Soeren Ahmerkamp1, Farooq Moin Jalaluddin1, Yuan Cui2, Douglas R Brumley3, Cesar O Pacherres4, Jasmine S Berg5, Roman Stocker6, Marcel M M Kuypers1, Klaus Koren7, Lars Behrendt2. 1. Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, 28359 Bremen, Germany. 2. Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. 3. School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. 4. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany. 5. Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 6. Institute for Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Aarhus University Centre for Water Technology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
From individual cells to whole organisms, O2 transport unfolds across micrometer- to millimeter-length scales and can change within milliseconds in response to fluid flows and organismal behavior. The spatiotemporal complexity of these processes makes the accurate assessment of O2 dynamics via currently available methods difficult or unreliable. Here, we present "sensPIV," a method to simultaneously measure O2 concentrations and flow fields. By tracking O2-sensitive microparticles in flow using imaging technologies that allow for instantaneous referencing, we measured O2 transport within (1) microfluidic devices, (2) sinking model aggregates, and (3) complex colony-forming corals. Through the use of sensPIV, we find that corals use ciliary movement to link zones of photosynthetic O2 production to zones of O2 consumption. SensPIV can potentially be extendable to study flow-organism interactions across many life-science and engineering applications.
From individual cells to whole organisms, O2 transport unfolds across micrometer- to millimeter-length scales and can change within milliseconds in response to fluid flows and organismal behavior. The spatiotemporal complexity of these processes makes the accurate assessment of O2 dynamics via currently available methods difficult or unreliable. Here, we present "sensPIV," a method to simultaneously measure O2 concentrations and flow fields. By tracking O2-sensitive microparticles in flow using imaging technologies that allow for instantaneous referencing, we measured O2 transport within (1) microfluidic devices, (2) sinking model aggregates, and (3) complex colony-forming corals. Through the use of sensPIV, we find that corals use ciliary movement to link zones of photosynthetic O2 production to zones of O2 consumption. SensPIV can potentially be extendable to study flow-organism interactions across many life-science and engineering applications.
The production of dioxygen (O2) by photosynthesis began approximately 2.3 bya, and the high energy yield obtained from O2 respiration enabled the development of multicellular life on Earth (Falkowski, 2006; Bekker et al., 2004). However, the poor water solubility of O2 places fundamental constraints on biological metabolism. The molecular diffusion of O2, or diffusive flux, around and into cells is typically slow compared with intracellular reaction rates. To expedite the transport of O2 from regions of production to consumption, life has evolved a range of ventilation mechanisms to enhance fluid flow in close proximity of cells. The magnitude and direction of this flow transports solutes, resulting in an advective flux. In systems ranging from coral surfaces to circulatory systems of animals, biological metabolism and physical transport processes (i.e., advection and diffusion) are intimately linked and unfold dynamically (from milliseconds to days) across spatial scales (micrometer to millimeter). Charting the complex interplay between O2 production, consumption, and transport processes is only possible through simultaneously measuring these quantities in a dynamic fashion. However, existing methods have largely focused on measuring O2 concentrations and transport processes separately. Here, we expand the toolbox of existing O2-sensing techniques by combining particle image velocimetry (PIV) with optode-based chemical sensing. This method, chemical-sensing PIV (“sensPIV”), now enables measurements of transport processes and O2 concentrations simultaneously across spatial scales and environments.Microscale transport is usually measured on particle ensembles via PIV or by particle-tracking velocimetry (PTV), which tracks individual particles in fluid flow. Both methods repeatedly image naturally occurring or artificially added particles (typical size 0.1–10 μm) to obtain information about the local speed and direction of fluid flow. Based on this information, flow fields can be accurately reconstructed in 2D or using stereoscopic or tomographic approaches in 3D (Raffel et al., 1998; Westerweel et al., 2013). A number of commercially available PIV systems and image-processing tools have enabled researchers to describe transport processes, such as blood flow through cardiovascular systems (Yousif et al., 2011; Kheradvar et al., 2010), or the interaction of small crustacea (Gemmell et al., 2014), flocs or particles (Zetsche et al., 2020), jellyfish (Costello et al., 2021; Gemmell et al., 2015), and planktonic protists (Drescher et al., 2010; Nielsen and Kiørboe, 2021; Gilpin et al., 2017) with their flow field. While these studies have provided insights into the interaction of organisms with surrounding flow fields during propulsion or foraging, they do not provide a quantitative assessment of how transport processes affect fluxes of O2.Microscale O2 measurements have traditionally been performed using amperometric micro-electrodes (Clark et al., 1953). Owing to their high accuracy and resolution, microsensors have decisively influenced our understanding of the role of O2 in biogeochemical processes (Revsbech and Jørgensen, 1986), human physiology (Sheffield, 1998), and plant physiology (Pedersen et al., 1998). More recently, optical sensors called optodes have emerged as powerful tools for measuring O2. This technology is based on the O2-dependent phosphorescence quenching of a chemical indicator enabling contactless O2 sensing (Morris et al., 1993; Klimant et al., 1995). By entrapping the indicator chemical in a polymeric matrix, surfaces can be coated, resulting in a variety of sensor types, such as optical fibers or planar optodes. Planar optodes enable the imaging of O2 in 2D and have revolutionized our understanding of O2 distributions and their heterogeneity within complex biological samples, like sediments (Frederiksen and Glud, 2006; Stockdale et al., 2009; Meysman et al., 2010), corals (Holst et al., 2002) or dental plaque (Khosravi et al., 2020). Recently, micro- and nanoparticle-based optodes (optode particles) have been used to visualize O2 concentrations around micro-organisms (Kühl et al., 2020), within micro-organisms (Okkelman et al., 2020; Zhdanov et al., 2015; Tobita and Yoshihara, 2016), and in the bone marrow of live animals (Spencer et al., 2014). Despite these powerful applications, the drawbacks of optodes include their low temporal resolution and the fact that planar optodes affect advective transport by acting as a wall and modifying the flow. As a result, optodes are typically applied to static measurements of O2 concentrations and diffusive transport. In nature, however, organisms interact with complex O2 gradients emanating from changing flow, aerotaxis, or O2 uptake (Stocker, 2012; Guasto et al., 2012). Studying the microscale organization of O2 fluxes thus requires the ability to concurrently visualize O2 gradients and advective transport.The importance of combining measurements of transport processes and O2 concentrations has already been highlighted by some studies. For example, sequential measurements using PIV and microsensors uncovered the effects of ciliary flow on O2 exchange in coral boundary layers (Pacherres et al., 2020; Shapiro et al., 2014). Unfortunately, such studies could not fully resolve the spatial distribution of O2, as microsensors can disturb flow fields. Concentration gradients and flow within, e.g., the phycosphere of individual algae (Kanso et al., 2021) or suspensions of micro-organisms (Sommer et al., 2017) may also exhibit strong variation in time and space, and to measure such minute changes in O2, it is important to apply sensors that are non-invasive. Yet only a handful of studies (Kim et al., 2013; Abe et al., 2004) have succeeded in measuring O2 concentrations and advective flow simultaneously and non-invasively using complex, highly controlled experimental setups. In particular, difficulties in compensating for uneven illumination and small windows of detectable O2 concentrations have prevented a broad implementation of these techniques. A simple, reliable, and reproducible approach that combines measurements of transport processes with O2-sensing is needed to enable the systematic study of how organisms interact with and modify their environment to optimize transport across a range of spatial scales.Here, we present sensPIV, a method that combines the ability of optodes to dynamically measure O2 with the ability of PIV to accurately resolve advective and diffusive transport processes. Using sensPIV, the interplay between transport processes and biological reactions can now be investigated at high resolution across a range of environments using experimental setups available in many laboratories. We demonstrate the versatility of sensPIV by applying it to three contrasting experimental systems of increasing complexity: microfluidic devices, artificial marine aggregates, and living coral fragments. Our sensPIV measurements reveal how flow fields increase exchange processes around particles and how corals actively modulate their microenvironment to enhance the flux of O2.
Results
Method development
There are three essential steps to successfully employ sensPIV: (1) the synthesis of O2-sensitive optode particles, (2) the correct illumination of optode particles, and (3) the correct choice of imaging modalities.
Synthesis of sensPIV particles
Particles used for sensPIV must exhibit a quantifiable quenching response over a range of O2 concentrations, fast response times, and good imaging capabilities. Although many O2-sensitive compounds fulfill these requirements (see, for example, Quaranta et al., 2012 and Wang and Wolfbeis, 2014 for chemistry overview), we recommend the use of platinum(II) meso- (2,3,4,5,6-pentafluoro)phenyl porphyrin (PtTFPP), as it is commercially available, photostable, relatively unaffected by temperature, and exhibits a good sensitivity across a broad range of O2 concentrations (Figures 1A–1H; Video S1; see Borisov et al., 2008). The dynamic quenching of PtTFPP by O2 leads to a reversible, O2-dependent change in luminescence intensity as well as luminescence lifetime. This relationship is described by the Stern-Volmer relationship,where K is the Stern-Volmer constant, [O] is the dissolved O2 concentration, I is the luminescence intensity at a given dissolved O2 concentration, and I is the luminescence intensity in the absence of O2. The same relationship applies to the luminescence lifetime in the presence (τ) and absence of O2 (τ0). From Equation 1, consequently, the calibration of sensPIV particles can be performed by measuring the luminescence intensities of O2-sensitive dyes at known O2 concentrations.
Figure 1
Characterization of the sensor particles
(A) O2-sensitive sensor particles excited by blue wavelengths (365–440 nm) emit green and red fluorescence (500–650 nm).
(B) Scanning electron micrographs of the same sensor particles as in (A) overlaid with the fluorescent signal.
(C) Size spectrum analysis reveals that sensor particle sizes range between 200 and 1,800 nm (median = 590 nm) for precipitated particles (orange) and 500–4,000 nm (median = 2,270 nm) for stained particles (gray).
(D) Emission spectra of O2-sensitive sensor particles. Dashed lines indicate the emission of the sensor particles at 0% O2 air sat. (red) and 100% O2 air sat. (black). The solid black line indicates the emission spectrum of the LED used for excitation of sensor particles.
(E) The luminescence intensity of stained particles based on the intensity of the camera pixel.
(F) Rapid lifetime measurement of precipitated particles as a function of O2 concentrations.
(G) Luminescence imaging of precipitated ratiometric sensPIV particles with an RGB camera. Note that, as a result of the spectral overlap between channels, the green channel also exhibits a slight O2 dependency. The concentrations of 0.5 mg L−1 (red, triangles) and 0.25 mg L−1 (orange, round) refer to the tested sensor particle concentrations.
(H) Calibration curve for two types of sensor particles at different concentrations of O2. Orange and red colors denote particles produced via precipitation (0.5 mg L−1: red triangles; 0.25 mg L−1: orange circles), and black colors denote particles produced via staining methods.
Characterization of the sensor particles(A) O2-sensitive sensor particles excited by blue wavelengths (365–440 nm) emit green and red fluorescence (500–650 nm).(B) Scanning electron micrographs of the same sensor particles as in (A) overlaid with the fluorescent signal.(C) Size spectrum analysis reveals that sensor particle sizes range between 200 and 1,800 nm (median = 590 nm) for precipitated particles (orange) and 500–4,000 nm (median = 2,270 nm) for stained particles (gray).(D) Emission spectra of O2-sensitive sensor particles. Dashed lines indicate the emission of the sensor particles at 0% O2 air sat. (red) and 100% O2 air sat. (black). The solid black line indicates the emission spectrum of the LED used for excitation of sensor particles.(E) The luminescence intensity of stained particles based on the intensity of the camera pixel.(F) Rapid lifetime measurement of precipitated particles as a function of O2 concentrations.(G) Luminescence imaging of precipitated ratiometric sensPIV particles with an RGB camera. Note that, as a result of the spectral overlap between channels, the green channel also exhibits a slight O2 dependency. The concentrations of 0.5 mg L−1 (red, triangles) and 0.25 mg L−1 (orange, round) refer to the tested sensor particle concentrations.(H) Calibration curve for two types of sensor particles at different concentrations of O2. Orange and red colors denote particles produced via precipitation (0.5 mg L−1: red triangles; 0.25 mg L−1: orange circles), and black colors denote particles produced via staining methods.
Video S1. Response of sensor particles in flow to changing O2 concentrations (see also STAR methods section), where the scale bar indicates 5 mm, related to Figures 4 and 5
Similar sensor particles were applied in the aggregate test case (see Figure 4) and coral test case (see Figure 5).To synthesize suitable particles for sensPIV, we explored two methods: (1) a precipitation method (Mistlberger et al., 2010) and (2) a staining method that uses commercially available particles (diameter of 2.3 μm; Figures 1A–1D and S1A). Precipitation is a straightforward process where an indicator dye (PtTFPP), a reference dye (Macrolex fluorescence yellow 10GN), and a polymer (styrene maleic anhydride) are dissolved in a solvent (tetrahydrofuran) that is well miscible with water (see STAR Methods). As dyes and the polymer are water insoluble, precipitation of dye-containing particles (size 200–1,800 nm) occurs instantaneously when mixed with water (Figures 1A–1C and S1A). To prevent particle aggregation, we used a copolymer of styrene and maleic anhydride. During precipitation, the anhydride groups are hydrolyzed and the resulting carbonic acid groups on the surface stabilize the particles (see Mistlberger et al., 2010 for tuning possibilities of nanoparticles). The main advantage of precipitation is the possibility of producing large amounts of sensor particles with minimal effort and virtually no specialized equipment. In contrast to precipitation, the staining method uses commercially available synthetic particles that are exposed to a mixture of an organic solvent (here acetone) and water with added O2 indicator PtTFPP (Borisov et al., 2008). Particles immersed in this mixture swell and entrap lipophilic dyes within the particles when the organic solvent evaporates.Notably, both synthesis methods produce particles that contain a range of different particle sizes (Figure 1C; 590 ± 360 nm [SD] by precipitation and 2,270 ± 1960 nm by staining) and, in order to suppress variability in particle sizes, we developed a protocol consisting of a series of sonication, centrifugation, and subsequent filtration steps (described in STAR Methods and Figure S1B). We found that, despite inhomogeneous particle sizes, a simple two-point calibration is sufficient for accurate O2 measurements via sensPIV (Figures 1E–1H).
Excitation and imaging of sensPIV particles
Quantifying the O2-dependent phosphorescence (Morris et al., 1993; Klimant et al., 1995) of nano- and micrometer-sized sensPIV particles requires microscale visualization. In this study, we examined sensPIV particles via epifluorescence microscopy or light-sheet microscopy (Figures 2A–2C). Standard epifluorescence microscopes can be readily adapted for sensPIV measurements, either by using existing laser- or diode-based light sources to excite PtTFPP (excitation [Ex.] ≈ 390 nm) or by adding a specific fluorescence filter cube (e.g., Ex. ≈ 390 nm; emission [Em.] > 490 nm) when using full-spectrum light sources (Figures 2A–2C). Epifluorescence microscopes are available in many research environments and are well suited to perform sensPIV in well-defined experimental setups (e.g., microfluidic applications). Compared with epifluorescence microscopy, light-sheet microscopy can be used to image sensPIV particles around larger 3D objects (mm-cm scale) or in experimental setups that require additional instrumentation, such as flow chambers. Light-sheet microscopy, however, requires high light intensities and a homogeneous illumination field, which is achievable only with high-power light-emitting diode (LED) systems with an output ranging between 2.5 W and 5 W or with laser diodes (see STAR Methods section).
Figure 2
Conceptual illustration of the three imaging approaches compatible with sensPIV and used within this study
(A) Luminescence intensity imaging: here, UV light (∼390 nm) is used to excite the O2-sensitive dye (PtTFPP) on sensPIV particles. The resulting red-shifted (>650 nm) luminescence intensity depends on ambient O2 concentrations. This approach is achievable using a simple epifluorescence microscope.
(B) Rapid lifetime imaging: here, sensPIV particles are excited with an intensity-modulated light sheet (∼450 nm) and the luminescence (∼650 nm) emitted by sensor particles is phase shifted. The resulting phase shift Δφ depends on the O2 concentration and is estimated based on a two-tap camera chip (see STAR Methods).
(C) Ratiometric imaging: here, blue light (∼450 nm) is used to excite both PtTFPP (via energy transfer; see text) and the reference dye, MY. The emission of the PtTFPP (red, R; ∼650 nm) is normalized by the emission of MY (green, G; ∼500 nm), which compensates for inhomogeneous illumination and simplifies calibration.
Conceptual illustration of the three imaging approaches compatible with sensPIV and used within this study(A) Luminescence intensity imaging: here, UV light (∼390 nm) is used to excite the O2-sensitive dye (PtTFPP) on sensPIV particles. The resulting red-shifted (>650 nm) luminescence intensity depends on ambient O2 concentrations. This approach is achievable using a simple epifluorescence microscope.(B) Rapid lifetime imaging: here, sensPIV particles are excited with an intensity-modulated light sheet (∼450 nm) and the luminescence (∼650 nm) emitted by sensor particles is phase shifted. The resulting phase shift Δφ depends on the O2 concentration and is estimated based on a two-tap camera chip (see STAR Methods).(C) Ratiometric imaging: here, blue light (∼450 nm) is used to excite both PtTFPP (via energy transfer; see text) and the reference dye, MY. The emission of the PtTFPP (red, R; ∼650 nm) is normalized by the emission of MY (green, G; ∼500 nm), which compensates for inhomogeneous illumination and simplifies calibration.Simultaneously recording fluid movement and local O2 concentration via sensPIV particles requires fast cameras (>10 Hz for the applied test cases) in order to capture the luminescence of rapidly moving particles. Capturing differences in luminescence is achieved via three imaging modalities, (1) luminescence imaging (Figure 2A), (2) ratiometric imaging (Figure 2B), and (3) rapid lifetime imaging (Figure 2C). In its simplest form, sensPIV can be executed by recording the luminescence intensity of sensor particles with a simple monochromatic camera. Such cameras are characterized by high quantum efficiencies, which allow for lower excitation intensities and faster recording frequencies (>100 Hz). However, the accuracy of measurements with monochromatic cameras is usually limited by the homogeneity of the illumination, which may be affected through shading when observed samples exhibit three-dimensionality. In our proof-of-concept applications, we demonstrate that effects of inhomogeneous excitation light can be avoided by performing in situ calibrations of sensor particles in simplified, controlled environments (such as microfluidic devices; see test case 1) or by using alternative imaging methods (such as ratiometric or rapid lifetime imaging) that record the light used for excitation at the same time as the emission light, thereby enabling instantaneous referencing.Ratiometric imaging takes advantage of two luminescent dyes present within the same sensPIV particle to obtain a ratio of luminescence signals. One dye serves as the O2-sensitive indicator, while the second O2-insensitive dye acts as a reference. Normalizing the intensity of the O2-sensitive dye with the reference intensity compensates for inhomogeneous illumination fields, particle sizes, and artifacts introduced by topographic features (see Koren et al., 2015 and references therein). Ideally, ratiometric dyes cover two colors of the RGB chip installed in many commercially available cameras, which allows for convenient sensPIV measurements by taking a single image. In our experiments, we optimized the synthesis of PtTFPP sensor particles for ratiometric sensPIV (see above and supplemental information; test case 3 for application). The O2-sensitive compound PtTFPP (Em. peak at ∼650 nm) in combination with the reference dye Macrolex fluorescent yellow 10GN (MY) (Em. peak at ∼480 nm) yields optimal performance in combination with standard RGB cameras (see also Koren et al., 2015). Notably, MY does not only act as a reference dye but also acts as an antenna molecule that transfers excitation energy to PtTFPP and thereby increases sensor brightness via light-harvesting effects (see Mayr et al., 2009). Instead of less powerful green or potentially harmful UV LEDs, which target the specific absorbance spectra of PtTFPP, it is therefore possible to work with less harmful and bright-blue LEDs.To measure dissolved O2 concentrations without addition of a reference dye, luminescent lifetime imaging is the method of choice (Holst et al., 2002; Murniati et al., 2016). The luminescence lifetime is the mean time between activation of a molecule and photon emission and is characteristic for every luminophore. The lifetime of the O2-sensitive PtTFPP (∼60 μs without O2) can be estimated via repeated imaging of the declining luminescence intensity after light exposure (see Koren et al., 2019). However, for typical shutter-modulated cameras, readout times are on the order of 10–100 s due to relatively slow sensors. Newer cameras allow for estimating the lifetime (τ) in the frequency domain based on the frequency shift (see key resources table and STAR Methods) and can capture lifetime images in less than 10 s (Koren et al., 2019). In order to meet the requirements for sensPIV (recording frequencies >10 Hz), we performed rapid lifetime measurements with a camera chip (QMFLIM2, pco) that has an in-pixel charge swing separating two taps within each pixel (Chen et al., 2015). The in-pixel charge swing allows quasi-instantaneous recording of two sequential images (IT1 and IT2), where each image covers half the period of the excitation signal (5 kHz; see Figure 2). The normalized intensity difference of the two images ΔI = (IT1 − IT2)/(IT1 + IT2) is directly related to the dissolved O2 concentration (see Figure 2C). The advantage of lifetime imaging is that only one O2-sensitive dye is needed and highly accurate measurements are achievable, even in heterogeneous samples (see test case 2 for application). The main disadvantages of this method are (1) the relatively high cost of the camera system and (2) that measured signals do not scale linearly (Figure 1F), which requires the application of a second-order polynomial fit (see STAR Methods).
Applications of sensPIVv
SensPIV under well-defined O2 gradients within microfluidic devices
Microfluidic chambers are ideal testing arenas for sensPIV, as they provide a high level of control over fluid flows, O2 concentrations, and imaging of microscale processes (Son et al., 2015). Owing to the importance of viscosity at small scales, fluid flows in microfluidic channels are laminar and exact mathematical solutions allow for robust calibration of flow measurements in prototypical channel geometries, like rectangular channels (Batchelor, 2000). Moreover, specific O2 concentrations can be controlled and varied over time (Garren et al., 2014; Rusconi et al., 2014a, 2014b; Yawata et al., 2014). These characteristics make microfluidic devices useful for biological and medical applications, including the study of bacterial aerotaxis and measuring O2-dependent cellular responses (Menolascina et al., 2017). Here, we used microfluidic devices to carefully calibrate sensPIV particles and to demonstrate accurate, simultaneous visualization of fluid flows and O2 concentrations.First, we introduced sensPIV particles into a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microfluidic device consisting of a main fluid channel surrounded by two adjacent gas channels (Figure 3A). As PDMS is gas permeable, we can control dissolved O2 concentrations in the main fluid channel containing sensPIV particles. To calibrate sensPIV particles, we equilibrated the fluid in the main channel first with compressed air (21% O2) and then with nitrogen gas (0% O2) while measuring the luminescence intensity of particles under no flow. Following this two-point calibration, we supplied compressed air to one of the gas channels and nitrogen gas to the other, ultimately resulting in a steady linear O2 gradient across the main channel. By relating the luminescence intensity of individual sensPIV particles to a previously obtained calibration curve, we could observe the evolution of O2 concentrations across the main channel (Figure 3B), as the system transitioned to the steady linear profile. This allowed us to compare our experimental O2 measurements with a time-resolved numerical model solving the scalar transport equations (Figure 3B; see STAR Methods section). This revealed that experimental O2 concentrations reached equilibrium after 70–100 s, which is consistent with diffusion timescales derived from our model. Experimental data and model results were in good agreement and demonstrated correlation coefficients (R) between 0.75 and 0.82 (Figure 3B; 1 indicating good positive correlation; Table S1). Dissimilarities between model results and experimental results occurred during the initialization of experiments, an observation we attribute to the capacity of PDMS to retain gases and the difference in the time required for gases to be released. Together, these experiments demonstrate that stationary sensPIV particles can visualize steady-state and dynamically changing O2 concentrations in simple microfluidic geometries.
Figure 3
The behavior of sensPIV particles in a simple microfluidic device with a well-defined linear O2 profile
(A) Cross-section of the microfluidic device used to control the gas environment around sensPIV particles. The microfluidic device was adapted from Rusconi et al., 2014b) and consists of a central fluidic channel surrounded by two (gas) side channels. Injecting 100% N2 (0% O2) into one of the gas channels and compressed air (21% O2) into the other resulted in a linear O2 gradient across the central fluidic channel containing sensPIV particles.
(B) O2 profiles in no flow conditions. Here, sensPIV particles were introduced into the main channel and kept quiescent. Shown are sensPIV measurements (dotted lines) and model simulations (solid lines) at time 40 s, 1 min 10 s, 1 min 40 s, and 12 min 25 s.
(C) O2 profiles under flow conditions. Here, sensPIV particles were continuously introduced into the main fluidic channel at a flow velocity of 11 μm s−1. Comparison between sensPIV measurements and model simulations at 50 s, 1 min 20 s, 1 min 50 s, and 12 min 35 s is shown (correlation coefficients are presented in Table S1).
The behavior of sensPIV particles in a simple microfluidic device with a well-defined linear O2 profile(A) Cross-section of the microfluidic device used to control the gas environment around sensPIV particles. The microfluidic device was adapted from Rusconi et al., 2014b) and consists of a central fluidic channel surrounded by two (gas) side channels. Injecting 100% N2 (0% O2) into one of the gas channels and compressed air (21% O2) into the other resulted in a linear O2 gradient across the central fluidic channel containing sensPIV particles.(B) O2 profiles in no flow conditions. Here, sensPIV particles were introduced into the main channel and kept quiescent. Shown are sensPIV measurements (dotted lines) and model simulations (solid lines) at time 40 s, 1 min 10 s, 1 min 40 s, and 12 min 25 s.(C) O2 profiles under flow conditions. Here, sensPIV particles were continuously introduced into the main fluidic channel at a flow velocity of 11 μm s−1. Comparison between sensPIV measurements and model simulations at 50 s, 1 min 20 s, 1 min 50 s, and 12 min 35 s is shown (correlation coefficients are presented in Table S1).Second, to determine whether sensPIV particles can accurately visualize transport processes and O2 concentrations simultaneously, we used the same microfluidic device to control both O2 concentrations and particle velocities in the main channel. At an average flow speed of 11 μm s−1 in the fluid channel and a compressed gas supply of 21% O2 and 0% O2 to the gas channels, we tracked and measured the intensity of sensPIV particles to simultaneously determine flow fields and local O2 concentrations (Figure 3C). This enabled us to derive the characteristic flow field in the main channel (a parabolic shape) and concurrently visualize the developing gradients of O2. Experimental data on flow fields and local O2 concentrations largely matched numerical modeling outputs (Figure 3C; Rvelocity = 0.83; Rgradient = 0.79–0.84; Table S1) and demonstrated that the equilibrium profile was attained after approximately 80–110 s.
SensPIV for measuring the dynamic O2 exchange around a model laboratory aggregate
Sedimentation of particles, flocs, or aggregates is a process occurring in both natural and industrial settings, including particulate matter transport in the ocean and deposition in wastewater treatment plants. In organic aggregates, the high carbon content and associated microbial activity lead to the formation of distinct microenvironments. When respiration exhausts O2 inside aggregates (Ploug, 2001), anaerobic processes are favored (e.g., denitrification and anammox), resulting in the enhanced removal of nutrients in wastewater treatment plants (Speth et al., 2016) and the ocean (Bianchi et al., 2018; Karthäuser et al., 2021). Inside aggregates, the duration and extent of O2 depletion is governed by the external supply of O2 and its transport through the aggregate boundary layer. The thickness of the aggregate boundary layer controls O2 fluxes into aggregates and is highly dependent on the surrounding flow field. Here, we used sensPIV to quantitatively assess the O2 exchange processes around and into millimeter-sized aggregates. For this, we synthesized porous agarose aggregates (porosity, i.e., the ratio of voids to total volume, θ = 0.97 ± 0.01; radius, r = 2.7 ± 0.1 mm; n = 6) with embedded sensor particles (produced via the precipitation method). To simulate an O2-depleted, sinking aggregate, agarose aggregates were degassed and placed into a temperature-compensated flow chamber (Figure 4A). Two separate experiments were performed in which the aggregate was exposed to a flow of 2.1 mm s−1, representing a Reynolds number of approximately 1, and a reference experiment with no flow.
Figure 4
sensPIV visualizes flow and O2 gradients around and inside a porous agarose aggregate
(A) Conceptual illustration of the experimental setup consisting of a flow chamber, an agarose sphere with embedded sensor particles, and the imaging setup.
(B) Reconstruction of the flow field (left panel) and O2 concentration inside and around the aggregate (right panel). Note the different scale bars for the O2 concentration inside and outside the aggregate (see also text). Lower panels indicate flow and O2 profile along the equator of the aggregate.
(C) Transient O2 concentrations in the core, at the surface, and in the boundary layer of an aggregate under flow and no-flow conditions. Diffusion timescale τD is estimated from the radius of the aggregate and the diffusion of O2 (see text).
sensPIV visualizes flow and O2 gradients around and inside a porous agarose aggregate(A) Conceptual illustration of the experimental setup consisting of a flow chamber, an agarose sphere with embedded sensor particles, and the imaging setup.(B) Reconstruction of the flow field (left panel) and O2 concentration inside and around the aggregate (right panel). Note the different scale bars for the O2 concentration inside and outside the aggregate (see also text). Lower panels indicate flow and O2 profile along the equator of the aggregate.(C) Transient O2 concentrations in the core, at the surface, and in the boundary layer of an aggregate under flow and no-flow conditions. Diffusion timescale τD is estimated from the radius of the aggregate and the diffusion of O2 (see text).In both experiments, the O2 boundary layer surrounding the aggregate and the O2 concentration inside the aggregate were visualized by taking a total of 100 images via rapid lifetime imaging (frequency of 10 Hz; Figure 4B). Flow fields were reconstructed by PTV (Figure S2), and O2 concentrations were estimated by relating the difference of two intensity images to a calibration curve (Figure 1F; see also Figure S3). High-resolution sensPIV images revealed a 2.5-mm-thick O2 boundary layer surrounding the aggregate and O2 concentrations that rapidly decrease from 100% to 90% air saturation in the vicinity of the aggregate surface. The shape of the O2 boundary layer is narrow on the upstream side and then asymmetrically increases in size toward the downstream side, together confirming previous microsensor-based measurements (Ploug, 2001). We note that, while microsensors provide comparable information, sensPIV measures O2 transport processes in two dimensions without disturbing flow fields (see also Figure S4).We next examined the impact of flow on the transfer of O2 from the aggregate exterior into its interior. To better understand this process, we estimated the diffusion timescale of O2 into the aggregate (τD = a
D = 32 min), which qualitatively matched our experimental results with sensPIV (30 min). However, the direct comparison of flow (velocity of 2.1 mm s−1) with no-flow conditions revealed more than 8 % O2 difference inside the aggregate (measured after 10 min) indicating an enhanced diffusion of O2. To quantify this enhancement effect, we evaluated the O2 fluxes, J, through the exterior of the aggregate by calculating the concentration gradient perpendicular to the surface under flow and no-flow conditions. To account for the asymmetry of O2 concentrations induced by flow fields, all O2 gradients were averaged along the whole surface of the aggregate followingwhere D is the diffusion coefficient of O2, θ is the porosity of the aggregate, and is the unit normal vector perpendicular to the surface of the aggregate (A) resulting in a surface O2 concentration gradientAfter initiating flow, the fluxes of O2 into the anoxic aggregate core were between 1.3 and 1.8 nmol cm−2 s−1 and declined over time as the aggregate saturated with O2 (compare Figure 4C). We extracted the fluxes for a given O2 concentration inside the aggregate and expressed the flow-dependent uptake enhancement as the Sherwood number, which is the ratio of the flux in the presence of flow to the flux in the absence of flow. For the aggregate case, we found an average Sherwood number of 1.75, implying that the fluid flow increased O2 exchange by 75% compared with no-flow conditions. This number only represents a single test case and strongly depends on the ratio of settling velocity timescales and diffusion timescales. Previous modeling studies have estimated the uptake enhancement to be about ten times greater for the same spherical aggregate shape and flow regime (Kiørboe and Thygesen, 2001). We attribute this difference to the fact that most models do not take into account aggregate porosity and apply simplified boundary conditions (Moradi et al., 2018). Our visualization of aggregate-fluid exchange processes under flow conditions thus demonstrates the importance of experimentally verifying numerical models. SensPIV is suited to address this challenge and to elucidate how the presence of flow and metabolic activity shapes O2 gradients.
SensPIV for the visualization of O2 dynamics and cilia-induced flows around the coral Porites lutea
Cilia are hair-like structures present in many motile micro-organisms but also humans and other mammals (Sleigh, 1962; Wan, 2018). A key function of (motile) cilia is to initiate fluid motion to propel organisms or to enhance ventilation across surfaces (Gilpin et al., 2020). In a final experiment, sensPIV was used to investigate the microscale interaction of epidermal cilia on a reef-building coral with its surrounding flow environment. Previous studies on coral flow fields demonstrated that the beating of epidermal cilia stirs the boundary layer and enhances mass transport (Shapiro et al., 2014). However, due to methodological limitations, it was not fully understood how the flow field generated by cilia affects the O2 concentrations within the coral boundary layer and what benefit the coral derives from this.Here, we used the stony coral Porites lutea as a model organism and measured sensPIV particles around its surface through a recently developed light-sheet microscope and recirculating flow chamber (Pacherres et al., 2020). First, we tested the biocompatibility of sensPIV particles by adding particles and observing coral cilia beating for 5 min during stroboscopic light exposures (20 ms each). The introduction of sensPIV did not visibly induce coral bleaching or change the beating of cilia but induced substantial mucus production as previously observed under light stress (Fabricius-Dyg et al., 2012; Koren et al., 2016). After experiments, coral fragments were visually inspected for several days and no substantial release of Symbiodiniaceae was detected. Finally, we tested the effects of continuous illumination by exposing a coral fragment to light for 2 min, a duration that is 60 times longer than the total illumination time used in experiments. Prolonged light exposure caused the release of endosymbionts and bleaching of the coral fragments exposed to light. These experiments suggest that sensPIV particles are biocompatible as long as light and particle exposure are minimized. In all subsequent experiments, this was achieved by using short light strobes (≤20 ms) and removing sensor particles after finishing experiments (∼1 min).To visualize O2 concentrations around P. lutea, we introduced sensPIV particles and recorded 100 color images within a time window of 2 s (see also Video S2). Based on these images, we reconstructed the O2 concentration using a ratiometric-referencing approach with the red (R) and green (G) channels of the color image (Figures 5A and 5B). We found that single images can reconstruct O2 concentrations with an error of approximately 10%–15% and that additional images (n > 40) reduced the error to below 2% (see Figure S4). To compare the accuracy of sensPIV with the accuracy of a “traditional” amperometric microsensor, individual vertical profiles were extracted from sensPIV measurements and O2 concentrations were found to change by ΔC = 1.5 μmol L−1 over a distance of ∼Δz = 20 μm, which is close to the resolution of commercially available O2 microsensors (see Figure S5). However, while both methods capture similar O2 concentrations, microsensors are able to resolve more pronounced gradients. We attribute this to the fact that the sensPIV experiments were performed at oversaturated O2 concentrations in the range of 240–650 μmol L−1 (compare Nelson and Altieri, 2019). At this concentration range, the phosphorescence of O2 sensor particles is already substantially quenched, as illustrated by the sensor calibration (Figure 1G). At an O2 saturation of 0%, a 10% change of O2 results in a signal change of 7%, while at 100% O2 saturation, a 10% change of O2 results in a signal change of 1%. PtTFPP thus appears best suited for low-O2 conditions, and better accuracies at high O2 concentrations could be achieved with iridium or ruthenium-based dyes (Quaranta et al., 2012).
Figure 5
sensPIV can visualize flow and O2 around corals and other complex biological structures
(A) A custom light-sheet-microscope-based flow chamber setup containing an actively stirring coral specimen (Porites lutea; see Video S1 for video).
(B) Color image of sensPIV particles around the coral surface. Note the O2 microsensor in the top left corner, which is used to cross-reference measurements.
(C) Combined particle image velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) graph of sensPIV particles. Arrows indicate the flow along the coral’s surface, as determined by PIV using the red channel of the RGB image. Colored dots represent individual particles, and the color indicates the velocity component perpendicular to the coral surface as determined by PTV. Red and blue depict upward and downward flow of particles, respectively.
(D) sensPIV-derived O2 concentrations inside the coral boundary layer.
(E) Diffusive and advective O2 fluxes normal to the surface along the vortex area highlighted in (D). The advective flux perpendicular to the surface was averaged for the first 250 μm above the coral surface along the red line, and the upper limit is indicated by a gray line in (D).
sensPIV can visualize flow and O2 around corals and other complex biological structures(A) A custom light-sheet-microscope-based flow chamber setup containing an actively stirring coral specimen (Porites lutea; see Video S1 for video).(B) Color image of sensPIV particles around the coral surface. Note the O2 microsensor in the top left corner, which is used to cross-reference measurements.(C) Combined particle image velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) graph of sensPIV particles. Arrows indicate the flow along the coral’s surface, as determined by PIV using the red channel of the RGB image. Colored dots represent individual particles, and the color indicates the velocity component perpendicular to the coral surface as determined by PTV. Red and blue depict upward and downward flow of particles, respectively.(D) sensPIV-derived O2 concentrations inside the coral boundary layer.(E) Diffusive and advective O2 fluxes normal to the surface along the vortex area highlighted in (D). The advective flux perpendicular to the surface was averaged for the first 250 μm above the coral surface along the red line, and the upper limit is indicated by a gray line in (D).The sensPIV analysis of O2 concentrations revealed a boundary layer along the coral surface with a width of approximately 1,300 ± 300 μm (Figures 5D and S5C) and characterized by large heterogeneities in both horizontal and vertical directions. Two distinct semi-circular-shaped vortices indicated local increases in O2 production at the coral surface (Figure 5D). The width of the vortices varied between 800 and 1,500 μm and extended 900 ± 300 μm into the flow field, thus traversing almost the entire boundary layer (Figure 5D). The flow field (black arrows in Figure 5C) in the vicinity of the coral exhibited complex pulsed movements that were insufficiently captured by averaged image ensembles. To improve the visualization of these vortical flows, the velocity perpendicular to the coral surface was calculated via PTV (Figure 5C). This demonstrated that vertical velocities ranged from −0.1 to 0.1 mm s−1 and the width of each of the vortices was 1,000–1,250 μm (compare also Figure S5D).A comparison of O2 concentrations and flow fields suggest that upward-directed fluid motion, induced by cilia, coincides with zones of higher O2 concentrations while downwelling flows coincide with lower O2 concentrations. This implies that cilia are not stirring the entire boundary layer homogeneously as assumed previously (Shapiro et al., 2014) but likely organize their beating pattern to increase the upward transport of excess O2 from the tissue. O2 is also transported downwards toward the mouth openings (Pacherres et al., 2022) where the coral actively respires. SensPIV has thus helped reveal that the coral actively stirs the boundary layer in order to externally link zones of O2 production with zones of O2 consumption and, presumably, accelerate metabolism. To quantify this transport effect, we calculated the advective flux of O2 asand diffusive flux as where is the velocity perpendicular to the surface and C is the O2 concentration. The advective flux of O2 was averaged for the first 250 μm above the coral surface and ranged from −36 nmol cm−2 s−1 to 38 nmol cm−2 s−1 (negative sign implies downward-pointing flux, compare Figure 5E). Averaging along the vortex, the net upward flux is 1.5 nmol cm−2 s−1. In comparison, the net diffusive flux (averaged along the whole coral surface) is 0.4 nmol cm−2 s−1. The dominance of advection over diffusion can be tested using the non-dimensional Peclet number where L is the characteristic length scale of the vortices (L ≈ 1,000 μm). For the present coral, the Peclet number was calculated to be approximately 100, confirming the ratio of the measured advective to diffusive fluxes of ∼95. In conclusion, the dominance of advective fluxes implies a substantial consumption of photosynthetically produced O2 through respiration at the mouth openings.
Discussion
SensPIV links microscale measurements of flow, traditionally performed via PIV, with measurements of O2 concentrations, typically performed with microsensors or immobilized optodes. Our three test cases demonstrate the power of sensPIV to study microscale advective and diffusive fluxes in experiments at varying complexity. These applications show the simple implementation of sensPIV for experimental research ranging from ecology to life sciences and engineering. Using sensPIV, we obtained insight into how corals optimize O2 consumption and production by measuring their advective ciliary flow. Previously, heterogeneous nutrient and O2 concentrations within the boundary layer of corals were attributed to changes in coral topography or flow and the resulting variations in concentration boundary layer thicknesses (de Beer et al., 2000; Shashar et al., 1993). Using sensPIV, we instead discovered that coral topography acts in tandem with local ciliary flow to enhance removal of O2 from coral tissues and, at the same time, optimize the coral metabolism. While further research is needed to disentangle the complex interactions occurring on coral surfaces, our initial results emphasize the ability of sensPIV to provide insights into mass-flow exchange around complex biological structures. Although we only present results from the coral species P. lutea, we emphasize that cilia are found in many biological systems, such as in the human respiratory tract (Loiseau et al., 2020) and the oviduct of female mammals (Enuka et al., 2012; Byatt-Smith et al., 1991). In these examples, the transport of O2 might play a key role in the clearance of particles and pathogens and for supplying O2 to embryos, which could be studied using sensPIV.Notably, sensPIV (in its most basic form) only requires simple setups (see key resources table), making this technology accessible to the research community at low cost. We thus anticipate the integration of sensPIV into a range of existing microscopy platforms (e.g., light-sheet microscopy; Krzic et al., 2012) or into aquatic in situ laser scanning instruments for measurements of O2 and flow fields (e.g., Ahmerkamp et al., 2017; Katija et al., 2017; Liao et al., 2009; Katija and Dabiri, 2008). Moreover, engineering and medical research may also profit from sensPIV as a tool to study transport of O2 in bioreactors (Seidel et al., 2021), for aerodynamic pressure measurements (Gregory et al., 2008), when measuring the transfer efficiency of O2 to tissue cells (Bein et al., 2018), or even to discriminate pO2 in cell populations via flow cytometry (e.g., Koch, 2002). To date, most studies that estimate the effect of flow on O2 fluxes have been performed using numerical models (e.g. Moradi et al., 2018; Ahmerkamp et al., 2015; Broomé et al., 2013). However, these models are abstract versions of reality, rely on simplified system geometries and boundary conditions, usually assume immobile objects, and typically discount microscale heterogeneities in flow and O2 concentrations. By applying sensPIV to sinking agarose aggregates, we revealed the bias resulting from model oversimplifications and highlighted the need to include the porosity of aggregates for more realistic predictions. In the future, sensPIV could probe the influence of the spatial organization of micro-organisms inside aggregates and their exchange with ambient flow and chemistry. Moreover, the combination of numerical simulations with sensPIV experiments could provide powerful insights into the complex coupling between flow, metabolic rates, and exchange fluxes. Our model aggregates (test case 2) also serve as analogs of other motile “particles,” such as synthetic microswimmers or motile micro-organisms, and could facilitate measurements of O2 “trails” around individual cells (Guasto et al., 2012; Kanso et al., 2021) and to study the collective mixing of suspensions of micro-organisms (Sommer et al., 2017). Applying sensPIV in more complex flow setups will enable the study of planktonic organisms (Krishnamurthy et al., 2020) and their single-cell heterogeneity (Behrendt et al., 2020). Understanding the dynamics underlying these processes could lead to novel insights into how organisms interact with their microscale environment.Finally, sensPIV is not limited to measurements of O2 but can, in principle, also measure an increasing number of other analytes including pH, CO2, temperature, and NH3 (Merl and Koren, 2020; Moβhammer et al., 2019). Our sensPIV data on corals emphasize the need for measuring spatially separated zones of production and consumption to understand the distribution of metabolites across complex shapes. The exchange processes between coral endosymbionts and the coral animal in the boundary layer likely apply to nutrient distributions and chemical solutes in addition to O2. The integration of other chemical sensors into sensPIV could provide important insights into the interplay between remineralization processes and flow at the scale of individual organisms.
Limitations of the study
SensPIV has limitations that are related to current imaging technologies and synthesis of sensor particles. The spatial resolution of sensPIV is mainly limited by the size of particles and the ability of cameras to discern them as individuals. In our test cases, the smallest visible sensor particles had a median diameter of 500 nm. Consequently, this set the resolution for resolving spatial gradients in the range of 1–10 μm. For intracellular studies, where a resolution far below 1 μm is required and diffusion timescales dominate, other methods thus far surpass the ability of sensPIV to measure O2 concentrations (e.g., Okkelman et al., 2020; Zhdanov et al., 2015). The strength of sensPIV is its ability to image flow fields and concentrations simultaneously at a resolution that is close to microsensors. However, if the effects of flow fields are negligible and/or O2 gradients are one-dimensional, traditional microsensors still outperform sensPIV in relation to spatial resolution and accuracy.Further, if sensPIV is applied to autofluorescent organisms (e.g., phototrophs), their natural fluorescence can interfere with the luminescence signal emitted by sensPIV particles. This limitation can be overcome by using O2-sensitive dyes, which are excited in the deep red or near-infrared range and thereby avoid autofluorescence spillover from photopigments (e.g., Niedermair et al., 2010). If information on O2 concentrations within the tissue are of interest, confocal laser scanning microscopy or two-photon phosphorescence lifetime microscopy may be a powerful alternative to sensPIV (see, e.g., Shen et al., 2018 and Moritomo et al., 2016). Finally, during the synthesis of sensor particles, the amount of dye embedded within individual sensor particles can vary. This can affect luminescence intensities and the ratiometric signal at constant O2 concentrations (visible in Figure S3B) and requires compensation by averaging spatially or across image ensembles. Particle synthesis can also be improved through the covalent coupling of PtTFPP and the reference dye (e.g., Koren et al., 2012), resulting in improved resonance energy transfer and an improved referencing in ratiometric imaging approaches.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Soeren Ahmerkamp (sahmerka@mpi-bremen.de).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
Experimental model and subject details
P. lutea colonies reared at the aquaria facilities of the Alfred Wegener Institute were used as fragment source. The colonies were kept in artificial seawater (salinity 32.6 ± 0.26) (Dupla Marine Premium Reef Salt Natural Balance), under 25.2 ± 0.07°C temperature, a 12-h light-dark cycle, light intensity of 75 and 80 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 (LI-COR LI-192, USA) and pH of 7.9 ± 0.09 (YSI, USA). Food was provided in the form of freshly hatched Artemia nauplii every second day. Before the start of the experiments, small fragments (1.5 cm long, 1 cm wide) were cut out from the source colonies and allowed to heal for at least two weeks in the culturing tank.
Method details
Sensor particle production
For ratiometric and lifetime imaging, sensor particles were prepared as described earlier via precipitation (Mistlberger et al., 2010; Koren et al., 2015, 2016) with minor specific modifications as described in the following. Briefly, 100 mg of the polymer PSMA (styrene maleic anhydride copolymer with 8% MA, Mw: 250000 g mol−1; generously provided by Polyscope), 1.5 mg of the reference dye Macrolex fluorescence yellow 10GN (MY) obtained from Lanxess (Köln, Germany) and 1.5 mg of the O2 indicator Platinum(II) meso- (2,3,4,5,6-pentafluoro)phenyl porphyrin (PtTFPP, Frontier Scientific) were dissolved in 10 g of tetrahydrofuran (THF). This solution was then rapidly poured into 200 mL of vigorously stirred MQ water. After evaporating the THF under an airstream, the particle suspension was further concentrated at elevated temperature (around 60°C) until a concentration of 5 mg mL−1 was reached. The final concentration was measured by drying and subsequent weighing of 1 mL of the particle suspension. A small sample was dried on an indium tin oxide coated glass slide for further inspection using a scanning electron microscope (FEI, Quanta 250 FEG scanning electron microscope) combined with a fluorescence microscope (Seacom, Delmic, Netherlands). It was ensured, that fluorescent signals based on a 392 nm excitation strongly correlated with the particles’ positions on the glass side (Figure 1A).Alternatively, particles were prepared by staining FluoSpheres™ Polystyrene Microspheres (Thermo Scientific; catalogue number F13080). One milliliter of the bead suspension was mixed with 1 mL of acetone (Sigma Aldrich) for a duration of 2 min. Afterwards, 1 mg mL−1 PtTFPP dissolved in acetone was added and mixed for another 2 min. Subsequently, the acetone was slowly removed from the solution by gently blowing nitrogen over the stirred solution. While the acetone evaporated, the dye became entrapped within the particles.In all test cases, particles were centrifuged before each use. For this purpose, sensor particles at the target concentration were placed in centrifugation vessels containing the medium of the experiments. Sensor particles were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min. For coral experiments, the sensor particles were repeatedly centrifuged in the seawater medium at a salinity of 33 PSU. Prior to experiments, the vessels were sonicated for 2 min to avoid larger aggregates. For microfluidic experiments, the supernatant was replaced with MQ water with 0.05% surfactant (Tween 20, Sigma-Aldrich Co., Germany). Before sensor particles were injected into the system, they were sonicated for 15 min to decrease aggregate formation. Producing particles with the precipitation and staining method results in a large variety of particle sizes. To optimize the size distribution, the sensor particles were gently shaken and left for a time period of 24–48 h. In this way, sensor particle sizes separated by their density and can be pipetted from specific depths. For microfluidic test-case, we only sampled sensor particles which stayed dissolved for a time period of 48 h. Similarly, centrifugation was applied to sensor particles in the aggregate test-case. We note that, in addition to this study, the biocompatibility of similar sensor particles was previously tested in different applications for algae, other colony-forming corals and seagrass roots (Koren et al., 2015, 2016; Trampe et al., 2018).
Exciting and measuring sensPIV particles
In order to meet the illumination requirements for sensPIV imaging (≥10 Hz), high light intensities are required. In the past, such requirements were only fulfilled by high-energy continuous-wave or pulsed laser diodes, however, those limit the applicability as the costs are high, special requirements for safe operation are needed and experimental designs can become very complex. These methodological limitations can be overcome with new ultra-bright light emitting diode (LED) systems that can reach light intensities similar to laser diodes. The commercially available LED systems applied in the coral and particle test case have powers ranging between 2.5 W (Wavelength dependent, Omicron, LedHUB, here used for rapid lifetime imaging) and 5 W (LPS3, ILA5150 GmbH, here used for ratiometric imaging). Collimation of LED light is challenging but using state-of-the-art optics, light sheets with widths of 500–1000 μm can be generated (Willert et al., 2010). To achieve this, the LED light was directed via a fiber bundle into the light sheet optics. In front of a cylindrical lens, the fiber bundle was aligned in a linear arrangement resulting in a light-sheet thickness of ∼1000 μm (e.g. Figure 1 j). A second cylindrical lens was applied to yield a converging light sheet that minimizes the light sheet to a thickness of <500 μm over a depth of ∼2 mm. In many systems it is important to limit the total light exposure to avoid thermal convection or avoid substantial photosynthetic activity, therefore we triggered the light source via the camera and reduced the recording period to less than 5 s. However, to test if the high excitation light intensity affected the O2 measurements within the coral test-case, we implanted a microsensor into the tissue where the photosynthetic symbionts are located, and observed an O2 production of less than 10 μmol L−1 within the 2 s recording period with light exposure.It should be noted that the optimal imaging frequency depends on the system of interest. In some microscale applications, such as the beating of cilia or flagella, recording frequencies of more than 100 Hz have to be achieved. In this case, the response-time of the sensor particles has to be considered. The O2-dependent quenching of the sensor particles is diffusion limited and, thus, depends on the size of the particles. For the precipitated particles, the median size was 590 ± 360 nm resulting in the diffusion timescale of This implies that at recording frequencies of below 1000 Hz the sensor particles adapt quasi-instantaneously (compare Video S1). However, as the sensor-particle distribution is relatively wide, up to 5 μm, care has to be taken that the response-time of the sensor particles is not affecting the interpretation of results obtained through high-speed imaging (see also section on the limitations of sensPIV).The lifetime of the O2-sensitive dye (∼60 μs) can be estimated via repeated imaging of the declining fluorescence intensity after light exposure (see for example (Koren et al., 2019)). This requires shutter-modulated cameras with a temporal resolution of order 10–100 s due to relatively slow sensor readout times and low light intensities employed in most experiments. Recent technical advances, namely a two-tap QMFLIM2 image sensor (pco.FLIM, PCO AG) allows us to estimate the lifetime τ (∼60 μs) in the frequency domain based on the frequency-shift, ΔΦ, induced by the quencher (O2). Applying the camera allows us to keep light-intensities at a high level. Lifetime and frequency-shift are directly related through the equation τ = tan(ΔΦ)/(2π fmod), where fmod is the modulation frequency (∼5 kHz). This method improves temporal resolution and lifetime images can be recorded in less than 10s (Koren et al., 2019). In order to improve the temporal resolution further, and to meet the requirements for particle velocimetry (recording frequencies above 10 Hz), we adapted the two-tap QMFLIM2 camera chip (pco.FLIM, PCO AG, Germany), which has in each pixel an in-pixel charge swing separating two taps. Each tap records half the period of the excitation signal, which is a sinus function. In reference experiments, the integration windows of the taps were temporally shifted to maximize the difference between the taps at 100% O2. The normalized difference of the taps will change with the O2 concentrations and follows the rising flank of the sinus wave which is well represented by a second-order polynomial fit (see also Figure S3). It has to be ensured that the expected quenching through O2 results in a phase of much less than 90° at the given modulation frequency. Further, the in-pixel swing leads to an asymmetry of the two in-pixel taps that is intensity-dependent. This asymmetry was corrected by recording a homogeneously illuminated object with a wavelength matching the emission wavelength of the O2-sensitive dye. A telecentric lens (TEC – V7X, Computar, USA) was fitted to the camera and a polyester filter (Lee filter, 101 Yellow, Canada) was used to filter the blue excitation light. Sensor particle excitation was achieved through a light sheet using a LedHUB attached to customized light sheet optics (see above).A published microfluidic device design (Rusconi et al., 2014a; 2014b) was adapted to generate known linear O2 gradients and validate the sensor particle response in heterogeneous conditions. The device consists of two parallel side channels that act as the O2 source and sink, respectively, and a central channel where the O2 gradient develops. See the device dimension and channel system cross-section in Figure 2.The micro-channel system was designed with AutoCAD software (Autodesk, USA) and printed on a plastic photolithography mask (microlitho.co.uk). Then, a silicon wafer was spin coated with SU-8 photoresist (SU-8 2150, Micro-Chem company, US) and baked according to manufacturer recommendations to allow the formation of a cross-link between the photoresist and the silicon substrate. This step was repeated until the desired photoresist thickness (here 750 μm) was achieved. The photolithography mask was placed upon the photoresist-wafer complex in an alignment machine and exposed to UV light. After removing the mask from the photoresist, the whole wafer was submerged in an organic solvent (mr-DEV 600, micro resist technology) to dissolve the portions of the photoresist which were not cross-linked. A master was formed with the polymerized features on the silicon wafer.The device was fabricated using standard PDMS replica molding procedures. Briefly, a 1:10 vacuum degassed PDMS solution consisting of curing agent: PDMS base (SYLGARD 184 Silicon Elastomer Base, Sigma-Aldrich Co., US) was poured onto the mold and thermally cured for at least 8 h at 80°C. After curing, devices with a thickness of 5 mm were cut using a scalpel and peeled away. The PDMS device was plasma treated for 30 s (Zepto, Diener electronic GmbH, Germany) and bonded onto a 75 × 50 mm microscopy slide (2947–75×50, Corning Inc., US). Inlet and outlet ports were punched using a biopsy punch (Miltex Biopsy Punch, Integra LifeSciences Co., US). The resulting device was placed onto a heating plate set to 80°C for 5 h to improve bonding. Final channel widths and heights were 400 and 750 μm, respectively. The PDMS wall separating the fluidic test channel from the gas channels was 400 μm. The overall length of the serpentine pattern was 532 mm.PtTFPP sensor particles, produced via the staining method, were calibrated under two O2 levels within the microfluidic device. Before experiments, the two side channels were connected to two high-precision flow controllers (Cole Parmer, IL) via O2 impermeable tubing (Masterflex 06404–14, Norprene, Saint-Gobain, France) and a small connecting piece (∼10 cm) of Tygon tubing (Tygon, inner diameter 0.5 mm, outer diameter 1.5 mm, Saint-Gobain, France). The inlet of the central channel was connected to a 1 mL gas-tight syringe (Hamilton #1001, Reno, NV) mounted onto a syringe pump (neMESYS, CETONI GmbH, Germany) in order to control particle flow rates. First, N2 was supplied into both side channels for 40 min to reach 0% air saturation within the gas permeable PDMS device. After this equilibration period, a solution of sensPIV particles was introduced into the central channel filled with MQ water and thereafter the flow was stopped to keep particles still. Particles in the main channel were then equilibrated to 0% air saturation for 20 min and imaged using an inverted Nikon Ti-E microscope (Nikon inc., Tokyo, Japan) and an sCMOS camera (Andor Zyla 4.2, Oxford instruments, Belfast, UK); first by phase contrast using an LED white-light illuminator and then in fluorescence by excitation at 392 nm (Spectra X light engine, Lumencor Inc., Beaverton, OR, US). This was repeated for several locations along the central channel to obtain the calibration of particles for 0% O2. To calibrate particles at 100% air saturation, compressed air was supplied to both side channels and the above calibration procedure was repeated again. In order to identify particles and relate the O2 concentration to their fluorescence intensity, we applied a particle boundary tracing algorithm. First, brightfield images were pre-processed by tuning brightness, contrast and background subtraction. Then particles were identified through intensity thresholding and only particles with a circularity larger than 0.7 were included in the post-processing.Experiments in microfluidic devices were performed with sensPIV particles under flow as well as no-flow conditions. In order to study the evolution of dissolved-O2 over time, we simulated the dissolved-O2 transport inside the microfluidic chips using a multiphysics COMSOL model based on the 3D microfluidic channel geometry. The flow field was simulated by solving the Stokes equations:where u is the velocity vector, p the pressure, μ dynamic viscosity and ∇ the gradient operator. The continuity equation for incompressible fluids reads:The O2 distribution in the microfluidic chip was then calculated solving the advection-diffusion equation: where D is the diffusion coefficient for O2 in PDMS and water (DO2,PDMS = 3.25 × 10−9 m2 s−1, DO2,water = 2.01 × 10−9 m2 s−1 based on a temperature of T = 293.15 K (Markov et al., 2014)) and C is the O2 concentration. For all walls we assumed no-slip boundary conditions. The flow field was driven by the prescribed flow rate set by the syringe pump. To achieve a realistic O2 distribution, the gas concentration of the outer channels was imposed at the boundary and saturated O2 concentrations at the inlet were assumed.
Measuring the dynamic O2 exchange around a model laboratory aggregate
Model laboratory aggregates were prepared by mixing 2.48 mg mL−1 of sensor particles (produced via the precipitation method) with 0.7% agarose (Biozym, Germany). Agarose was dissolved in Milli-Q (MQ) water by boiling the mixture in a microwave. Subsequently, the solution was cooled down to ∼40°C and sensPIV particles were added and thoroughly mixed. In order to form spherical particles the prepared agarose solution was pipetted into a glass beaker containing MQ water overlaid with cold canola oil (Ja! Canola Oil, Rewe). While cooling, the oil induced the formation of spherical model particles that subsequently sank from the oil layer into the MQ water. Particles were filtered using a 100 μm plankton mesh (Hydro-Bios, Germany), washed in MQ water and stored in the dark.Experiments with model aggregates were performed in a recirculating glass flow chamber (height: 10.7 cm; diameter: 2.5 cm). To provide a homogeneous flow field, the glass chamber was connected via a 3D-printed polyether ether ketone (PEEK, FKM Sintertechnik Gmbh, Germany) inlet which had 1 mm capillaries, to a gear pump (ISMATEC, ISM901B, Germany). The pump volume was adjusted to achieve a flow velocity of 2.1 mm s−1 inside the flow chamber. The entire chamber was immersed in an aquarium filled with MQ water (dimensions: 18.4 × 9.7 × 9.7 cm) to stabilize the temperature at 20°C. Prior to all experiments, the particle was degassed overnight using N2 gas and only then attached to a needle connected to a motorized linear drive (Faulhaber, T-LSR75A, Germany). This allowed for the precise positioning of the agarose particle into the center of the recirculating glass flow chamber.Calibration of the sensor particles was performed in the flow chamber via a degassing setup at ten different O2 concentrations under the same conditions as in the experiments. The target O2 concentrations were cross-checked with a microsensor (OXR430, Pyroscience, Germany). The O2 concentration was reconstructed by decomposing the field of view into the interior of the aggregate and the outside of the aggregate. Care had to be taken to ensure that the darker image IT2 did not fall below the noise level, in which case the normalized intensity would not be uniquely associated with a specific O2 concentration. In case IT2 fell below the noise level we performed calibration based on the difference of IT2 and IT1 which yielded good results. Flow fields were determined using a kinematic prediction algorithm (https://web.stanford.edu/∼nto/LPT.shtml, Last Visit: 8/9/2021) in Matlab (2018b, Mathworks). In each image, 1154 ± 23 sensor particles were tracked and the reconstructed PTV tracks ranged between 5 and 463 individual data points.
SensPIV for the visualization of O2 dynamics and vortical flows around the coral P. lutea
We adapted a custom-built light sheet microscopy recirculating flow chamber setup (see (Pacherres et al., 2020) for details, schematic in Figure 4) with which we performed ratiometric O2 measurements, PIV and PTV around a live coral specimen. A small fragment of the coral P. lutea, roughly 2 cm in size, was placed into the flow chamber and a free-flow velocity of 1500 μm s−1 was imposed. After an equilibration period of 10 min, 1 mL of sensPIV particle stock solution (1 mg mL−1) was added to the flow-chamber resulting in a final concentration of 0.025 mg mL−1. In order to minimize mucus production, the coral was only exposed for short time periods (<2 min) to sensor particles before filtering away the remaining particles via a syringe filter (0.22 μm, Millex) placed into the recirculation system. All experiments were performed in a temperature controlled room at 25 °C. The sensor particles were illuminated with a blue LED (450 nm ± 30nm, LPS3, ILA GmbH, Germany) using light sheet optics (see also Figure 4A). Imaging was performed using an RGB camera (Grasshopper3, SONY ICX625, FLIR) through a custom-built microscopic lens array (based on Qioptiq Optem-Fusion System, Germany). Exposure times were reduced to below 20 ms and the light was triggered by the camera to minimize light exposure to the coral. The blue channel was used to determine the surface of the coral using an in-house developed tracking algorithm. PIV was performed based on the red channel (Em. > 550 nm) of the camera chip using standard cross-correlation techniques of two subsequent images using the software PIVView (Pivtec GmbH, Germany, see also Figure S2), and PTV was performed based on a kinematic prediction algorithm (https://web.stanford.edu/∼nto/LPT.shtml, Last Visit: 8/9/2021) in MATLAB (2018b, Mathworks). For both techniques, the images were pre-processed with a five px kernel Gaussian high-pass filter to remove the background noise and signals of smaller particles. For PIV, we applied a multi-grid refinement technique with an initial window size of 256 px (approx. 460 μm for the coral test-case) and final window size of 64 px (approx. 115 μm). The window sizes were adjusted to achieve a sufficient particle density (7-9 particles) of larger sensor particles in each interrogation window. Depending on the flow features, it may be desirable to increase the particle density which can be achieved by increasing sensor-particle concentrations which will not affect calibration (compare Figure 1G). O2 concentrations were determined based on ratiometric measurements of the red and green channel: IR = R/G after calibration at various O2 concentrations using Equation (1). All image post-processing was performed in MATLAB (2018b, Mathworks). The boundary layer thickness was determined based on the average location where O2 decreases to 10% of the surface concentration (compare also Figure S5).It should be noted that during the calibration procedure, we observed an emission of schott-glass filters that can affect the ratiometric measurements and corrections would require an additional light-dependent referencing of the applied filter. However, the problem can be overcome by using polyester filters (e.g. Lee filters, Canada). In addition to the sensPIV measurements, an electrochemical microsensor with a tip size of 20 μm (Unisense, Denmark) was used for comparison and to cross-reference the measurements. The microsensor was attached to an XYZ-micromanipulator (Unisense, Denmark) to perform profiles for comparison. O2 measurements were performed in 20 μm steps.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Details of the statistical methods used in this study, such as the averaging procedure for improving signals of sensor particles, are described in detail in the respective sections and in the supplemental information that is available below. The number of replications for the measured parameters are described along with the presented means, or/and presented as distributions if sample size was sufficient. For linear regressions the fitting parameters along with statistical measures are present in the main text or in the supplemental information. Experimental results are cross-compared with numerical models or other methods such as O2-microsensor measurements.
Authors: A Bekker; H D Holland; P-L Wang; D Rumble; H J Stein; J L Hannah; L L Coetzee; N J Beukes Journal: Nature Date: 2004-01-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yutaka Yawata; Otto X Cordero; Filippo Menolascina; Jan-Hendrik Hehemann; Martin F Polz; Roman Stocker Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Joel A Spencer; Francesca Ferraro; Emmanuel Roussakis; Alyssa Klein; Juwell Wu; Judith M Runnels; Walid Zaher; Luke J Mortensen; Clemens Alt; Raphaël Turcotte; Rushdia Yusuf; Daniel Côté; Sergei A Vinogradov; David T Scadden; Charles P Lin Journal: Nature Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Daan R Speth; Michiel H In 't Zandt; Simon Guerrero-Cruz; Bas E Dutilh; Mike S M Jetten Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 14.919