| Literature DB >> 35647262 |
Sithu Win1, Monica Miranda-Schaeubinger2, Ronald Gustavo Durán Saucedo3, Paula Carballo Jimenez4, Jorge Flores3, Brandon Mercado-Saavedra5, Lola Camila Telleria6, Anne Raafs7, Manuela Verastegui8, Caryn Bern1, Freddy Tinajeros3, Stephane Heymans7, Rachel Marcus9, Robert H Gilman2, Monica Mukherjee10.
Abstract
Background: Chagas disease is an endemic protozoan disease with high prevalence in Latin America. Of those infected, 20-30% will develop chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) however, prediction using existing clinical criteria remains poor. In this study, we investigated the utility of left ventricular (LV) echocardiographic speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain (GLS) for early detection of CCC. Methods and results: 139 asymptomatic T. cruzi seropositive subjects with normal heart size and normal LV ejection fraction (EF) (stage A or B) were enrolled in this prospective observational study and underwent paired echocardiograms at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Progressors were participants classified as stage C or D at follow-up due to development of symptoms of heart failure, cardiomegaly, or decrease in LVEF. LV GLS was calculated as the average peak systolic strain of 16 LV segments. Measurements were compared between participants who progressed and did not progress by two-sample t-test, and the odds of progression assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Of the 139 participants, 69.8% were female, mean age 55.8 ± 12.5 years, with 12 (8.6%) progressing to Stage C or D at follow-up. Progressors tended to be older, male, with wider QRS duration. LV GLS was -19.0% in progressors vs. -22.4% in non-progressors at baseline, with 71% higher odds of progression per +1% of GLS (adjusted OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.20-2.44, p = 0.003).Entities:
Keywords: Chagas cardiomyopathy; Chagas disease; Echocardiography; Strain imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35647262 PMCID: PMC9136131 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics of participants by progression status.
| Age, years | 55.8 ± 12.5 | 55.2 ± 12.6 | 61.9 ± 9.8 | 0.078 |
| Female, % | 69.8 (97) | 72.4 (92) | 41.7 (5) | 0.026 |
| Hypertension, % | 65.7 (88) | 67.7 (84) | 40.0 (4) | 0.076 |
| Systolic, mmHg | 123.9 ± 23.4 | 123.9 ± 23.7 | 124.3 ± 21.1 | 0.947 |
| Diastolic, mmHg | 75.6 ± 12.7 | 75.2 ± 12.7 | 79.3 ± 12.6 | 0.282 |
| Diabetes, % | 15.1 (21) | 15.0 (19) | 16.7 (2) | 0.704 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29.4 ± 6.4 | 29.3 ± 6.5 | 30.1 ± 5.3 | 0.694 |
| Chagas treatment, % | 10.1 (14) | 10.2 (13) | 8.3 (1) | 0.931 |
| Chagas Stage A, % | 34.5 (48) | 34.7 (44) | 33.3 (4) | 0.927 |
| Chagas Stage B, % | 65.4 (91) | 65.4 (83) | 66.7 (8) | – |
| Heart rate, bpm | 66.8 ± 9.9 | 66.9 ± 10.1 | 65.5 ± 8.5 | 0.638 |
| PR interval, ms | 167.1 ± 23.9 | 166.6 ± 24.1 | 173.5 ± 21.2 | 0.380 |
| QRS duration, ms | 97.5 ± 29.9 | 95.8 ± 29.9 | 115.4 ± 25.1 | 0.030 |
| QTc, ms | 425.9 ± 25.5 | 426.3 ± 24.4 | 420.7 ± 36.9 | 0.485 |
| LBBB, % | 0.7 (1) | 0 (0) | 8.3 (1) | 0.001 |
| RBBB or Incomplete RBBB, % | 10.8 (15) | 10.2 (13) | 16.7 (2) | 0.493 |
| LPFB, % | 2.2 (3) | 1.6 (2) | 8.3 (1) | 0.124 |
| LAFB, % | 12.9 (18) | 12.6 (16) | 16.7 (2) | 0.688 |
| IVCD, % | 4.3 (6) | 3.2 (4) | 16.7 (2) | 0.085 |
| AV Block 1st Degree, % | 8.6 (12) | 8.7 (11) | 8.3 (1) | 0.969 |
| AV Block 2nd or 3rd Degree, % | 0.7 (1) | 0.8 (1) | 0 (0) | 0.758 |
| AFib or Flutter, % | 1.4 (2) | 0 (0) | 16.7 (2) | <0.001 |
| Prolonged QT, % | 1.4 (2) | 1.6 (2) | 0 (0) | 0.661 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 68.6 ± 13.2 | 68.9 ± 13.7 | 65.6 ± 4.5 | 0.403 |
| PR interval, ms | 159.5 ± 21.1 | 158.8 ± 20.8 | 168.0 ± 23.3 | 0.187 |
| QRS duration, ms | 104.7 ± 37.5 | 102.9 ± 37.5 | 123.3 ± 32.9 | 0.072 |
| QTc, ms | 422.3 ± 44.5 | 421.3 ± 45.6 | 432.5 ± 30.7 | 0.409 |
| LBBB, % | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | – |
| RBBB or Incomplete RBBB, % | 15.1 (21) | 13.4 (17) | 33.3 (4) | 0.065 |
| LPFB, % | 0.7 (1) | 0 (0) | 8.3 (1) | 0.001 |
| LAFB, % | 18.0 (25) | 16.5 (21) | 33.3 (4) | 0.148 |
| IVCD, % | 2.9 (4) | 2.4 (3) | 8.3 (1) | 0.237 |
| AV Block 1st Degree, % | 3.6 (5) | 3.2 (4) | 8.3 (1) | 0.357 |
| AV Block 2nd or 3rd Degree, % | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | – |
| AFib or Flutter, % | 2.2 (3) | 0.8 (1) | 16.7 (2) | <0.001 |
| Prolonged QT, % | 0.7 (1) | 0.8 (1) | 0 (0) | 0.758 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD for continuous variables, or % (n) for dichotomous variables.
ECG, electrocardiogram; LBBB, left bundle branch block; RBBB, right bundle branch block; LAFB, left anterior fascicular block; IVCD, intraventricular conduction delay; LPFB, left posterior fascicular block.
Relationship between baseline measures and progression of cardiomyopathy.
| LV GLS (per +1%)** | 1.82 (1.32–2.51) | |
| LV GLS (per +1%)** | 1.76 (1.24–2.51) | |
| Age (per 1 year) | 1.01 (0.96–1.07) | 0.705 |
| Female | 0.41 (0.10–1.59) | 0.196 |
| LV GLS (per +1%)** | 1.71 (1.20–2.44) | |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 1.10 (0.93–1.31) | 0.259 |
| QRS duration (per 10 ms) | 1.28 (0.97–1.70) | 0.083 |
*Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval from univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
** LV GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain.
Fig. 1Receiver operating characteristic curve for LV GLS, LVEF and QRS duration. * LV GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain. LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Fig. 2Progression to Stage C or D at follow-up by Baseline LV GLS. LV GLS, left ventricular global longitudinal systolic strain.