Literature DB >> 35635749

Application of Nonfungible Tokens to Health Care. Comment on "Blockchain Technology Projects to Provide Telemedical Services: Systematic Review".

John Gambril1,2, Carter Boyd3, Jamal Egbaria4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  blockchain; cryptocurrency; distributed ledger; finance; health information exchange; internet; medical education; non-fungible token; nonfungible token; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35635749      PMCID: PMC9153915          DOI: 10.2196/34276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   7.076


× No keyword cloud information.
In their systematic review, Koshechkin and colleagues [1] thoughtfully explored and summarized the potential applications of blockchain technology to solve unique challenges in health care. Blockchain technology is a highly secure but transparent method of tracing digital transactions of assets or information through a decentralized, immutable ledger [1]. Thanks to the expansion of cryptocurrency—digital currency traded through blockchain networks—blockchain has become a household term. Blockchain technology has been applied to numerous industries, and many possibilities exist for application within health care [2]. In their review, Koshechkin and colleagues [1] identified 18 studies addressing blockchain solutions for various health care challenges. These included medical data access, medical services processing, diagnostic support, payment transactions, and fundraising, among others. This review offers an excellent synopsis of ongoing blockchain projects in health care accompanied by discussion of future directions. One novel entity that utilizes blockchain technology not identified in this paper is the nonfungible token (NFT). NFTs are similar to cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, in that they are digital tokens existing within a blockchain that can be bought and sold. NFTs, however, are distinct tokens. While 1 Bitcoin is always equal to another Bitcoin, each NFT is singular and unique (ie, nonfungible) [3]. Interestingly, although NFTs are digital, they can, and often do, represent physical items. Regarding health care, NFTs have been suggested as a means to streamline and simplify blood [4] and stem cell [5] product supply chains. While the full discussion of NFT potential in health care warrants a lengthier article, we will touch on the simplest application: capital. NFTs represent an untapped method of fundraising and revenue generation. They allow the monetization of unique items and content, digital or physical, new or old. NFTs offer the added benefits of transaction tracing, verifiable authenticity, and shared ownership of physical objects (analogous to stockholders of a company). One can imagine NFT auctions of historic medical equipment or journal articles, recorded lectures from renowned experts, and even naming rights to a lecture series. Much like baseball cards or stamps, medicine could find its own niche in collecting NFTs. NFTs also open an avenue for monetization of original creations such as reflective art and literature or unique medical education content. Medical education resources are constantly evolving, and many are free to learners (tweetorials, podcasts, YouTube channels, etc). If collectors agree to maintain open access after purchase, leveraging this content as NFTs could represent a new market to raise funds for scholarships, research, advocacy, or public health projects. Many will argue that buyers are unlikely to permit open access to their NFT. However, as already seen in other NFT markets, because NFTs are unique and traceable digital tokens, ownership can still be boasted despite public access [3]. As illustrated by Koshechkin and colleagues’ [1] review, blockchain technology is an exciting entity offering much potential for the advancement of health care. NFTs are yet another example of blockchain technology with innumerable possibilities and potential in health care.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences-A scoping review.

Authors:  Anton Hasselgren; Katina Kralevska; Danilo Gligoroski; Sindre A Pedersen; Arild Faxvaag
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Non-fungible tokens: Stem cell transplantation in the blockchain.

Authors:  Garrett S Booth; Eric A Gehrie
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.764

Review 3.  Blockchain Technology Projects to Provide Telemedical Services: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Konstantin Koshechkin; Georgy Lebedev; George Radzievsky; Ralf Seepold; Natividad Madrid Martinez
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.