Literature DB >> 3564211

New techniques in evaluation of impotence.

W E Bradley.   

Abstract

Two new methods of evaluating erectile function were compared and contrasted in a series of 41 patients complaining of impotence. The first method consisted of a single measurement of maximum rigidity at penile base and along the penile shaft utilizing Snap-Gauges. The second method consisted of simultaneous continuous monitoring of penile tumescence and rigidity of the penile base and shaft. The results demonstrated concurrence of interpretation of both techniques. However, whereas the results of Snap-Gauge testing clearly distinguished between organic and psychogenic impotence, continuous penile rigidity monitoring usually delineated the nature of the penile erectile abnormality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3564211     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(87)90501-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  A study on the mechanical reliability of the Dacomed snap gauge: implications for the differentiation between organic and psychogenic impotence.

Authors:  G K Diedrich; W Stock; J LoPiccolo
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1992-12

2.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate, nocturnal penile tumescence, laboratory arousal, and sexual acting out in a male with schizophrenia.

Authors:  A J Cooper; S Losztyn; N C Russell; Z Cernovsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1990-08

3.  Patient-reported erectile dysfunction: a cross-validation study.

Authors:  M D Ackerman; J P D'Attilio; M H Antoni; R K Rhamy; D Weinstein; V A Politano
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1993-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.