| Literature DB >> 35647050 |
Xiaoyu Li1,2, Yongliang Jiang1, Hantong Hu2, Jiali Lou1, Yajun Zhang1, Xiaofen He1, Yuanyuan Wu2, Junfan Fang1, Xiaomei Shao1, Jianqiao Fang1.
Abstract
Objectives: By comparing the differences in the thermal transport effect between the heart and lung meridians induced by moxibustion, this study aimed to investigate the specificity of site-to-site associations on the body surface between different meridians.Entities:
Keywords: heart and lung meridians; infrared thermography; moxibustion; site specificity; thermal transport
Year: 2022 PMID: 35647050 PMCID: PMC9136163 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.817901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Flow diagram of the participants through the study [With reference to the CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram, Schulz et al., BMJ, 2010, 340: p. c332; (9)].
Figure 2The schematic of the experiment and the positions of monitoring points. (A) The Lung meridian intervention group. Moxibusition site: Site 1 (LU5); IRT monitoring sites: Site 1 (LU5), Site 2 (Midpoint of LU9 and LU5), Site 3 (LU9), Site 4 (HT3), Site 5 (Midpoint of HT7 and HT3), Site 6 (HT7). (B) The Heart meridian intervention group. Moxibusition site: Site 4 (HT3); IRT monitoring sites: Site 1 (LU5), Site 2 (Midpoint of LU9 and LU5), Site 3 (LU9), Site 4 (HT3), Site 5 (Midpoint of HT7 and HT3), Site 6 (HT7).
Figure 3Procedures for the IRT examination.
Demography characteristics of participants in experiments (mean ± SEM).
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age (YEARS) | 28.08 ± 0.54 | 27.90 ± 0.52 |
| Height (CM) | 167.90 ± 1.46 | 168.85 ± 1.48 |
| Weight (KG) | 62.62 ± 2.52 | 62.86 ± 2.65 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 21.93 ± 0.56 | 21.79 ± 0.65 |
mean ± SEM, mean ± standard error of mean; BMI, body mass index.
Physiological indexes of the study subjects prior to and immediately after IRT examination (mean ± SEM, n = 80).
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SBP (MMHG) | 110.88 ± 2.02 | 109.98 ± 2.05 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 111.53 ± 2.23 | 110.13 ± 2.07 | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| DBP (MMHG) | 72.68 ± 1.52 | 72.40 ± 1.33 | 0.11 | 0.91 | 72.40 ± 1.49 | 72.53 ± 1.25 | 0.15 | 0.88 |
| HR (BPM) | 71.63 ± 1.58 | 69.70 ± 1.39 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 71.58 ± 1.58 | 69.98 ± 1.06 | 1.51 | 0.13 |
| RR (RPM) | 16.05 ± 0.24 | 16.10 ± 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.85 | 16.18 ± 0.25 | 16.10 ± 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.89 |
| BT (°C) | 36.28 ± 0.05 | 36.32 ± 0.04 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 36.35 ± 0.04 | 36.36 ± 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.95 |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; RR, respiratory rate; BT, body temperature; mmHg, millimeters of mercury; bpm, beats per minute; rpm, breaths per minute.
Temperature and its corresponding change magnitude in measurement Sites of both meridians in the Lung intervention group (mean ± SEM, °C).
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Site 1 (LU5) | 32.31 ± 0.22 | 42.36 ± 0.73*** | 42.26 ± 0.51*** | 40.97 ± 0.43*** | 33.91 ± 0.13*** |
| Site 2 | 32.00 ± 0.19 | 32.93 ± 0.19*** | 33.32 ± 0.26*** | 33.36 ± 0.26*** | 31.83 ± 0.18 |
| Site 3 (LU9) | 32.54 ± 0.20 | 33.22 ± 0.21*** | 33.49 ± 0.23*** | 33.33 ± 0.25*** | 32.30 ± 0.25 |
| Site 4 (HT3) | 31.64 ± 0.19 | 31.88 ± 0.19* | 31.93 ± 0.21* | 32.11 ± 0.20** | 31.55 ± 0.20 |
| Site 5 | 31.66 ± 0.18 | 31.65 ± 0.17 | 31.51 ± 0.17 | 31.58 ± 0.18 | 31.25 ± 0.19* |
| Site 6 (HT7) | 32.28 ± 0.22 | 32.29 ± 0.20 | 32.16 ± 0.22 | 32.13 ± 0.25 | 31.92 ± 0.26 |
The values in parentheses were the increased (or decreased) change magnitude of temperature from pre-moxibustion; adjusted P-value based on the Bonferroni post-hoc multiple comparison test; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05 compared with pre-moxibustion; .
Figure 4Temperature curves in measurement sites of both meridians in the Lung intervention group (mean ± SEM, °C). ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05, compared with pre-moxibustion.
Temperature and its corresponding change magnitude in measurement Sites of both meridians in the Heart intervention group (mean ± SEM, °C).
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Site 1 (LU5) | 31.53 ± 0.15 | 32.06 ± 0.16*** | 32.03 ± 0.17*** | 32.11 ± 0.17*** | 31.17 ± 0.16* |
| Site 2 | 31.51 ± 0.19 | 31.88 ± 0.17*** | 31.82 ± 0.18** | 31.87 ± 0.15** | 31.22 ± 0.17 |
| Site 3 (LU9) | 31.98 ± 0.25 | 32.21 ± 0.23 | 32.08 ± 0.24 | 32.06 ± 0.23 | 31.55 ± 0.22 |
| Site 4 (HT3) | 32.14 ± 0.19 | 42.08 ± 0.79*** | 41.02 ± 0.49*** | 43.44 ± 2.29*** | 33.83 ± 0.14*** |
| Site 5 | 32.21 ± 0.18 | 33.34 ± 0.22*** | 33.92 ± 0.23*** | 33.71 ± 0.18*** | 32.10 ± 0.15 |
| Site 6 (HT7) | 32.96 ± 0.27 | 33.51 ± 0.26* | 33.82 ± 0.29** | 33.57 ± 0.24 | 32.76 ± 0.24 |
The values in parentheses were the increased (or decreased) change magnitude of temperature from pre-moxibustion; adjusted P-value based on the Bonferroni post-hoc multiple comparison test; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 compared with pre-moxibustion; .
Figure 5Temperature curves in measurement sites of both meridians in the Heart intervention group (mean ± SEM, °C). ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, and *P < 0.05, compared with pre-moxibustion.
Figure 6Continuous display of representative infrared images. (1) Infrared images in the lung intervention group and (2) Infrared images in the heart intervention group. (A) images with pre-moxibustion, (B) images with moxibustion 5 min, (C) images with moxibustion 10 min, (D) images with moxibustion 15 min, and (E) Images with post-moxibustion 5 min.