Literature DB >> 35646500

Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumor of the Infratentorial Multiple Lesions: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Kiyohide Kakuta1, Kenichiro Asano1, Norihito Shimamura1, Akira Kurose2, Hiroki Ohkuma1,3.   

Abstract

A dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT) is a benign neoplasm that usually occurs in the supratentorial cerebral cortex. Here, we report a rare case of an infratentorial DNT in a 42-year-old woman who presented with dizziness and a gait disturbance. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lesion demonstrated hyperintensity on T2-weighted images and hypointensity on T1-weighted images of the left cerebellar hemisphere with a multifocal lesion. Macroscopically, the lesion appeared soft, avascular, and slightly torose at the cortical surface. Histologically, dysplastic disorganization of the cortex and floating neurons were observed. The pathological and immunochemical features of this case agree with the diagnosis of a DNT. The lesion partially included cortical heterotopia, which is a novel observation in an infratentorial DNT. On the basis of the previous reports, we discussed the surgical resection of the infratentorial DNT.
© 2022 The Japan Neurosurgical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellar tumor; dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; infratentorial tumor

Year:  2022        PMID: 35646500      PMCID: PMC9119689          DOI: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMC Case Rep J        ISSN: 2188-4226


Introduction

A dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT) is a benign lesion that corresponds to a World Health Organization (WHO) grade I tumor and has the characteristics of a hamartoma. DNT usually manifests in the temporal lobe as a glial-neuronal tumor[1]) and is associated with drug-resistant partial seizures. In unusual cases, DNTs have been reported to occur in the posterior fossa and instead present with ataxia or vertigo.[2-4]) We present a case of an infratentorial DNT and discuss the strategy of adequate treatment based on previous reports.

Case Report

A 47-year-old woman was admitted with a 3-month history of dizziness and a gait disturbance, but no ataxia or nystagmus (Karnofsky performance status [KPS] 80%). The patient had no family history of central neuronal system abnormalities or other relevant disease. Computed tomography (CT) showed a low-density area and calcification of the left cerebellar hemisphere (Fig. 1a). No enhancement was observed on CT. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also showed multiple lesions of the left cerebellar hemisphere and vermis (Fig. 1b-d); the lesions appeared as hypointensities on T1-weighted images and hyperintensities on T2-weighted images. No enhancement was observed after gadolinium injection. Cerebral angiography showed no tumor stain in a six-vessel study, and a thallium single-photon emission computed tomography (Tl-SPECT) scan showed no abnormal uptake. Accordingly, a low-grade glioma was assumed as the preoperative diagnosis. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient before surgery.
Fig. 1

(a) Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showing a low-density area containing a focal calcified hyperdense lesion in the left cerebellar hemisphere (arrows). (b-d) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing multiple lesions in the left cerebellar hemisphere and vermis (arrowheads). (b) T1-weighted image showing hypointensity. (c) T2-weighted and (d) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image showing hyperintensity. Notably, there is no peri-tumoral edema or space-occupying effect.

(a) Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan showing a low-density area containing a focal calcified hyperdense lesion in the left cerebellar hemisphere (arrows). (b-d) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showing multiple lesions in the left cerebellar hemisphere and vermis (arrowheads). (b) T1-weighted image showing hypointensity. (c) T2-weighted and (d) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image showing hyperintensity. Notably, there is no peri-tumoral edema or space-occupying effect. A left-sided suboccipital craniectomy was performed. Macroscopically, the lesion appeared soft, avascular, and slightly torose at the cortical surface. The boundary was well defined but could not detached from the cerebellar hemisphere (Fig. 2a). These findings supported the conclusion that the lesion was an intra-axial tumor. This lesion showed barely visible 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence (Fig. 2b). Several pieces of the left cerebellar hemisphere were removed for biopsy (Fig. 2c). The intraoperative frozen section diagnosis was cortical dysplasia, and the operation was therefore terminated. The patient had no postoperative complications. The symptoms improved spontaneously. She was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 12 (KPS 100%).
Fig. 2

Intraoperative photograph during resection of the left cerebellar tumor. (a) The lesion (arrow) was gray and well circumscribed. (b) The lesion was observed with slight fluorescence induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). (c) Partial resection was performed.

Intraoperative photograph during resection of the left cerebellar tumor. (a) The lesion (arrow) was gray and well circumscribed. (b) The lesion was observed with slight fluorescence induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). (c) Partial resection was performed. A histological examination of the lesion showed oligodendrocyte-like cells (OLCs), with round medium-sized nuclei that were distributed over a wide range (Fig. 3a). The background was edematous, with a viscous consistency, and small myxoid cystic lesions including differentiated neurons, which corresponded to “floating neuron,” were observed (Fig. 3b). A chicken-wire-like vascular pattern was also identified. These features satisfied the criteria of a DNT, and the part of the lesion containing cells that resembled neurons was considered to be equivalent to cortical heterotopia. Neurons in various stages of differentiation with round nuclei, defined nucleoli, and eosinophilic reticulum were intermixed with OLCs (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3

(a) Photomicrography of the lesion shows oligodendrocyte-like cells (OLCs) and specific neuroglial elements distributed over a wide range (hematoxylin–eosin stain [H&E], ×40). (b) Floating neurons are observed in the myxoid interstitial tissue (H&E, ×100). (c) Neurons at various stages of differentiation are observed with round nuclei, defined nucleoli, and eosinophilic reticulum intermixed with OLCs (H&E, ×200). (d) Olig2-positive cells (×200). (e) Chromogranin A-positive cells (×200). (f) Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) -positive cell processes are densely observed throughout the lesion (×200).

(a) Photomicrography of the lesion shows oligodendrocyte-like cells (OLCs) and specific neuroglial elements distributed over a wide range (hematoxylin–eosin stain [H&E], ×40). (b) Floating neurons are observed in the myxoid interstitial tissue (H&E, ×100). (c) Neurons at various stages of differentiation are observed with round nuclei, defined nucleoli, and eosinophilic reticulum intermixed with OLCs (H&E, ×200). (d) Olig2-positive cells (×200). (e) Chromogranin A-positive cells (×200). (f) Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) -positive cell processes are densely observed throughout the lesion (×200). A part of the lesion extended into the cerebellar cortex. On immunohistochemistry, olig2 labeling indicated the presence of OLCs (Fig. 3d). Chromogranin A (Fig. 3e) and neuronal nuclei (NeuN) labeling indicated differentiated neurons. The neuropil around the cells was positive for synaptophysin. Neurons within the cortical heterotopia were positive for chromogranin A, NeuN, and olig2. The MIB-1 staining index was less than 1%. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive cell processes were densely observed throughout the lesion (Fig. 3f). Sanger sequencing revealed no mutations in in IDH-1, IDH-2, BRAF and TERT genes (Supplementary Fig. 1a-d). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis revealed that neither IDH mutation nor 1p19q codeletion had been detected in the lesion (Supplementary Fig. 1e). This genetic profile suggests that the lesion is negative for oligodendroglioma. Given these histological and genetic characteristics, the lesion was determined to be a DNT that extended into the cerebellar cortex, contained neurons at various stages of differentiation, and involved cortical heterotopia.

Discussion

A DNT was first identified in 1988 in temporal lobectomy specimens removed for the treatment of epilepsy.[1]) A DNT was initially observed as a group of tumors with superficial resemblance to small oligodendroglioma and considered to be hamartomatous. Later, however, Daumas-Duport et al. proposed the concept of a DNT with characteristics consistent with the WHO-classified glial-neuronal neoplasm (grade I).[1]) A DNT is indeed a benign, mixed glial-neuronal neoplasm characterized by an intracortical location, multinodular architecture, and heterogeneous cellular composition.[1]) The most important histological hallmark of DNT is the specific glioneuronal element, which is a structure formed by bundles of axons lined with small OLCs and oriented in columns perpendicular to the cortical surface. Between these columns, floating neurons can be observed, which are neurons with normal cytology that appear to float in a pale, eosinophilic matrix.[5],[6]) The OLCs express glial markers, including the S-100 protein and glial transcription factor Olig2. GFAP is absent in OLCs, whereas the stellate astrocytes within the specific glioneuronal element are positive for GFAP.[7]) A DNT is generally located in the temporal lobe, and it is associated with early-onset complex partial seizures that progress to medically intractable epilepsy before the age of 20 years.[1]) In previous reports, there is a slight sex predominance among male.[7]) The typical age of clinical presentation ranges between 2 and 23 years,[1],[8],[9]) with 85% of patients under the age of 15 years;[1]) however, DNTs have been reported as early as 16 months[10]) and as late as 75 years.[11]) The most common location is in the temporal lobe (62%),[1],[9],[12-15]) but DNTs can be detected in any lobe of the brain, with 31% occurring in the frontal lobe and 7% in the parietal and occipital lobes.[1],[9],[16],[17]) Supratentorial DNTs are generally found in young patients with partial complex epilepsy, but they have also been associated with other manifestations, such as learning difficulties,[18]) headache,[19]) and psychosis.[20]) In contrast, several cases of DNT have been reported in an unusual anatomical location (e.g., septum pellucidum,[21]) basal ganglia,[22],[23]) brain stem,[3],[22],[24]) or cerebellum[2-4],[22],[23],[25-31])), and associated symptoms included ataxia, nausea, vomiting, vertigo, and dizziness. Interestingly, no reported cases of infratentorial DNT have involved epilepsy. The radiological appearance of DNT on non-enhanced CT is a cortical or subcortical focal mass that is moderately to markedly hypodense[32-34]) and occasionally isodense or hyperdense.[32],[33],[35]) Calcification can be observed inside the tumor in 11%-36% of patients.[1],[16],[32],[33],[36]) On MRI, a DNT appears as a hypointense cortical mass on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) in 95% of cases[32]) and as a hyperintense mass on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) in 100% of cases.[32-35]) Angiography can show normal findings (54%-100%),[1],[37-40]) even in lesions with bleeding.[41]) A DNT displays neovascularization in 10.2% of cases[1],[6],[36]) and can be avascular in 15.3% of cases, producing a shift of normal structures in 12.8% of cases.[1],[5]) Abe et al. reported that a DNT does not produce abnormal uptake on Tl201-SPECT, but it shows hypoperfusion on I123-IMP-SPECT or Tc99m-HMPAO-SPECT.[36]) In the present case, the typical appearance of DNT was seen on CT, MRI, angiography, and Tl201-SPECT, but I123-IMP-SPECT was not performed. To date, 13 cases of infratentorial DNT have been reported in the literature (Table 1).[2-4],[22-31]) Three reports were combined with supratentorial lesions.[22],[23],[30]) In the other 10 cases, DNTs were located focally in the infratentorial cortex, and associated symptoms included vertigo[2]) and ataxia.[3],[4]) Taken together with the present case report, infratentorial DNTs do not appear to be associated with epilepsy. Surgical treatment was recommended in 11 patients,[2-4],[22],[24-27],[30],[31]) 5 patients underwent complete resection,[2],[24],[25],[27],[31]) 3 patients underwent partial resection or biopsy,[3],[4],[26]) and 3 patients underwent remote lesion removal (right temporal lobectomy).[22],[23],[30]) Long-term clinical follow-up demonstrated no evidence of recurrence and a stable clinical course. Histopathologically, these 13 cases exhibited features of abnormal layer morphology and OLCs. An infratentorial DNT with cortical hetrotopia has not been reported previously; thus, this is the first report of such pathology.
Table 1

Reported cases of infratentorial DNTs

AuthorAge (years) SexLocationRegionInitial symptomsOperationClinical course
Kuchelmeister et al.[2)]28FemaleVermisSingleVertigoGross total removalUneventful
Fujimoto et al.[3)]44FemaleRight cerebellar hemisphere, vermis, tonsil, brainstemMultipleAtaxiaRight cerebellar hemisphere lobectomy, tonsillectomyUneventful
Yasha et al.[4)]20MaleCerebellar tonsilSingleAtaxiaDecompression of the lesion, third ventriculostomyNo clinical progression
Leung et al.[22)]10FemaleRight temporal lobe, bilateral thalamus, right cerebellar hemisphere, ponsMultipleEpilepsyRight temporal lobectomyImproved
Han et al.[23)]10FemaleRight temporal lobe, basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum, periventricular white matterMultipleSeizure, mild intellectual disabilityRight temporal tumor removalSeizure free
Kurtkaya-Yapicier et al.[24)]51MaleMidbrain tectumSingleHeadache, gait ataxiaGross total removalImproved
Vaquero et al.[25)]21FemaleLeft cerebellar hemisphereSingleGait instability, headache, diplopiaGross total removalSymptom free
Litrico et al.[26)]26FemaleLeft cerebellar hemisphereSingleVertigoPartial resectionNA
Nair et al.[27)]25MaleRight cerebellar hemisphereSingleHeadache, visual impairmentGross total removalSymptom free
Sunwoo and Kim[28)]61MaleLeft cerebellar hemisphereSingleAbnormal oculographic movementNDND
Tailor et al.[29)]34FemaleVermisMultipleVertigo, headache, truncal ataxiaNDND
McWilliams et al.[30)]8MaleBilateral cerebellar hemisphere, right temporal lobeMultipleHeadache, vomitBiopsy (right temporal lobe)ND
Yuan et al.[31)]2FemaleCerebellumsSingleGait instabilityGross total removalNo recurrence
Present case47FemaleLeft cerebellar hemisphere, vermisMultipleDizzinessBiopsyImproved

NA: not described

Reported cases of infratentorial DNTs NA: not described From an oncological point of view, a DNT is a highly stable lesion.[42]) There are two possible malignant transformations of DNT: spontaneous malignant transformation[43]) or transformation suspected to occur in association with chemotherapy and radiotherapy.[44]) Although malignant transformation is rare, complete resection is the recommended treatment strategy for a supratentorial DNT to treat associated epilepsy. In a patient series evaluated by Stanescu et al., DNTs did not recur following complete resection over a 4.5-year follow-up period in 92% of patients, and growth of the residual lesion did not occur in 6 patients after partial resection.[32]) In addition, the malignant transformation of an infratentorial DNT is rare, and it therefore remains unclear whether complete resection is indicated. The clinical presentation of an infratentorial DNT (e.g., ataxia, vertigo, or headache) can be an uneventful clinical course.[3],[4],[31]) In our patient, the symptoms were relieved even though the resection range was limited to biopsy. As there was little mass effect on MRI and the symptoms of dizziness were nonspecific, the possibility that the infratentorial DNT in this case was an incidental tumor should be considered. Total resection is not considered absolutely necessary in infratentorial DNTs. Good outcomes have also been reported in cases with intact infratentorial lesions.[22],[23]) These previous reports suggest that it is more appropriate to select diagnostic resection than total removal for infratentorial DNTs if the procedure can disturb infratentorial brain function. Although it is extremely rare in such cases, regular image follow-up is necessary considering the possibility of malignant transformation. It is thus necessary to accumulate and review additional reports of infratentorial DNTs to recommend an appropriate treatment strategy.

Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Supplementary Fig. 1 (a–d) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing of the IDH-1/2, BRAF, and TERT genes. Mutations in these genes were not detected. (e) Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) revealed the absence of IDH-1/2 mutation and 1p19q codeletion. Click here for additional data file.
  14 in total

1.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor. A case report.

Authors:  T Wierzba-Bobrowicz; B Schmidt-Sidor; M Zabek; G M Szpak; W Lechowicz
Journal:  Folia Neuropathol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Glioneuronal tumors and medically intractable epilepsy: a clinical study with long-term follow-up of seizure outcome after surgery.

Authors:  E Aronica; S Leenstra; C W van Veelen; P C van Rijen; T J Hulsebos; A C Tersmette; B Yankaya; D Troost
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Histological heterogeneity of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour: identification and differential diagnosis in a series of 74 cases.

Authors:  M Honavar; I Janota; C E Polkey
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Malignant transformation of a dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor. Case report.

Authors:  R R Hammond; N Duggal; J M Woulfe; J P Girvin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumours.

Authors:  C Daumas-Duport
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.508

6.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor. Features in 16 patients.

Authors:  A A Raymond; S F Halpin; N Alsanjari; M J Cook; N D Kitchen; D R Fish; J M Stevens; B N Harding; F Scaravilli; B Kendall
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial micro-tumor in a 75-year-old patient with long-standing epilepsy.

Authors:  J Gottschalk; M Korves; B Skotzek-Konrad; S Goebel; J Cervós-Navarro
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.368

8.  Surgical pathology of drug-resistant partial epilepsy. A 10-year-experience with a series of 327 consecutive resections.

Authors:  Basile Pasquier; Michel Péoc'H; Blandine Fabre-Bocquentin; Lamia Bensaadi; Dominique Pasquier; Dominique Hoffmann; Philippe Kahane; Laura Tassi; Jean-François Le Bas; Alim Louis Benabid
Journal:  Epileptic Disord       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.819

9.  Malignant transformation of a dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor after radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Rushing; Lester D Thompson; Hernando Mena
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.090

10.  Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor: a surgically curable tumor of young patients with intractable partial seizures. Report of thirty-nine cases.

Authors:  C Daumas-Duport; B W Scheithauer; J P Chodkiewicz; E R Laws; C Vedrenne
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.