| Literature DB >> 35646357 |
Mathias Anthony Mbinda1, Fabiola Vincent Moshi2.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with nurses' and midwives' skills in performing neonatal resuscitation. Method: Health facility-based analytical cross-sectional study design was employed from January 2021 to April 2021 among 340 nurses and midwives selected by multistage random sampling technique. An observation checklist was used to collect data. Data were coded and entered into SPSS version 20 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with nurse/midwives' skills in neonatal resuscitation.Entities:
Keywords: Neonatal; Tanzania; midwifery; nurses; practice; resuscitation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35646357 PMCID: PMC9136440 DOI: 10.1177/20503121221100991
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAGE Open Med ISSN: 2050-3121
WHO-recommended procedures for neonatal resuscitation.
| S. no. | Recommendation | Strength of recommendation | Quality of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clamp cord after 1 min for all newborns who do not require positive-pressure ventilation | Strong | High to moderate |
| Clamp and cut cord when newly-born babies require positive-pressure ventilation, | Weak | Guidelines Development Group (GDG) consensus in absence of published evidence | |
| 2 | Rub the back 2–3 times before clamping the cord and initiating positive-pressure ventilation. | Weak | GDG consensus in absence of published evidence |
| 3 | Do not perform suctioning of nose and mouth in neonates born through clear amniotic fluid who start breathing on their own after birth | Strong | High |
| Suctioning of the mouth and nose should not be done routinely before initiating positive pressure ventilation in neonates born through clear amniotic fluid who do not start breathing after thorough drying and rubbing the back 2–3 times. | Weak | GDG consensus in absence of published evidence | |
| 4 | Do not perform intrapartum suctioning of mouth and nose at the delivery of the head in the presence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid | Strong | High |
| 5 | Do not perform tracheal suctioning in neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid who start breathing on their own. | Strong | low |
| Do not perform suctioning of mouth and nose in neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid who start breathing on their own | Weak | GDG consensus in absence of published evidence | |
| Tracheal suctioning should be done before initiating positive pressure ventilation in neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid who do not start breathing on their own. | Weak (in situations where endotracheal intubation is possible) | Very low | |
| Suctioning of the mouth and nose should be done before initiating positive-pressure ventilation in neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid who do not start breathing on their own. | Weak | GDG consensus in absence of published evidence | |
| 6 | In settings where mechanical equipment to generate negative pressure for suctioning is not available and a newly-born baby requires suctioning, a bulb syringe (single-use or easy to clean) is preferable to a mucous extractor with a trap in which the provider generates suction by aspiration. | Weak | Very low |
| Positive-pressure ventilation | |||
| 7 | Positive-pressure ventilation should be initiated within 1 min after birth in newly-born babies who do not start breathing despite thorough drying and additional stimulation. | Strong | Very low |
| 8 | In newly-born term or preterm (>32 weeks gestation) babies requiring positive-pressure ventilation, ventilation should be initiated with air. | Strong | Moderate |
| 9 | Use a self-inflating bag and mask in positive-pressure ventilation | Weak | Very low |
| 10 | Ventilation should be initiated using a facemask interface. | Strong | Based on limited availability and lack of experience with nasal cannulae, despite low-quality evidence for benefits |
| 11 | Adequacy of ventilation should be assessed by measurement of the heart rate after 60 seconds of ventilation with visible chest movements. | Strong | Very low |
| 12 | In newly-born babies who do not start breathing within 1 min after birth, priority should be given to providing adequate ventilation rather than to chest compressions. | Strong | Very low |
| Stopping resuscitation | |||
| 13 | In newly-born babies with no detectable heart rate after 10 min of effective ventilation, resuscitation should be stopped. | Strong | Low |
| In newly-born babies who continue to have a heart rate below 60/min and no spontaneous breathing after 20 min of resuscitation, resuscitation should be stopped. | Weak (relevant to resource-limited settings) | Very low | |
Figure 1.Dodoma region map.
Proportion distributional of nurses/midwife in Dodoma region (N = 340).
| Variable | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| 20–34 | 241 | 70.9 |
| 35–49 | 83 | 24.4 |
| 50–54 | 16 | 4.7 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 116 | 34.1 |
| Female | 224 | 65.9 |
| Marital status | ||
| Single | 184 | 54.1 |
| Married | 152 | 44.7 |
| Divorce/separated | 4 | 1.2 |
| Religion | ||
| Christianity | 254 | 74.7 |
| Muslim | 86 | 25.3 |
| Working experience | ||
| <4 years | 143 | 42.1 |
| 4–6 years | 87 | 25.6 |
| 7–9 years | 39 | 11.5 |
| >10 years | 71 | 20.9 |
| Professional | ||
| Nurses | 207 | 60.9 |
| Midwives | 133 | 39.1 |
| Level of profession education | ||
| Certificate | 66 | 19.4 |
| Diploma | 195 | 57.4 |
| Advanced diploma | 10 | 2.9 |
| Bachelor of science in nursing | 64 | 18.8 |
| Masters | 5 | 1.5 |
| Years of labor ward practice | ||
| 1–5 years | 250 | 73.5 |
| 6–10 years | 70 | 20.6 |
| > 11 | 20 | 5.9 |
| Facility level | ||
| Dispensary | 62 | 18.2 |
| Health center | 83 | 24.4 |
| District hospital | 55 | 16.2 |
| Regional hospital | 140 | 41.2 |
| Distance of place of residence to health facility | ||
| 1–5 km | 239 | 70.3 |
| 6–10 km | 62 | 18.2 |
| >16 | 39 | 11.5 |
| Nurses/midwives in each shift | ||
| 2–3 | 246 | 72.4 |
| 4–5 | 76 | 22.4 |
| 6–7 | 18 | 5.3 |
| Delivery per day | ||
| 1–5 | 92 | 27.1 |
| 6–10 | 119 | 35.0 |
| 11–20 | 102 | 30.0 |
| > 20 | 27 | 7 |
Description of nurses and midwives skills on neonatal resuscitation.
| S. no. | Variable | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cleans hands and resuscitation area. | 81 | 23.8 |
| 2 | Dries thoroughly and removes wet cloth on a baby and put dry, clean cloth | 236 | 69.4 |
| 3 | Show or say the baby is not crying | 125 | 36.8 |
| 4 | Clear airway and stimulates breathing, keep warm, positions head while covering the baby. | 246 | 72.4 |
| 5 | Position mask correctly on the babies’ face, and starts ventilation with bag and mask. | 226 | 66.5 |
| 6 | Ventilates at 40 breaths/min and check respiration and pulse rate and records. | 205 | 60.3 |
| 7 | Looks for chest movement | 153 | 45.0 |
| 8 | Continues ventilation, prompt: say, “Please show what to do if the chest is not moving with ventilation, after one or more steps to improve ventilation”, say “The chest is moving now” | 148 | 43.5 |
| 9 | Bag-squeezing technique done correctly | 173 | 50.9 |
| 10 | Evaluate breathing and heart rate | 133 | 39.1 |
| 11 | Continues ventilation prompt: After 3 min say, “The heart rate is 120 per minute and the baby is breathing” Recognizes baby is breathing and heart rate is normal | 125 | 36.8 |
| 12 | Recognizes baby is breathing and heart rate is normal | 123 | 36.2 |
| 13 | Stops ventilation; monitors baby and communicates with mother. | 129 | 37.9 |
Figure 2.Nurses’ and midwives’ skills on neonatal resuscitation (N = 340).
Chi-square test for the relationship between nurses’ and midwives’ demographic characteristics and neonatal resuscitation skills (N = 340).
| Variables | Skills score | χ2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adequate skills, | Inadequate skills, | |||
| Age (years) | 5.830 |
| ||
| 20–34 | 104 (43.2%) | 137 (56.8%) | ||
| 35–49 | 35 (42.2%) | 48 (57.8%) | ||
| 50 and above | 2 (12.5%) | 14 (87.5%) | ||
| Gender | 7.626 |
| ||
| Male | 60 (51.7%) | 56 (48.3%) | ||
| Female | 81 (36.2%) | 143 (63.8%) | ||
| Marital status | 5.906 |
| ||
| Single | 77 (41.8%) | 107 (58.2%) | ||
| Married | 60 (39.5%) | 92 (60.5%) | ||
| Divorce/separated | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Working experience | 19.941 |
| ||
| <4 years | 72 (50.3%) | 71 (49.7%) | ||
| 4–6 years | 31 (35.6%) | 56 (64.4%) | ||
| 7–9 years | 22 (56.4%) | 17 (43.6%) | ||
| > 10 years | 16 (22.5%) | 55 (77.5%) | ||
| Professional | 0.001 | 0.972 | ||
| Nurse | 86 (41.5%) | 121 (58.5%) | ||
| Midwifery | 55 (41.4%) | 78 (58.6%) | ||
| Level of education | 14.191 |
| ||
| Certificate | 27 (40.9%) | 39 (59.1%) | ||
| Diploma | 82 (42.1%) | 113 (57.9%) | ||
| Advanced diploma | 0 (0%) | 10 (100%) | ||
| Bachelor in nursing | 27 (42.2%) | 37 (57.8%) | ||
| Masters | 5 (100%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Years of labor ward practice | ||||
| 1–5 years | 110 (44.0%) | 140 (56%) | 2.699 | 0.259 |
| 6–10 years | 25 (35.7%) | 45 (64.3%) | ||
| > 11 | 6 (30%) | 14 (70%) | ||
| Facility level | 13.826 |
| ||
| Dispensary | 16 (25.8%) | 46 (74.2%) | ||
| Health center | 28 (33.7%) | 55 (66.3%) | ||
| District hospital | 27 (49.1%) | 28 (50.9%) | ||
| Regional hospital | 70 (50%) | 70 (50%) | ||
| Distance of place of residence to health facility | 20.920 |
| ||
| 1–5 km | 115 (48.1%) | 124 (51.9%) | ||
| 6–10 km | 22 (35.5%) | 40 (64.5%) | ||
| > 16 km | 4 (10.3%) | 35 (89.7%) | ||
| Nurses/midwives in each shift | 21.622 |
| ||
| 2–3 | 97 (39.4%) | 149 (60.6%) | ||
| 4–5 | 44 (57.9%) | 32 (42.1%) | ||
| 6–7 | 0 (0%) | 18 (100%) | ||
| Delivery per day | 7.715 |
| ||
| 1–5 | 36 (39.1%) | 56 (60.9%) | ||
| 6–10 | 56 (47.1%) | 63 (52.9%) | ||
| 11–20 | 44 (43.1%) | 58 (56.9%) | ||
| >20 | 5 (18.5%) | 22 (81.5%) | ||
Binary logistic analysis for factors associated with nurse/midwives’ neonatal resuscitation skills.
| Variable | COR |
| 95% CI | AOR |
| 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Age group | ||||||||
| 20–34 | 0.188 | 0.029 | 0.042 | 0.846 | 0.082 | 0.008 | 0.013 | 0.514 |
| 35–49 | 0.196 | 0.039 | 0.042 | 0.918 | 0.087 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.551 |
| 50 + | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Female | 1.892 | 0.006 | 1.2 | 2.981 | 1.216 | 0.566 | 0.624 | 2.368 |
| Working experience | ||||||||
| <4 years | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 4–6 years | 1.954 | 0.03 | 1.059 | 3.168 | 2.905 | 0.003 | 1.437 | 5.873 |
| 7–9 years | 1.123 | 0.503 | 0.384 | 1.598 | 0.803 | 0.676 | 0.287 | 2.247 |
| >10 years | 2.949 | < 0.001 | 1.827 | 6.651 | 12.83 | < 0.001 | 3.602 | 45.655 |
| Facility level | ||||||||
| Dispensary | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Health center | 0.683 | 0.305 | 0.33 | 1.416 | 0.962 | 0.85 | 0.447 | 2.661 |
| District hospital | 1.361 | 0.01 | 0.166 | 0.784 | 1.544 | 0.032 | 0.118 | 0.907 |
| Regional hospital | 1.348 | 0.002 | 0.18 | 0.672 | 2.943 | 0.107 | 0.22 | 1.158 |
| Distance residence to health facility | ||||||||
| 1–5 km | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 6–10 km | 0.123 | <0.001 | 0.042 | 0.358 | 0.09 | <0.001 | 0.025 | 0.326 |
| >16 | 0.208 | 0.008 | 0.065 | 0.661 | 0.049 | <0.001 | 0.011 | 0.217 |
| Nurses/midwife in each shift | ||||||||
| 2–3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 4–5 | 1.473 | 0.005 | 0.281 | 0.789 | 2.396 | 0.012 | 0.193 | 0.814 |
| 6–7 | 1.05 | 0.998 | 0 | 4.01 | 0.998 | 0 | ||
| Delivery per day | ||||||||
| 1–5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 6–10 | 0.723 | 0.25 | 0.416 | 1.256 | 1.385 | 0.031 | 0.366 | 1.572 |
| 11–20 | 0.847 | 0.571 | 0.478 | 1.504 | 2.693 | 0.016 | 0.162 | 0.916 |
| >20 | 2.829 | 0.054 | 0.982 | 8.144 | 6.007 | <0.001 | 1.401 | 25.756 |
COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; AOR: adjusted odds ratio.