| Literature DB >> 35647164 |
Tao He1, Chan Liu1, Zhi-Xia Lu1, Li-Li Kong1, Yan Li1, Zhe Xu1, Ya-Jing Dong1, Wei Hao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical advantages of painless colonoscopy can reduce the fear and discomfort of patients and increase the detection rate of diseases. Propofol has the characteristics of fast effect and short action time. It is a common choice for painless endoscopic sedation and anesthetics. However, propofol can cause severe respiratory and circulatory depression. Therefore, it is important to find a way to reduce the dose of propofol. AIM: To explore the effect of wrist-ankle acupuncture on propofol dose during colonoscopy.Entities:
Keywords: Analgesia; Ankle; Painless colonoscopy; Wrist-ankle acupuncture
Year: 2022 PMID: 35647164 PMCID: PMC9100732 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3764
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Clin Cases ISSN: 2307-8960 Impact factor: 1.534
Figure 1CONSORT trial profile.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the needling position for wrist-ankle acupuncture. Superior 1: In front of the ulnar margin on the little finger side, the most depressed part when pressed with the thumb; Superior 2: In the center of the front of the wrist, between the palmaris longus tendon and the flexor carpi radialis muscle tendon, i.e. the Neiguan point; Superior 3: On the lateral side of the radial artery; Superior 4: On the radius margin of thumb when keeping the palm of the hand inward; Superior 5: On the center of the back of wrist, i.e. Waiguan point; Superior 6: On the dorsum of ulnar margin on the side of little finger; Inferior 1: In the inner edge of the Achilles tendon; Inferior 2: In the medial side adjacent to the posterior border of tibia; Inferior 3: At the site one transverse finger inward from the front of tibia; Inferior 4: At the midpoint of the anterior margin of tibia and anterior margin of fibula; Inferior 5: In the lateral side adjacent to the posterior border of tibia; Inferior 6: In the outer edge of the Achilles tendon.
Comparison of general data between the two groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sex (male/female) | 40/51 | 46/44 | 0.93 | 0.33 |
| Age (years-old) | 49.34 ± 1.11 | 49.73 ± 1.12 | 0.25 | 0.80 |
| Body mass index (kg) | 67.75 ± 13.58 | 65.54 ± 11.50 | 1.18 | 0.24 |
| Operation time of examination (min) | 15.98 ± 0.66 | 16.08 ± 0.63 | 0.11 | 0.91 |
Comparison of related indexes during anesthesia between the two groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Propofol induction dose (mg) | 80.0 (20) | 115.0 (20) | -9.35 | < 0.0001 |
| Total propofol dose (mg) | 110.0 (40) | 157.5 (70) | -7.15 | < 0.0001 |
| Incidence of hypoxemia, | 2 (2.2) | 10 (11.1) | 4.46 | 0.035 |
| Incidence of hypotension, | 3 (3.3) | 14 (15.6) | 7.99 | 0.005 |
| Abdominal distention, | 8 (8.8) | 26 (28.9) | 11.98 | 0.001 |
| Nausea and vomiting, | 3 (3.3) | 5 (5.6) | 0.14 | 0.46 |
WAA: Wrist-ankle acupuncture; CON: Control.
Comparison of patients' satisfaction and examiners' satisfaction after examination and Borg fatigue index between the two groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wake-up time (min) | 3.26 ± 0.87 | 6.06 ± 0.88 | 21.5 | < 0.0001 |
| VAS score of pain between 15 min | 1.38 ± 0.49 | 2.31 ± 0.47 | 13.05 | < 0.05 |
| VAS score of pain between 30 min | 0.65 ± 0.48 | 1.89 ± 0.32 | 20.56 | < 0.05 |
| Borg fatigue index (5 min) | 1.74 ± 0.697 | 2.57 ± 0.498 | 84.92 | < 0.001 |
| Borg fatigue index (30 min) | 0.396 ± 0.492 | 0.278 ± 0.450 | 2.82 | 0.095 |
| Patients' satisfaction (VAS) | 9.57 ± 0.50 | 9.44 ± 0.50 | 1.71 | 0.88 |
| Examiners' satisfaction (VAS) | 9.89 ± 0.31 | 9.28 ± 0.45 | 158.97 | < 0.001 |
WAA: Wrist-ankle acupuncture; CON: Control; VAS: Visual analog scale.