| Literature DB >> 35646842 |
Jiwei Chen1, Yifan Huang1, Yuexuan Shu1, Xiaoyue Hu2,3, Di Wu1, Hangjin Jiang2, Kui Wang1, Weihua Liu3, Weiqi Fu1,4.
Abstract
Microalgae have drawn much attention for their potential applications as a sustainable source for developing bioactive compounds, functional foods, feeds, and biofuels. Diatoms, as one major group of microalgae with high yields and strong adaptability to the environment, have shown advantages in developing photosynthetic cell factories to produce value-added compounds, including heterologous bioactive products. However, the commercialization of diatoms has encountered several obstacles that limit the potential mass production, such as the limitation of algal productivity and low photosynthetic efficiency. In recent years, systems and synthetic biology have dramatically improved the efficiency of diatom cell factories. In this review, we discussed first the genome sequencing and genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) of diatoms. Then, approaches to optimizing photosynthetic efficiency are introduced with a focus on the enhancement of biomass productivity in diatoms. We also reviewed genome engineering technologies, including CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) gene-editing to produce bioactive compounds in diatoms. Finally, we summarized the recent progress on the diatom cell factory for producing heterologous compounds through genome engineering to introduce foreign genes into host diatoms. This review also pinpointed the bottlenecks in algal engineering development and provided critical insights into the future direction of algal production.Entities:
Keywords: biomass productivity; diatoms; microalgae; photosynthesis; synthetic biology; systems biology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646842 PMCID: PMC9136054 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.908804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Advantages and disadvantages of different types of cell factories.
| Platform | Advantages | Disadvantages | Example | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bacteria | low cost; high growth rate; easy to perform | without post-translational modifications; require external nutrition | recombinant human insulin (Humulin®) |
|
| yeasts | have post-translational modifications | require external nutrition | humanized Ab (Herceptin®) |
|
| plants | no external nutrition needed; low cost | occupy the land for crops; restricted by-laws; low growth rates and yields | recombinant taliglucerase alfa |
|
| mammals | mature commercial applications; similar to humans; have post-translational modifications | high cost; low efficiency; susceptible to pathogens | recombinant c1- esterase inhibitor |
|
| diatoms | rapid biomass accumulation; have post-translational modifications | low efficiency of autotrophy at high density; transgene-silencing; fewer Synthetic biology tools | monoclonal antibodies |
|
Summary of sequenced diatom genomes.
| Scientific name | GenBank | Modifier | Size (Mbp) | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GCA_014885115.2 | A3 | 66.88 | 2020 |
|
| GCA_019693545.1 | NMCA1316 | 37.74 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_021927905.1 | NIES-3715 | 41 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_013187285.1 | CCMP332 | 171.1 | 2020 |
|
| GCA_019693525.1 | UTEX2084 | 48.25 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_019693425.1 | UTEX661 | 30.16 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_002217885.1 | JPCC DA0580 | 49.74 | 2017 |
|
| GCA_900642245.1 | / | 98.38 | 2019 |
|
| GCA_900095095.1 | / | 68.97 | 2016 |
|
| GCA_001750085.1 | CCMP1102 | 80.54 | 2016 |
|
| GCA_004335955.1 | AAB | 29.55 | 2019 |
|
| GCA_004335815.1 | MG8b | 53.21 | 2019 |
|
| GCA_900291995.1 | / | 29.21 | 2018 |
|
| GCA_019154785.2 | hildebrandi | 99.71 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_019593585.1 | CPCC-160 | 41.16 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_016586335.1 | NIES-4239 | 47.13 | 2020 |
|
| GCA_013372465.1 | Nitz4 | 27.23 | 2020 |
|
| GCA_000150955.2 | CCAP 1055/1 | 27.45 | 2008 |
|
| GCA_900660405.1 | B856 | 56.77 | 2019 |
|
| GCA_018806925.1 | RCC75 | 51.09 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_019693575.1 | NMCA1005 | 83.51 | 2021 |
|
| GCA_000296195.2 | CCMP1005 | 92.04 | 2012 |
|
| GCA_000149405.2 | CCMP1335 | 32.44 | 2009 |
|
| GCA_020086505.1 | SBOTS_1isolate | 52.89 | 2021 |
FIGURE 1Timeline and basic and applied research trends on microalgal PE and biomass productivity. The upper panel refers to fundamental research on PE in diatoms, and the lower panel refers to practical applications of synthetic biology tools. The red part represents green microalgae, while the blue region represents diatoms.
FIGURE 2The biosynthetic pathway of Fx and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in diatoms. Rectangles represent intermediates, and arrows represent biosynthetic pathways and active enzymes. (A) Fucoxanthin. The figure was adapted from a previous publication (Manfellotto et al., 2020). A dashed line represents the unknown biosynthetic process. (B) omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The figure was adapted from a previous publication (Sayanova et al., 2017) and only covers the pathway of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Abbreviations: IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; PSY, phytoene synthase; GGPPS, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; PDS, phytoene desaturase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; CRISO, carotenoid isomerase; LCYB, lycopene β-cyclase; Zx, zeaxanthin; ZEP1, ZEP2, and ZEP3, three types of Zea epoxidase; VDE, violaxanthin de-epoxidase; Vx, violaxanthin; VDL, violaxanthin de-epoxidase-like proteins; Nx, neoxanthin; Ddx, diadinoxanthin; Dtx, diatoxanthin.
FIGURE 3Schematic diagram of engineering diatoms as cell factories for heterologous production of value-added compounds. Heterologous expression system includes (A) the selection of target source genes, (B) conventional genetic engineering or genome engineering technologies like CRISPR, (C) DNA transformation and expression locus in diatoms, and (D) production of value-added compounds (D'Adamo et al., 2019). The part with blue cycle and arrows represents the framework for inorganic carbon utilization. Abbreviations: CBB, Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle; CCM, carbon concentrating mechanism; PHB, Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate.
Heterologous compounds expressed in diatoms.
| Heterologous compounds | Hosts | Promoter | Selective makers | Transformation method | Yield | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human IgG antibody1 |
| nitrate reductase promoter | GFP | microparticle bombardment | 1.6 mg/L |
|
| Human IgG antibody1 |
| nitrate reductase promoter | GFP | microparticle bombardment | 2.5 mg/L |
|
| Human IgG antibody2 |
| nitrate reductase promoter | GFP | microparticle bombardment | 1.3 mg/L |
|
| Bisabolene |
| GAPDH gene promoter | nptII | microparticle bombardment | 0.81 ± 0.22 mg/L |
|
| Lupeol |
|
|
| microparticle bombardment | 0.1 mg/L |
|
| Geraniol |
| upstream of Phatr3_J49678, Phatr3_49202, Phatr3_J21569, Phatr3_J1 35766 and Clp1p | mVenus (YFP) | bacterial conjugation | 0.309 mg/L |
|
| Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) |
| nitrate reductase promoter | eGFP | microparticle bombardment | 10.6% of dry cell weight |
|
bler, zeocin resistance gene marker; eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; FCPA/LHCF1, fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c binding protein A promoter; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GFP, green fluorescent protein; natr, nourseothricin resistance selection marker; nptII, neomycin phosphotransferase gene; YFP, yellow fluorescent protein; 1the human monoclonal IgG antibody CL4mAb against the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg); 2the human monoclonal IgG antibody against pathogenic Marburg virus nucleoprotein.
FIGURE 4Conceptual scheme for diatom cell factory. (A) systems biology: understanding the whole picture of metabolism in diatoms; (B) synthetic biology: genetic manipulation and genome engineering; (C) photosynthetic efficiency: fundamental principle of energy conversion and biomass production; (D) value-added products: output from diatom cell factory including homologous and heterologous compounds.