| Literature DB >> 35647327 |
Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas as well as the key component depleting the ozone sphere of the earth. Cattle have high feed and water intakes and excrete large amounts of urine and feces. N2O can be produced from cattle excreta during storage and use as fertilizer. Mitigating the N2O emissions from cattle excreta during production is important for protecting the environment and the sustainable development of the cattle industry. Feeding cattle with low-protein diets increases N utilization rates, decreases N excretion and consequently reduces N2O emissions. However, this approach cannot be applied in the long term because of its negative impact on animal performance. Recent studies showed that dietary inclusion of some plant secondary metabolites such as tannins, anthocyanins, glucosinolates and aucubin could manipulate the N excretion and the urinary components and consequently regulate N2O emissions from cattle excreta. This review summarized the recent developments in the effects of dietary tannins, anthocyanins and glucosinolates on the metabolism of cattle and the N2O emissions from cattle excreta and concluded that dietary inclusion of tannins or anthocyanins could considerably reduce N2O emissions from cattle excreta.Entities:
Keywords: Anthocyanin; Aucubin; Cattle; Glucosinolate; Nitrous oxide; Tannin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35647327 PMCID: PMC9118128 DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.12.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Nutr ISSN: 2405-6383
Fig. 1Transformation of nitrogenous compounds in soil (modified from Levy-Booth et al., 2014). The amoA gene encodes NH3 monooxygenase; napA and narG genes encode NO3- reductases; nirK and nirS genes encode NO2- reductases; norB gene encodes NO reductase; nosZ gene encodes N2O reductase; nxrA gene encodes NO2- oxidase; nifH gene encodes nitrogenase; DNRA: Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium.
N proportions of urinary nitrogenous compounds in beef cattle1.
| Item | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total N, g/L | 15.3 (6.7 to 26.9) | 2.6 (2.4 to 2.9) | 5.1 (4.0 to 6.5) | 4.3 (2.5 to 5.5) | 6.2 (5.8 to 6.9) | ND |
| N proportion, % UN | ||||||
| Urea | 60.4 (43.0 to 70.4) | 65.4 (59.2 to 70.3) | 70.4 (63.9 to 76.8) | 66.0 (57.4 to 77.4) | 69.2 (67.2 to 71.9) | 64.7 (59.0 to 70.1) |
| Allantoin | 3.1 (1.9 to 4.5) | 6.0 (4.6 to 7.4) | 6.9 (5.5 to 8.1) | 9.5 (5.7 to 11.2) | 9.6 (7.9 to 10.5) | 6.1 (5.7 to 6.6) |
| Uric acid | ND | 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0) | 1.1 (0.8 to 1.3) | 1.4 (1.0 to 1.8) | 0.9 (0.9 to 1.0) | 0.2 (0.2 to 0.3) |
| Creatinine | 3.4 (2.4 to 4.9) | 10.5 (10.3 to 10.7) | 6.5 (4.3 to 9.2) | 9.6 (5.7 to 14.7) | 9.4 (8.8 to 10.0) | 5.4 (5.0 to 5.8) |
| Hippuric acid | 5.0 (2.2 to 7.3) | 2.7 (2.5 to 2.9) | 4.2 (3.2 to 5.8) | 4.2 (2.2 to 5.6) | 5.1 (4.8 to 5.4) | 3.2 (3.1 to 3.2) |
ND = not determined or not reported; UN = urinary N.
Data are expressed as mean values (range within brackets). Data in Da Silva Cardoso et al. (2019) contained 5 treatment means with n = 5 per treatment; Gao et al. (2022) contained 4 treatment means with n = 8 per treatment; Bao et al. (2018) contained 4 treatment means with n = 4 per treatment; Zhou et al. (2019) contained 4 treatment means with n = 4 per treatment; Zhao et al. (2021) contained 3 treatment means with n = 6 per treatment; Xie et al. (2021) contained 4 treatment means with n = 8 per treatment.
Fig. 2The basic molecular structure of tannins (A, McSweeney et al., 2001), glucosinolates (B, Possenti et al., 2017), anthocyanins (C, Riaz et al., 2016) and aucubin (D, Zeng et al., 2020). R represents the R chain.
Fig. 3The degradation of tannic acid in the rumen (modified from McSweeney et al., 2001).
Contents and types of glucosinolates in Brassica plants.
| Glucosinolates | Broccoli sprouts | Brussels Sprouts | Cauliflower | Red cabbage | Kale rosette leaves |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total, μmol/100 g fresh weight | 402 | 940 | 322 | 462 | 880 |
| Individual molar proportion, % | |||||
| Glucoiberin | 14.90 | 6.24 | 12.92 | 8.01 | 5.57 |
| Glucoraphanin | 33.08 | 1.61 | 1.41 | 32.03 | 1.02 |
| Progoitrin | 2.64 | 14.15 | 2.66 | 19.85 | 0.11 |
| Gluconapin | 0.61 | 11.49 | 0.42 | 7.64 | 58.41 |
| Sinigrin | 0.93 | 16.49 | 13.04 | 8.74 | 8.18 |
| Glucoalysin | 0.03 | 1.17 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Glucoerucin | 25.37 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 1.86 | 0.45 |
| Glucobrassicin | 0.99 | 39.79 | 47.52 | 0.00 | 18.75 |
| Neoglucobrassicin | 7.76 | 0.00 | 7.27 | 0.00 | 4.77 |
| 4-Methoxyglucobrassicin | 13.78 | 8.98 | 12.55 | 10.41 | 1.14 |
| Gluconasturtiin | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 1.25 |
| 4-Hydroxyglucobrassicin | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 1.14 |
Tian et al. (2005).
Volden et al. (2008).
Sun et al. (2011).