| Literature DB >> 35643506 |
Bo Qian1, Jing Sun2, Pengcheng Zuo1, Min Da1, Xuming Mo3, Yongjun Fang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of the tumour microenvironment (TME) has enabled remarkable advancements in research on cancer progression in the past few years. It is crucial to understand the nature and function of the TME because precise treatment strategies, including immunotherapy, for managing specific cancers have received widespread attention. The immune infiltrative profiles of neuroblastoma (NB) have not yet been completely illustrated. The purpose of this research was to analyse tumour immune cell infiltration (ICI) in the microenvironment of NB.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Immune cell infiltration; Immunotherapy; Neuroblastoma; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35643506 PMCID: PMC9145414 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02641-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 3.253
Fig. 1Summary of study design
Fig. 2The profiles of immune cell infiltration in the TME of NB. A 1000 hierarchical clustering was performed to determine the stable k value of the consensus matrix for all NB patients (k = 2–5). B Association between tumour-associated immune cells in NB patients and overall survival (p = 0. 179). C The distribution of infiltrating immune cells in different NB groups. D The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test the differences in infiltrating immune cells, immune scores and matrix scores in different ICI clusters. NS no significance; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. E The interaction of tumour-related infiltrating immune cells in NB
Fig. 3Distinguishing immune-related gene subtypes. A The DEGs in different groups were divided into three groups by unsupervised cluster analysis as gene Clusters A–C. B The distribution of infiltrating immune cells in different NB subtypes. C, D Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of notable genes of different ICI subtypes: ICI notable genes. E Association between different NB subgroups and overall survival, p = 0.04. F Differences in infiltrating immune cells, immune scores and matrix scores of different NB gene subtypes. NS, no significance; ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. G, H The distribution of CTLA4 and PD-L1 expression among different ICI genotypes (p < 0.001)
Fig. 4Establishment of ICI score. A Distribution of the alluvial graph of different ICI clusters, ICI scores and survival statuses. B The expression of immune checkpoint-related targets and immune activation-related targets in different ICI score subgroups. C The main enrichment analysis result in the low ICI score subgroup was heparan sulphate glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis signalling pathways. D The main enrichment analysis result in the high ICI score subgroup was apoptosis, cytokine receptor interaction, toll-like receptor and leucocyte transendothelial migration signalling pathways. E Association between different ICI score groups and overall survival in the TARGET and GSE85047 cohorts. Log rank test, p = 0.028