Literature DB >> 35635635

Meiotic pairing and double-strand break formation along the heteromorphic threespine stickleback sex chromosomes.

Shivangi Nath1, Lucille A Welch1, Mary K Flanagan1, Michael A White2.   

Abstract

Double-strand break repair during meiosis is normally achieved using the homologous chromosome as a repair template. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes share little sequence homology, presenting unique challenges to the repair of double-strand breaks. Our understanding of how heteromorphic sex chromosomes behave during meiosis has been focused on ancient sex chromosomes, where the X and Y differ markedly in overall structure and gene content. It remains unclear how more recently evolved sex chromosomes that share considerably more sequence homology with one another pair and form double-strand breaks. One possibility is barriers to pairing evolve rapidly. Alternatively, recently evolved sex chromosomes may exhibit pairing and double-strand break repair that more closely resembles that of their autosomal ancestors. Here, we use the recently evolved X and Y chromosomes of the threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to study patterns of pairing and double-stranded break formation using molecular cytogenetics. We found that the sex chromosomes of threespine stickleback fish did not pair exclusively in the pseudoautosomal region. Instead, the chromosomes fully paired in a non-homologous fashion. To achieve this, the X chromosome underwent synaptic adjustment during pachytene to match the axis length of the Y chromosome. Double-strand break formation and repair rate also matched that of the autosomes. Our results highlight that recently evolved sex chromosomes exhibit meiotic behavior that is reminiscent of autosomes and argues for further work to identify the homologous templates that are used to repair double-strand breaks on the X and Y chromosomes.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meiosis; double-strand breaks; sex chromosomes; synaptic adjustment; threespine stickleback

Year:  2022        PMID: 35635635     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-022-09699-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  67 in total

1.  Multiple independent evolutionary losses of XY pairing at meiosis in the grey voles.

Authors:  Pavel M Borodin; Ekaterina A Basheva; Anna A Torgasheva; Olesya A Dashkevich; Fedor N Golenishchev; Irina V Kartavtseva; Kazuyuki Mekada; Beth L Dumont
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Distribution of the Rad51 recombinase in human and mouse spermatocytes.

Authors:  A L Barlow; F E Benson; S C West; M A Hultén
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11.

Authors:  F Baudat; K Manova; J P Yuen; M Jasin; S Keeney
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Heteromorphic sex chromosomes: navigating meiosis without a homologous partner.

Authors:  Paula M Checchi; Joanne Engebrecht
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.609

5.  Gene duplication, gene conversion and the evolution of the Y chromosome.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Dynamic changes in Rad51 distribution on chromatin during meiosis in male and female vertebrates.

Authors:  T Ashley; A W Plug; J Xu; A J Solari; G Reddy; E I Golub; D C Ward
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Mammalian Y chromosomes retain widely expressed dosage-sensitive regulators.

Authors:  Daniel W Bellott; Jennifer F Hughes; Helen Skaletsky; Laura G Brown; Tatyana Pyntikova; Ting-Jan Cho; Natalia Koutseva; Sara Zaghlul; Tina Graves; Susie Rock; Colin Kremitzki; Robert S Fulton; Shannon Dugan; Yan Ding; Donna Morton; Ziad Khan; Lora Lewis; Christian Buhay; Qiaoyan Wang; Jennifer Watt; Michael Holder; Sandy Lee; Lynne Nazareth; Jessica Alföldi; Steve Rozen; Donna M Muzny; Wesley C Warren; Richard A Gibbs; Richard K Wilson; David C Page
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The telomere bouquet is a hub where meiotic double-strand breaks, synapsis, and stable homolog juxtaposition are coordinated in the zebrafish, Danio rerio.

Authors:  Yana P Blokhina; An D Nguyen; Bruce W Draper; Sean M Burgess
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  How did the guppy Y chromosome evolve?

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; Roberta Bergero; Chay Graham; Jim Gardner; Karen Keegan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sex chromosome differentiation via changes in the Y chromosome repeat landscape in African annual killifishes Nothobranchius furzeri and N. kadleci.

Authors:  Jana Štundlová; Monika Hospodářská; Karolína Lukšíková; Anna Voleníková; Tomáš Pavlica; Marie Altmanová; Annekatrin Richter; Martin Reichard; Martina Dalíková; Šárka Pelikánová; Anatolie Marta; Sergey A Simanovsky; Matyáš Hiřman; Marek Jankásek; Tomáš Dvořák; Joerg Bohlen; Petr Ráb; Christoph Englert; Petr Nguyen; Alexandr Sember
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 4.620

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.