Literature DB >> 35637954

LncRNA TNFRSF10A-AS1 promotes gastric cancer by directly binding to oncogenic MPZL1 and is associated with patient outcome.

Donglei Sun1,2, Hongyan Gou2,3, Dandan Wang1, Chenyang Li1, Yan Li2, Hao Su2,3, Xiaohong Wang4, Xiaolan Zhang1, Jun Yu2,3.   

Abstract

Background: LncRNA is closely associated with the progression of human tumors. The role of lncRNA TNFRSF10A-AS1 (T-AS1) in gastric cancer (GC) is still unclear. We aim to investigate the functional significance and the underlying mechanisms of T-AS1 in the pathogenesis and progression of GC. Experimental Design: The clinical impact of T-AS1 was assessed in 103 patients with GC. The biological function of T-AS1 was studied in vitro and in vivo. T-AS1 downstream effector were identified by RNA sequencing and RNA pulldown assay.
Results: T-AS1 was upregulated in GC cell lines and GC tissues as compared to adjacent non-cancer tissues (n = 47, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that GC patients with T-AS1 high expression had a significantly shortened survival (n=103, P < 0.05). T-AS1 significantly promoted GC cell proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and cell migration/invasion abilities, but suppressed cell apoptosis. Silencing of T-AS1 in GC cells exerted opposite effects in vitro. Knockout of T-AS1 significantly inhibited xenograft tumor growth in nude mice. Mechanistically, T-AS1 directly bound to Myelin Protein Zero Like 1 (MPZL1). MPZL1 showed an oncogenic function in GC by promoting cell proliferation, migration and invasion but inhibiting cell apoptosis. High expression of MPZL1 was associated with poor survivor of GC patients. Knockdown of MPZL1 could abrogate the effect of T-AS1 in the tumor-promoting function. Conclusions: T-AS1 plays a pivotal oncogenic role in GC and is an independent prognostic factor for GC patients. The oncogenic function of T-AS1 is dependent on its direct downstream effector MPZL1. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Long non-coding RNA; MPZL1; TNFRSF10A-AS1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35637954      PMCID: PMC9134913          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.68776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   10.750


Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally 1 and the third-leading cause in China 2. Since patients are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with limited therapeutic strategies, the 5-year overall survival rate of GC patients remains unsatisfactory 3. Although great advances have been made in GC treatment, the molecular mechanisms underlying its tumorigenesis and metastasis are still poorly understood. Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) have been reported to be involved in cell proliferation, tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis 4, 5. LncRNAs can act as enhancers, endogenous siRNA, scaffolds, or decoys through physical interaction with other RNA species or proteins, directly affecting cell-signaling cascades. Accumulating evidence shows that lncRNAs are involved in the pathogenesis and progression of many kinds of cancers 6 and play a role in the promotion or suppression of GC 7. lncRNAs also have diagnostic and prognostic potential and may even inform therapeutic options for cancer patients 8, 9. We recently discovered that a novel lncRNA TNFRSF10A-AS1 (T-AS1) was overexpressed in GC 10. However, the functional significance and mechanisms of T-AS1 action in GC are largely unknown. This study was to investigate the functional role, molecular mechanism and clinical implication of T-AS1 in gastric carcinogenesis.

Results

T-AS1 is upregulated in GC cells and primary GC tumors

T-AS1 expression in GC cells and primary GC tissues was determined by RT-PCR and qRT-PCR, T-AS1 was highly expressed in all 6 GC cell lines (MGC803, MKN74, HGC27, MKN45, BGC823 and AGS), but low expressed in the normal gastric cell GES1 (Figure ). Upregulation of T-AS1 in GC tumors was confirmed in two different cohorts. T-AS1 expression was significantly upregulated in primary gastric tumors as compared with adjacent normal tissues (n = 47) as determined by qRT-PCR (P < 0.001) in our cohort. Consistently, T-AS1 was upregulated in GC paired samples (n = 26, P < 0.0001) and unpaired samples (tumor, n = 375; normal, n = 32; P < 0.0001) from TCGA cohort (Figure ). These results demonstrated that T-AS1 was commonly overexpressed in GC.

T-AS1 high expression is associated with the survival in patients with GC

We further evaluated the clinicopathologic feature and the mortality risk of T-AS1 expression in GC patients. In primary GC tissues from 103 Chinese patients (), multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that T-AS1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor for GC patients (HR, 1.03; P = 0.011) (Figure ). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that GC patients with high T-AS1 expression had significantly shorter survival than those with low T-AS1 expression (P <0.05) (Figure ).

TNFRSF10A-AS1 promotes GC cell growth in vitro and in vivo

Overexpression were performed on BGC823 and GES1 cells which expressed T-AS1 at low level, and knockdown were performed on MGC803 and AGS cells which with high level of T-AS1 and more commonly used in gastric cancer research. In vitro gain- and loss-of-function assays of T-AS1 showed that ectopic expression of T-AS1 in BGC823 and GES1 cells significantly increased cell viability and clonogenicity (Figure ). Conversely, T-AS1 knockdown by RNA interference in MGC803 and AGS cells markedly inhibited cell viability and clonogenicity (Figure ). To investigate the effect of T-AS1 on subcutaneous xenograft tumors, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to knock out the T-AS1 exon in the gene and T-AS1 stable knockout was constructed in MGC803 cells. Four sgRNAs was used to knock out Exon 1 and part of Exon 2 of T-AS1 gene (Figure ). The knockout effect was confirmed by qRT-PCR and gene sequencing (P < 0.001, Figure ). We subcutaneously injected MGC803 cells stably knock out T-AS1-KO or NC into the left and right dorsal flanks of nude mice, respectively. As shown in Figure , knockout of T-AS1 markedly decreased the size (P < 0.0001) and weight (P < 0.05) of MGC803 xenograft tumors (Figure ). Ki-67 staining further confirmed that knockout of T-AS1 inhibited cell proliferation evidenced by reduced Ki-67 positive cells (P < 0.001, Figure ).

T-AS1 inhibits cell apoptosis by activating p53 signaling

Apoptosis analysis by flow cytometry showed that T-AS1 significant reduced total apoptotic cells in BGC823 and GES1 cells transfected with T-AS1 compared to the control cells (all P < 0.05) (Figure ), while knockdown of T-AS1 significantly increased apoptosis cells of MGC803 and AGS cells (both P < 0.05) (Figure ). The T-AS1 induced decrease in apoptosis was confirmed by the elevated protein expression of key apoptosis markers (cleaved forms of caspase-7, caspase-8, and caspase-9), while knockdown of T-AS1 showed the converse effects (Figure ). To understand the molecular basis of the oncogenic property of T-AS1, RNA-sequencing was performed in T-AS1 knockdown and control GC cells (MGC803 and AGS). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that knockdown of T-AS1 significantly activated tumor suppressive p53 signaling (Figure ).

T-AS1 promotes cell-cycle progression

We next investigated the effect of T-AS1 on cell cycle progression by flow cytometry. Ectopic expression of T-AS1 accelerated G1/S phase progression in BGC823 (P < 0.01) and GES1 cells (P < 0.01, Figure ). Conversely, knockdown of T-AS1 by RNA interference in MGC 803 and AGS cells decelerated the G1-S cell cycle transition (P < 0.05, Figure ). The enhanced G1/S cell cycle by T-AS1 was confirmed by the upregulation of the key G0/G1 phage regulators CDK4 and cyclin D1, and knockdown of T-AS1 showed opposite effect (Figure ). Our results indicated that T-AS1 could promote cell cycle and inhibit cell apoptosis by activating p53 signaling (Figure ).

T-AS1 promotes cell migration and invasive abilities of GC cells

Wound-healing and Matrigel invasion assays were performed to determine the effects of T-AS1 on cell migration and invasion. Ectopic expression of T-AS1 significantly increased the migration and invasiveness abilities of BGC823 cells (all P < 0.001) and GES1 cells (all P < 0.01, Figure ). On the other hand, knockdown of T-AS1 markedly suppressed the migration and invasion abilities of MGC803 and AGS cells (Figure ). Protein expression of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers was investigated by western blot. T-AS1 overexpression upregulated the expression of Snail and Slug (Figure ), while knockdown of T-AS1 had the opposite effects (Figure ). These findings demonstrated that the oncogenic effect of T-AS1 was also associated with its role in promoting cell migration and invasion of GC cells.

MPZL1 is the direct downstream effector of T-AS1 in GC

To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pro-tumorigenic action of T-AS1, gene expression profiles were analyzed by RNA sequencing in T-AS1 knockdown MGC803 and AGS cells. MPZL1 was the most significantly downregulated gene in T-AS1 knockdown cells (Figure ). T-AS1 expression was positively correlated with MPZL1 mRNA expression on cells (Figure ) and in TCGA cohort (R=0.4721, P = 0.0149, Figure ). Moreover, T-AS1 expression was also correlated with MPZL1 at protein level by Western blot (Figure ). lncLocator analysis showed that T-AS1 mainly located in cell cytoplasm (). RNA FISH analysis using eight probes of T-AS1 gene () confirmed that T-AS1 was mainly located in the cytoplasm in AGS cells and MGC803 cells (Figure ). RNA pull-down assays confirmed that T-AS1 could bind to MPZL1 (Figure ).

MPZL1 shows oncogenic function in GC and is associated with poor survival of GC patients

MPZL1 mRNA expression was upregulated in 5 GC cell lines (AGS, MKN74, MKN45, MGC803, HGC27) but not in BGC823 and GES1 cell lines (Figure ). MPZL1 mRNA expression was significantly higher in GC tumor tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues of paired samples (n = 27, P < 0.0001); and in GC tumor tissues compared to normal gastric tissues of unpaired samples (Normal, n = 32; Tumor, n = 375; P < 0.0001) (Figure ). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high MPZL1 expression was correlated with poor overall survival of GC patients (Figure ). To investigate the function of MPZL1 in GC, knockdown of MPZL1 by RNA interference in MGC803 and AGS cells, low expression of MPZL1 was confirmed by qRT-PCR and western blot (). Moreover, MPZL1 expression promoted cell proliferation and clonogenicity in MGC803 and AGS cells (). MPZL1 also promoted migration and invasion in MGC803 and AGS cells ().

The oncogenic role of T-AS1 is partially dependent on MPZL1

We then assessed whether the oncogenic function of T-AS1 in GC was dependent on MPZL1. BGC823 and GES1 cells stably transfected with T-AS1 or control vector were co-transfected with siRNA against MPZL1 (Figure ). MPZL1 knockdown in BGC823 and GES1 cells significantly abolished the promoting effect of T-AS1 on cell viability (P < 0.001, Figure ) and clonogenicity (P < 0.001, Figure ). Knockdown of MPZL1 significantly blunted the promoting effects of T-AS1 overexpression on cell migration and invasion in BGC823 and GES1 cells (all P < 0.01, Figure ). These results indicated that the tumor-promoting effect of T-AS1 is at least in part dependent on MPZL1 in GC.

Discussion

In this study, we found that T-AS1 was highly expressed in GC tumors tissues and in GC cell lines. We investigated the clinical implication of T-AS1 expression in GC and found that T-AS1 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor for GC patients and correlated with an increased risk of death. Therefore, T-AS1 might serve as a prognostic biomarker in GC patients. In this connection, we investigated the functional significance of T-AS1 in GC both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro gain- and loss-of-function assays showed that overexpression of T-AS1 in BGC823 and GES1 cells significantly increased cell viability and colony formation ability. Overexpression of T-AS1 also promoted the G1/S cell cycle transition by upregulating of cyclin D1 and CDK4 in CRC cell lines concomitant with inhibition of p53 pathway. T-AS1 also significantly increased cell migration and invasion abilities, but suppressed cell apoptosis. Conversely, T-AS1 knockdown in MGC803 and AGS cells significantly suppressed cell growth, migration/invasion, but induced cell apoptosis. We furtherly generated stalely T-AS1 knockout MGC803 cells, T-AS1 knockout in MGC803 cells inhibited tumor growth in mouse subcutaneous xenograft models in vitro and decreased the expression of proliferation-associated marker Ki-67. These findings collectively indicated that T-AS1 plays an oncogenic function in GC through modulating cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis and migration/invasion. The molecular mechanisms by which T-AS1 exerts its pro-tumorigenic and pro-metastatic functions in GC were evaluated by RNA sequencing in T-AS1 knockdown and control GC cells. RNA sequencing analysis showed that MPZL1 is one of the critical downstream targets of T-AS1. T-AS1 expression correlated positively with MPZL1 from GC cells and GC tissues. RNA pull-down assay confirmed T-AS1 interacted with MPZL1. Since T-AS1 localized both in cell cytoplasm and nucleus, we hypothesis that T-AS1 may be involved in transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory processes to alter the expression and function of downstream targets MPZL1. MPZL1 was reported to promote tumor growth in several cancer types 11, 12. We found that MPZL1 was upregulated in GC cells. High expression of MPZL1 was associated with poor prognosis in GC. In keeping with our finding, data from the Human Protein Atlas showed that MPZL1 overexpression was associated with a poor prognosis in renal, liver, lung and thyroid cancers (www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000197965-MPZL1/pathology). We then assessed whether the tumor-promoting function of T-AS1 in GC depends on MPZL1. The rescue experiment showed that knockdown of MPZL1 by siRNA in BGC823 and GES1 cells significantly blunted the promoting effects of T-AS1 on cell verbality, colony formation, cell migration/invasion abilities, inferring that the tumor-promoting effect of T-AS1 is at least in part dependent on MPZL1 in GC. In conclusion, our study showed for the first time that lncRNA T-AS1 is a tumor-promoting factor in GC through inducing cell proliferation, cell-cycle transition, metastasis/invasion, but inhibiting apoptosis. T-AS1 directly binds to its downstream effector MPZL1 to induce its expression, an oncogenic factor. The tumor promoting function of T-AS1 is at least in part depending on MPZL1 expression (Figure . Moreover, T-AS1 may service as a prognostic factor for GC patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients and human samples

The study cohort included 103 patients with histologically confirmed GC at Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China, including 47 paired GC tumor tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues. Detailed patient information is shown in . The tumor-node-metastasis stage of GC was determined according to the classifications recommended by the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition. All subjects provided written informed consent for obtaining the study specimens. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Peking University Cancer Hospital and the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. This study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association.

Cell lines

Six GC cell lines (AGS, BGC823, MKN74, MGC803, HGC27, and MKN45) and one normal gastric epithelial cell line GES1 were used in this study. AGS was obtained from the ATCC. BGC823, MGC803, HGC27 and GES1 were obtained from Cell Research Institute, Shanghai, China. MKN74 was obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank. These cell lines were obtained between 2014 and 2015, and cell authentication of cells we performed the function and mechanisms study (AGS, BGC823, MGC803 and GES1) was verified by short tandem repeat profiling. Cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco BRL, supplemented with 10% FBS). Routine mycoplasma testing was performed by PCR. Cells were grown for no more than 20 passages in total for any experiment.

In vivo tumorigenicity assays

To assess the effect of T-AS1 on tumor growth, MGC803 cells (5 × 106 cells) stably transfected with sgNC or sgT-AS1 were injected subcutaneously into the left and right flanks of 4-week-old male Balb/c nude mice (n = 10 per group). Tumor volume (mm3) was calculated using the longest and shortest diameters of the tumor as previously described 13. At the end of the experiments, the mice were sacrificed and the tumors were weighed and stored for further analysis. All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

T-AS1 expression in GC cells was detected using Stellaris RNA FISH with 8 independent probes (Bio search Technologies, Hoddesdon, UK) on cell slides according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Probe sequences are listed in . Briefly, cell slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and hybridized with T-AS1 probes (200 nM) for 16h at 37 °C. Chromosomes were stained with DAPI in PBS for 5 min. Immunofluorescence images were taken with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

RNA sequencing

A 3-μg sample of RNA was used as the input material for RNA sample preparation. All samples had RNA integrity values > 6.8. Sequencing libraries were generated using the IlluminaTruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's recommendations. The libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X-ten platform as per the manufacturer's instructions (Shanghai Biotechnology Corp., Shanghai, China).

RNA pull-down assay

Full-length T-AS1 was transcribed using T7 MEGAscript kits (Shanghai GenePharma, Shanghai, China) and labelled in vitro using the Pierce RNA 3′ End Desthiobiotinylation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA pull-down assays were performed using the Pierce Magnetic RNA-Protein Pull-Down Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Desthiobiotin-labelled RNA (50 pM) was mixed with 50 μL of magnetic beads and incubated with AGS cell protein lysates for 60 min at 4 °C with rotation. The beads were washed briefly 4 times, boiled in SDS buffer and the RNA-binding proteins were detected by western blot.

CRISPR/Cas9 knockout assay

The lentiviral sgT-AS1 construct, as reported previously 14 (Genechem Technologies, Shanghai, China), was transfected into MGC803 cells using the vector CV279 MCS-EF1a-Cas9-FLAG-P2A-puro. The T-AS1 sequence and the sgRNA position of the 4 sgRNAs used in this assay are shown in . After transfection, MGC803 cells were selected by puromycin and distributed into 192-well plates. sgT-AS1 in single stable cells was verified by PCR using the detection primer shown in . Control cells were treated with an empty vector containing nonsense sgRNA.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (standard V.22.0; IBM Corporation, A). The χ2 test was used to compare patient characteristics and determine distributions of expression and covariates by vital status. The Mann-Whitney U test or Student's t test was used to compare variables between two groups. The cutoff value was determined by survival significance analysis using the tool Cutoff Finder (http://molpath.charite.de/cutoff/) 15. Overall survival in relation to expression was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve and the log rank test. The difference in cell viability and tumor growth rate between the two groups was determined by repeated-measures analysis of variance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and all tests were two-tailed. Supplementary methods, figures and tables. Click here for additional data file.
  8 in total

Review 1.  The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer.

Authors:  Maite Huarte
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  Kevin C Wang; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Roles of long noncoding RNAs in gastric cancer and their clinical applications.

Authors:  Weiliang Sun; Yunben Yang; Chunjing Xu; Yi Xie; Junming Guo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression.

Authors:  Kevin C Wang; Yul W Yang; Bo Liu; Amartya Sanyal; Ryan Corces-Zimmerman; Yong Chen; Bryan R Lajoie; Angeline Protacio; Ryan A Flynn; Rajnish A Gupta; Joanna Wysocka; Ming Lei; Job Dekker; Jill A Helms; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  PZR promotes metastasis of colorectal cancer through increasing FAK and Src phosphorylation.

Authors:  Dan Tan; Wenpeng Zhang; Yu Tao; Yesseyeva Galiya; Mingliang Wang
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.848

7.  Amplification of MPZL1/PZR promotes tumor cell migration through Src-mediated phosphorylation of cortactin in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Deshui Jia; Ying Jing; Zhenfeng Zhang; Li Liu; Jie Ding; Fangyu Zhao; Chao Ge; Qifeng Wang; Taoyang Chen; Ming Yao; Jinjun Li; Jianren Gu; Xianghuo He
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  Classifying gastric cancer using FLORA reveals clinically relevant molecular subtypes and highlights LINC01614 as a biomarker for patient prognosis.

Authors:  Yiyun Chen; Wing Yin Cheng; Hongyu Shi; Shengshuo Huang; Huarong Chen; Dabin Liu; Weiqi Xu; Jun Yu; Jiguang Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 9.867

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.