| Literature DB >> 35634027 |
Muhammad Mutasim Billah Tufail1, Asad Shamim1, Asghar Ali1, Muhammad Ibrahim1, Danial Mehdi1, Waseem Nawaz1.
Abstract
The health care delivery system in Pakistan is in a process of rapid growth, and it consists of public and private sectors. The provincial government is preliminarily responsible for providing health care facilities within its province except in federally administered areas. In Pakistan, there are three tiers of governmental healthcare delivery systems, which comprise government, semi-government, and parastatal organizations. The purpose of this study is to understand the rapid increase in influx of patients in major city hospitals of the Punjab province. The reasons for patient flow towards the major city areas can vary, but our point of focus is mainly on those patients who are prescribed to get a computed tomography (CT) scan done for better diagnosis and early treatment, including but not limited to roadside accident cases. The study targets the define, measure, analyze, improve and control (DMAIC) problem solving approach to assess the potential cause of CT patient flow and the challenges that the health department is facing to cater to such a patient niche and process while minimizing the congestion in city government hospitals. The approach in this study summarizes with numerous quality tools like Voice of Customer (VOC) which is customer feedback, Customer Output Process Input and Supplier (COPIS) processes use for high-level process map to know what your customer value, Approver Resource Member Interested (ARMI) chart which is use to analyze the stakeholders on management of the project, evaluation with the help of fishbone diagram and house of quality, and for process improvement methodology we use the team brainstorming technique and the kaizen 5-why technique. The technique came up with an idea of a public-private partnership (PPP) project-partnership between public agency and private firm, as the health care industry in Punjab province is going through budgetary issues. In a PPP project, the Government will allocate the space to a private firm to build the facility on their own and provide quality service for CT scan diagnosis to the public of Punjab. The study identified the top 10 critical factors that the patients have expected from the government to be provided on priority. The Kaizen process improvement methodology has been adopted to provide the possible solution of government budgetary issues. The set of tools in this study can be adopted by other PPP projects to enhance the project performance.Entities:
Keywords: CT scan; DMAIC; healthcare management; house of quality (HOQ); six-sigma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35634027 PMCID: PMC9114784 DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2022030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIMS Public Health ISSN: 2327-8994
Figure 1.VOC vs. VOB.
Figure 2.COPIS process map.
ARMI chart.
| Stakeholder's role | Stakeholder resource | Define | Measure | Analyze | Improve | Control |
| Champion | Private firm | A | I | A | I | A |
| Sponsor | Government of Punjab | A | A | A | A | I |
| Mentor | Private firm | A | A | A | A | A |
| Process auditor | Project management unit-Lahore | A | I | I | I | A |
| Team member | Private firm-JV, DHQ hospital management | A | I | A | A | A |
| Project manager | Private firm | R/M | R/M | R/M | R/M | R/M |
| Subject matter expert (SME) | Private firm | R/M | R/M | R/M | R/M | R/M |
| Customer | Public of Punjab | I | I | I | I | I |
Figure 3.Ishikawa diagram to identify the causes of dissatisfaction in public of Punjab.
Figure 4.Voice of customer.
Figure 5.Technical attributes.
Figure 6.Inter-relation diagram.
Competitor assessment.
| Voice of Customer | Nishtar Hospital Multan | Mayo Hospital Lahore | PIMS Rawalpindi | ||
| Serial No. | Description | Weightage (Out of 10) | |||
| 1 | Free of charge | 9 | G | G | G |
| 2 | Ambience | 5 | P | P | F |
| 3 | Trained staff | 7 | F | F | G |
| 4 | Friendly staff | 8 | P | P | P |
| 5 | Easy process | 6 | P | P | P |
| 6 | Minimum reporting time | 4 | F | F | F |
| 7 | Qualified radiologist | 6 | G | G | G |
| 8 | Secure area | 5 | P | P | P |
| 9 | Minimum travel time | 9 | P | P | P |
| 10 | System availability | 9 | G | G | G |
Conformance to specifications.
| Technical Attribute | Service Provider | Free of Charge | Ambience | Trained Staff | Friendly Staff | Easy Process | Minimum Reporting Time | Qualified Radiologist | Secure Area |
| Technical Evaluation | Nishtar Hospital Multan | Y | Poor hygiene | X-ray tech, radiologist FCPS | N/A | Lengthy process | 2–3 days | FCPS | No |
| Mayo Hospital Lahore | Y | Poor hygiene | X-ray tech, radiologist FCPS | N/A | Lengthy process | 2–3 days | FCPS | No | |
| PIMS Rawalpindi | Y | Poor hygiene | X-ray tech, radiologist FCPS | N/A | Lengthy process | 2–3 days | FCPS | No | |
| PPP Project | Y | ISO certified | BS MTEC, radiologist FCPS | HR for training | Short automated process | Same day | FCPS | Private security guard |
Figure 8.The house of quality.
Kaizen root finding technique.
| X | WHY 1 | WHY 2 | WHY 3 | WHY 4 | Solution |
| Equipment Availability | Not available in all district hospitals | Poor planning | Incompetent planning staff | Private firm will provide equipment and staff without initial CAPEX | |
| Staff Availability | Not available in all district hospitals | No equipment | PPP will provide equipment and staff without initial CAPEX | ||
| City | Location | Remote cities have long travel times | Transportation not always available | Road conditions are inconsistent | PPP will provide equipment at remote locations |
| Poor Patients | Non-affording patients | Scans will be free of cost to patient | |||
| Reporting Time | Can take up to week | Hospitals are in urban areas | Central reporting center will provide reports on same day via robust internet system | ||
| Shifts | Trauma system requires 24 hours operation | System not available at remote locations | Urban city hospital timings may not match travelling patients | Long travel times | Private firm will ensure 24 hours travel |
| Working Days | Trauma system requires 7 working days operation | System not available at remote locations | Urban city hospital timings may not match travelling patients | Long travel times | Private firm will ensure 7 days a week operation |
| Budget/Funds | Expensive machinery | Insufficient funds | PC1 not approved | Minimum CAPEX required to provide services in 20 districts |
Priority chart.
| Action | Ease (1) | Confidence (3) | Impact (5) | Total = I x C x E | Which process step is impacted in future state |
| Establish PPP with private firms to provide equipment without initial CAPEX | 5 x 1 = 5 | 5 x 3 = 15 | 5 x 5 = 25 | 5 x 15 x 25 = 1875 | P–1 |
| PPP will provide equipment and staff without initial CAPEX | 5 x 1 = 5 | 5 x 3 = 15 | 5 x 5 = 25 | 5 x 15 x 25 = 1875 | |
| Firm will provide equipment to remote locations | 5 x 1 = 5 | 5 x 3 = 15 | 5 x 5 = 25 | 5 x 15 x 25 = 1875 | P–2, P–3, P–5 |
| Scans will be free of cost to patient | 4 x 1 = 4 | 3 x 3 = 9 | 5 x 5 = 25 | 4 x 9 x 25 = 900 | |
| Central reporting center will provide reports on same day via robust internet system | 3 x 1 = 3 | 3 x 3 = 9 | 5 x 5 = 25 | 3 x 9 x 25 = 675 | P–4 |
| Private firm will ensure 24 /7 Operation | 3 x 1 = 3 | 2 x 3 = 6 | 5 x 5 = 25 | 3 x 6 x 25 = 450 | |
| PPP will ensure minimum CAPEX required to provide services in 20 districts | 2 x 1 = 2 | 5 x 3 = 15 | 3 x 5 = 15 | 2 x 15 x 15 = 450 | P–1 |
Controlling plan.
| What is to be implemented | Where it is to be implemented | Who will implement it | By when | How it is to be implemented | Frequency of checking | Checked by |
| Terms of reference (TOR) will be published for invitation of EOI | Print and digital media | Health Department of Punjab | 1 April 2017 | Issuance of formal TORs by the technical committee | One time | Health Department Technical Committee |
| PPP will be established via tender on lowest patient rates | Print and digital media | Health Department of Punjab | 1 May 2017 | Tender award process by the technical committee | Process check | Health Department Technical Committee |
| CT scan machines will be installed phase wise (total 5 phases) | Phase wise selected District Headquarter hospitals | Private firm and Project Management Unit Lahore | 1 June 2019 | Import, logistics, installation and commissioning process will be carried out by private firm under the supervision of PMU | On each system delivery and monthly basis, whichever comes first | Private firm and Project Management Unit Lahore |
| Patient scan will be performed free of cost | All 20 District Headquarter hospitals | Private firm | 1 June 2019 | All operations of the site (patient registration, scanning, reporting) will be carried out by private firm | Monthly | Private firm and PMU |
| Reimbursement of claims made by private firm on scans performed | All 20 District Headquarter hospitals audited by PMU | Private firm and PMU | End of each month | Reimbursements will be made by the health dept. based on PMU audit | Monthly | Private firm and PMU |
| 95% uptime of machines | All 20 District Headquarter hospitals | Private firm | Next 5 years | Competent and trained engineering team will ensure 95% uptime | Monthly | Private firm and PMU |
| Same day reporting | All 20 District Headquarter hospitals | Private firm | Next 5 years | Via robust internet system and team of qualified radiologists | Weekly | Private firm and PMU |
Voice of customer.
| Serial No. | Description | Weightage (out of 10) |
| 1 | Free of charge | 9 |
| 2 | Ambience | 5 |
| 3 | Trained staff | 7 |
| 4 | Friendly staff | 8 |
| 5 | Easy process | 6 |
| 6 | Minimum reporting time | 4 |
| 7 | Qualified radiologist | 6 |
| 8 | Secure area | 5 |
| 9 | Minimum travel time | 9 |
| 10 | System availability | 9 |
Brainstorming meeting.
| Step | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
| Open Meeting | Kaizen Events | Closed Meeting |
|
| A meeting is called to order to discuss the process | To find problem roots, 5 whys technique | Standardization of meeting |
| Existing status of the survey for customer satisfaction | Implementing the kaizen project | Kaizen report data |
| Key | ||
| Ease | 1–5 | 5 = easiest |
| Impact | 1–5 | 5 = highest |
| Cost | 1–5 | 5 = lowest |