| Literature DB >> 35646669 |
Zheng Tian1,2,3,4,5,6, Ming Liu2,4,5,6, Xiaosheng Fang1,2,3,4,5,6, Xiangxiang Zhou1,2,3,4,5,6, Peipei Li1,2,3,4,5,6, Ying Li1,2,3,4,5,6, Lingyan Zhang1,2,3,4,5,6, Fang Liu7, Ya Zhang2,4,5,6, Xin Wang1,2,3,4,5,6.
Abstract
The biological and clinical features of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) exhibited profound heterogeneity across Chinese and patients of predominately European descent. However, the age-related peculiarities and risk assessment of Chinese CLL patients remained ill-defined. The present study demonstrated that CLL patients were characterized by the earlier age at onset in China (median age at diagnosis: 63 years old) than in the United States (median age at diagnosis: 69 years old). Young patients from Shandong Provincial Hospital CLL database displayed prolonged overall survival than the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cohort. Furthermore, among Chinese CLL patients, young patients showed an increased relapse rate compared with elderly patients. To optimize the risk assessment of CLL patients, novel risk score models named PR-Score and HBG-Score were developed for predicting the outcomes of young and elderly CLL patients respectively. The neonatal survival prediction systems were superior to international prognostic index for CLL (CLL-IPI) and Binet stage in assessing the overall survival and progression free survival of CLL patients. The analyses highlighted refinement of risk evaluation for CLL patients in different age groups, providing insights into individualized diagnosis and treatment of CLL.Entities:
Keywords: age; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; prognosis; real world observation; risk score
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646669 PMCID: PMC9135454 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.885150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Age composition of CLL patients. (A) Age composition of Chinese patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) included in the Shandong Provincial Hospital CLL (SPHCLL) database from 2010 to 2021. (B) Age composition of CLL patients of predominately European descent registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2018. (C) Age composition of Asian Americans with CLL registered in the SEER database from 2010 to 2018. (D) Age composition ratio of CLL patients after standardization according to the age distributions of the United States (US) and China.
Figure 2Survival analysis among CLL patients from the US and China. (A) Overall survival (OS) differences among patients from the SEER database and the Chinese SPHCLL database. (B) OS differences among young (<60 years old) patients from the SEER database and the Chinese SPHCLL database.
Clinical-pathological parameters in young and elderly CLL patients.
| Parameters | Young group (<60 years old) | Elderly group (≥60 years old) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) (%) | 150/233 (64.4) | 238/368 (64.7) | 0.941 |
| Splenauxe (%) | 62/112 (55.4) | 96/174 (55.2) | 0.976 |
| Hepatomegaly (%) | 9/107 (8.4) | 12/171 (7.0) | 0.816 |
| Lymphadenectasis (%) | 109/116 (94.0) | 150/169 (88.8) | 0.148 |
| Smoking history (%) | 47/111 (42.3) | 60/172 (34.9) | 0.212 |
| Drinking history (%) | 43/110 (39.1) | 59/171 (34.5) | 0.448 |
|
| 129/155 (83.2) | 231/252 (91.7) |
|
| Coronary heart disease | 6/89 (6.7) | 61/169 (36.1) |
|
| Hypertension | 28/95 (29.5) | 94/167 (56.3) |
|
| Diabetes | 18/95 (18.9) | 45/162 (27.8) | 0.134 |
| Hepatitis B | 9/87 (10.3) | 8/147 (5.4) | 0.195 |
| Tuberculosis | 4/84 (4.8) | 6/146 (4.1) | 0.815 |
|
| |||
| A | 22/107 (20.6) | 43/175 (24.6) | 0.213 |
| B | 47/107 (43.9) | 58/175 (33.1) | |
| C | 39/107 (36.4) | 74/175 (42.3) | |
|
| |||
| 0 | 8/107 (7.5) | 13/172 (7.6) | 0.912 |
| I | 27/107 (25.2) | 40/172 (23.3) | |
| II | 28/107 (26.1) | 43/172 (25.0) | |
| III | 16/107 (15.0) | 22/172 (12.8) | |
| IV | 28/107 (26.2) | 54/172 (31.4) | |
|
| |||
| Normal | 18/56 (32.1) | 39/91 (42.9) | 0.225 |
| Del 17p13 | 7/56 (12.5) | 13/91 (14.3) | 0.810 |
| Del 11q22.3 | 11/56 (19.6) | 9/91 (9.9) | 0.136 |
| Del 13q | 22/56 (39.3) | 33/91 (36.3) | 0.865 |
| Trisomy 12 | 8/56 (14.3) | 14/91 (15.4) | 0.856 |
|
| 12/35 (34.3) | 15/46 (32.6) | 0.874 |
|
| |||
| Complex abnormal karyotype | 7/52 (13.5) | 9/80 (11.3) | 0.923 |
| Uncomplex abnormal karyotype | 8/52 (15.4) | 12/80 (15.0) | |
| Normal karyotype | 37/52 (71.2) | 59/80 (73.8) | |
|
| |||
| RBC, (3.8-5.1) 10^12/L | 4.17 ± 0.83 | 3.80 ± 0.95 |
|
| Hb, (115-150) g/L | 123.95 ± 27.27 | 116.82 ± 28.70 |
|
| HCT, (35-45) % | 37.95 ± 7.08 | 35.80 ± 8.05 |
|
| MCV, (82-100) fL | 91.65 ± 7.72 | 95.56 ± 8.97 |
|
| RDW-SD, (39-46) fl | 46.45 ± 6.13 | 50.33 ± 10.34 |
|
| MCH, (27-34) pg | 29.71 ± 3.00 | 30.88 ± 2.77 |
|
| PLT, (125-300) 10^9/L | 173.57 ± 98.93 | 149.81 ± 85.08 |
|
| PCT, % | 0.18 ± 0.09 | 0.16 ± 0.09 |
|
| WBC, (3.5-9.5) 10^9/L | 42.90 ± 96.84 | 49.33 ± 90.72 | 0.535 |
| NEUT%, (40-75) % | 28.55 ± 31.30 | 21.53 ± 18.42 |
|
| LYMPH%, (20-50) % | 66.91 ± 25.25 | 72.78 ± 20.54 |
|
| AST, (13-35) U/L | 26.02 ± 21.41 | 21.93 ± 11.90 | 0.054 |
| ALT, (7-40) U/L | 25.00 ± 30.04 | 16.58 ± 11.40 |
|
| ALB, (40-55) g/L | 40.49 ± 5.94 | 39.42 ± 6.04 | 0.125 |
| APO A, (1-2) g/L | 1.03 ± 0.25 | 0.99 ± 0.23 | 0.163 |
| LP (a), (0-0.3) g/L | 0.26 ± 0.26 | 0.24 ± 0.22 | 0.361 |
| AAT, (89-205) mg/dl | 174.29 ± 61.31 | 153.47 ± 43.97 |
|
| CREA, (40-105) umol/L | 68.77 ± 24.80 | 75.62 ± 21.62 |
|
| eGFR (>90) | 102.83 ± 21.23 | 87.62 ± 15.25 |
|
| URIC, (155-357) umol/L | 301.69 ± 87.02 | 332.80 ± 93.94 |
|
| CysC, (0.54-1.15) mg/L | 1.07 ± 0.42 | 1.31 ± 0.84 |
|
| PHOS, (0.83-1.48) mmol/L | 1.22 ± 0.22 | 1.15 ± 0.21 |
|
| BMG, (1.0-3.0) mg/L | 3.17 ± 2.04 | 3.69 ± 2.02 |
|
| LDH, (120-250) U/L | 222.61 ± 108.45 | 239.66 ± 186.96 | 0.446 |
Bold p values represent statistical significance. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
AAT indicates alpha-1 antitrypsin; ALB, albumin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APO A, apolipoprotein A; AST, aspertate aminotransferase; BMG, beta macroglobulin; CREA, creatinine; CysC, cystation C; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb, hemoglobin; HCT, hematocrit; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; LP(a), lipoprotein(a); LYMPH%, lymphocyte percentage; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; NEUT%, neutrophilic granulocyte percent; PCT, platelet crit; PLT, platelet; RBC, red blood cell; RDW-SD, red cell volume distribution width-SD; WBC, white blood cell; PA, prealbumin; PHOS, phosphorus; and URIC, uric acid.
First-line treatment options and clinical efficacy evaluation in young and elderly CLL patients.
| Parameters | Young group (<60 years old) | Elderly group (≥60 years old) | χ2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| FC | 13/75 (17.3) | 26/98 (26.5) | 2.756 | 0.103 |
| FCR | 11/75 (14.7) | 9/98 (9.2) | 1.249 | 0.338 |
| CHOP | 6/75 (8.0) | 3/98 (3.1) | 1.219 | 0.270 |
| RCHOP | 3/75 (4.0) | 3/98 (3.1) | 0.112 | 0.738 |
| Ibrutinib | 8/75 (10.7) | 8/98 (8.2) | 0.317 | 0.605 |
| Bendamustine | 5/75 (6.7) | 2/98 (2.0) | 1.302 | 0.254 |
| Chlorambucil | 10/75 (13.3) | 18/98 (18.4) | 0.794 | 0.411 |
|
| ||||
| CR/PR | 17/26 (65.4) | 13/17 (76.5) | 0.513 | |
| SD | 4/26 (15.4) | 1/17 (5.9) | 0.633 | |
| PD | 5/26 (19.2) | 3/17 (17.6) | 0.896 | |
| Refractory | 5/26 (19.2) | 5/17 (29.4) | 0.481 | |
| Relapse | 11/26 (42.3) | 2/17 (11.8) |
| |
|
| ||||
| CR/PR | 5/7 (71.4) | 10/12 (83.3) | 0.603 | |
| PD | 2/7 (28.6) | 2/12 (16.7) | 0.603 |
Bold p values represent statistical significance. *p < 0.05.
CHOP indicates cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone; CR, complete remission; FC, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; FCR, ludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab; PD, disease progression; PR, partial remission; RCHOP, rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone; SD, stable disease.
Figure 3Survival analysis of Chinese CLL patients. (A) OS differences among young (<60 years old) and elderly (≥60 years old) Chinese CLL patients from the SPHCLL database. (B) Progression free survival (PFS) differences among young and elderly Chinese CLL patients from the SPHCLL database.
Univariable and multivariable analyses of OS in young and elderly CLL patients.
| Characteristics | Young group (<60 years old) | Elderly group (≥60 years old) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||
| HR (95% CI) |
| Coef | HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| Coef | HR (95% CI) |
| |
|
| 0.971 (0.951-0.991) |
| NS | NS | NS | 0.973 (0.961-0.985) |
| -0.030 | 0.970 (0.955-0.985) |
|
|
| 0.327 (0170-0.629) |
| -0.839 | 0.432 (0.195-0.960) |
| 0.460 (0.316-0.670) |
| NS | NS | NS |
|
| 1.326 (1.047-1.679) |
| 0.155 | 1.168 (0.968-1.408) |
| 1.115 (0.942-1.319) | 0.205 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 0.915 (0.850-0.985) |
| NS | NS | NS | 0.907 (0.853-0.984) |
| NS | NS | NS |
|
| 1.038 (0.938-1.147) | 0.470 | ND | ND | ND | 1.038 (1.001-1.077) |
| -0.095 | 1.099 (1.044-1.158) |
|
|
| 0.032 (0.003-0.307) |
| NS | NS | NS | 0.198 (0.041-0.966) |
| NS | NS | NS |
|
| 0.048 (0.007-0.311) |
| NS | NS | NS | 0.086 (0.019-0.388) |
| NS | NS | NS |
|
| 1.060 (1.001-1.123) |
| NS | NS | NS | 1.146 (1.026-1.279) |
| NS | NS | NS |
|
| 1.011 (0.999-1.024) | 0.072 | ND | ND | ND | 1.019 (1.007-1.030) |
| -0.028 | 1.028 (1.011-1.045) |
|
|
| 0.986 (0.936-1.039) | 0.592 | ND | ND | ND | 0.965 (0.935-0.996) |
| NS | NS | NS |
Bold p values represent statistical significance. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
BUN indicates blood urea nitrogen; BUN/CREA, blood urea nitrogen/creatinine; 95% CI indicates 95% confidence interval; GLO, globulin; HDL-C, high-density lipoproteincholesterol; ND, not done; NS, not signficant; PT, prothrombin time; RBP, retinol binding protein; ALB, APO A, Hb and RBC are explained in .
Figure 4Novel risk score models for young (<60 years old) and elderly (≥60 years old) CLL patients. (A) Increased PR-Score significantly correlated with shortened OS in young patients. (B) Increased PR-Score significantly correlated with shortened PFS in young patients. (C) PR-Score model showed advanced prognostic ability than international prognostic index for CLL (CLL-IPI) and Binet stage in predicting OS of young patients. (D) PR-Score model showed advanced prognostic ability than CLL-IPI and Binet stage in predicting PFS of young patients. (E) Increased HBG-Score significantly correlated with shortened OS in elderly patients. (F) Increased HBG-Score significantly correlated with shortened PFS in elderly patients. (G) HBG-Score model showed advanced prognostic ability than CLL-IPI and Binet stage in predicting OS of elderly patients. (H) HBG-Score model showed advanced prognostic ability than CLL-IPI and Binet stage in predicting PFS of elderly patients.