| Literature DB >> 35647649 |
Kazuhiro Ishikawa1,2, Yuki Uehara2,3,4,5, Nobuyoshi Mori2, Yumiko Mikami3, Sayuri Tokioka6, Daiki Kobayashi7, Hisa Goke1, Tatsuya Inukai1, Aki Sakurai8,9, Yohei Doi8,9,10, Sayoko Kawakami11, Shizuo Kayama11, Motoyuki Sugai11, Shigeki Nakamura1.
Abstract
Faropenem (FRPM) is active against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, but evidence for its efficacy is lacking. This study determined the correlation between the susceptibility by disk diffusion method and the MIC of FRPM for third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and the effectiveness of FRPM for the treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by these two bacteria in a retrospective cohort analysis. Of the 48 third-generation cephalosporin-resistant clinical isolates tested, 44 isolates produced ESBL, and 8 isolates produced AmpC, including 4 isolates produced both ESBL and AmpC. Thirty-seven isolates had an FRPM MIC of ≤1 mg/L, and seven had an FRPM MIC of 2 mg/L. An FRPM MIC of >2 mg/L was observed with four isolates. In a retrospective cohort analysis, 63 patients with UTI treated with FRPM were identified. All isolates of ESBL-producing E. coli (n = 54) and K. pneumoniae (n = 9) treated with FRPM showed disk diffusion zone diameters larger than 16.0 mm (estimated MIC, 2.2 mg/L). All patients completed the scheduled treatment courses with FRPM, but 28- and 90-day relapses happened in 10 patients (16%) and 16 patients (25%), respectively. No significant risk factors for the 28- and 90-day relapses were found. FRPM can be used according to disk diffusion susceptibility testing in UTI. Further investigations are necessary to assess the clinical breakpoint of FRPM for ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and the candidates most likely to benefit from using FRPM.Entities:
Keywords: AmpC β-lactamase; Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; extended-spectrum β-lactamase; faropenem; urinary tract infection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35647649 PMCID: PMC9211419 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00125-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.938