| Literature DB >> 35645832 |
Samuel Ruiz de Martín Esteban1, Irene Benito-Cuesta1, Itziar Terradillos2,3, Ana M Martínez-Relimpio1, M Andrea Arnanz1, Gonzalo Ruiz-Pérez1, Claudia Korn4, Catarina Raposo4, Roman C Sarott5, Matthias V Westphal5, Izaskun Elezgarai2,3, Erick M Carreira5, Cecilia J Hillard6, Uwe Grether4, Pedro Grandes2,3, M Teresa Grande1, Julián Romero1.
Abstract
The distribution and roles of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor in the CNS are still a matter of debate. Recent data suggest that, in addition to its presence in microglial cells, the CB2 receptor may be also expressed at low levels, yet biologically relevant, in other cell types such as neurons. It is accepted that the expression of CB2 receptors in the CNS is low under physiological conditions and is significantly elevated in chronic neuroinflammatory states associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. By using a novel mouse model (CB2 EGFP/f/f), we studied the distribution of cannabinoid CB2 receptors in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (by generating 5xFAD/CB2 EGFP/f/f mice) and explored the roles of CB2 receptors in microglial function. We used a novel selective and brain penetrant CB2 receptor agonist (RO6866945) as well as mice lacking the CB2 receptor (5xFAD/CB2 -/-) for these studies. We found that CB2 receptors are expressed in dystrophic neurite-associated microglia and that their modulation modifies the number and activity of microglial cells as well as the metabolism of the insoluble form of the amyloid peptide. These results support microglial CB2 receptors as potential targets for the development of amyloid-modulating therapies.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; CB2 receptor; amyloid; cannabinoids; microglia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35645832 PMCID: PMC9136843 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.841766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Microglial GFP localization in the subiculum of CB2 EGFP/f/f and 5xFAD/CB2 EGFP/f/f mice. Double pre-embedding immunogold (GFP) and immunoperoxidase (Iba1) method for electron microscopy. GFP particles (red arrows) localize in Iba1-positive microglial elements (DAB immunodeposits, brown, *). In CB2 EGFP/f/f (A–D), only GFP membrane localization is observed (arrows, (B). In 5xFAD/CB2 EGFP/f/f, GFP particles are found in both membranes and cytosol (E–G). Notice dystrophic neurites (light green areas contoured by white dashed lines) in 5xFAD/CB2 EGFP/f/f. Scale bars: 1 µm.
FIGURE 2Assessment of the microglial GFP/CB2 localization in the subiculum of CB2
EGFP/f/f and 5xFAD/CB2
EGFP/f/f mice. (A) Number of microglial GFP-positive processes per 100 μm2. (B) Percentage of GFP-positive microglial processes. (C) GFP gold particles per microglial area. (D) Microglial GFP particles per 100 μm2. (E) Percentage of GFP particles in microglial membrane vs. cytosol in 5xFAD/CB2
EGFP/f/f mice. Mann-Whitney U test. *
FIGURE 3The chronic exposure to the CB2 selective agonist, RO6866945, did not modify the expression of cannabinoid CB2 receptors. (A) mRNA levels of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor did not vary after treatment with RO6866945 but were completely absent in 5xFAD/CB2
-/- mice. (B) Binding of the fluorescent probe RO7246360 to cannabinoid CB2 receptors was used to quantify protein levels, revealing no changes after treatment with the agonist and the negligible levels of CB2 protein in 5xFAD/CB2
-/- mice. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. **
FIGURE 4Signaling cascades regulated by the activation and deletion of cannabinoid CB2 receptors. (A) cAMP and p-CREB (B) levels were significantly decreased by the treatment with the CB2 agonist, remaining unaltered in samples from CB2-null mice. (C) p-p38MAPK levels were significantly elevated by the exposure to the agonist; in addition, samples from 5xFAD/CB2
-/- mice exhibited significantly lower levels. (D) p-ERK levels were not modified by the treatment with the CB2 agonist or the genetic deletion of the receptor. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. *
FIGURE 5Iba1+ microglia and phagocytic activity is decreased after genetic deletion of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor. Analysis of cortices by western blot (A) and flow cytometry (B,C) revealed no changes associated to the treatment with the agonist together with a significant decrease in Iba1+ microglia (A). Phagocytic activity (B,C) of microglia was significantly impaired in 5xFAD/CB2
-/- mice. Scatter plots of CD11b isolated microglia after intraperitoneal administration of methoxy-X04 are shown (B). Phagocytic capacity was calculated as percentage of methoxy-X04+/CD11b+/CD45lo cells to CD11b+/CD45lo cells (C). Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. *
FIGURE 6Cannabinoid CB2 receptors modulate amyloid dynamics in vivo. No changes were evident after treatment in APP (A), C83 (B) or BACE1 (C), as measured by western blot. Soluble amyloid levels (D) remained also unaltered, while those of insoluble amyloid (E) were significantly increased by the exposure to the CB2 agonist and decreased in 5xFAD/CB2
-/- mice. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. *