Literature DB >> 35642557

Post hoc power is not informative.

Lacey W Heinsberg1, Daniel E Weeks1,2.   

Abstract

Post hoc power estimates are often requested by reviewers and/or performed by researchers after a study has been conducted. The purpose of this commentary is to provide a heuristic explanation of why post hoc power should not be used. To illustrate our point, we provide a detailed simulation study of two essentially identical research experiments hypothetically conducted in parallel at two separate universities. The simulation demonstrates that post hoc power calculations are misleading and simply not informative for data interpretation. As such, we encourage authors and peer-reviewers to avoid using or requesting post hoc power calculations.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achieved power; exploratory data analysis; observed power; postexperiment power; retrospective power

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35642557      PMCID: PMC9452450          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.344


  9 in total

1.  Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed?

Authors:  M Levine; M H Ensom
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  The Interpretation of Statistical Power after the Data have been Gathered.

Authors:  John J Dziak; Lisa C Dierker; Beau Abar
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02

3.  A Post Hoc Discussion About Post Hoc Power: Divergent Viewpoints on Controversial Methodology.

Authors:  Scott A LeMaire
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Post Hoc Power: Not Empowering, Just Misleading.

Authors:  Andrew D Althouse
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Post hoc Power.

Authors:  Regina L Nuzzo
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  A Proposal to Mitigate the Consequences of Type 2 Error in Surgical Science.

Authors:  Yanik J Bababekov; Sahael M Stapleton; Jessica L Mueller; Zhi Ven Fong; David C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comment on "Post-hoc Power: If You Must, At Least Try to Understand".

Authors:  Andrew D Althouse; Zad R Chow
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis?

Authors:  Yiran Zhang; Rita Hedo; Anna Rivera; Rudolph Rull; Sabrina Richardson; Xin M Tu
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2019-08-08

Review 9.  BDNF DNA methylation changes as a biomarker of psychiatric disorders: literature review and open access database analysis.

Authors:  Galina Y Zheleznyakova; Hao Cao; Helgi B Schiöth
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.