| Literature DB >> 35641591 |
Luong Thi Yen Nguyet1, Krittika Keeratikunakorn1, Kampon Kaeoket2, Natharin Ngamwongsatit3,4.
Abstract
Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli is one of the most serious problems in pig production. This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility and genotypes profiles of diarrhoeagenic E. coli that causes diarrhea in piglets. Thirty-seven pathogenic E. coli strains were used in this study. These were isolated from rectal swabs of diarrheic piglets from farms in Thailand from 2018 to 2019. Escherichia coli isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin (100%), followed by oxytetracycline (91.9%), enrofloxacin (89.2%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (86.5%), amoxicillin: clavulanic acid (81.1%), colistin and gentamicin (75.7%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (64.9%), ceftazidime (35.1%) and 97.3% showed multidrug-resistance (MDR). There were 8 (21.6%) mcr-1 carriers, 10 (27.0%) mcr-3 carriers and 10 (27.0%) co-occurrent mcr-1 and mcr-3 isolates. The phenotype-genotype correlation of colistin resistance was statistically significant (performed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ = 0.853; p < 0.001)). In addition, PCR results determined that 28 of 37 (75.7%) isolates carried the int1 gene, and 85.7% int1-positive isolates also carried the mcr gene. Genetic profiling of E. coli isolates performed by ERIC-PCR showed diverse genetics, differentiated into thirteen groups with 65% similarity. Knowledge of the molecular origins of multidrug-resistant E. coli should be helpful for when attempting to utilize antibiotics in the pig industry. In terms of public health awareness, the possibility of transmitting antibiotic-resistant E. coli from diarrheic piglets to other bacteria in pigs and humans should be of concern.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35641591 PMCID: PMC9156692 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13192-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility against 10 antimicrobial agents of E. coli isolated from the rectal swabs of diarrheic piglets of farms in Thailand during 2018 to 2019.
Virulence factors included in this data table: shiga-toxin (stx2e), heat-labile enterotoxin (lt), heat-stable enterotoxin (stp, sth), enteroaggregative E. Coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1 (astA), intimin (eaeA), adhesin (aidA), fimbriae (F4, F18, F41).
The values were below or above the dilution range marked with the sign “ ≤ ” or “ > ”.
MICs highlighted in light grey represent resistance according to CLSI (VET01S, M100) guidelines.
NA means not analyzed.
AMX amoxicillin, AMC amoxicillin: clavulanic acid, CEF ceftiofur, CAZ ceftazidime, CRO ceftriaxone, CT colistin, ENR enrofloxacin, CN gentamicin, OTC oxytetracycline, SXT trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Figure 1The antimicrobial-resistance percentages of E. coli strains (N = 37). Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by MIC assay and analyzed based on the resistance breakpoints according to CLSI (VET01S, M100) guidelines.
Antibiograms based on the MIC results of 37 E. coli strains distributing into 21 pattern types (A-U).
| Pattern | Profile | Number of resistance antimicrobials | Isolate(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CT-CN-CRO-CEF-CAZ | 10 | 5 |
| B | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CN-CRO-CEF-CAZ | 9 | 2 |
| C | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-CT-CN-CRO-CEF-CAZ | 9 | 1 |
| D | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CT-CN-CRO-CEF | 9 | 3 |
| E | AMX-ENR-OTC-SXT-CT-CN-CRO-CEF-CAZ | 9 | 4 |
| F | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CN-CRO-CEF | 8 | 1 |
| G | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CT-CRO-CEF | 8 | 3 |
| F | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC -CT-CN-CRO-CEF | 8 | 1 |
| I | AMX-ENR-SXT-CT-CN-CRO-CEF-CAZ | 8 | 1 |
| J | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CRO-CEF | 7 | 1 |
| K | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CT-CN | 7 | 4 |
| L | AMX-OTC-SXT-CT-CN-CRO-CEF | 7 | 1 |
| M | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-CRO-CEF | 6 | 1 |
| N | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CN | 6 | 1 |
| O | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT-CT | 6 | 1 |
| P | AMX-AMC-ENR-SXT-CT-CN | 6 | 1 |
| Q | AMX-AMC-OTC-SXT-CT-CN | 6 | 1 |
| R | AMX-AMC-ENR-OTC-SXT | 5 | 2 |
| S | AMX-AMC-ENR-CT-CN | 5 | 1 |
| T | AMX-OTC-SXT-CT-CN | 5 | 1 |
| U | AMX-AMC-OTC | 3 | 1 |
AMX amoxicillin, AMC amoxicillin: clavulanic acid, CEF ceftiofur, CAZ ceftazidime, CRO ceftriaxone, CT colistin, ENR enrofloxacin, CN gentamicin, OTC oxytetracycline, SXT trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.
Figure 2The MIC profiles of 37 E. coli isolates from diarrheic piglets. The right vertical axis lists the geographical regions of Thailand and the horizontal axis is labeled with the antibiotics. The color bar represents the antimicrobial susceptibility results.
The distribution of E. coli strains (N = 28/37) harboring colistin-resistance genes at different MICs of colistin.
| No. of isolates | Different MIC of colistin (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 µg/mL | 2 µg/mL | 4 µg/mL | 8 µg/mL | ||
| 8 | – | – | 5 (17.9%) | 3 (10.7%) | |
| 10 | – | – | 8 (28.6%) | 2 (7.1%) | |
| 10 | 1 (3.6%) | – | 2 (7.1%) | 7 (25.0%) | |
| Total | 28 (100%) | 1 (3.6%) | 0 | 15 (53.6%) | 12 (42.9%) |
Comparison between genotypes and phenotypes of colistin resistance using mPCR and MIC assays from 37 E. coli isolates, which are based on the resistance breakpoints according to CLSI (VET01S, M100) guidelines.
| Colistin | Resistance genotype | Non-resistance genotype | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resistance phenotype | 27 | 1 | 28 |
| Non-resistance phenotype | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Total | 28 | 9 | 37 |
Figure 3Dendrogram of 37 E. coli isolates from ERIC-PCR banding pattern. Similarity analysis was performed by Dice coefficient and UPGMA method. The original ERIC-PCR gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1.