| Literature DB >> 35640928 |
Lucia Carril-Ajuria1,2, Aude Desnoyer2,3, Laurence Albiges1,4, Nathalie Chaput-Gras5,3, Maxime Meylan6, Cécile Dalban7, Marie Naigeon3,8,4, Lydie Cassard2, Yann Vano6,9, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq10, Salem Chouaib11, Benoit Beuselinck12, Sylvie Chabaud7, Janice Barros-Monteiro13, Antoine Bougoüin6, Guillaume Lacroix6, Irelka Colina-Moreno6, Florence Tantot14, Lisa Boselli2, Caroline De Oliveira2, Wolf Herve Fridman6, Bernard Escudier1, Catherine Sautes-Fridman6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phase II NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 study reported safety and efficacy of nivolumab in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) in a 'real-world setting'. We conducted a translational-research program to determine whether specific circulating immune-cell populations and/or soluble factors at baseline were predictive of clinical outcomes in patients with m-ccRCC treated with nivolumab within the NIVOREN study.Entities:
Keywords: cytokines; immunity; immunotherapy; translational medical research; urologic neoplasms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35640928 PMCID: PMC9157347 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 12.469
Patient’s baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes
| Discovery cohort | Validation cohort | Overall study population | |
| mAge (years) | 61.5 (33.0–81.0) | 64.0 (22.0–87.0) | 64.0 (22.0–90.0) |
| Sex | |||
|
| 29 (65.9) | 251 (80.2) | 556 (77.2) |
|
| 15 (34.1) | 62 (19.8) | 164 (22.8) |
| Score IMDC | |||
|
| 20 (45.5) | 50 (16.0) | 131 (18.2) |
|
| 17 (38.6) | 178 (57.1) | 404 (56.3) |
|
| 7 (15.9) | 84 (26.9) | 183 (25.5) |
| ECOG PS | |||
|
| 39 (88.6) | 254 (85.2) | 581 (84.9) |
|
| 5 (11.4) | 44 (14.8) | 103 (15.1) |
| Fuhrman grade | |||
|
| 2 (4.7) | 14 (5.0) | 27 (4.1) |
|
| 11 (25.6) | 83 (29.5) | 192 (29.5) |
|
| 17 (39.5) | 127 (45.2) | 295 (45.3) |
|
| 13 (30.2) | 57 (20.3) | 136 (20.9) |
| Sarcomatoid component | |||
|
| 5 (11.4) | 26 (9.0) | 58 (8.5) |
|
| 39 (88.6) | 262 (91.0) | 626 (91.5) |
| Nephrectomy | 42 (95.5) | 263 (84.0) | 609 (84.6) |
| Brain metastases | 9 (20.5) | 42 (14.5) | 83 (12.3) |
| Previous therapy lines | |||
|
| 28 (63.6) | 179 (57.2) | 359 (49.9) |
|
| 11 (25.0) | 112 (35.8) | 295 (40.9) |
|
| 3 (6.8) | 22 (7.0) | 66 (9.1) |
|
| 7 (17.9) | 60 (19.2) | 144 (21.0) |
| 12 months PFS (%, 95% CI) | 20.5 (10.1 to 33.0) | 24.6 (20.0 to 29.5) | 23.8 (20.7 to 27.0) |
| 12 months OS (%, 95% CI) | 84.0 (69.4 to 92.0) | 69.0 (63.5 to 73.8) | 69.4 (65.9 to 72.7) |
IHC, immunohistochemistry; IMDC, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium; mAge, median age; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.
Figure 1Density t-SNE plots of baseline B cells subpopulations according to response to nivolumab in the discovery cohort. DN B cells, double negative B cells; NSwM B cell, unswitched memory B cells; SwM B cells, switched memory B cells; t-SNE, t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding. s
Figure 2(A) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the different circulating B cell subsets (naive B cells (CD19+, CD27–, IgD+), double negative B cells (DN B cells, CD19+, CD27–, IgD–) and memory B cells including unswitched (NSwM, CD19+, CD27+, IgD+), switched memory B cells (SwM B cells, CD19+, CD27+, IgD–)) in two No-OR patients and in two OR patients of the discovery cohort. (B) Normalized concentrations of B cells and B cell subpopulations between No-OR and OR patients of the discovery cohort. (C) As in (B) but histograms showing normalized concentrations at baseline (C1), 1 month post-treatment initiation (C3) and at end of nivolumab treatment (C7). DN B cells, double negative B cells; NSwM B cells, unswitched memory B cells; SwM B cells, switched memory B cells.
Figure 3(A) Kaplan-Meier for OS according to NswM B cells concentration levels (high: ≥median; low:
Figure 4(A) Correlation heatmap of log2 transformed count values of circulating NSwM B cells, circulating Tfh cells, tumor-associated TLS (numbers (Nb) and density), CD20 +cell numbers (Nb CD20.) and cytotoxic CD8+ (n=17) in tumor center (TC) or invasive margin (IM). (B) Correlation between circulating Tfh cells and NSwM B cells (n=43). Of note only 43 patients out of the 44 analyzed underwent correlation analysis as there was one patient for which we did not have the B cell immunophenotyping (only Tfh). (C) Log2 transformed count values of Tfh cells and Tfh subsets between responders (OR) and non-responders (No-OR). (D) Kaplan-Meier for overall survival according to blood cells concentration levels of Tfh, Tfh2 and Tfh17DP (high ≥median, low
Figure 5TLS enrichment was tested with the χ2 test between responders and non-responders (left panel). Kaplan-Meier for overall survival (middle panel) and progression-free survival (right panel) according to tumor-associated TLS numbers (over 2 TLS : ≥2 TLS, under 2 TLS : <2 TLS) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab. TLS, tertiary lymphoid structures.
Figure 6(A) Correlation heatmap of log2 transformed count values of the B, Tfh subpopulations, and soluble factors. (B) Correlation between blood NSwM B cells and BAFF (upper panel) and BCA-1/CXCL13 (middle panel), and correlation between Tfh cells and BCA-1/CXCL13 (lower panel). (C) Kaplan-Meier for OS according to IL-6 (upper panel), BCA-1/CXCL13 (middle panel) and BAFF (lower panel) concentration levels (high ≥P75, low