Literature DB >> 35645640

Evaluation of Patient Preference and Perception Regarding the Clinical Use of Autologous Versus Allogeneic Cell Therapy in Orthopedic Surgery.

Claire D Eliasberg1, Daniel A Nemirov2, Samuel J E Green1, Stephen G Melancon1, Scott A Rodeo1.   

Abstract

Background: Cell therapy has become a hot topic in orthopedics, with significant research dedicated to improving physicians' understanding of its efficacy. However, little is known about patients' cell therapy knowledge. Questions/Purposes: The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate patients' perceptions of cell therapy in orthopedics, (2) determine whether patients have a preference for autologous or allogeneic cell therapy, and (3) assess patient concerns about cell therapy.
Methods: Consecutive outpatients of an orthopedic clinic were surveyed from June 2019 to January 2020. All patients were 18 years old or older and being seen for an orthopedic intervention, including rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, arthroscopic meniscectomy, or a cartilage repair procedure such as an osteochondral allograft transplantation or matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation.
Results: A total of 50 patients were surveyed (mean age: 53 years). The patients' average rating for likelihood to use autologous cells was 8.86 ± 2.2 out of 10 and the average rating for likelihood to use allogeneic cells was 6.24 ± 3.3; 46% of patients had no specific concerns about autologous cell therapy, while 28% expressed concerns about efficacy, and 12% had concerns about donor age. The top 2 "main concerns" about allogeneic cell therapy were disease transmission (30%) and immune reaction (24%). Conclusions: This survey found that patients asserted a preference for autologous cell therapy in orthopedics. Further research is necessary to further elucidate the factors related to cell therapy that are most important to patients.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basic science; body sites; injections; knee; nonoperative treatments; practice specialty; questionnaires; shoulder; sports; stem cells

Year:  2021        PMID: 35645640      PMCID: PMC9096988          DOI: 10.1177/15563316211014885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of stem cells in orthopaedics

Authors:  G-I Im
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Stem-cell tourism and scientific responsibility. Stem-cell researchers are in a unique position to curb the problem of stem-cell tourism.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  A Call for Standardization in Cell Therapy Studies: Commentary on an article by Iain R. Murray, BMedSci(Hons), MRCS, MFSEM, PhD, et al.: "International Expert Consensus on a Cell Therapy Communication Tool: DOSES".

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics (MIBO): Platelet-Rich Plasma and Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Iain R Murray; Andrew G Geeslin; Ewan B Goudie; Frank A Petrigliano; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Selling Stem Cells in the USA: Assessing the Direct-to-Consumer Industry.

Authors:  Leigh Turner; Paul Knoepfler
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  The FDA and the US direct-to-consumer marketplace for stem cell interventions: a temporal analysis.

Authors:  Paul S Knoepfler; Leigh G Turner
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  US stem cell clinics, patient safety, and the FDA.

Authors:  Leigh Turner
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 11.951

8.  Cash-Based Stem-Cell Clinics: The Modern Day Snake Oil Salesman? A Report of Two Cases of Patients Harmed by Intra-articular Stem Cell Injections.

Authors:  John Taliaferro; Shane A Shapiro; Daniel P Montero; Glenn G Shi; Benjamin K Wilke
Journal:  JBJS Case Connect       Date:  2019-12

9.  International Expert Consensus on a Cell Therapy Communication Tool: DOSES.

Authors:  Iain R Murray; Jorge Chahla; Marc R Safran; Aaron J Krych; Daniel B F Saris; Arnold I Caplan; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Improving translation success of cell-based therapies in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Jennifer J Bara; Marietta Herrmann; Christopher H Evans; Theodore Miclau; Anthony Ratcliffe; R Geoff Richards
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.