| Literature DB >> 35635569 |
Yuichi Saito1, Yuki Deguchi2, Motohiro Nakao2, Hirokazu Shiraishi2, Naoya Sakamoto2, Satoru Kobayashi2, Yoshio Kobayashi3.
Abstract
Late rather than acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been recently recognized as a predictor of future adverse events in patient with coronary artery disease. The risk-predicting models for acute kidney injury reported by Mehran et al., Bartholomew et al., and Tsai et al. were derived from a large cohort and externally validated, although the applicability of these models for predicting late kidney injury is unknown. A total of 327 patients undergoing elective PCI procedures were included. We calculated the three scores and tested their diagnostic ability for predicting late kidney injury (> 6 months after PCI), defined as an increase in creatinine levels ≥ 0.3 mg/dl or ≥ 50% from baseline. During the median follow-up period of 28 months, 27 (8.3%) patients had late kidney injury. All three scores significantly predicted late kidney injury, among which the score by Tsai et al. had a better diagnostic ability (area under the curve 0.83, best cut-off value 14, p < 0.001). With the best cut-off value, patients with Tsai score ≥ 14 had a significantly higher rate of late kidney injury than their counterpart (27.4% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, established risk scores for acute kidney injury may be useful for predicting late kidney injury after PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: Kidney injury; Outcome; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Risk score
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35635569 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-022-02105-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 1.814