| Literature DB >> 35645876 |
Shangui Hu1, Zhen Zhu2.
Abstract
Social commerce has produced enormous economic benefits as well as challenges for organizations, individuals, and industries. However, social media usage does not necessarily generate users' intention to purchase on social commerce websites. How social media usage influences users' purchase intention on social commerce websites still deserves more scholarly attention and this seems particularly important when social commerce transcends borders and countries. Taking an interdisciplinary perspective, the current study adopted a survey research method and identified the roles of social media usage in arousing users' purchase intention on social commerce websites in a culturally diversified environment. The data was collected from 2,058 international students coming from 135 countries and was analyzed using MPLUS based structural equation modeling. The research unveils the pathway whereby social media usage serves to generate users' purchase intention on social commerce websites. Importantly, users' cultural intelligence has been found to play a significant role mediating the effects of social media usage on users' intention. Further, cultural distance was found to attenuate the effects of social media usage on cultural intelligence. Based on the research findings, the study suggests that social commerce practitioners should be fully aware of the enabling roles of social media and cultural intelligence as well as the deterring role of cultural distance when arousing customers' purchasing intention in cross-cultural business operations. Any measures facilitated by social media usage to improve international consumers' cultural intelligence and mitigate the negative effects of cultural distance are supposed to be effective to enhance their purchasing intention. Accordingly, the study confirms the mutually melt and integrative relationships between information technology advancement and business prosperity in cross-cultural environment, which eventually contribute to sustainable development of society.Entities:
Keywords: cross-cultural background; cultural distance; cultural intelligence; purchase intention; social commerce; social media usage
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645876 PMCID: PMC9131092 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Proposed research model. The dotted line refers to two mediation effects of cultural intelligence.
Demographic statistics of the sample (N = 2058).
| Category | Item | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
| Age | ≤20 years old | 365 | 17.74% |
| 21–25 years old | 863 | 41.93% | |
| 26–30 years old | 473 | 22.98% | |
| ≥31 years old | 357 | 17.35% | |
| Gender | Male | 1154 | 56.07% |
| Female | 904 | 43.93% | |
| Areas | Asia | 1356 | 65.89% |
| Africa | 509 | 24.73% | |
| Europe | 97 | 4.71% | |
| Oceania | 17 | 0.83% | |
| America | 75 | 3.64% | |
| Missing data | 4 | 0.19% | |
| Highest diploma | below bachelor | 772 | 37.51% |
| bachelor | 681 | 33.09% | |
| master | 493 | 23.96% | |
| doctor | 112 | 5.44% | |
| Stay length in China | Less than 6 months | 446 | 21.67% |
| 6–12 months | 127 | 6.17% | |
| 1–2 years | 525 | 25.51% | |
| More than 2 years | 960 | 46.65% |
Means, standard deviations, and correlation matrix (N = 2058).
| Constructs | Means | SD | CQ | CD | SMUI | SMUS | PI |
| CQ | 3.9223 | 0.65314 |
| ||||
| CD | 3.3768 | 0.90273 | 0.307 |
| |||
| SMUI | 3.8431 | 0.90465 | 0.389 | 0.342 |
| ||
| SMUS | 3.8481 | 0.86333 | 0.435 | 0.324 | 0.641 |
| |
| PI | 3.9342 | 0.80811 | 0.568 | 0.282 | 0.372 | 0.413 |
|
CQ, cultural intelligence; CD, cultural distance; SMUI, social media usage for information; SMUS, social media usage for socializing; PI, purchase intention; **p < 0.01 (two-tailed) and the diagonal is the arithmetic square root of the AVE value (bold values).
Measurement of constructs.
| Constructs | Dimensions | Loadings | CR | AVE | Cronbach’s alpha |
| SMUI | SMUI1 | 0.853 | 0.766 | 0.908 | 0.843 |
| SMUI2 | 0.887 | ||||
| SMUI3 | 0.885 | ||||
| SMUS | SMUS1 | 0.825 | 0.869 | 0.690 | 0.763 |
| SMUS2 | 0.791 | ||||
| SMUS3 | 0.873 | ||||
| meta-cognitive CQ | CQ1 | 0.894 | 0.944 | 0.808 | 0.912 |
| CQ2 | 0.897 | ||||
| CQ3 | 0.916 | ||||
| CQ4 | 0.888 | ||||
| Cognitive CQ | CQ5 | 0.823 | 0.932 | 0.696 | 0.912 |
| CQ6 | 0.810 | ||||
| CQ7 | 0.841 | ||||
| CQ8 | 0.845 | ||||
| CQ9 | 0.847 | ||||
| CQ10 | 0.840 | ||||
| Motivational CQ | CQ11 | 0.833 | 0.931 | 0.728 | 0.970 |
| CQ12 | 0.847 | ||||
| CQ13 | 0.874 | ||||
| CQ14 | 0.852 | ||||
| CQ15 | 0.860 | ||||
| Behavioral CQ | CQ16 | 0.776 | 0.928 | 0.723 | 0.903 |
| CQ17 | 0.848 | ||||
| CQ18 | 0.884 | ||||
| CQ19 | 0.885 | ||||
| CQ20 | 0.885 | ||||
| PI | PI1 | 0.905 | 0.938 | 0.829 | 0.897 |
| PI2 | 0.912 | ||||
| PI3 | 0.915 | ||||
| CD | CD1 | 0.792 | 0.929 | 0.688 | 0.906 |
| CD2 | 0.812 | ||||
| CD3 | 0.866 | ||||
| CD4 | 0.866 | ||||
| CD5 | 0.886 | ||||
| CD6 | 0.747 |
CQ, cultural intelligence; CD, cultural distance; SMUI, social media usage for information; SMUS, social media usage for socializing; PI, purchase intention.
FIGURE 2Results of the hypothesized model. SMU, social media usage. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Results of the mediating effect.
| Mediating effect | Estimate | SE |
| BC 99% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| SMUI-CQ-ICS | 0.087 | 0.015 | 0.000 | 0.046 | 0.124 |
| SMUS-CQ-ICS | 0.145 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.105 | 0.187 |
Results of hierarchical regression analyses for interaction.
| Variable | Cultural intelligence | ||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | |
| Age | –0.021 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.015 |
| Gender | –0.003 | –0.042 | –0.044 | –0.033 | –0.034 |
| Stay length in China | 0.002 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Highest diploma | –0.015 | 0.014 | 0.018 | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| SMUI | 0.237 | 0.229 | |||
| SMUS | 0.285 | 0.278 | |||
| CD | 0.142 | 0.145 | 0.135 | 0.137 | |
| SMUI*CD | –0.035 | ||||
| SMUS*CD | –0.029 | ||||
| R2 | 0.001 | 0.189 | 0.192 | 0.221 | 0.223 |
| ΔR2 | 0.189 | 0.003 | 0.221 | 0.002 | |
| ΔF | 79.593 | 7.274 | 97.235 | 4.949 | |
N = 2058. SMUI, social media usage for information; SMUS, social media usage for socializing; CD, cultural distance. Standardized regression coefficients are shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 3Moderating effect of cultural distance on the relationship between informational social media usage and cultural intelligence.
FIGURE 4Moderating effect of cultural distance on the relationship between socializing social media usage and cultural intelligence.