °C) are different (Figure ), which can be explained by the wider peaks obtained for HgII species standards. The wider peaks could originate from the wet deposition method of preparing HgII species standards (HgII aqueous phase chemistry), which is not entirely equivalent to the NTP-loaded HgII species (HgII gas-phase chemistry). Considerable hydrolysis of HgCl2 in water and species transformation are possible, but those of higher halogenides (bromide and iodide) are less likely due to greater stability of these halogenides (several orders of magnitude lower solubility product constant Ksp).[40,41] Second, we compared the values obtained for NTP-loaded HgII species to the values from the literature. Literature values for temperature desorption of HgII species differ, mainly due to differences in the matrices to which HgII is bound. For HgO, the literature values for desorption temperature range from 240 to 310 °C for yellow HgO and from 550 to 600 °C for red HgO.[37,42] The temperature desorption diagram for NTP-loaded HgO agrees well with the literature data for yellow HgO, which serves as additional confirmation that the HgII produced was really HgO. For matrix-bound HgCl2, the desorption temperature in the literature ranges between 190 and 250 °C,[37] which is similar to our results for NTP-loaded HgCl2. The presence of Hg2Cl2 cannot be completely ruled out due to the fact that Hg2Cl2 and HgCl2 have very similar desorption temperatures.[43] Nevertheless, desorption of Hg2Cl2 usually results in a doublet peak,[44] which is not seen in our results. For HgBr2, there are not many data available for matrix-bound HgBr2 but mostly for pure HgBr2.[43] HgBr2 is desorbed at lower temperatures than HgCl2 and HgO, which is in agreement with our observations.[43] The limitation of our comparison to the literature values and to measured standards is that there is still a possibility that a similar but not yet tested HgII compound could have a similar temperature desorption range and therefore overlap with our presumably NTP-produced HgII species. Therefore, we can confirm the presence of presumed species with a high degree of confidence but not with absolute certainty.

Conclusions

Calibration using NTP oxidation of Hg0 to HgII has proven to be a suitable way to achieve quantitative production of two gaseous HgII species: HgO and HgCl2. They were produced with a degree of measurement uncertainty that we consider appropriate for ambient concentration calibration, as ambient HgII measurements are generally accompanied with higher uncertainty contributions (originating mostly from sampling). Quantitative production of HgBr2 was limited by the high gaseous reactivity or aqueous solubility of Br2 reaction gas. The presence of each produced HgII species was indirectly confirmed. Future research will focus on the use of NTP not only for sorbent traps but also for the calibration of denuders and the calibration of field measurements. Automation of the presented calibration could result in lower standard uncertainty due to improved repeatability.
  23 in total

1.  Uncertainties of Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Measurements Using KCl-Coated Denuders, Cation-Exchange Membranes, and Nylon Membranes: Humidity Influences.

Authors:  Jiaoyan Huang; Mae Sexauer Gustin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Accurate calibration of mercury vapour measurements.

Authors:  Richard J C Brown; Andrew S Brown
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 3.  Non-thermal plasma technologies: new tools for bio-decontamination.

Authors:  M Moreau; N Orange; M G J Feuilloley
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 14.227

4.  International system of units traceable results of Hg mass concentration at saturation in air from a newly developed measurement procedure.

Authors:  Christophe R Quétel; Mariavittoria Zampella; Richard J C Brown; Hugo Ent; Milena Horvat; Eduardo Paredes; Murat Tunc
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Evaluation of the KCl denuder method for gaseous oxidized mercury using HgBr2 at an in-service AMNet site.

Authors:  Crystal D McClure; Dan A Jaffe; Eric S Edgerton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Improvements to the Accuracy of Atmospheric Oxidized Mercury Measurements.

Authors:  Seth N Lyman; Lynne E Gratz; Sarrah M Dunham-Cheatham; Mae Sexauer Gustin; Adriel Luippold
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Uncertainty Assessment of Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Measurements Collected by Atmospheric Mercury Network.

Authors:  Irene Cheng; Leiming Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Removal mechanism of elemental mercury by using non-thermal plasma.

Authors:  Youngchul Byun; Dong Jun Koh; Dong Nam Shin
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Do we understand what the mercury speciation instruments are actually measuring? Results of RAMIX.

Authors:  Mae Sexauer Gustin; Jiaoyan Huang; Matthieu B Miller; Christianna Peterson; Daniel A Jaffe; Jesse Ambrose; Brandon D Finley; Seth N Lyman; Kevin Call; Robert Talbot; Dara Feddersen; Huiting Mao; Steven E Lindberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects.

Authors:  Charles T Driscoll; Robert P Mason; Hing Man Chan; Daniel J Jacob; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.