| Literature DB >> 35639184 |
Feng Yang1,2, Shouwei Wang3,4, Yingying Li1, Shilei Li2, Wenting Liu1, Yushuang Li1, Haijuan Hu2.
Abstract
The traditional breeding industry has been increasingly saturated and caused environmental pollution, disease transmission, excessive resource use, and methane emission; however, it still cannot meet the needs of the growing population. To explore other alternatives, researchers focused on cell agriculture and cell-based meat, especially large-scale cell culture. As a prerequisite for production, large-scale culture technology has become an important bottleneck restricting cell-based meat industrialization. In this study, the single-factor variable method was adopted to examine the influence of Cytodex1 microcarrier pretreatment, spinner flask reaction vessel, cell culture medium, serum and cell incubation, and other influencing factors on large-scale cell cultures to identify the optimization parameters suitable for 3D culture environment. Collagen and 3D culture were also prospectively explored to promote myogenesis and cultivate tissue-like muscle fibers that contract spontaneously. This research lays a theoretical foundation and an exploratory practice for large-scale cell cultures and provides a study reference for the microenvironment of myoblast culture in vitro, a feasible direction for the cell therapy of muscular dystrophy, and prerequisites for the industrialized manufacturing of cell-based meat. Graphical summary: Research on large-scale myoblast culture using spinner flasks and microcarriers. For cell culture, the microcarriers were pretreated with UV and collagen. Cell seeding condition, spinner flask speed, resting time, and spinner flask culture microenvironment were then optimized. Finally, two culture systems were prepared: a culture system based on large-scale cell expansion and a culture system for myogenesis promotion and differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: Cell proliferation; Cell-based meat; Microcarriers; Myogenesis; Optimized culture system; Spinner flask; Spontaneous contraction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35639184 PMCID: PMC9156609 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-022-01397-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 4.126
Fig. 1Effect of cell pretreatment on cell attachment and proliferation. A Control, UV irradiation, and collagen infiltration three groups of cell inoculation status and 24 h attachment efficiency results. B Comparison results of cell attachment efficiency between the control group and the UV treatment group. C UV and/or CG treatment compares the results of cell attachment efficiency with the control group
Fig. 2Effect of serum condition optimization on cell adhesion. A Effect of serum-free, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% serum concentrations on the efficiency of cell attachment. B Comparison of the number of attached and dead cells between the optimized serum and control groups. C Difference in the number of cell attachments in media with different serum concentrations
Fig. 3Effect of different resting times on cell adhesion. A Cell attachment and morphological results. B Comparative analysis of the number of attached cells and produced clumps and the difference in cell length in the cell culture microenvironment at different resting times. C Multi-factor correlation analysis for resting time, number of attached cells, number of clumps, and length of cells
Fig. 4Long resting time promotes cell myogenesis. A Diagram of myoblasts at different myogenesis stages. B Early myogenesis identification results. C Myogenesis forms muscle fibers and then a tissue-like structure that contracts spontaneously. D Myogenesis promotes the differentiation of myoblasts and the formation of tissue-like structures
Fig. 5Number of inoculated cells and evaluation results of comprehensive optimization conditions. A Cell proliferation curve in spinner flask and microcarrier culture with different numbers of inoculated cells. B Morphology of inoculated cells attached to the microcarriers. C Comprehensive evaluation of the optimized conditions for the promotion of cell proliferation culture system. D Schematic of the adjustment of key parameters in different optimization schemes (large-scale cell proliferation system and myogenic system)