| Literature DB >> 35645838 |
Xuefeng Chen1,2, Qian Yang2, Wenlou Bai2, Wenjing Yao2, Litian Liu2, Yuanyuan Xing2, Cunliang Meng2, Peng Qi2, Yi Dang2, Xiaoyong Qi1,2.
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors play a beneficial role for normoglycemic patients with heart failure (HF). However, the underlying mechanism remains largely unexplored. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the cardioprotective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in a normoglycemic rabbit model of chronic heart failure (CHF) and its potential mechanism was also explored. A total of 24 male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into the sham group, HF group, perindopril group, and dapagliflozin (DAPA) group. The normoglycemic CHF model was established by aortic constriction for 12 weeks. In the 13th week, DAPA (1 mg/kg/day) or perindopril (0.5 mg/kg/day) was administered by oral gavage daily for 10 weeks. Both the sham group and HF group were given normal saline via gavage. After 10 weeks, the heart structure and function were evaluated by echocardiography and plasma NT-proBNP. Moreover, cardiac fibrosis was analyzed using immunohistochemistry, Masson's trichrome staining, and Western blotting analysis. The results showed that DAPA improved the myocardial structure and function of normoglycemic CHF rabbits and ameliorated myocardial fibrosis. Further study indicated that DAPA suppressed cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting the transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1)/Smad signaling pathway. Collectively, our findings showed that DAPA could ameliorate cardiac fibrosis in normoglycemic CHF rabbits by inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway.Entities:
Keywords: SGLT2 inhibition; TGFβ1/Smad; chronic heart failure; dapagliflozin; myocardial fibrosis; rabbit model
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645838 PMCID: PMC9136228 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.873108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Characteristics and biochemical indicators of rabbits after 10 weeks of treatment in four groups.
| Sham group | HF group | Peri group | DAPA group | F | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||
| BW (kg) | 3.58 ± 0.17 | 3.49 ± 0.23 | 3.58 ± 0.27 | 3.45 ± 0.19 | 0.475 | 0.704 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 6.13 ± 0.50 | 6.08 ± 0.28 | 6.80 ± 0.59 | 6.38 ± 0.42 | 2.573 | 0.088 |
| Na+(mmol/L) | 143.17 ± 1.47 | 143.00 ± 1.58 | 141.40 ± 1.82 | 141.60 ± 1.14 | 1.940 | 0.161 |
| HGB (g/L) | 129.83 ± 4.71 | 116.40 ± 7.44 | 114.20 ± 9.26 | 116.80 ± 2.17 | 7.055 | 0.003 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | 104.40 ± 9.72 | 449.70 ± 21.26 | 352.20 ± 15.39 | 298.55 ± 14.31 | 495.557 | 0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 99.47 ± 14.48 | 100.72 ± 15.04 | 109.32 ± 6.96 | 106.38 ± 12.71 | 0.701 | 0.564 |
| Osmotic pressure | 305.81 ± 3.58 | 307.88 ± 3.38 | 303.16 ± 2.86 | 304.09 ± 5.17 | 1.481 | 0.255 |
| Heart mass (g) | 7.78 ± 0.83 | 12.31 ± 1.21 | 10.32 ± 1.27 | 8.31 ± 0.26 | 22.953 | 0.001 |
| LV mass (g) | 6.05 ± 0.62 | 9.74 ± 1.17 | 8.02 ± 0.89 | 6.56 ± 0.27 | 22.683 | 0.001 |
| LV mass/BW (g/kg) | 1.69 ± 0.22 | 2.79 ± 0.39 | 2.25 ± 0.35 | 1.84 ± 0.07 | 15.835 | 0.001 |
Values were expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were conducted by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s or Games–Howell post hoc test.
p < 0.05 vs. the sham group.
p< 0.05 vs. the HF group.
p < 0.05 vs. the Peri group.
FIGURE 1Characteristics and biochemical indicators with statistical differences after 10 weeks of treatment in four groups. a p < 0.05 vs. the sham group; b p < 0.05 vs. the HF group; c p < 0.05 vs. the Peri group.
FIGURE 2Echocardiographic representative images after drug treatment by M-mode and (A) comparison of HR and (B) echocardiographic data of the left ventricle (C–E). a p < 0.05 vs. the sham group; b p < 0.05 vs. the HF group; c p < 0.05 vs. the Peri group; d p < 0.05 vs. the counterpart data of the 12th week.
Echocardiographic investigation of left ventricle structural and functional data in rabbits.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham group ( | HF group ( | Peri group ( | DAPA group ( |
|
| |
| HR (bpm) | 233.5 ± 19.9 | 224.6 ± 13.8 | 248.8 ± 29.7 | 253.2 ± 13.2 | 2.191 | 0.126 |
| IVS (mm) | 2.83 ± 0.09 | 3.02 ± 0.29 | 2.81 ± 0.13 | 2.89 ± 0.14 | 1.337 | 0.284 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 13.05 ± 1.27 | 12.88 ± 0.85 | 12.80 ± 1.05 | 13.19 ± 3.12 | 0.049 | 0.985 |
| LVPW (mm) | 2.77 ± 0.19 | 3.02 ± 0.17 | 2.79 ± 0.10 | 2.71 ± 0.28 | 2.369 | 0.107 |
| LVESD (mm) | 7.97 ± 0.85 | 7.88 ± 0.51 | 8.01 ± 0.58 | 8.33 ± 2.29 | 0.125 | 0.944 |
| FS (%) | 38.90 ± 3.35 | 38.82 ± 1.54 | 37.38 ± 1.31 | 37.36 ± 4.15 | 0.468 | 0.708 |
| EF (%) | 73.43 ± 4.12 | 73.54 ± 1.85 | 71.78 ± 1.51 | 71.48 ± 1.52 | 0.470 | 0.707 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| HR (bpm) | 216.2 ± 8.2 | 262.2 ± 28.1 | 274.2 ± 24.1 | 269.6 ± 15.3 | 10.195 | 0.001 |
| IVS (mm) | 2.81 ± 0.11 | 2.97 ± 0.17 | 3.02 ± 0.27 | 3.09 ± 0.21 | 2.075 | 0.142 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 13.18 ± 1.33 | 13.16 ± 0.78 | 12.96 ± 1.01 | 12.70 ± 1.20 | 0.212 | 0.887 |
| LVPW (mm) | 2.79 ± 0.09 | 2.91 ± 0.24 | 2.79 ± 0.16 | 2.84 ± 0.06 | 0.734 | 0.546 |
| LVESD (mm) | 8.29 ± 0.87 | 11.02 ± 0.61 | 10.86 ± 0.84 | 10.62 ± 0.99 | 13.281 | 0.001 |
| FS (%) | 37.08 ± 1.38 | 16.22 ± 0.52 | 16.20 ± 0.99 | 16.32 ± 0.37 | 696.253 | 0.001 |
| EF (%) | 71.32 ± 1.77 | 37.70 ± 0.89 | 37.62 ± 1.94 | 37.98 ± 0.67 | 767.830 | 0.001 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| HR (bpm) | 227.1 ± 18.0 | 252.2 ± 18.3 | 218.2 ± 9.0 | 208.2 ± 9.0 | 8.209 | 0.001 |
| IVS (mm) | 2.92 ± 0.17 | 2.92 ± 0.17 | 2.99 ± 0.56 | 2.79 ± 0.30 | 0.321 | 0.810 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 12.07 ± 1.16 | 13.24 ± 1.81 | 13.84 ± 3.12 | 12.86 ± 2.84 | 0.566 | 0.645 |
| LVPW (mm) | 2.79 ± 0.09 | 2.79 ± 0.10 | 2.71 ± 0.21 | 2.71 ± 0.23 | 0.397 | 0.757 |
| LVESD (mm) | 7.65 ± 0.71 | 11.16 ± 1.54 | 11.21 ± 2.54 | 9.55 ± 2.57 | 4.156 | 0.022 |
| FS (%) | 36.51 ± 2.15 | 15.72 ± 0.86 | 19.06 ± 2.11 | 26.28 ± 2.99 | 100.528 | 0.001 |
| EF (%) | 70.82 ± 2.65 | 36.70 ± 1.72 | 42.98 ± 4.04 | 55.82 ± 5.59 | 90.073 | 0.001 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were conducted by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s or Games–Howell post hoc test.
p < 0.05 vs. the sham group.
p< 0.05 vs. the HF group.
p < 0.05 vs. the Peri group.
p < 0.05 vs. the counterpart data of the 12th week.
FIGURE 3DAPA suppresses myocardial fibrosis in the CHF rabbit model. IHC staining of collagen I, collagen III, and TGF-β1 and Masson’s trichrome staining of the myocardium. (A) Percentages of positive areas of collagen I (B), collagen III (C), TGF-β1 , and (D) connective tissue fraction. (E) Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. a p < 0.05 vs. the sham group; b p < 0.05 vs. the HF group; c p < 0.05 vs. the Peri group.
FIGURE 4Effect of DAPA on myocardial fibrosis. (A) Western blotting analysis for the expressions of collagen I, collagen III, α-SMA, and CTGF. (B) Relative expression at the protein level was determined, and β-actin was adopted as the loading control. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
FIGURE 5Effect of DAPA on the TGF-β1/Smad pathway in vivo. (A) Western blotting analysis for the expressions of the TGF-β1/Smad pathway. (B) Relative expression at the protein level was determined, and β-actin was adopted as a loading control. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.