BACKGROUND: With the introduction of DNA-damaging therapies into standard of care cancer treatment, there is a growing need for predictive diagnostics assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status across tumor types. Following the strong clinical evidence for the utility of DNA-sequencing-based HRD testing in ovarian cancer, and growing evidence in breast cancer, we present analytical validation of the Tempus HRD-DNA test. We further developed, validated, and explored the Tempus HRD-RNA model, which uses gene expression data from 16,750 RNA-seq samples to predict HRD status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples across numerous cancer types. METHODS: Genomic and transcriptomic profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing from Tempus xT, Tempus xO, Tempus xE, Tempus RS, and Tempus RS.v2 assays on 48,843 samples. Samples were labeled based on their BRCA1, BRCA2 and selected Homologous Recombination Repair pathway gene (CDK12, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D) mutational status to train and validate HRD-DNA, a genome-wide loss-of-heterozygosity biomarker, and HRD-RNA, a logistic regression model trained on gene expression. RESULTS: In a sample of 2058 breast and 1216 ovarian tumors, BRCA status was predicted by HRD-DNA with F1-scores of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. Across an independent set of 1363 samples across solid tumor types, the HRD-RNA model was predictive of BRCA status in prostate, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer, with F1-scores of 0.88, 0.69, and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We predict HRD-positive patients across many cancer types and believe both HRD models may generalize to other mechanisms of HRD outside of BRCA loss. HRD-RNA complements DNA-based HRD detection methods, especially for indications with low prevalence of BRCA alterations.
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of DNA-damaging therapies into standard of care cancer treatment, there is a growing need for predictive diagnostics assessing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status across tumor types. Following the strong clinical evidence for the utility of DNA-sequencing-based HRD testing in ovarian cancer, and growing evidence in breast cancer, we present analytical validation of the Tempus HRD-DNA test. We further developed, validated, and explored the Tempus HRD-RNA model, which uses gene expression data from 16,750 RNA-seq samples to predict HRD status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples across numerous cancer types. METHODS: Genomic and transcriptomic profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing from Tempus xT, Tempus xO, Tempus xE, Tempus RS, and Tempus RS.v2 assays on 48,843 samples. Samples were labeled based on their BRCA1, BRCA2 and selected Homologous Recombination Repair pathway gene (CDK12, PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D) mutational status to train and validate HRD-DNA, a genome-wide loss-of-heterozygosity biomarker, and HRD-RNA, a logistic regression model trained on gene expression. RESULTS: In a sample of 2058 breast and 1216 ovarian tumors, BRCA status was predicted by HRD-DNA with F1-scores of 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. Across an independent set of 1363 samples across solid tumor types, the HRD-RNA model was predictive of BRCA status in prostate, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer, with F1-scores of 0.88, 0.69, and 0.62, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We predict HRD-positive patients across many cancer types and believe both HRD models may generalize to other mechanisms of HRD outside of BRCA loss. HRD-RNA complements DNA-based HRD detection methods, especially for indications with low prevalence of BRCA alterations.
Authors: M Esteller; J M Silva; G Dominguez; F Bonilla; X Matias-Guiu; E Lerma; E Bussaglia; J Prat; I C Harkes; E A Repasky; E Gabrielson; M Schutte; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-04-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: T Grellety; F Peyraud; N Sevenet; O Tredan; N Dohollou; E Barouk-Simonet; M Kind; M Longy; J-Y Blay; A Italiano Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Talia Golan; Grainne M O'Kane; Robert E Denroche; Maria Raitses-Gurevich; Robert C Grant; Spring Holter; Yifan Wang; Amy Zhang; Gun Ho Jang; Chani Stossel; Dikla Atias; Sharon Halperin; Raanan Berger; Yulia Glick; J Patrick Park; Adeline Cuggia; Laura Williamson; Hui-Li Wong; David F Schaeffer; Daniel J Renouf; Ayelet Borgida; Anna Dodd; Julie M Wilson; Sandra E Fischer; Faiyaz Notta; Jennifer J Knox; George Zogopoulos; Steven Gallinger Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Patricia Pautier; Sandro Pignata; David Pérol; Antonio González-Martín; Regina Berger; Keiichi Fujiwara; Ignace Vergote; Nicoletta Colombo; Johanna Mäenpää; Frédéric Selle; Jalid Sehouli; Domenica Lorusso; Eva M Guerra Alía; Alexander Reinthaller; Shoji Nagao; Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse; Ulrich Canzler; Giovanni Scambia; Alain Lortholary; Frederik Marmé; Pierre Combe; Nikolaus de Gregorio; Manuel Rodrigues; Paul Buderath; Coraline Dubot; Alexander Burges; Benoît You; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Philipp Harter Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Céline Duval; Marie de Tayrac; Karine Michaud; Florian Cabillic; Claudie Paquet; Peter Vincent Gould; Stéphan Saikali Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrea M Marquard; Aron C Eklund; Tejal Joshi; Marcin Krzystanek; Francesco Favero; Zhigang C Wang; Andrea L Richardson; Daniel P Silver; Zoltan Szallasi; Nicolai J Birkbak Journal: Biomark Res Date: 2015-05-01
Authors: Malgorzata Krajewska; Ruben Dries; Andrew V Grassetti; Sofia Dust; Yang Gao; Hao Huang; Bandana Sharma; Daniel S Day; Nicholas Kwiatkowski; Monica Pomaville; Oliver Dodd; Edmond Chipumuro; Tinghu Zhang; Arno L Greenleaf; Guo-Cheng Yuan; Nathanael S Gray; Richard A Young; Matthias Geyer; Scott A Gerber; Rani E George Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Nike Beaubier; Robert Tell; Robert Huether; Martin Bontrager; Stephen Bush; Jerod Parsons; Kaanan Shah; Tim Baker; Gene Selkov; Tim Taxter; Amber Thomas; Sam Bettis; Aly Khan; Denise Lau; Christina Lee; Matthew Barber; Marcin Cieslik; Casey Frankenberger; Amy Franzen; Ali Weiner; Gary Palmer; Robert Lonigro; Dan Robinson; Yi-Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Eric Lefkofsky; Arul Chinnaiyan; Kevin P White Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-05-25
Authors: C Cruz; M Castroviejo-Bermejo; S Gutiérrez-Enríquez; A Llop-Guevara; Y H Ibrahim; A Gris-Oliver; S Bonache; B Morancho; A Bruna; O M Rueda; Z Lai; U M Polanska; G N Jones; P Kristel; L de Bustos; M Guzman; O Rodríguez; J Grueso; G Montalban; G Caratú; F Mancuso; R Fasani; J Jiménez; W J Howat; B Dougherty; A Vivancos; P Nuciforo; X Serres-Créixams; I T Rubio; A Oaknin; E Cadogan; J C Barrett; C Caldas; J Baselga; C Saura; J Cortés; J Arribas; J Jonkers; O Díez; M J O'Connor; J Balmaña; V Serra Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 32.976