| Literature DB >> 35635167 |
Huitian Gou1, Yuanyuan Liu1, Wenjing Shi1, Jinyu Nan2, Chuan Wang1, Yanan Sun1, Qihang Cao1, Huilin Wei1, Chen Song1, Changqing Tian1, Yanquan Wei1, Huiwen Xue1.
Abstract
In order to clarified characteristics and function of internalin G (inlG) in Listeria monocytogenes ATCC®19111 (1/2a) (LM), the immune protection of the inlG was evaluated in mice, the homologous recombination was used to construct inlG deletion strains, and their biological characteristics were studied by the transcriptomics analysis. As a result, the immunization of mice with the purified protein achieved a protective effect against bacterial infection. The deletion strain LM-AinlG was successfully constructed with genetic stability. The mouse infection test showed that the virulence of LM was decreased after the deletion of the inlG gene. The deletion strain showed enhanced adhesion to and invasion of Caco-2 cells. Compared to the wild strain, 18 genes were up-regulated, and 24 genes were down-regulated in the LM-AinlG. This study has laid a foundation for further research on the function of inlG and the pathogenesis of LM. In this study, immunization of mice with the purified inlG protein achieved a protective effect against Listeria monocytogenes infection. The virulence of LM-ΔinlG was decreased by mouse infection. However, the adhesion and invasion ability to Caco-2 cell were enhanced. Compared to the wild strain, 18 genes were up-regulated, and 24 genes were down-regulated in the LM-ΔinlG. This study has laid a foundation for further study of the function of the inlG and the listeriosis.Entities:
Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes; gene deletion; immune protection; internalin G; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35635167 PMCID: PMC9152910 DOI: 10.33073/pjm-2022-009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Microbiol ISSN: 1733-1331
PCR primers used in the experiments.
| Primer | Sequence | Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| ΔInlG-F1 | 633 | |
| ΔInlG-R1 | CCTCCGATGAAAAGCGTTCCTAAAATAGTAGGAATAATTCCCAAGATAGCTGTCACT | |
| ΔInlG-F2 | ATGTTTTACTTGTAGTGACAGCTATCTTGGGAATTATTCCTACTATTTTAGGAACGC | 596 |
| ΔInlG-R2 | ||
| D-F | TGTCCGCAACAGCTAGCCCAG | 1,644/3,100 |
| D-R | GCAAGTGGGGTTAAATCACTT | |
| Hly-F | GATGCATCTGCATTCAATAA | 1,510 |
| Hly-R | TTATTCGATTGGATTATCTAC |
Fig. 1Analysis of the recombinant protein. M – Protein marker, 1 – bacteria before the induction with IPTG, 2 – the induced bacteria, 3 – supernatant of lysed induced bacteria, 4 – precipitation of induced bacteria, 5 – purified InlG recombinant protein, 6 – uninduced bacteria reaction with positive serum, 7 – induced bacteria reaction with positive serum.
Determination of the median lethal dose of the bacteria (BACT) in mice.
| BACT (CFU) | Death/Total | Mortality (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 109 | 9/10 | 90 |
| 108 | 8/10 | 80 |
| 107 | 6/10 | 60 |
| 106 | 4/10 | 40 |
| 105 | 2/10 | 20 |
| 0 | 0/10 | 0 |
Fig. 2Pathological changes in the tissue of infected mice stained with hematoxillin-eosin. a/d – Normal mouse, b/e – the mice immunized with normal saline, c/f – the mice immunized with protein and challenged with bacteria.
Fig. 3Relative adhesion and invasion of LM and LM-ΔInlG in Caco-2 cells. This test was done in triplicate in each run and repeated for three times. The cell assay rates of LM19111 were set at 100%. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Fig. 4Differentially expressed genes in LM-ΔInlG compared to LM. The abscissa indicates the fold change of gene expression, and the ordinate indicates the significance of the gene difference. The red dots indicate the up-regulated genes, the green dots indicate the down-regulated genes, and the blue dots indicate the genes that are not significantly different.
Fig. 5KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes in LM-ΔInlG compared to LM. The enriched KEGG categories are on the vertical axis. The ratio of the enriched DEGs in the KEGG category to the total genes in that category is shown on the horizontal axis.
Differentially expressed genes in related KEGG pathways in LM-ΔInlG compared to LM.
| Term | Gene ID | Name | Log2FC | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quorum sensing | lmo0205 | plcB | 1.89 | up | phospholipase C |
| lmo0202 | hly | 1.77 | up | listeriolysin O precursor | |
| Novel00001 | no | 1.76 | up | thiol-activated cytolysin | |
| Novel00002 | no | 1.64 | up | thiol-activated cytolysin beta sandwich domain | |
| lmo2363 | no | –1.35 | down | glutamate decarboxylase | |
| lmo0447 | no | 1.66 | up | pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase conserved domain | |
| Propanoate metabolism | lmo1373 | no | –1.86 | down | transketolase, pyrimidine binding domain |
| lmo1153 | no | 1.88 | up | propanediol dehydratase subunit alpha | |
| lmo2720 | no | –2.02 | down | AMP-binding enzyme C-terminal domain | |
| lmo1374 | no | –1.52 | down | biotin-requiring enzyme | |
| lmo1371 | no | –1.28 | down | pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase | |
| Valine, leucine, nd isoleucine degradation | lmo1373 | no | –1.86 | down | transketolase, pyrimidine binding domain |
| lmo1374 | no | –1.52 | down | biotin-requiring enzyme | |
| lmo1371 | no | –1.28 | down | pyridine nucleotide-disulphide oxidoreductase | |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | lmo0205 | plcB | 1.89 | up | phospholipase C |
| lmo1176 | eutC | 3.18 | up | ethanolamine ammonia-lyase small subunit | |
| lmo1175 | eutB | 1.87 | up | ethanolamine ammonia-lyase large subunit | |
| Butanoate metabolism | lmo1369 | no | –2.94 | down | phosphate acetyl/butaryl transferase |
| lmo2363 | no | –1.35 | down | glutamate decarboxylase | |
| lmo0447 | no | 1.66 | up | pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase conserved domain |