Janne Pesonen1,2, Michael Shacklock3,4, Juha-Sampo Suomalainen5, Lauri Karttunen3,6, Jussi Mäki3, Olavi Airaksinen3,6, Marinko Rade3,7,8. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Kuopio University Hospital, PL 100, 70029, KYS/Kuopio, Finland. janne.pesonen@kuh.fi. 2. Department of Surgery (incl. Physiatry), University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. janne.pesonen@kuh.fi. 3. Department of Rehabilitation, Kuopio University Hospital, PL 100, 70029, KYS/Kuopio, Finland. 4. Neurodynamic Solutions, Adelaide, Australia. 5. Department of Clinical Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. 6. Department of Surgery (incl. Physiatry), University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 7. Faculty of Medicine, University of Osijek, Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Hospital "Martin Horvat", Rovinj, Croatia. 8. Department of Natural and Health Studies, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Pula, Croatia.
Correction to: BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22, 808 (2021)10.1186/s12891-021-04649-zFollowing publication of this article [1], the authors report the following corrections to the main text and Figs. 4 and 5:
Fig. 4
Crosstabulations between ESLR, traditional SLR and MRI findings for lumbar disc herniation. ESLR = Extended straight leg raise test; MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging; Trad. SLR = Traditional straight leg raise test
Fig. 5
Crosstabulations between ESLR, traditional SLR and MRI findings for neural compression. ESLR = Extended straight leg raise test; MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging; Trad. SLR = Traditional straight leg raise test
Crosstabulations between ESLR, traditional SLR and MRI findings for lumbar disc herniation. ESLR = Extended straight leg raise test; MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging; Trad. SLR = Traditional straight leg raise testCrosstabulations between ESLR, traditional SLR and MRI findings for neural compression. ESLR = Extended straight leg raise test; MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging; Trad. SLR = Traditional straight leg raise testThe authors noticed that the sensitivity and specificity values for both lumbar disc herniation and nerve root compression for extended straight leg raise and traditional straight leg raise test were miscalculated due to erroneous formula in the Excel file. The reported sensitivity and specificity values have been corrected to the abstract and to the results section on Figs. 4 and 5.Corrected values are (old ➔ corrected):ESLR sensitivity for lumbar disc herniation 0.85 ➔ 0.61ESLR specificity for lumbar disc herniation 0.45 ➔ 0.75Traditional SLR sensitivity for lumbar disc herniation 0.90 ➔ 0.32Traditional SLR specificity for lumbar disc herniation 0.37 ➔ 0.92 (all Fig. 4).ESLR sensitivity for nerve root compression 0.75 ➔ 0.60ESLR specificity for nerve root compression 0.50 ➔ 0.67Traditional SLR sensitivity for nerve root compression 0.70 ➔ 0.28Traditional SLR specificity for nerve root compression 0.40 ➔ 0.80 (all Fig. 5).With the corrected values to the sensitivity and specificity, two sentences in the Discussion’s third paragraph had minor changes. The focus of the study, main discussion or the message of the study remains unchanged and unaffected. Also, the conclusion of the study remains unchanged.
Authors: Janne Pesonen; Michael Shacklock; Juha-Sampo Suomalainen; Lauri Karttunen; Jussi Mäki; Olavi Airaksinen; Marinko Rade Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 2.362