Literature DB >> 35637370

Common and stimulus-type-specific brain representations of negative affect.

Marta Čeko1, Philip A Kragel2,3, Choong-Wan Woo4,5,6, Marina López-Solà7, Tor D Wager8,9.   

Abstract

The brain contains both generalized and stimulus-type-specific representations of aversive events, but models of how these are integrated and related to subjective experience are lacking. We combined functional magnetic resonance imaging with predictive modeling to identify representations of generalized (common) and stimulus-type-specific negative affect across mechanical pain, thermal pain, aversive sounds and aversive images of four intensity levels each. This allowed us to examine how generalized and stimulus-specific representations jointly contribute to aversive experience. Stimulus-type-specific negative affect was largely encoded in early sensory pathways, whereas generalized negative affect was encoded in a distributed set of midline, forebrain, insular and somatosensory regions. All models specifically predicted negative affect rather than general salience or arousal and accurately predicted negative affect in independent samples, demonstrating robustness and generalizability. Common and stimulus-type-specific models were jointly important for predicting subjective experience. Together, these findings offer an integrated account of how negative affect is constructed in the brain and provide predictive neuromarkers for future studies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35637370     DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01082-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   28.771


  76 in total

Review 1.  Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant.

Authors:  J A Russell; L F Barrett
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-05

Review 2.  Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation.

Authors:  P Read Montague; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Localization of pain-related brain activation: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Emma G Duerden; Marie-Claire Albanese
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Insel; Bruce Cuthbert; Marjorie Garvey; Robert Heinssen; Daniel S Pine; Kevin Quinn; Charles Sanislow; Philip Wang
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value.

Authors:  Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; John A Assad
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The case against economic values in the orbitofrontal cortex (or anywhere else in the brain).

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Yael Niv
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  A susceptibility gene for affective disorders and the response of the human amygdala.

Authors:  Ahmad R Hariri; Emily M Drabant; Karen E Munoz; Bhaskar S Kolachana; Venkata S Mattay; Michael F Egan; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02

Review 8.  Neural Circuit Motifs in Valence Processing.

Authors:  Kay M Tye
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Neuroscience of affect: brain mechanisms of pleasure and displeasure.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: controlling attention to threat-related stimuli.

Authors:  Sonia Bishop; John Duncan; Matthew Brett; Andrew D Lawrence
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-01-04       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  2 in total

1.  Functional brain reconfiguration during sustained pain.

Authors:  Jae-Joong Lee; Sungwoo Lee; Dong Hee Lee; Choong-Wan Woo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Laser stimulation of the skin for quantitative study of decision-making and motivation.

Authors:  Julia Pai; Takaya Ogasawara; Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Kei Ogasawara; Robert W Gereau; Ilya E Monosov
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2022-09-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.