| Literature DB >> 35634726 |
Shan-Peng Ma1, Wei-Ping Ma1, Shi-Ning Yin2,3, Xiang-Yue Chen1, Xiao-Qing Ma1, Bao-Hong Wei1, Jing-Guang Lu2,3, Hong-Bing Liu1,3,4.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Mulisan decoction (MLS) is a classic formula of traditional Chinese medicine for treating hyperhidrosis. The mechanism remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Traditional Chinese medicine; hyperhidrosis; metabolic mechanism; pharmacodynamics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35634726 PMCID: PMC9154783 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2022.2074465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.889
Figure 1.Effects of Mulisan decoction (MLS) on the levels of (A) body weight, (B) sweat points, and (C) organ index in reserpine and pilocarpine (RP) rats (n = 10). #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 when compared with the control group; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 when compared with the model group.
Figure 2.Effects of MLS on the levels of (A) interleukin-2 (IL-2) level, (B) interleukin-6 (IL-6), (C) interferon γ (IFN-γ), (D) tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and (E) Th1/Th2 cell radio in RP rats (n = 10). #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 when compared with the control group; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 when compared with the model group.
Figure 3.Principal component analysis (PCA) scores of plasma samples of all groups and quality control (QC) samples in (A) positive ion mode and (B) negative ion mode.
Figure 4.Orthogonal partial least squares discrimination analysis (OPLS-DA) scores of plasma samples of control group, model group, and MLS group: (A) control vs. model in positive ion mode; (B) control vs. model in negative ion mode; (C) control vs. model vs. MLS in positive ion mode; (D) control vs. model vs. MLS in negative ion mode.
Results of identified potential biomarkers in plasma via control vs model.
| Compound name | HMDB ID | RT/ min | Formula | Observed | Error/ ppm | Adduction | Trend | Metabolic pathways |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000086 | 1.62 | C8H20NO6P | 258.1099 | −0.6575 | [M + H]+ | ↓ | Ether lipid metabolism; Glycerophospholipid metabolism | |
| Pantothenic acid | 0000210 | 2.69 | C9H17NO5 | 220.1176 | −1.5928 | [M + H]+ | ↓ | Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis |
| Glycodeoxycholic acid | 0000631 | 11.47 | C26H43NO5 | 450.3208 | −1.3535 | [M + H]+ | ↓ | – |
| LysoPC(18:3(9Z,12Z,15Z)) | 0010388 | 12.38 | C26H48NO7P | 518.3236 | −0.9871 | [M + H]+ | ↑ | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| LysoPC(P-18:0) | 0013122 | 14.93 | C26H54NO6P | 508.3760 | −0.3047 | [M + H]+ | ↓ | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| LysoPC(20:1(11Z)) | 0010391 | 16.27 | C28H56NO7P | 550.3862 | −0.9368 | [M + H]+ | ↑ | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| Protoporphyrin IX | 0000241 | 18.18 | C34H34N4O4 | 563.2645 | −1.3101 | [M + H]+ | ↓ | Porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism |
| Uric acid | 0000289 | 2.11 | C5H4N4O3 | 167.0203 | −4.3337 | [M-H]- | ↑ | Purine metabolism |
| Indolelactic acid | 0000671 | 9.27 | C11H11NO3 | 204.0663 | −1.3372 | [M-H]- | ↑ | – |
| Taurodeoxycholic acid | 0000896 | 10.13 | C26H45NO6S | 498.2908 | 2.7170 | [M-H]- | ↑ | – |
| Glycochenodeoxycholic acid | 0000637 | 10.22 | C26H43NO5 | 448.3079 | 2.4478 | [M-H]- | ↓ | Primary bile acid biosynthesis |
| 7-Ketodeoxycholic acid | 0000391 | 11.16 | C24H38O5 | 451.2711 | 1.0858 | [M + Cl]- | ↓ | – |
| Isoursodeoxycholic acid | 0000686 | 13.03 | C24H40O4 | 391.2862 | 2.1947 | [M-H]- | ↓ | – |
| LysoPC(22:5(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 0010403 | 13.50 | C30H52NO7P | 614.3483 | 2.6375 | [M + Cl]- | ↑ | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| LysoPC(22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)) | 0010401 | 14.45 | C30H54NO7P | 616.3635 | 2.6792 | [M + FA-H]- | ↑ | Glycerophospholipid metabolism |
Note: ↑ and ↓ represent higher and lower expression in model group compared to control group.
Figure 5.Metabolic pathway analysis of RP rats.
Figure 6.Metabolic regulation of MLS on RP rats. *p < 0.05 when compared with the model group.