| Literature DB >> 35646984 |
Shilong Tang1, Lisha Nie2, Xianfan Liu1, Zhuo Chen1, Yu Zhou1, Zhengxia Pan1, Ling He1.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the application of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of autism in children.Entities:
Keywords: autism; brain; children; iron; magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646984 PMCID: PMC9133426 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.818404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
FIGURE 1Schematic diagram of the image processing and parameter extraction.
Comparison of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and iron content measurement data between the study and control groups [± s, n = 60].
| Frontal | Hippocampus | CA | PU | GP | TH | Temporal | SN | RN | ||
| CBF (ml/100 g⋅min) | Control group | 63.2 ± 8.63 | 68.07 ± 13.38 | 61.20 ± 16.51 | 69.26 ± 21.99 | 72.20 ± 37.18 | 67.88 ± 17.28 | 74.95 ± 15.61 | 70.64 ± 27.98 | 72.99 ± 30.20 |
| Study group | 59.69 ± 9.91 | 65.43 ± 12.19 | 51.57 ± 9.01 | 69.10 ± 13.43 | 74.30 ± 20.24 | 69.18 ± 13.07 | 70.29 ± 11.45 | 59.01 ± 18.28 | 64.95 ± 22.19 | |
| 8.623 | 1.993 | 5.783 | 7.287 | 3.991 | 4.564 | 11.875 | 2.973 | 6.442 | ||
| 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.358 | 0.297 | 0.189 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | ||
| Iron content ppb(× 10–14) | Control group | 104.94 ± 15.59 | 135.77 ± 15.48 | 807.57 ± 35.79 | 49.51 ± 13.87 | 1025.64 ± 163.78 | 314.64 ± 19.65 | 172.99 ± 18.47 | 528.62 ± 48.52 | 197.63 ± 29.66 |
| Study group | 89.32 ± 15.94 | 116.44 ± 16.17 | 543.24 ± 37.63 | 47.59 ± 15.66 | 989.74 ± 143.25 | 289.57 ± 20.62 | 151.82 ± 20.4 | 457.45 ± 39.57 | 129.58 ± 31.87 | |
| T value | 1.687 | 3.896 | 7.692 | 0.985 | 5.639 | 1.003 | 2.438 | 1.392 | 6.781 | |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.067 | 0.135 | 0.094 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||
FIGURE 2Cerebral blood flow (CBF) value and iron content bar graphs.
Comparison of the diffusion kurtosis imaging results between the study and control groups [10–4 μm2/ms± s, n = 60].
| Frontal | Hippocampus | CA | PU | GP | TH | Temporal | SN | RN | ||
| MD value | Control group | 1121.89 ± 50.88 | 1361.07 ± 92.92 | 1229.51 ± 141.55 | 908.63 ± 115.87 | 937.33 ± 117.72 | 1007.63 ± 129.89 | 1053.64 ± 42.74 | 1282.43 ± 116.17 | 1042.22 ± 186.25 |
| Study group | 1494.05 ± 61.18 | 1561.49 ± 93.85 | 1211.10 ± 138.95 | 926.68 ± 95.15 | 936.37 ± 135.43 | 964.42 ± 118.48 | 1339.92 ± 42.15 | 1283.30 ± 126.94 | 1036.29 ± 259.37 | |
| T value | −5.687 | −4.325 | 12.568 | −6.899 | 15.689 | 7.661 | −8.334 | −5.667 | 4.235 | |
| 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.912 | 0.681 | 0.561 | 0.112 | 0.001 | 0.763 | 0.881 | ||
| FA value | Control group | 1198.67 ± 182.35 | 1276.54 ± 163.33 | 987.56 ± 129.39 | 1373.87 ± 166.03 | 1504.81 ± 268.13 | 1538.58 ± 223.78 | 1040.43 ± 163.72 | 2390.88 ± 246.12 | 1550.65 ± 178.43 |
| Study group | 1009.27 ± 168.54 | 1025.36 ± 188.23 | 965.92 ± 149.36 | 1362.33 ± 148.07 | 1513.62 ± 278.33 | 1563.21 ± 225.12 | 838.54 ± 196.24 | 2317.37 ± 221.56 | 1547.28 ± 163.54 | |
| T value | 9.874 | 7.679 | 4.056 | 7.213 | −5.623 | −7.934 | 5.213 | 6.653 | 7.327 | |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.704 | 0.569 | 0.726 | 0.829 | 0.001 | 0.127 | 0.128 | ||
| FAK value | Control group | 2584.56 ± 238.57 | 2340.52 ± 198.25 | 2430.70 ± 153.47 | 2896.67 ± 301.84 | 2874.59 ± 269.13 | 2429.83 ± 298.65 | 2714.91 ± 263.68 | 2131.81 ± 273.63 | 2205.98 ± 314.67 |
| Study group | 2969.32 ± 235.31 | 2621.87 ± 221.55 | 2443.76 ± 178.62 | 2803.59 ± 288.62 | 2884.59 ± 258.33 | 2563.87 ± 271.19 | 2958.98 ± 312.54 | 2187.56 ± 269.64 | 2197.65 ± 268.61 | |
| T value | −12.673 | −3.897 | −8.971 | 7.467 | −12.634 | −15.768 | −3.876 | −6.629 | 9.762 | |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.973 | 0.089 | 0.691 | 0.098 | 0.001 | 0.691 | 0.988 | ||
| MK value | Control group | 1041.27 ± 247.96 | 1113.77 ± 186.48 | 1048.89 ± 211.49 | 1055.84 ± 166.45 | 1285.79 ± 255.22 | 1247.02 ± 256.28 | 955.04 ± 154.82 | 1385.06 ± 229.23 | 1531.84 ± 232.72 |
| Study group | 1008.08 ± 244.34 | 1060.71 ± 201.83 | 989.46 ± 226.40 | 997.80 ± 187.32 | 1268.37 ± 241.20 | 1192.24 ± 245.56 | 912.12 ± 158.52 | 1333.43 ± 224.45 | 1410.35 ± 214.26 | |
| T value | 15.689 | 11.238 | 7.652 | 9.994 | 1.893 | 5.557 | 11.294 | 22.567 | 3.894 | |
| 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.786 | 0.235 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||
| RK value | Control group | 490.93 ± 125.81 | 554.48 ± 125.28 | 527.55 ± 129.82 | 573.87 ± 125.03 | 738.87 ± 168.25 | 721.56 ± 133.73 | 435.97 ± 143.70 | 910.46 ± 129.35 | 829.94 ± 125.61 |
| Study group | 471.25 ± 165.92 | 538.90 ± 131.40 | 515.36 ± 149.13 | 562.33 ± 153.07 | 724.42 ± 178.73 | 699.33 ± 125.66 | 406.57 ± 163.45 | 873.33 ± 121.22 | 811.49 ± 149.55 | |
| T value | 8.376 | 2.229 | 3.051 | 4.223 | 3.684 | 1.996 | 11.237 | 9.671 | 2.364 | |
| 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.356 | 0.079 | 0.751 | 0.088 | 0.001 | 0.114 | 0.856 | ||
| AK value | Control group | 1123.69 ± 92.44 | 1239.29 ± 107.22 | 1077.73 ± 105.12 | 1014.02 ± 168.27 | 1112.05 ± 171.21 | 1121.25 ± 159.94 | 1074.11 ± 99.98 | 1084.05 ± 139.48 | 1443.03 ± 196.92 |
| Study group | 1017.30 ± 87.74 | 1004.66 ± 75.26 | 1001.43 ± 115.05 | 986.46 ± 178.21 | 1093.91 ± 168.64 | 1069.11 ± 156.75 | 1002.44 ± 101.99 | 1047.12 ± 145.24 | 1461.41 ± 197.39 | |
| T value | 5.662 | 2.897 | 4.336 | 6.879 | 2.337 | 11.562 | 7.821 | 1.982 | 4.287 | |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.568 | 0.236 | 0.983 | 0.001 | 0.561 | 0.894 | ||
FIGURE 3Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) value bar graphs.
Comparison of the brain volume measurement data between the study and control groups [cm3, ± s, n = 60].
| Whole brain | Frontal | Hippocampus | CA | PU | GP | TH | Temporal | SN | RN | |
| Control group | 1356.72 ± 92.38 | 143.69 ± 15.73 | 9.15 ± 0.62 | 8.51 ± 0.86 | 14.15 ± 1.17 | 2.41 ± 0.35 | 13.21 ± 1.06 | 126.25 ± 8.02 | 0.77 ± 0.12 | 0.52 ± 0.09 |
| Study group | 1329.20 ± 114.26 | 143.16 ± 12.25 | 9.29 ± 0.59 | 8.26 ± 0.76 | 14.22 ± 1.19 | 2.39 ± 0.33 | 13.29 ± 1.12 | 125.50 ± 7.70 | 0.78 ± 0.11 | 0.52 ± 0.07 |
| T value | 1.894 | 7.832 | 3.652 | 9.763 | 2.883 | 3.765 | 6.892 | 9.764 | 5.732 | 9.421 |
| 0.256 | 0.136 | 0.057 | 0.002 | 0.109 | 0.372 | 0.903 | 0.078 | 0.062 | 0.147 | |
Comparison of the test results of the trace iron, hemoglobin content, and red blood cell volume between the study and control groups [± s, n = 60].
| Trace iron (μmol/L) | Hemoglobin (g/L) | MCV (fL) | |
| Control group | 7.89 ± 0.61 | 139.42 ± 25.58 | 83.62 ± 5.16 |
| Study group | 7.92 ± 0.57 | 141.73 ± 24.57 | 86.45 ± 4.89 |
| T value | 12.376 | 13.871 | 4.579 |
| 0.382 | 0.971 | 0.089 |
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis results of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) values in frontal lobe, temporal lobe and hippocampus (n = 60).
| Variable | AUC | Std. error | 95% CI | ||
|
| |||||
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||
|
| |||||
| Multimodal technology (QSM, CBF, DKI) | 0.902 | 0.026 | 0.000 | 0.850 | 0.953 |
| QSM | 0.876 | 0.031 | 0.000 | 0.815 | 0.937 |
| CBF | 0.803 | 0.039 | 0.000 | 0.726 | 0.880 |
| FA | 0.760 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.676 | 0.844 |
| MK | 0.737 | 0.045 | 0.000 | 0.649 | 0.826 |
| AK | 0.691 | 0.048 | 0.000 | 0.597 | 0.785 |
| RK | 0.711 | 0.047 | 0.000 | 0.618 | 0.804 |
| MD | 0.771 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.686 | 0.855 |
| FAK | 0.709 | 0.047 | 0.000 | 0.616 | 0.801 |
|
| |||||
| Multimodal technology (QSM, CBF, DKI) | 0.896 | 0.027 | 0.000 | 0.842 | 0.950 |
| QSM | 0.860 | 0.032 | 0.000 | 0.797 | 0.924 |
| CBF | 0.789 | 0.042 | 0.000 | 0.706 | 0.872 |
| FA | 0.729 | 0.045 | 0.000 | 0.641 | 0.818 |
| MK | 0.763 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.678 | 0.848 |
| AK | 0.708 | 0.047 | 0.000 | 0.616 | 0.800 |
| RK | 0.690 | 0.048 | 0.000 | 0.597 | 0.784 |
| MD | 0.769 | 0.043 | 0.000 | 0.685 | 0.854 |
| FAK | 0.692 | 0.049 | 0.000 | 0.595 | 0.788 |
|
| |||||
| Multimodal technology (QSM, CBF, DKI) | 0.917 | 0.025 | 0.000 | 0.868 | 0.965 |
| QSM | 0.868 | 0.032 | 0.000 | 0.806 | 0.930 |
| CBF | 0.760 | 0.044 | 0.000 | 0.673 | 0.847 |
| FA | 0.733 | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.642 | 0.823 |
| MK | 0.752 | 0.044 | 0.000 | 0.666 | 0.839 |
| AK | 0.738 | 0.045 | 0.000 | 0.650 | 0.826 |
| RK | 0.642 | 0.05 | 0.007 | 0.543 | 0.741 |
| MD | 0.729 | 0.049 | 0.000 | 0.632 | 0.825 |
| FAK | 0.716 | 0.047 | 0.000 | 0.624 | 0.808 |
FIGURE 4(A) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis results of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), cerebral blood flow (CBF), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and multimodal technology (QSM, CBF, DKI) values in frontal lobe. (B) ROC curve analysis results of QSM, CBF, DKI, and multimodal technology (QSM, CBF, DKI) values in hippocampus. (C) ROC curve analysis results of QSM, CBF, DKI, and multimodal technology (QSM, CBF, DKI) values in temporal lobe.