Literature DB >> 35647433

Discovery of 9,11-Seco-Cholesterol Derivatives as Novel FXR Antagonists.

Jia-Xu Zhou1,2, Cui-Na Li2, Ya-Meng Liu2, Su-Qin Lin3, Ying Wang2, Cen Xie2, Fa-Jun Nan1,2,4.   

Abstract

The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) plays an important role in the regulation of bile acid, lipid, and glucose homeostasis. Recent findings have shown that the inhibition of FXR is beneficial to improvement of related metabolic diseases and cholestasis. In the present work, 9,11-seco-cholesterol derivatives were designed and synthesized by cleaving the C ring of cholesterol and were identified as novel structures of FXR antagonists. Compound 9a displayed the best FXR antagonistic activity at the cellular level (IC50 = 4.6 μM) and decreased the expression of the target genes of FXR in vivo.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35647433      PMCID: PMC9134407          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Bile acids (BAs) are atypical steroidal molecules generated by the liver from cholesterol and are important signaling molecules that activate bile acid activated receptors (BARs), including the farnesoid X receptor (FXR).[1,2] In hepatocytes and the distal ileum, FXR signaling regulates bile acid synthesis, metabolism, and transport.[3,4] In addition, FXR plays a key role in lipid, glucose, and energy metabolism.[4−9] A growing number of studies have suggested that FXR antagonists exhibit beneficial effects in the treatment of metabolic diseases. The natural FXR antagonist tauro-β-muricholic acid (T-β-MCA, IC50 = 40 μM) inhibits intestinal FXR signaling and improves various metabolic end points in mice with established obesity.[10] Glycine-β-muricholic acid (Gly-MCA),[11] glycoursodeoxycholic acid (GUDCA, IC50 = 77.2 μM),[12,13] tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA, IC50 = 75.1 μM),[12,13] and hyocholic acid (HCA, IC50 = 70.1 μM)[14] have also been identified as FXR antagonists and reverse metabolic dysfunctions in HFD-fed obese mice by inhibiting intestinal FXR activity (Figure ). In addition, some nonsteroidal FXR antagonists have been reported, including 3f (IC50 = 0.58 μM),[15]25 (IC50 = 9.2 nM),[16]NDB (IC50 = 3.4 μM),[17] and FLG249 (IC50 = 32.0 nM)[18] (Figure ). FLG249 is the first reported nonsteroidal FXR antagonist exerted downstream of FXR in mouse ileum.[18] Therefore, novel potent FXR antagonists need to be developed to study FXR signaling as a potential therapeutic target for metabolic diseases.
Figure 1

Structures of steroidal and nonsteroidal FXR antagonists.

Structures of steroidal and nonsteroidal FXR antagonists. Modifying the structure of natural products is a common strategy to discover novel drug candidates.[19,20] In our previous work, we reported a series of potent TGR5 agonists by modifying the natural product betulinic acid as a mimic of endogenous ligands of TGR5, including 13α(21) and 11d-Na(22) (Figure ). In comparison to natural bile acids, such as CDCA, synthetic mimics share a hydrophobic ring system and a polar hydrophilic carboxylic acid group; the latter plays a key role in forming tight interactions with BARs. Cholesterol is the starting substance of bile acid biosynthesis and thus shares the same core structural skeleton as endogenous ligands of bile acid receptors, such as TGR5 and FXR. We propose an accessible strategy by modifying the structure of cholesterol through opening one of the rings of cholesterol to generate a carboxylic group and maintain the remaining hydrophobic ring system to create a novel seco-cholesterol as a mimic of endogenous ligands of FXR.
Figure 2

Structures of betulinic acid, 11d-Na, cholesterol, and 9,11-seco-cholesterol.

Structures of betulinic acid, 11d-Na, cholesterol, and 9,11-seco-cholesterol.

Results

The synthesis of the desired seco-cholesterol compounds is outlined in Scheme . The C ring of cholesterol was cleaved in the 9,11-position to generate a ketone acid, and the structure–activity relationship of the C3, C9, and C10 positions was investigated. The key intermediate olefin 1a with C3−α-OH was synthesized according to Kido’s method[23] from 7-dehydrocholesterol, and intermediate 1b with C3−β-OH was synthesized from 1a by oxidation with Dess–Martin periodinane in DCM, followed by reduction with sodium borohydride in MeOH. Then, the C3–OH was protected by acetic anhydride to afford 2a,b, which were treated with ozone and water to cleave the double bond to give seco-cholesterols 3a,b with a ketone and a carboxylic group. Hydroxylation of 3a,b with potassium hydroxide gave 4a,b, respectively. Then, 4a was reacted with various amino acids under N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline in DMF to afford 5a,b. A Knoevenagel condensation was used to extend the length of the carboxylic chain. First, olefin 1a was treated with ozone in DCM and subsequently quenched with dimethyl sulfide to give 6 with a ketone and an aldehyde group. Then, 6 was reacted with propanedioic acid and piperidine in pyridine to obtain 7. The double bone of 7 was reduced with Pd/C under H2 to generate 8, and the carbonyl group of 4a,b at the C9 position was reduced by sodium borohydride to afford 9a–d with different configurations of hydroxyl groups. 9a–c could be distinguished by the chemical shifts and coupling constants of the H atom at the C9 position.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of Seco-Cholesterol Derivatives

Reagents and conditions: (a) DMP, DCM, 0 °C, overnight; (b) CeCl3, NaBH4, MeOH:THF = 1:1, 30 min; (c) Ac2O, DMAP, pyridine, 12 h; (d) O3, DCM, −78 °C, 30 min, then H2O; (e) KOH aqueous, MeOH, 2 h. (f) NaBH4, t-BuOH, 70 °C, 30 min; (g) EEDQ, Et3N, R-NH2, DMF, 90 °C, overnight; (h) O3, DCM, −78 °C, 30 min, then Me2S, 0 °C, overnight; (i) propanedioic acid, piperidine, pyridine, 90 °C, 4 h; (j) Pd/C, H2, MeOH, 3 days.

Synthesis of Seco-Cholesterol Derivatives

Reagents and conditions: (a) DMP, DCM, 0 °C, overnight; (b) CeCl3, NaBH4, MeOH:THF = 1:1, 30 min; (c) Ac2O, DMAP, pyridine, 12 h; (d) O3, DCM, −78 °C, 30 min, then H2O; (e) KOH aqueous, MeOH, 2 h. (f) NaBH4, t-BuOH, 70 °C, 30 min; (g) EEDQ, Et3N, R-NH2, DMF, 90 °C, overnight; (h) O3, DCM, −78 °C, 30 min, then Me2S, 0 °C, overnight; (i) propanedioic acid, piperidine, pyridine, 90 °C, 4 h; (j) Pd/C, H2, MeOH, 3 days. The cytotoxicity and efficacy on FXR antagonism of compounds were assessed by a Cell-Titer Blue assay and a cell-based luciferase reporter assay, respectively. FXR-driven SHP promoter transactivation was evaluated by transient cotransfection with a human FXR expression vector and luciferase reporter construct (SHP-luc) in the HEK293T cell line, and the transactivation activity was measured in the presence of GW4064 (10 μM) with or without test compounds. As reported in Table , the inhibition rates of 3a,b and 4a,b were moderate at 10 μM; in general, the potency of 4a with C3−α-OH was better than that of 4b with C3−β-OH, and the subsequent replacement of the C3 position OH with an acetyl ester group had no significant improvement on FXR inhibition. These initial results encouraged us to further modify these seco-cholesterol skeletons. Although most natural steroidal FXR antagonists are conjugated bile acids, in contrast, there was no improvement in FXR inhibition when the carboxyl group was conjugated by taurine (5a) and glycine (5b). In comparison with 4a, the FXR antagonistic activity was significantly increased when the length of the carboxylic chain was extended. Moreover, compound 8, with a saturated chain, is better than compound 7, with an unsaturated chain, for FXR inhibitory activity. The presence of the hydroxyl group at the C9 position substantially increased the FXR inhibitory rates, and the effect of the configuration of C3–OH on FXR inhibitory activity became weak.
Table 1

In Vitro FXR Inhibitory Rates of Seco-Cholesterol Derivatives

compdinhibition (%)acell viability (%)
3a54.7 ± 6.2>100
3b24.9 ± 2.0>100
4a53.1 ± 4.9>100
4b14.1 ± 4.1>100
5a0.7 ± 6.3>100
5b46.9 ± 4.5>100
776.3 ± 1.9>100
885.8 ± 2.4>100
9a90.1 ± 0.6>100
9b100 ± 0.2>100
9c100 ± 0.0>100
9d89.5 ± 2.4>100

The testing concentration was 10 μM.

The testing concentration was 10 μM. We completed preliminary SAR screening for C3, C9, and C11, and further selected compounds with an FXR inhibitory rate of greater than 80% to test their IC50 and cell toxicity. As Table shows, although 9a–d had a great inhibitory rate, most of the compounds demonstrated apparent cytotoxicity, excluding compound 9a. Compound 9a was selected as the most potent FXR antagonist with an IC50 value of 4.6 μM. To further confirm FXR inhibition, we tested the effect of 9a on the downstream target genes of FXR in vivo. C57BL/6J male mice (age 6–8 weeks) were given an antibiotic cocktail (bacitracin, neomycin, and streptomycin) in drinking water at 0.1% (w/v) for a consecutive 3 days to deplete gut microbiota and then gavaged with taurocholic acid (TCA, an FXR agonist, 400 mg/kg) and compound 9a (10 mg/kg) 2, 24, and 48 h before they were sacrificed. In the ileum, 9a substantially inhibited the mRNA expression of FXR target genes Shp and Fgf15, which was induced by TCA, but did not affect the Tgr5 mRNA level (Figure A). Compound 9a also inhibited the expression of Fxr and Shp in the liver (Figure B).
Table 2

In Vitro FXR Inhibitory Activity of Compounds 8, 9a–d, and HCA

compdIC50 (μM) FXR inhibitioncell viability (%)
87.741.1
9a4.6>100
9b4.627.2
9c3.485.4
9d1.645
HCA27.3>100
Figure 3

Compound 9a inhibited the expression of genes downstream of FXR in the ileum (A) and liver (B) induced by TCA, an FXR agonist.

Compound 9a inhibited the expression of genes downstream of FXR in the ileum (A) and liver (B) induced by TCA, an FXR agonist. Recent reports indicated that intestine-selective FXR inhibition is beneficial to treat metabolic diseases.[10−13] Inhibition of intestinal FXR suppresses FGF15/19-FGF4R signaling, subsequently increasing BA synthesis and eliminating BAs via the feces, eventually reversing the accumulation of cholesterol in the liver.[13] In addition, the intestinal selective FXR antagonist Gly-MCA reduces the biosynthesis of intestine-derived ceramides, which reverses obesity, and metabolic syndrome by activating beige fat thermogenesis in obese mice.[9] However, in the liver, in the absence of FXR, the expression of CYP7A1, CYP8B1, and sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) increases, and the level of SHP expression decreases, which results in an increased level of hepatic BAs. The increased BA levels induce IL-1β, which eventually leads to tumorigenesis.[24,25] The present work identified some novel potent FXR antagonists with in vitro and in vivo FXR inhibition activity, while it also shows some antagonism of FXR signaling in the liver, which will be a problem[24−26] and requires further optimization in the future. In conclusion, we discovered a series of novel FXR antagonists through cleavage of the cholesterol C-ring to mimic endogenous ligands. Compound 9a exhibits potent inhibition of FXR with an IC50 value of 4.6 μM in vitro and effectively decreases expression on downstream genes of FXR in vivo. In comparison with other natural BA FXR antagonists, 9a has a more potent inhibitory activity and lower cytotoxicity. Further optimization of these seco-cholesterol derivatives to improve their tissue specificity is in progress in our laboratory and will be reported in due course.
  25 in total

1.  Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin.

Authors:  Lulu Sun; Cen Xie; Guang Wang; Yue Wu; Qing Wu; Xuemei Wang; Jia Liu; Yangyang Deng; Jialin Xia; Bo Chen; Songyang Zhang; Chuyu Yun; Guan Lian; Xiujuan Zhang; Heng Zhang; William H Bisson; Jingmin Shi; Xiaoxia Gao; Pupu Ge; Cuihua Liu; Kristopher W Krausz; Robert G Nichols; Jingwei Cai; Bipin Rimal; Andrew D Patterson; Xian Wang; Frank J Gonzalez; Changtao Jiang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Activation of the nuclear receptor FXR improves hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in diabetic mice.

Authors:  Yanqiao Zhang; Florence Ying Lee; Gabriel Barrera; Hans Lee; Charisse Vales; Frank J Gonzalez; Timothy M Willson; Peter A Edwards
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Investigation around the Oxadiazole Core in the Discovery of a New Chemotype of Potent and Selective FXR Antagonists.

Authors:  Carmen Festa; Claudia Finamore; Silvia Marchianò; Francesco Saverio Di Leva; Adriana Carino; Maria Chiara Monti; Federica Del Gaudio; Sara Ceccacci; Vittorio Limongelli; Angela Zampella; Stefano Fiorucci; Simona De Marino
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Bile acids: natural ligands for an orphan nuclear receptor.

Authors:  D J Parks; S G Blanchard; R K Bledsoe; G Chandra; T G Consler; S A Kliewer; J B Stimmel; T M Willson; A M Zavacki; D D Moore; J M Lehmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Medicinal chemistry and pharmacological effects of Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) antagonists.

Authors:  Christina Lamers; Manfred Schubert-Zsilavecz; Daniel Merk
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Targeted disruption of the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR impairs bile acid and lipid homeostasis.

Authors:  C J Sinal; M Tohkin; M Miyata; J M Ward; G Lambert; F J Gonzalez
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Anti-hyperglycemic activity of a TGR5 agonist isolated from Olea europaea.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sato; Cédric Genet; Axelle Strehle; Charles Thomas; Annelise Lobstein; Alain Wagner; Charles Mioskowski; Johan Auwerx; Régis Saladin
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Microbiome remodelling leads to inhibition of intestinal farnesoid X receptor signalling and decreased obesity.

Authors:  Fei Li; Changtao Jiang; Kristopher W Krausz; Yunfei Li; Istvan Albert; Haiping Hao; Kristin M Fabre; James B Mitchell; Andrew D Patterson; Frank J Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Mediterranean products as promising source of multi-target agents in the treatment of metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Donatella Bagetta; Annalisa Maruca; Antonio Lupia; Francesco Mesiti; Raffaella Catalano; Isabella Romeo; Federica Moraca; Francesca Alessandra Ambrosio; Giosuè Costa; Anna Artese; Francesco Ortuso; Stefano Alcaro; Roberta Rocca
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  Intestine-selective farnesoid X receptor inhibition improves obesity-related metabolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Changtao Jiang; Cen Xie; Ying Lv; Jing Li; Kristopher W Krausz; Jingmin Shi; Chad N Brocker; Dhimant Desai; Shantu G Amin; William H Bisson; Yulan Liu; Oksana Gavrilova; Andrew D Patterson; Frank J Gonzalez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.