| Literature DB >> 35634379 |
Junhong Su1,2, Fanglin Li3, Yueying Wang3, Yuxin Su3, Auke Verhaar1, Zhongren Ma3, Maikel P Peppelenbosch1.
Abstract
Recently we reported that in healthy volunteer Ramadan-associated intermittent fasting (RAIF) remodels the gut microbiome and resulted in an increase in small chain fatty acid producing bacteria concomitant with improved metabolic parameters. As interpretation of these results is hampered by the possible psychological effects associated with the study, we now aim to investigate RAIF in experimental animals. To this end, 6-week male BALB/c mice were subjected to RAIF (30 days of a 16-h daily fasting; n = 8) or provided with feed ad libitum (n = 6). Fecal samples were collected before and the end of fasting and bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing was performed. We found that RAIF remodeled the composition of gut microbiota in BALB/c mice (p < 0.01) and especially provoked upregulation of butyrate acid-producing Lachnospireceae and Ruminococcaceae (p < 0.01), resembling the effects seen in human volunteers. Hence we conclude that the effects of RAIF on gut microbiome relate to the timing of food intake and are not likely related to psychological factors possibly at play during Ramadan.Entities:
Keywords: BALB/c mice; Ramadan; gut microbiome; human; intermittent fasting
Year: 2022 PMID: 35634379 PMCID: PMC9133532 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.832757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Study design and bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing. (A) Experimental design for the 16-h daily fasting group (n = 8) and the no fasting group fed Ad libitum (n = 6). Food and water are only freely available during the other 8 h. The fecal samples were collected at the beginning (Day 0) and end (Day 30) the fasting. After fecal DNA isolation, the bacterial V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to map the gut microbiota. The images of mouse model were generated with assistance of Biorender.com. (B) Rarefaction curves of detected bacterial OTUs of the gut microbiome from no fasting and fasting groups each reach saturation stage with increasing sequencing depth. Each vertical bar represents standard error. (C) The rank abundance curve depicting the bacterial species richness and evenness in the gut microbiome of fasting vs. no fasting mice before or after fasting.
FIGURE 2IF shapes the composition of the gut microbiome in BALB/c mice. (A) Alpha diversity indexes were shown as Shannon and Simpson. The significance was calculated by unpaired student’s t-test. Bray–Curtis distance based Principal Co-ordinates Analysis (PCoA) of the gut microbiome in fasting and no fasting mice at day 0 (B) and day 30 (C). Different color represents different groups or time points of sample collection. Each point corresponds to a community from a single individual. Colors indicate community identity. Ellipses show the 95% confidence intervals. ** if p-value is less than 0.01 by ANOSIM test. (D) Taxa that show alternative abundance before and after fasting are depicted. Taxa with a log linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score above 4.00 as determined by using linear discriminant analysis coupled with effect size measurements (LEfSe). The hierarchy of the discriminating taxonomic levels was visualized as cladograms allowing taxonomic comparisons before and after fasting.
Changes in relative abundance of LefSe-identified taxa during fasting.
| Day 30 |
| |||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Baseline (A) ( | Non-fasting (B) ( | Fasting (C) ( | A vs. B | A vs. C | B vs. C | |
|
| ||||||
| Firmicutes | 56.68 ± 9.77 | 52.79 ± 7.48 | 67.53 ± 4.84 | 0.40 | 0.008 | < 0.001 |
| Bacteroidetes | 33.32 ± 10.96 | 38.79 ± 4.93 | 24.39 ± 6.12 | 0.26 | 0.048 | < 0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Lachnospiraceae | 37.46 ± 7.36 | 34.40 ± 7.36 | 43.99 ± 3.90 | 0.41 | 0.031 | 0.008 |
| Ruminococcaceae | 15.07 ± 2.90 | 13.98 ± 2.52 | 19.45 ± 1.99 | 0.43 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| Rikenellaceae | 6.64 ± 1.58 | 5.46 ± 1.19 | 7.92 ± 1.85 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.015 |
| Porphyromonadaceae | 2.02 ± 0.48 | 1.51 ± 0.60 | 3.88 ± 1.57 | 0.06 | < 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Bacteroidetes_S24-7_group | 20.26 ± 9.64 | 22.14 ± 3.33 | 9.77 ± 6.21 | 0.65 | 0.012 | < 0.001 |
| Prevotellaceae | 2.90 ± 2.20 | 8.63 ± 4.13 | 2.12 ± 1.44 | < 0.001 | 0.38 | 0.001 |
SD, standard deviation. The significance was calculated by two-sided unpaired student’s t-test.