| Literature DB >> 35642188 |
A Roshini1, K V D Kiran1.
Abstract
Wireless body area networks have taken their unique recognition in providing consistent facilities in health monitoring. Several studies influence physiological signal monitoring through a centralized approach using star topology in regular activities like standing, walking, sitting, and running which are considered active postures. Unlike regular activities like walking, standing, sitting, and running, the in-bed sleep posture monitoring of a subject is highly necessary for those who have undergone surgery, victims of breathing problems, and victims of COVID-19 for whom oxygen imbalance is a major issue as the mortality rate in sleep is high due to unattended patients. Suggestions from the medical field state that the patients with the above-mentioned issues are highly suggested to follow the prone sleep posture that enables them to maintain the oxygen level in the human body. A distributed model of communication is used where mesh topology is used for the data packets to be carried in a relay fashion to the sink. Heartbeat rate (HBR) and image monitoring of the subject during sleep are closely monitored and taken as input to the proposed posture prediction-Bayesian network (PP-BN) to predict the consecutive postures to increase the accuracy rate of posture recognition. The accuracy rate of the model outperforms the existing classification and prediction algorithms which take the cleaned dataset as input for better prediction results.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35642188 PMCID: PMC9148412 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3102545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Telemed Appl ISSN: 1687-6415
Figure 1Survey report on sleep disturbance.
Figure 2System design.
Figure 3PP-BN process flow.
Figure 4PP-BN model.
Figure 5Data synthesis of the sleep dataset.
Algorithm 1Posture prediction-Bayesian network (PP-BN).
Figure 6(a) Extraction of image frames from the sleep video. (b) The subset of the MPII dataset based on the extracted sleep posture.
Figure 7Threshold filtering.
Figure 8Sleep posture prediction rate.
Comparative chart of sleep posture recognition.
| S. no | Sensor name | No. of subjects | No. of sensors | Algorithm | Accuracy rate | Year of work |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uniformly distributed pressure sensors | 10 | 1768 | Support vector machines | 77.14% | 2015 |
| 2 | Uniformly distributed FSR sensor | 19 | 3200 | Deep neural networks | 99.70% | 2018 |
| 3 | Matrix of FSR sensors | 6 | NA | Template matching by a minimum mean squared error | 96.10% | 2017 |
| 4 | Uniformly distributed pressure sensors | 12 | 1728 | Fully connected networks | 97.90% | 2020 |
| 5 | Uniformly distributed pressure sensors | 19 | 3200 | Deep neural networks | 97.10% | 2018 |
| 6 | Uniformly distributed pressure sensors | 14 | 8192 | EMD+ | 91.21% | 2016 |
| 7 | Uniformly distributed pressure sensors | 16 | 1024 | ResNet | 90.08% | 2021 |
| 8 | Accelerometer pulse sensor (our method) | 14 | 5 | Posture prediction-Bayesian network (PP-BN) | 91.05% | 2022 |